Both Sides: Why we don't fuck with the GOP

easy_b

Easy_b is in the place to be.
BGOL Investor

The Republican voters that did not vote for Trump in the primaries just got more. They fired to vote for Biden. White people really don’t understand that they are going to be affected by the bullshit just like everyone else. The baby boomers are finding this out the hard way from the Reagan bullshit right now.
 

darth frosty

Dark Lord of the Sith
BGOL Investor



BREAKING: President Biden gives Donald Trump a taste of his own medicine and coins a new nickname for the cash-strapped former president, calling him "Broke Don" as he stares down a $464 million nightmare.

But it gets even better...

"Not a Winning Campaign: Broke Don Hides in Basement," wrote Biden's campaign in a new email. "Trump can’t raise money, isn’t campaigning, and is letting convicts and conspiracy theorists run his campaign."

The Biden campaign has good reason to take this mini victory lap. Just yesterday it was revealed that Trump raised only $10.9 million in February compared to $53 million raised by Biden.

Trump now has $42 million in his war chest. Comparatively, Biden has $155 million — and Biden isn't drowning in legal fees and court damages.

"We are two weeks into the general election and Donald Trump can’t raise money, is hiding at his country club, and is letting convicts and conspiracy theorists take over his campaign. That is not a winning strategy," said Biden spokesperson Ammar Moussa.

The Biden campaign further mocked Trump, asking if "trailing your opponent in cash on hand by nearly 4 to 1 and hitting up donors to help cover your own personal debts instead of funding your campaign [is] a winning formula for November?"

Trump is in deep, deep financial trouble and he just keeps sinking deeper...

Please retweet and ❤️ if you're voting for Biden in November — and consider joining the growing exodus to Tribel, a new pro-democracy social network that is exploding in popularity because Twitter and Facebook are trying to stop its growth — which is only making Tribel grow even faster. Please follow us on Tribel to get all of our breaking news alerts sent straight to your phone or computer by clicking the following link: tribel.app.link/okwPIHYCIqb
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
Ben Shapiro’s Daily Wire Cuts Ties With Candace Owens Amid Israel Feud



Ben Shapiro’s conservative media empire has cut ties with Candace Owens, amid a lengthy public feud between the far-right pundit and her bosses over the Israel-Hamas war.

“Daily Wire and Candace Owens have ended their relationship,” Shapiro’s co-founder Jeremy Boreing tweeted on Friday morning. “The rumors are true—I am finally free,” Owens posted to her own X account. Representatives for The Daily Wire and Owens did not immediately respond to requests for additional comment.

Owens joined Shapiro’s outlet in 2021, hosting an eponymous, daily podcast prominently featuring her brand of vitriolic MAGA conservative commentary and conspiracy theories.

Shapiro had often come to the defense of Owens’ rhetoric, but following the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, the pair began a very public battle that at one point featured the Daily Wire co-founder daring his star podcaster to quit.

The feud began last November when Owens tweeted that “no government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide.” While she did not specifically mention the State of Israel, her remarks were widely condemned by her fellow conservative media figures. Soon after, Shapiro publicly called Owens’ behavior “disgraceful” and chided her “faux-sophistication” on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Days later, their feud became even more personal. Owens posted to X a series of Bible verses suggesting “you cannot serve both God and money.” That pointed remark was viewed by many as a not-so-subtle use of the antisemitic “dual loyalty” trope against Shapiro, who responded: “Candace, if you feel that taking money from The Daily Wire somehow comes between you and God, by all means quit.” Owens hit back that her boss was “utterly out of line” and “acting unprofessional and emotionally unhinged for weeks now.”

That same week, Owens appeared for a friendly interview on Tucker Carlson’s web show, where she lamented Shapiro’s “ad hominem attacks” and said she would not respond to him on a “level of intellect” because “there’s nothing that he has expressed... that he fundamentally disagrees with in terms of what I said.” Carlson agreed, taking issue with how Shapiro had skipped past saying “‘I don’t think she’s correct’ or ‘Maybe she doesn’t know what she’s talking about,’” and went straight to labeling her “absolutely disgraceful.”

