Props... He stood his ground and got the message across.
Fail. Meg brought him, Malik, who I've had conversations with, on to show white people he will stutter and to make him look like he's begging her to believe him, or understand his position. Oh, and to show she has the power to limit his expression on her network, so his thoughts are incomplete, rushed, sidetracked, and yet again,she flexes the department ran by the african amercian POTUS' findings or , what she says are their findings in the mike brown investigation. Why did he bring that up ? Niggas never win on FOX, and yet we cheer like we did something, speaking out, to the wrong people. SMH. Malik talks tougher with black media on these issues, and shit him and Meg are both attorneys, talk that talk. Wasn't he on FOX for another controversy? He knows the game. What the fucc do we get out of going on FOX ? is DL Hughley week up already ? You know who has the power, just look at who goes to who begging for understanding and debating, debating...lol.
Last edited:
She always bring up Mike Brown because there was no footage and the DOJ not faulting the pig. That shit is getting tired because she can't justify all the other killings caught on film so Mike Brown and Trayvon Martin is her favorite argument even though both were unarmed.
Brother didn't mince his words at the end when he said there will be no peace and stating the need for reparations.
this is what im seeing too, he didnt do too bad but ,even i, as a layman could've handled that better, Dl Hughley handled it better than a trained attorney whos been in the game fro 20+yrs , why dont they come prepared with shit?, i can bet with a 30min intrvw malik would demolish her ,but hes playing her game on her turf,u cant come thinking they'll give u a fair chance to lay out ur points, they'll drag u down to their devilish level and beat u with experience
why cant a trained attorney have beter counters for te hbs "talkin points" shes always on?
its so simple... just cos the DOJ didnt have cameras there , there were witnesses who coroborated the "hands up dont shoot narrative",
there were witnesses who lied for darren wilson and werent disqualified, and just cos a blackman gives his testimoony doesnt mean they'd not discredit it , it happens all the time,
they dont allow certain black witnesses and certain exhibits into the court room.(its been documented time and time agagin with proof).
if the measure of the truth is the final DOJ decision then no blackman was ever hanged but rather hung themselves, how many white people went to court and walked off scott free for lynching and shootin blackmen? in cases that was drawn out in court for weeks on end?
so the DOJ didnt prove anything, all they proved was that they handicapped the prosecution with their racist maneuvers,
in garner case ,we all saw a blackman got choked on tv and yet the court system says the cops werent complicent, so how much more a case where there wasnt any video? ,
same couldve happened with scott if there wasnt any videos and the false statemnets of the racist cos was the only testimony given..so doj didnt prove shit
When she said there r bad killings he should've pressed her, which ones? Go through the names?
Alton Sterling?
Philando Castile?
Was Eric Garner choked to death? His death was ruled a Homicide!!!
Freddie Grays death was ruled a homicide!!!
You keep citing a failure to convict or indicte as proof nothing happened when a) we have video and b) we also have medical examiners indicating that a homicide took place. If a homicide took place under police care shouldn't someone or actually several officers be in jail? And if they're not shouldn't black people be rightfully upset? Would u be upset of Freddie Gray or Eric Garner was your son?
Which shootings were bad shootings Meagan? WHICH ONES!?!?
Etc, etc. saying there r bad shootings in the abstract means nothing if u support every acquittal and failure to indicte in reality as we go through case by case.
She brings up Mike Brown and twists the investigation. It doesn't say Mike Brown attacked the officer, it says there was apparently some kind of struggle at the car. A DOJ investigation is not a trial it is just a report and a collection of evidence. But if you want to bring up Mike Brown and they're both attorneys, why no mention of the DA who was guilty of suborning perjury by inviting a witness to testify who he knew was lying? Or the RAMPANT racist corruption uncovered?
Further, why ru highlighting the race of a judge or DA when it's the system were talking about? Eric Holder's DOJ? Eric Holder didn't do the investigation, he didn't interview those witness, he didn't write the report. You call it Eric Holders DOJ as a way to preempt criticism but you don't call it Obamas armed forces that killed Bin Ladin.
