Movies: Steven Spielberg says he regrets the harmful impact Jaws had on the shark population Update: 50th Anniversary!

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
''

Steven Spielberg says he regrets the harmful impact Jaws had on the shark population

"That's one of the things I still fear — not to get eaten by a shark, but that sharks are somehow mad at me for the feeding frenzy of crazy sports fishermen."
By Jessica WangDecember 18, 2022 at 07:15 PM EST






Steven Spielberg said he regrets the harmful impact his classic 1975 film Jaws had on the shark population.
"I truly and to this day regret the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film," the filmmaker said of the thriller and source material by author Peter Benchley during an interview with BBC Radio 4's Desert Island Discs on Sunday. "I really, truly regret that."
Spielberg also said he feared that the remaining shark population is upset with him when asked how he would feel about sharks circling if he were on the show's imaginary desert island. "That's one of the things I still fear," he said. "Not to get eaten by a shark, but that sharks are somehow mad at me for the feeding frenzy of crazy sports fishermen that happened after 1975."


Roy Scheider on set of 'Jaws'

| CREDIT: SUNSET BOULEVARD/CORBIS VIA GETTY
The film is set in the fictional New England town of Amity Island that finds itself terrorized by a goliath of a great white shark. Richard Dreyfuss and Robert Shaw play an ichthyologist and ship captain who offer to help Roy Scheider's police chief capture the beast. Research has suggested that the film contributed to a population decline around the U.S.
"Jaws was a turning point for great white sharks," Oliver Crimmen, fish curator at the Natural History Museum in London, told BBC in 2015. "I actually saw a big change happen in the public and scientific perception of sharks when Peter Benchley's book Jaws was published and then subsequently made into a film."
George Burgess, director of the Florida Program for Shark Research, said "thousands" of fishers set out to catch trophy sharks following the thriller's debut. "You didn't have to have a fancy boat or gear," Burgess said. "An average Joe could catch big fish, and there was no remorse, since there was this mindset that they were man-killers."


Steven Spielberg

| CREDIT: STEVE GRANITZ/FILMMAGIC
Benchley has also expressed remorse. "Knowing what I know now, I could never write that book today," the late author once said. "Sharks don't target human beings, and they certainly don't hold grudges." Benchley, who died in 2006 at the age of 65, would go on to become a shark and ocean advocate following the release of his novel.
Spielberg conceded that there was manipulation on his part in the radio interview. "A filmmaker must never manipulate the audience unless every single scene has a jack-in-the-box kind of scare," he said. "That's manipulation. I did that a couple of times in Poltergeist and I certainly did it once in Jaws, where the head comes out of the hole. That's okay, I confess that."
 
Steven's bored saying this. Fuck dem sharks.

bmtsVD.jpg
 
:yawn:

So go ahead and donate the millions you made off that movie to me..

I don't give a fuck.

I haven't heard about sharks being endangered. Fuckin' weirdo white people shit :smh:
Its is some weirdo shit he on but people be killing them sharks in very high numbers either directly or indirectly...if sharks were smarter animals, they would swim away in terror every time they see a human
 
Last edited:
Fuck them sharks....But what about the color of purple and niggas?Because after Whoopi did that pitchers hold with her fingers on that black man,shiiit was never the same,it's been a war ever since.Them three fingers changed lives
 
This revision is history is funny to me. It's nothing different than white people have done throughout history.

That's what white people do, and Jewish people are white people so, white people destroy. That's all they know how to do.

If a wolf eats your pet dog in your yard you blame yourself for leaving your dog outside or sending it to go use the bathroom by itself.

If a wolf kills a white person's dog, white people get together and they kill every wolf in three states.

White people are motivated by money, profits and fear. You can't tell me I'm wrong. A wolf kills one cow and the white people are mad that their profits are going to be impacted by that one cow getting killed so they kill hundreds if not thousands of wolves

White people fear sharks and even though every year there are fewer than 20 people who are killed by shark attacks, but every year white people kill thousands of sharks.

Money, profits and fear

That's why white people fear us and still attack us

"HE'S GOT A GUN!!!"

Is what police yell before they shoot one of us even though what they saw or think they saw was a gun or a shadow, guns aren't illegal to possess, so why do they immediately shoot when they see or think they see a gun?

