Not really because only 15% of the republicans in Iowa voted/Caucus. This was a record for lowest turnout in Iowa history.
Both Sides: Why we don't fuck with the GOP
- Thread starter donwuan
- Start date
The media ain’t gonna say this, but I think a lot of Republicans ain’t feeling this Republican candidates. we’ll see what happens in other states but yeah they not a huge fan of Biden, but they definitely don’t like these Republican candidates. If this happens in other states, this is going to fuck over Republicans especially down ballot Republicans. Even though it was a state seat in Florida, It was raining and carrying on and people still came out to vote for a Democrat to flip that state seat from red to blue.
It was sub zero temperatures for one thing
That is true, but it was raining like cats and dogs in that Florida seat that flipped from red to blue so it depends on how you feel about the candidate
This dude gets it...
He always been a standup dude
They probably hate that she has the floor
And only 53% voted for Trump.
Yeah, and this happened when the Repugs tried to hold him in contempt and the Democrats blew up the Republicans bullshit last week.
This is the kind of thing that slips under the radar and ends up damaging the country for decades...
The court, which maintains the right-wing supermajority that allowed it to repeal Roe v. Wade for Trump, spent hours today ripping into the ability of federal agencies to create policies and regulations that help keep us all safe, healthy, and free.
The Republican Party has long wanted to gut the federal government and roll back regulations because doing so will increase the profits of massive corporations — while hurting average Americans.
The justices are currently hearing two cases regarding the so-called "Chevron deference" which dates back to 1984. It allows agency officials the latitude to effectively interpret the specifics of laws passed by Congress, which are often ambiguous in places.
The Chevron deference stipulates that judges should defer to agency interpretations of laws when disputes arise. Trump-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch whined that the doctrine means "The government always wins."
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Biden appointee, voiced the concerns of the liberal wing of the bench by correctly pointing out that overturning Chevron will force courts to make policy decisions that they don't fully understand since they aren't experts.
"I see Chevron as doing the very important work of helping courts stay away from policymaking," she said.
Justice Elena Kagan, another liberal, used artificial intelligence as an example of a domain in which the courts simply aren't qualified to make expert detailed-oriented decisions.
"Congress knows that this court and lower courts are not competent with respect to deciding all the questions about AI that are going to come up in the future," said Kagan said. "We don’t even know what the questions are about AI, let alone the answers to them."
If Republicans repeal Chevron, they will be throwing our country to the wolves — and it's no coincidence that those wolves donate heavily to Republican politicians.
Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council is one of the most cited cases in American law and a bulwark of environment, healthcare, consumer safety, benefit programs, and nuclear energy regulations.
She fucked with that other judge in press conferences after every court date. Let's see if she fucks around and finds out with this judge.
Habba: You said, I came to New York to interview Fran Lebowitz.
Judge Kaplan: Can I get the transcript?
Roberta Kaplan: Your Honor, I don't see the difference
Habba: May I proceed?
Judge Kaplan: No. She just said something. And you haven't provided the transcript
Judge Kaplan: Ms. Habba, we're going to do it my way in this courtroom and that's how it's going to be. You tell me the line number and I read it. Then we go from there.
Habba: I was reading --
Judge Kaplan: We are going to take a recess...
Judge Kaplan: Do not read it out loud. What line numbers?
Habba: Page 14, 6 through 8.
Judge Kaplan: What are you doing, offering into evidence?
Habba: I'm offering it as impeachment.
Judge Kaplan: Those are 2 different things.
Habba: Do you know if there is a communications team at the White House?
Carroll: I don't know.
Habba: I represent to you that it does.
Judge Kaplan: You're not going to be representing anything, or you'll be a witness.
Habba: Many people called you a liar before the President made his statement -Carroll's lawyer: She's not asking a question.
Habba: I wasn't finished. It says, "You're a pathetic old hag"
Judge Kaplan: It's not in evidence.
Habba: I'm trying to get it in.
Judge Kaplan: No, we are not going to read out loud a document not yet in evidence. We are going to take a break right here to 3:30 and you're going to refresh your memory about how you get a document in.
Habba: Did you receive Tweets in the 5 hours before President Trump spoke.
Carroll: I hadn't seen them.
Habba: Were you tagged?
Judge Kaplan: Don't get into content!
Habba: How do you suggest I proceed?
Judge Kaplan: Show it to her, ask if she recognizes it.
Habba: Do you recognize it?
Carroll: Yes.
Judge Kaplan: It's not marked. It should be marked. Do it appropriately. Do it overnight. They. Need. To. Be. Premarked.
