If the institution of marriage were to be redesigned as 5 year terms, how would it work?

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Is-Marriage-Worth-It-600x320.jpg


marriage institution
AI Overview
Learn more

An institutional marriage is a formal union that is regulated by social norms and expectations. It is a social institution that is considered the foundation of families and a key to social stability.

Characteristics
  • Lifelong commitment: Spouses in an institutional marriage consider it a lifelong commitment.

  • Childrearing: Institutional marriages prioritize childrearing.

  • Division of labor: Spouses typically adhere to a breadwinner-homemaker division of labor.

  • Restrictions: Society places restrictions on marriage based on factors like age, race, social status, and gender.
History
    • Marriage has historically been filled with restrictions.
    • The institution of marriage has transitioned from a traditional model to a romantic model.
Impact
    • Marriage affects the entire society and future generations.
    • The structure of rules that govern marriage influence behavior within the marriage.


Considering the redesign of the concept would be 5 year re-up-able deal how would it need to work?

After 5 years...without consent from both parties the marriage automatically dissolves...so what would be the terms of that? factoring in child support and any provable issues of abuse between both parties...
 
Marriage is the only license that does not expire. I believe that it should have and expiration and and term limits. As far as assets, there should be a deliberate division decided between the partners and re-evaluated each time the new contract is signed. Trusts should be established for the children as well. With the option to opt-out. People no longer care if the kids have the same last names and usually are blended families anyway.
 
This is a non starter, as I don’t think it settles any of the foundational issues that occur. Child rearing involves far more than five year increments, and issues that come about would likely not be ameliorated with five year increments. Women have broken marriage. Men have gone along too much with it. Until that changes, nothing changes.
 
Marriage is the only license that does not expire. I believe that it should have and expiration and and term limits. As far as assets, there should be a deliberate division decided between the partners and re-evaluated each time the new contract is signed. Trusts should be established for the children as well. With the option to opt-out. People no longer care if the kids have the same last names and usually are blended families anyway.
Then the argument will just start earlier and with more certainty. The blended family is more unstable. The marriages are more likely to fail earlier than first marriages. It doesn’t address the root causes in any way.
 
Then the argument will just start earlier and with more certainty. The blended family is more unstable. The marriages are more likely to fail earlier than first marriages. It doesn’t address the root causes in any way.
Which root cause? Most marriages don't even make it 5 years and 10 is damn near unheard of these days. At least if there is a goal to maintain family and lifestyle knowing there's an out clause people would work harder todo right by each other.
 
Which root cause? Most marriages don't even make it 5 years and 10 is damn near unheard of these days. At least if there is a goal to maintain family and lifestyle knowing there's an out clause people would work harder todo right by each other.
Where do you get your data from?
 
To make that happen you would have to

1) force women to use their maiden name for all legal and financial matters. Otherwise you open the door for widespread fraud

2) require a DNA test for all live births Otherwise you'd have 4-5 dudes paying child support on the same kid.

3) require mandatory prenups.

4) require mandatory wills. No judge wants to divide assets amongst multiple exes

5) switch from a family to skill/merit based immigration system. Otherwise you have to deal with the legal clusterfuck of having a marriage expire in the middle of a green card application.

6) redefine morality. If a Christian couple renewed their marriage licence, but had it lapse due to a backlog is it still okay to fuck?

7) get rid of spousal immunity in criminal court. Otherwise prosecutors could postpone trials until the license expires causing a bigger case backlog.

8) ban divorce. Why should the state put in the work if you can let the license run its course?

9) institute universal health care. Otherwise insurance companies could cut family coverage if the license lapses while your partner is in a coma.

10) institute third party medical decisions. If your spouse suffers a brain injury, dementia, or Alzheimer's they won't have the capacity to renew a marriage license. So someone else has to be able to make medical decisions for them.
 
Why not ban marriage all together and fuck who you want. Marriage was created by rich people to keep wealth in a certain group of families. Why keep that shit going? It's easier to have children and take care of your seed.
 
Marriage is the only license that does not expire. I believe that it should have and expiration and and term limits. As far as assets, there should be a deliberate division decided between the partners and re-evaluated each time the new contract is signed. Trusts should be established for the children as well. With the option to opt-out. People no longer care if the kids have the same last names and usually are blended families anyway.
This is a good start. The only issue is with division of assets and things such as IP. How do you prove that your partner didn't give you the idea for the business that made the family millions?
 
This is a good start. The only issue is with division of assets and things such as IP. How do you prove that your partner didn't give you the idea for the business that made the family millions?
You still couldn't prove it if you are married in the current state of the law.
 