There's just so much to deconstruct and it's not that hard, she's using the same tactics and talking points as with DL Hughly. Truthfully, I'd let her try to take me to the Mike Brown case and tear her ass up, there's a lot there and she's taking a lot of liberties saying things like it showed that Mike Brown reached for the gun, the report does NOT show that. It shows that his DNA was on the gun. What's more likely, an unarmed 6'4" man reached down and across the body of a 6'4" officer to get his gun or that the officer pulled the gun on him and he reacted to it trying not to be shot? The report is not conclusive on what happened it offers its perspective and there's no reason to assume DOJ is unbiased because a black man is running it. That's fox logic and it's flawed.
She only has a few tricks but Malik Hsabazz done already said soooo much dumb shit to be quoted on, she can always attack him. They've been doing it for years already.
Alton Sterling?
Philando Castile?
Was Eric Garner choked to death? His death was ruled a Homicide!!!
Freddie Grays death was ruled a homicide!!!
You keep citing a failure to convict or indicte as proof nothing happened when a) we have video and b) we also have medical examiners indicating that a homicide took place. If a homicide took place under police care shouldn't someone or actually several officers be in jail? And if they're not shouldn't black people be rightfully upset? Would u be upset of Freddie Gray or Eric Garner was your son?
Which shootings were bad shootings Meagan? WHICH ONES!?!?
Etc, etc. saying there r bad shootings in the abstract means nothing if u support every acquittal and failure to indicte in reality as we go through case by case.
She brings up Mike Brown and twists the investigation. It doesn't say Mike Brown attacked the officer, it says there was apparently some kind of struggle at the car. A DOJ investigation is not a trial it is just a report and a collection of evidence. But if you want to bring up Mike Brown and they're both attorneys, why no mention of the DA who was guilty of suborning perjury by inviting a witness to testify who he knew was lying? Or the RAMPANT racist corruption uncovered?
Further, why ru highlighting the race of a judge or DA when it's the system were talking about? Eric Holder's DOJ? Eric Holder didn't do the investigation, he didn't interview those witness, he didn't write the report. You call it Eric Holders DOJ as a way to preempt criticism but you don't call it Obamas armed forces that killed Bin Ladin.
There's just so much to deconstruct and it's not that hard, she's using the same tactics and talking points as with DL Hughly. Truthfully, I'd let her try to take me to the Mike Brown case and tear her ass up, there's a lot there and she's taking a lot of liberties saying things like it showed that Mike Brown reached for the gun, the report does NOT show that. It shows that his DNA was on the gun. What's more likely, an unarmed 6'4" man reached down and across the body of a 6'4" officer to get his gun or that the officer pulled the gun on him and he reacted to it trying not to be shot? The report is not conclusive on what happened it offers its perspective and there's no reason to assume DOJ is unbiased because a black man is running it. That's fox logic and it's flawed.
She only has a few tricks but Malik Hsabazz done already said soooo much dumb shit to be quoted on, she can always attack him. They've been doing it for years already.
Obama, and Holder let Wilson off. Took the word of the cop and his fake ass red cheek injuries. And of course some Black people always running to the scene looking out for white master--oh Mike was the aggressor. No you fucks Mike has the right to fight back for unjust behaviour. Oh I forgot we as Black people are supposed to simply tuck our heads, and comply, no matter the words use, the signs of aggression used, the use of force upon us. So since the Feds let him off, for killing a kid walking down the street and leaving his body in the street like a deer....why the fuck does ANY cop have to respect the life of a Black kid.
Obama and Holder would not even FIGHT for that family, for Trayvon, for Sandra....none of them
THANK U FOR BEING MORE ARTICULATE ! COS ITS EXACTLY WHAT I WAS TRYNNA SAY, I GET SO FRUSTRATED WATCHING THIS SHIT I BE TYPING MY ASS OFF !!
You know what though..........at this point I wish all brothas and sistas stop talking to her. She's just using police brutality and the Mike Brown case to cause more controversy, hatred and ratings for her show. Crakka bitch knows exactly what she's doing. Using our lives and the site of injustice for business purposes. Hope nothing but the worst for this bitch.