Money, profits and fear
 






 
Not ya fault, them Japanese be loving some shark fin soup. Them fool on iron chef be gitty as fuck when they make shark fin soup.
 
That’s like a mothafucka saying they feel bad because snakes are endangered. It’s a fucking snake!
 

How Steven Spielberg’s ‘Jaws’ Endured a Hellish Production to Become Hollywood’s First Summer Blockbuster​

By
Brent Lang





Jaws the Exhibition at the Academy Museum

Courtesy of Margaret Herrick Library, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
“The shark’s not working.”

For weeks, the cast and crew of “Jaws” kept hearing the same four words over their walkie-talkies while shooting the film’s climactic ocean battle. That familiar message terrified Steven Spielberg, 27 years old at the time, with only one theatrical feature to his name. If one of the production’s three animatronic great whites broke down, it could mean another wasted day. All the setbacks put the film more than 100 days behind schedule and doubled its budget to $8 million.



Related Stories​

Vincent Cassel

Vincent Cassel to Star in Netflix's Next Big French Movie, 'Quasimodo,' Directed by 'Mesrine' Helmer, Produced by Mediawan's Radar Films



“We didn’t know how they were ever going to finish this movie,” remembers Jeffrey Kramer, who played a sheriff’s deputy in the film. “There were rumors all around the set that the studio was going to shut us down.”

Popular on Variety​







The video player is currently playing an ad.


Spielberg, who had been entrusted with turning Peter Benchley’s bestselling novel about a rampaging shark into a cinematic event, feared he’d be fired. Yet he was determined not to betray how much the pressure weighed on him.

“His nails were bitten to the stubs,” remembers Carl Gottlieb, the film’s co-writer. “But that was the only manifestation of his nerves. Steven knew he needed to lead by example. That meant concentrating on his job and keeping his cool even when everything around him was going to hell.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And everything that could go to hell, did. Filming just off Martha’s Vineyard had been Spielberg’s idea. He thought making “Jaws” on the open water would give it authenticity. It turned out to be an agonizing ordeal. Boats filled with pleasure cruisers drifted into shots; the waves and weather were unpredictable, so maintaining continuity was nearly impossible; and everyone kept getting seasick. When they weren’t retching over the side of the boat, the actors often clashed, with hard-drinking veteran Robert Shaw, playing fisherman Quint, frequently belittling Richard Dreyfuss, the up-and-coming actor cast as Hooper, a cocky oceanographer. The whole enterprise seemed doomed.




“’Jaws’ should never have been made,” Spielberg admitted to Time the Monday after the film opened in 1975. “It was,” he said, “an impossible effort.”

Despite its chaotic creation, “Jaws” became the highest-grossing movie in history, earning a staggering $260.7 million in its initial release. Fifty years later, we’re still living in the entertainment landscape that “Jaws” reshaped. Its outsize success made studios realize that if they packaged and promoted movies correctly, they wouldn’t just be hits — they could become phenomena, selling T-shirts and toys along with tickets. “Jaws” established the template for “Star Wars,” “Jurassic Park,” “The Avengers” and the other culture-defining smashes that followed in its wake.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This movie changed cinema, and you still can’t go to a summer blockbuster or to the beach without thinking about it,” says Eli Roth, the director of the horror film “Hostel.” “So much of the language of cinema comes from this film. [Spielberg] created all of it.”

Jaws-Storyboard-and-Film-Still.jpg

Top, Part of a storyboard; bottom, a shot from “Jaws”mptvimages.com; Everett Collection
“Jaws” is a masterpiece, rivaling “Psycho” in its use of editing, music and camera angles to establish tension and suspense. The film works because it taps into familiar anxieties. Who hasn’t felt suddenly paranoid about all the creatures lurking beneath the waves? But the irresistible force of Spielberg’s vision and ambition allowed him not only to finish “Jaws,” but to create something far greater than the sum of its potboiler parts.

“It’s a great story of what Steven Spielberg accomplished by surviving what was a nightmare,” Steven Soderbergh says. “If that person hadn’t made it, it probably wouldn’t have been made at all. It certainly wouldn’t be a classic.”