But the Daily Wire in-fighting appeared to reach its final stage this week when Owens liked a social-media post asking conservative rabbi Shmuley Boteach whether he is “drunk on Christian blood again”—an overt reference to the antisemitic “blood libel” canard that has regained popularity on the far-right via QAnon. (Days earlier, Owens dabbled in other antisemitic tropes by suggesting there’s a Jewish “gang” in Hollywood.)

The pair had previously come into public conflict in October 2022 when Owens defended Kanye West’s tweet that “I’m going death con 3 On JEWISH PEOPLE.” Owens said of the MAGA rapper’s shocking post: “if you are an honest person, you did not think this tweet was antisemitic.”

At the time, Shapiro appeared hesitant to criticize Owens, one of his media empire’s most influential personalities. “On a personal level, I get Candace defending her friend,” he said at the time, offering only a tepid rebuttal: “I don’t think her defense... is convincing.”

It appears Shapiro wasn’t so gentle this time around.
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
The word ‘and’ could land criminal defendants with longer sentences thanks to Supreme Court ruling

Court interpretted the “safety valve” provision of the First Step Act to mean defendants need to meet three pieces of criteria to be eligible for shorter sentencing instead of just one



A new Supreme Court ruling will make it more difficult for criminal defendants with prior nonviolent drug offenses to seek shorter sentences under a law whose purpose was to reform federal prisons.

In a 6-3 decision released on Friday, the court ruled that the word “and” means “and”, not “or”, in a complicated case that challenged justices to interpret grammar and the intention of the First Step Act – a criminal justice reform bill passed under the Trump administration.


Under the “safety valve” provision of the First Step Act, criminal defendants could be eligible for shorter sentencing (less than the mandatory 15-year minimum) so long as they did not have: more than four criminal history points, a prior serious offense, and a prior violent offense.


But up for debate was whether defendants had to satisfy just one of those criteria points or all of them to be eligible for lower sentencing – which drastically changes the prison time an individual faces

In the majority opinion, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that a defendant must satisfy all of those points to be eligible saying, “Lenity applies only when a statute is genuinely ambiguous.”

“In the Government’s view, “and” connects three criminal-history conditions, all of which must be satisfied to gain safety-valve relief,” Justice Kagan wrote.



The ruling means that individuals seeking reduced sentencing under the “safety valve” provision will have to meet all three criteria laid out in the document in order to qualify. Otherwise, they will automatically receive a mandatory minimum of 15 years – even for nonviolent drug offenses.


Last year, the Department of Justice found that less than 10 per cent of those who were serving five years or less in prison under the First Step Act re-offended. But that number increased by six percentage points for those serving 15 years or more.

Justice Kagan argued that interpreting “and” to mean “or” would contradict the government’s reading of the statute and other parts of the provision. She added that allowing each one of the criteria to be weighed on its own would unevenly punish individuals leaving room for error and further challenges.


Justice Kagan was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the dissenting opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.


Meanwhile, Justices Neil Gorsuch delivered the dissenting opinion joined by Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, saying that in this decision, “If this difference seems a small one, it is anything but.”

He criticised the court’s interpretation, saying it deviates from Congress’ intention in creating the safety valve provision to reduce sentencing by having a judge interpret the defendant’s circumstances.

“Today, the Court indulges each of these moves. All to what end? To deny some individuals a chance—just a chance—at relief from mandatory minimums and a sentence that fits them and their circumstances. It is a chance Congress promised in the First Step Act, and it is a promise this Court should have honored,” Justice Gorsuch wrote.
 

rude_dog

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Lmbaoooooo the Japanese got reparations you dumb coon
I don't understand how uneducated, unintelligent and ignorant people like her and Charlie Kirk have such a large following. Intelligent people are very deliberate with their words. She's ignorant of history, constantly wrong. You can see it when Obama speaks. You can see him thinking it over in his mind as he speaks. This dumb bitch thinks if she says something fast, it makes her look smart.

I look at the MAGA movement as the rise of the unintelligent. People who were a step behind in class and hold that resentment.
 
Top