To make that happen you would have to

1) force women to use their maiden name for all legal and financial matters. Otherwise you open the door for widespread fraud
I dont think that would be big problem
2) require a DNA test for all live births Otherwise you'd have 4-5 dudes paying child support on the same kid.
I agree
3) require mandatory prenups.
that should be the case anyway
4) require mandatory wills. No judge wants to divide assets amongst multiple exes
every productive adult should be doing that anyway
5) switch from a family to skill/merit based immigration system. Otherwise you have to deal with the legal clusterfuck of having a marriage expire in the middle of a green card application.
The institution of marriage should not be used for that purpose anyway so there should be guards against it period
6) redefine morality. If a Christian couple renewed their marriage licence, but had it lapse due to a backlog is it still okay to fuck?
I dont think that would be a big issue since the religious couple would be more conscientious about being married.
7) get rid of spousal immunity in criminal court. Otherwise prosecutors could postpone trials until the license expires causing a bigger case backlog.
I dunno if that really changes anything since the state cant stop a couple from re-upping their marriage.

8) ban divorce. Why should the state put in the work if you can let the license run its course?
I dont see a need to ban divorce since people can divorce in shorter time period..especially in cases of abuse.
9) institute universal health care. Otherwise insurance companies could cut family coverage if the license lapses while your partner is in a coma.

10) institute third party medical decisions. If your spouse suffers a brain injury, dementia, or Alzheimer's they won't have the capacity to renew a marriage license. So someone else has to be able to make medical decisions for them.

nine and ten :thumbsup: :thumbsup:





this is what I'm talking about...this is what I was looking for....people putting thought into the scenario...
 
Last edited:
This is a good start. The only issue is with division of assets and things such as IP. How do you prove that your partner didn't give you the idea for the business that made the family millions?

Correct to me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't she have to prove that she DID? For that matter, wouldn't she also have to materially contribute to that business?

If Ben's wife said "you and your friend Jerry should start an ice cream company" and did nothing else which she be able to take half of his share just for that one off suggestion?
 
This is a good start. The only issue is with division of assets and things such as IP. How do you prove that your partner didn't give you the idea for the business that made the family millions?

Correct to me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't she have to prove that she DID? For that matter, wouldn't she also have to materially contribute to that business?

If Ben's wife said "you and your friend Jerry should start an ice cream company" and did nothing else which she be able to take half of his share just for that one off suggestion?
 
I dont think that would be big problem

I agree

that should be the case anyway

every productive adult should be doing that anyway

The institution of marriage should be used for that purpose anyway so there should be guards against it period

I dont think that would be a big issue since the religious couple would be more conscience about being married.

I dunno if that really changes anything since the state cant stop a couple from re-upping their marriage.


I dont see a need to ban divorce since people can divorce in shorter time period..especially in cases of abuse.


nine and ten :thumbsup: :thumbsup:





this is what I'm talking about...this is what I was looking for....people putting thought into the scenario...

It would be a hard sell because America idealizes marriage and family. We have an unspoken belief that strong families create strong communities which in turn create a strong nation.

You can see it in our laws. Soldiers can't be deployed to war if their brother was KIA. In some states the baby is automatically yours no matter who your wife slept with. It's why an Indian software engineer can get a PhD from Harvard and still need an H1-B 10 years later, but a high school dropout from Canada can marry an Oakland chick and get a green card. More telling, it's why we never elected a divorced president until 2016

Issuing 5-year marriage licenses would mean admitting our deepest held cultural value is false. Changing this institution would have a ripple effect across all other areas of American life.
 
Ron shouldn't get shit!

Ideas for businesses, inventions, songs, etc can come from any and everywhere.

My dad ripped the seal off of one gallon milk jug and got the idea to invent a plumbing flashing which became a huge success.. Who should get the money for that? The grocery store? The farm? The cow?

Smokey Robinson chatted up a clerk at the department store who said "I second that notion" only she screwed up and said "I second that emotion". For anyone else it would have been a passing joke. Smokey turned it into a number one hit. Why should he give her anything?

It takes a lot more than inspiration to make a successful business. You got to roll up your sleeves and make it happen. Anyone who doesn't should consider themselves lucky for anything they get.
 
Ron shouldn't get shit!

Ideas for businesses, inventions, songs, etc can come from any and everywhere.

My dad ripped the seal off of one gallon milk jug and got the idea to invent a plumbing flashing which became a huge success.. Who should get the money for that? The grocery store? The farm? The cow?

Smokey Robinson chatted up a clerk at the department store who said "I second that notion" only she screwed up and said "I second that emotion". For anyone else it would have been a passing joke. Smokey turned it into a number one hit. Why should he give her anything?

It takes a lot more than inspiration to make a successful business. You got to roll up your sleeves and make it happen. Anyone who doesn't should consider themselves lucky for anything they get.
in all of those examples their strangers...ron is his best friend.
 
in all of those examples their strangers...ron is his best friend.