And it continues to inspire artists who were born decades after “Jaws” opened. “When directors bring us ideas, ‘Jaws’ is still referenced as much as any other movie,” says Jason Blum, founder of Blumhouse, the company behind “The Purge” and “Get Out.” “Even young filmmakers say, ‘It’s going to be like the shark in “Jaws.”’ That’s incredible for a film that’s 50 years old.”

No one would be more surprised by the enduring appeal of “Jaws” than the Universal executives who greenlit the picture. Initially the studio treated the film as just another B movie. “Nobody thought much about it,” says Joe Alves, the production designer. “People at Universal were much more excited about this George C. Scott film called ‘The Hindenburg.’”




As word leaked out in the Hollywood trades about the delays and cost overruns, there was a growing sense that “Jaws” had all the makings of a disaster. “Everywhere we went, people treated us with sympathy, like we had some kind of illness,” David Brown, one of the film’s producers, told Variety three weeks before “Jaws” debuted. “They’d say, ‘I hope you overcome your difficulties.’”

But after the film was finished and started testing, preview audiences were electrified by what Spielberg delivered; they screamed so intensely that popcorn flew out of buckets. “As soon as the studio saw that reaction, they went, ‘Jesus, this is going to be a big movie,’” remembers Alves. “That’s when everything shifted.”

Suddenly Universal was inspired to back the picture with a massive (for its time) $1.8 million promotional blitz, one that revolutionized how movies were marketed and released. It started with the decision to debut the film on June 20, 1975. Nowadays, summer is the most popular time for moviegoing, but before “Jaws,” studios hadn’t yet become obsessed with that season. Many of the biggest films — including “The Godfather,” “Love Story” and “The Exorcist” — premiered in the spring or winter. But those were aimed at adults; “Jaws” wanted to attract teenagers along with their parents, so it helped to debut the film when school was out. The film’s huge gross illustrated the commercial power of this younger audience. It was a lesson Hollywood would never forget.

Jaws-Theater-Box-Office.jpg

Crowds lined up outside a movie house in New York City to see “Jaws” when it opened in June 1975.Bettmann Archive
“Jaws” also demonstrated how a movie could be turned into a zeitgeist-tapping sensation through the power of mass-marketing and distribution. “Jaws” went national, with Universal releasing the movie in more than 400 theaters across the country. Studios were still employing a road-show model for many films, rolling them out slowly across different markets and advertising in local papers and TV stations along the way. But Universal wanted “Jaws” to be easily accessible to everyone in America all at once, so it could become an event. To generate excitement, the studio invested heavily in television spots, airing dozens of 30-second commercials on primetime network shows like “The Waltons” and “Happy Days.”




The company also leaned into the popularity of Benchley’s novel, which was released in 1974, coordinating with the publisher so the marketing campaigns for the movie and the book that inspired it would be aligned. That ensured that the “Jaws” film would arrive with “pre-awareness” — meaning that audiences would already be primed for the carnage in store.

“We sent copies to people who talk to other people, like headwaiters and cab drivers,” Brown told Variety in 1975. “We adapted the artwork of the book to the artwork of the film promotion. By the time we sneaked the film in Dallas, we didn’t even need to name it in the ad. We put in the logo of the shark’s teeth and the swimming girl and 3,000 came out in a hailstorm.”

“Jaws” is a bridge between the darker, moodier stories that dominated late ’60s and early ’70s Hollywood, such as “Bonnie and Clyde” and “The French Connection,” and the blockbuster era that followed. In some ways, the two halves of its story connect those two distinct periods in cinema history. The first part of “Jaws” follows ineffectual police chief Brody (Roy Scheider) as he tries and largely fails to resist political pressure from the mayor (Murray Hamilton) to keep the beaches open, even as the body count rises. It’s a portrait of how institutional corruption can lead to bloodshed. That resonated with viewers who lived through the Vietnam War, and it was very much in keeping with the skeptical tone of the movies that immediately preceded it.

“You could feel this malaise and cynicism start to seep into movies in the late ’60s. You had the war and the hippie movement and then Watergate,” says Kevin Sandler, associate professor of film and
media studies at Arizona State University. “Movies reflected that for a while. But by the mid-’70s tastes were shifting, and people wanted things that were less politically aware and purely entertaining.”

