This will have disastrous consequences. Eliminating the Chevron doctrine is, in lay terms, the equivalent of blessing judicial mansplaining. "Oh, you're an expert on clean water and think a pollutant should only be present at a certain level? Sorry, my uninformed opinion trumps your PhD in environmental science."
Make no mistake — Clarence Thomas SOLD his vote on the Chevron doctrine
He was strongly in favor of it, even authoring a decision reinforcing it in 2005
Then he got $4 million in gifts from corporate interests who wanted Chevron gone
And now Thomas did a 180 to kill Chevron