Both Sides: Why we don't fuck with the GOP

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

Mofokr did say its fue people on both sides. wasn't no hoax

she didn't say they died on Jan 6th, they died because of Jan 6

she was at the capital earlier before the insurrection and later after it. she didn't say she was present ar the insurrection, she said she was at the capital om Jan 6

Trump did say there will be a bloodbath if he didn't win.. His campaign tried to clean up the wreckless talking


What was scheduled to be a guest appearance by former President Donald Trump at a campaign rally for Ohio Senate candidate Bernie Moreno quickly turned into Trump saying there would be a "bloodbath" for the country if he doesn't win the 2024 general election -- while also railing against the electric vehicle industry manufacturing automobiles outside the U.S. and using disparaging language to describe immigrants who are in the country illegally.

"We're gonna put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not gonna be able to sell those guys if I get elected," Trump said at Saturday's event while criticizing overseas manufacturing production.

"Now, if I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath for the whole ... that's gonna be the least of it, it's gonna be a bloodbath for the country, that'll be the least of it."

Trump's campaign has pushed back on claims Trump was talking about violence throughout the country should he lose reelection in 2024, arguing he was talking about the destruction of the auto industry.
 

Casca

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
ebsyfa3ps9od1.jpeg
 

T_Holmes

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Someone explain to me how illegals can vote
Personally, it feels like adding that language in when it's already part of law, besides being redundant, could literally cause some sort of conflict later, especially when/if it comes time to make changes.

But in this case, it's all symbolism. And they know that they can try to score publicity points, because their ignorant base will ignore the part where it's unnecessary to include it.
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
Personally, it feels like adding that language in when it's already part of law, besides being redundant, could literally cause some sort of conflict later, especially when/if it comes time to make changes.

But in this case, it's all symbolism. And they know that they can try to score publicity points, because their ignorant base will ignore the part where it's unnecessary to include it.
If it gets added Trump will take credit, not adding it will be "proof" dems want illegals to vote. It's a winwin for the GOP narrative.
 
Top