The second half of “Jaws” taps into that desire for escapism, leaning into spectacle and helping to establish the blockbuster formula in the process. As soon as Brody, Quint and Hooper embark on a quest to kill the shark, the picture assumes a narrative propulsion that Spielberg understood innately. He instructed Gottlieb to streamline Benchley’s novel, casting aside subplots such as an affair between Dreyfuss’ character and Brody’s wife, as well as a real estate conspiracy involving the Mafia.




“He wanted to eliminate everything that was extraneous so we could be totally focused on the story of three men against the sea,” says Gottlieb.

Spielberg also knew that the movie’s villain needed to have a gargantuan size and scope that would make it truly terrifying.

“The way Peter wrote the book was that this was just a normal shark doing what normal sharks do, so he kept urging Steven to keep the shark down to 15 feet,” says Wendy Benchley, the author’s widow. “But Steven understood movies; he knew that he needed the shark to be 25 feet so it could be this monster who could swallow Robert Shaw whole.”

Initially, the great white was supposed to have even more screen time. However, the mechanical difficulties meant that Spielberg had to shoot around the shark, finding novel ways to suggest its deadly presence. To keep audiences off guard, he relied on creative editing by Verna Fields, who cut together shots from the fish’s perspective with glimpses of a fin cutting through the water and set them to John Williams’ pounding and foreboding three-note theme. That iconic music, partially inspired by the score that plays during “Psycho’s” shower scene, took Spielberg a second to embrace.

“I played boom boom boom on the piano for him,” Williams told Variety in 2024, “and Steven said, ‘Are you serious?’ I said, ‘If you hear the basses and celli in the orchestra, I think it might work.’ And so we did a session with the orchestra, and he said, ‘Oh, this is wonderful.’”

Steven-Spielberg-Riding-Jaws-Animatronic.jpg

Spielberg on one of three animatronic great white sharks used in the filming of “Jaws”Sunset Boulevard/Corbis via Getty Images
In 1975, when the shark finally leaped out of the ocean, crashed into the ship and sank his teeth into Quint, audiences were as dazzled as they were terrified. Today, the effects seem primitive. What resonates most strongly is the film’s subtler or more emotional moments — the camera lingering on a man left holding a stick after his dog fails to come back from a swim or the scene where Brody’s son mimics his depressed father’s body language at the dinner table. And, of course, there’s Quint’s USS Indianapolis monologue, an aria of trauma and suffering, in which he drunkenly describes watching his fellow sailors get ripped apart by ravenous tiger sharks after their cruiser sinks. The speech was honed by various writers, including Gottlieb, Gloria Katz and John Milius, but it was Shaw, a playwright as well as an actor, who finally cracked it.




“He took all the versions to his house,” Gottlieb remembers. “Then he came to dinner one night, slammed his hand on the table and said, ‘I’ve got that pesky speech licked.’ He read it to us. It was so stunning that when he finished, Steven said, ‘That’s it. We’re shooting that.’”

The entire monologue lasts roughly four minutes, an eternity in an era of quick-cutting superhero films and fantasies. But it is essential in establishing the bond between the three protagonists, so that audiences will actually care if they live or die. The villain may be fantastical, but the drama still operates at a human level. That sensibility has been lost in the ensuing decades as the blockbusters that “Jaws” inspired have become more obsessed with establishing cinematic universes than creating compelling characters to inhabit them.

As for Spielberg, “Jaws” launched his career into the stratosphere. Public fascination with the wunderkind filmmaker intensified as the film dominated the box office. The attention Spielberg received was flattering but came with its own pressures.

“I don’t think I’ll ever top ‘Jaws’ commercially,” Spielberg said in a 1977 New York Times profile shortly before the release of his next film, “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.” “The minute ‘Jaws’ became so successful, people kept saying, ‘How can you top that?’ But I don’t run my career on what people think.”

Spielberg was wrong about one thing. Two of his films, “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial” and “Jurassic Park,” would become the most commercially successful in history, before they too were supplanted by even bigger blockbusters. As for the director, he would move beyond his populist roots to examine bleak moments in history with his masterworks “Schindler’s List” and “Saving Private Ryan.” As an artist, Spielberg kept stretching, telling bolder and more challenging stories — as long as they took place on land.