Then Dwyane Wayne should give him something as a friend. But he doesn't owe him anything. Same would apply if they were married and Ron filed for divorce.

However, if Ron helped with the coding, marketing, packaging, bookkeeping or whatever else that would be different.

Million dollar ideas are a dime a dozen. People rarely see them for what they are. Even when they do they are either unwilling or unable to execute them.

Like my old roommate who sketched a cuddly anthropomorphic covid virus and wanted me to introduce him to a millionaire I knew so he could make it into a toy line.

I refused. This guy doesn't deal with toys or invest in other people's projects. He sticks to his own hustle because he knows it'll work. My roommate got butt hurt and complain that nobody listens to his great ideas. I got fed up and finally said to him "if your idea is so great why haven't you put any money into it? Why are you expecting him to take all the risk for you?"

Never heard another word about it.
 

Philadelphia Eagles star Saquon Barkley engaged to Anna Congdon ahead of Super Bowl 2025 appearance​


6d512895db4f3646b603505f4d593e7c



He put a ring on it!

Philadephia Eagles star Saquon Barkley is engaged to Anna Congdon ahead of his team’s Super Bowl 2025 appearance versus the Kansas City Chiefs, according to People.

“I can’t be the athlete I am and have the success I have so in my career without the help of her,” the NFL star told the outlet of his fiancée.

“She’s been super helpful and always has my back, not only in football but throughout life there’s a lot that goes on. But as we continue to grow and mature and go through life together, we continue getting closer and continue to get even better.”

Barkley, 27, who shares daughter Jada, 6, and son Saquon Jr., 2, with Congdon, said they “just sit back and laugh sometimes when [their kids are] over there playing and just smile and think about where everything started.”

The running back and Congdon, 26, met at Penn State and have been dating since 2017.


Barkley and his teammates are set to take on the Chiefs in the Super Bowl in New Orleans on Feb. 9, which is also the athlete’s 28th birthday.

“The best birthday gift you can have is playing in the Super Bowl and the only thing better than that is winning the Super Bowl on your birthday,” he told People.

“So plans before or after … I really don’t have any idea or any game plan at all. I’m really just focusing on going out there and playing this game and trying to continue to play at a high level.”



7 years two kinds and two NFL teams later....NOW he's marrying her???
 
It would make no difference.

The same motherfuckers would still complain about the same shit they complain about in marriage now.
And instead of a "seven year itch" used to explain fucking around, they'd just make it a "two year itch". :dunno:
 
Last edited:
So all you broke niggas are afraid of marriage because you are scared she might take half of the imaginary millions you dont have :smh:

There are more women graduating from college and more becoming the bread winner of the family, women should be scared of you not the other way around.
 
Exactly! You bitches get PMS when told to back the shit you’re shoveling. Fucking goofy liar. Now shut the fuck up. It’s probably your night to get pegged by the Dyke you’re “married “ to.
You feel better now faggot? :roflmao:
 
Last edited:
I know a few married women (5) that married for 20+ years....most of them will tell you their marriage is more like being roommates that get along.

All of them would fuck around with the right man knowing their husbands ain't going nowhere... ..just sayin:rolleyes:
 
So all you broke niggas are afraid of marriage because you are scared she might take half of the imaginary millions you dont have :smh:

There are more women graduating from college and more becoming the bread winner of the family, women should be scared of you not the other way around.
And they're shitty with the newfound agency. And your second sentence is illogical, as women are (especially black women) are the ones more likely to file for divorce. And don't try that debunked line about abusive men, as women were just as likely to throw the first blow, and are more likely to be the abuser in one way physical abuse. also, men can't engage in paternity fraud. Women under 40 are at least as likely to cheat. And, at the end of the housing crisis, unmarried women were more likely than unmarried men to be in foreclosure. However, I do agree that too many men men complain about losing money they don't have to women they don't have.

You broads have the thumb on the scales in your favor, and your more in debt. Your words also show the good faith that you don't have, as as soon as you chicks got yours, you act like the very men you despise. Miss me with the bullshit. Y'all are anything BUT Flawless.
 
And they're shitty with the newfound agency. And your second sentence is illogical, as women are (especially black women) are the ones more likely to file for divorce. And don't try that debunked line about abusive men, as women were just as likely to throw the first blow, and are more likely to be the abuser in one way physical abuse. also, men can't engage in paternity fraud. Women under 40 are at least as likely to cheat. And, at the end of the housing crisis, unmarried women were more likely than unmarried men to be in foreclosure. However, I do agree that too many men men complain about losing money they don't have to women they don't have.

You broads have the thumb on the scales in your favor, and your more in debt. Your words also show the good faith that you don't have, as as soon as you chicks got yours, you act like the very men you despise. Miss me with the bullshit. Y'all are anything BUT Flawless.
The amount of dick riding you are doing you might as well be gay.
 
Back
Top