Georgia Homeowner jailed for confronting squatter

ansatsusha_gouki

Land of the Heartless
Platinum Member
I just don't understand,why it's so hard to get trespassers out of your home.





I understand,landlords can't just throw someone on the street but that's not the case at all most of the time. It's simple shit as someone breaking into the home and claiming to be tenants when they're not and then showing the police fake documents.





You would think the city would have many documentation of who owns the house. Then,the city acts like someone has the money to go to court to prove it's their home. On top of them being slow ass fuck about it.





Again,I understand that but most of the time it's usually someone breaking into someone's home or waiting for the home owner to go out of town and claiming as theirs with a fake document or when a tenant not paying rent but shocked when the landlord want them gone.



There's no way squatters should have this much power over a homeowner. It makes no sense at all.



 

Llano

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
The audacity of these folks out here

Like I said in another thread, it's getting hard out here & more people are getting hip to the squatting game for a free place to stay. They're finding out loopholes & are hoping home owners/landlord don't act swiftly.

I had a tenant not pay me rent in November & by the middle of the month, I had filed the eviction after not hearing from him. The judge ruled in my favor about couple weeks ago so the key is not beating around the bush and take legal action quickly.

It's all a hustle for these courts too, they don't mind it being drawn out because of all the court fees involved. That's the fucked up part about it.
 

xfactor

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Like I said in another thread, it's getting hard out here & more people are getting hip to the squatting game for a free place to stay. They're finding out loopholes & are hoping home owners/landlord don't act swiftly.

I had a tenant not pay me rent in November & by the middle of the month, I had filed the eviction after not hearing from him. The judge ruled in my favor about couple weeks ago so the key is not beating around the bush and take legal action quickly.

It's all a hustle for these courts too, they don't mind it being drawn out because of all the court fees involved. That's the fucked up part about it.
Court is all about generating cash. Judges today are nothing but modern day bankers.
 

850credit

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Like I said in another thread, it's getting hard out here & more people are getting hip to the squatting game for a free place to stay. They're finding out loopholes & are hoping home owners/landlord don't act swiftly.

I had a tenant not pay me rent in November & by the middle of the month, I had filed the eviction after not hearing from him. The judge ruled in my favor about couple weeks ago so the key is not beating around the bush and take legal action quickly.

It's all a hustle for these courts too, they don't mind it being drawn out because of all the court fees involved. That's the fucked up part about it.

Would you consider section 8?

They pay 1560 in my investment property area. I'm thinking of charging 1800 so they have to pay something.
 

Llano

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Would you consider section 8?

They pay 1560 in my investment property area. I'm thinking of charging 1800 so they have to pay something.

That's probably my next move to just put it back on section 8. The previous tenant for the property was on section 8.
 

lostsoul

Too old to care
BGOL Investor
Yeah, there's definitely something missing. If they moved out & the owner changed the locks then how are they allowed to break in your property the next day and the cops don't do anything?
I'm guessing that instead of going through the proper eviction channels she entered the property and changed the locks while the "tenant" was away. That would explain why the locks were broken and why the homeowner was arrested for trespassing.
 

Maweriman

Star
BGOL Investor
Sensational -- outrageous headlines but the "jailed victim" is not telling the whole story. There is a tenant-landlord relationship with "the so-called squatter" by virtue of being added to the lease with the tenant who signed the lease!
As such -- the "squatter" who is on the lease -- has to be legally evicted -- "crossing all of the legal "t-s" and dotting all of the legal i-s" -- which the "jailed victim" did not do. The cops followed the law!
 
Top