“You’ve probably noticed I haven’t done very many water pictures since ‘Jaws,’” Spielberg told biographer Richard Schickel in 2024.

“Jaws” left even its director terrified of the ocean.

***

Vintage Variety: The boost that “Jaws” gave to the summer box office in 1975 is covered in detail in this front page of the Aug. 13, 1975, edition of weekly Variety




Jaws080875W.jpg

From the Aug. 13, 1975, edition of weekly Variety
Below, Universal congratulating everyone who worked on “Jaws,” from the 9/25/1975 edition of Daily Variety
 

On the 50th Anniversary of Its Release, ‘Jaws’ Holds a Surprising Message for Us: Movies Should Feel Real​

Half a century later, Steven Spielberg's formative summer blockbuster looks more than ever like a New Hollywood fusion of Hitchcock and Altman.

By Owen Gleiberman
Plus Icon





Movies That Are Better Than the Book

Courtesy of Universal
It’s a cornerstone of movie mythology that “Jaws” and “Star Wars” are forever linked, like high-concept popcorn twins. They’re the movies that, taken together, ushered in the blockbuster revolution. As the myth goes, “Jaws” and “Star Wars” launched the permanent takeover of movies by — for lack of a better word — escapism. (Looking at the Hollywood product of the last half century, I can think of far nastier words for it.) But today, on the 50th anniversary of the day that “Jaws” was released, I’d like to take the opportunity to de-link those two movies.


Related Stories​

Vincent Cassel

Vincent Cassel to Star in Netflix's Next Big French Movie, 'Quasimodo,' Directed by 'Mesrine' Helmer, Produced by Mediawan's Radar Films



In 1977, “Star Wars” was a sci-fi fantasy so potent and square and video-game zappy, one that would prove to be so addictive to so many generations, that it effectively marked the birth of our all-fantasy-all-the-time popular culture. Its influence was beyond profound. It changed the consciousness of people. It made them want to live in other worlds. Obviously, it wasn’t the first movie or work of art to do that. (In modern times, you can trace the world-building narcotic quality of “Star Wars” back to “The Lord of the Rings,” with an assist from “Dune.”) To me, though, the bottom line is that it’s “Star Wars” that gave birth to the movie culture we have today.

Popular on Variety​







The video player is currently playing an ad.


But what of “Jaws”? When it opened on June 20, 1975, there’s no doubt that it felt like the formative summer movie and the ultimate popcorn movie. Yet it’s worth noting that a great deal of what was revolutionary about “Jaws” had to do with the unprecedented way that it was distributed and marketed. It opened on 464 screens, all but unheard of at the time, and the release was propelled by a marketing blitz that included an unprecedented $700,000 spent on two dozen national television advertising spots. This new level of commercial saturation helped turn “Jaws” into an instant juggernaut, allowing it to dethrone “The Godfather” as the top-grossing movie of all time in just 78 days. That’s a lot of why “Jaws” is thought of as the original summer blockbuster.




Really, though, blockbusters weren’t new. What was new was the term blockbuster (at least, as applied to movies), as well as what the term represented — a new mentality in Hollywood that would tilt the profit-vs.-quality equation toward a more openly rapacious balance. And because all of this is so wired into the mythology of “Jaws,” it’s easy to think of “Jaws” as a movie — or maybe as the movie — that incarnated Hollywood’s mid-’70s hairpin turn toward escapism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then again, it’s worth asking how true that actually is in a ’70s movie culture that had already given us such boffo bonanzas as “The Towering Inferno” and “Billy Jack” and “The Sting” and “The Exorcist” and “The Getaway” and “Shaft” and “The Last House on the Left” and “The Longest Yard” and “Herbie Rides Again” and “Willard” and “Summer of ’42” and “The Life and Times of Grizzly Adams” and “Freebie and the Bean” and “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” I’d argue that “Jaws” is no more “high concept,” no more decadently “escapist,” than any of those films. I’d also argue that it’s a greater work of movie art than any of them.

There’s no denying that the outrageous success of “Jaws” made it the first high-profile step toward a fundamental change in movie culture. (“Star Wars” was a much bigger step.) But when I watched “Jaws” again the other day, marveling in every scene at the genius of the young Steven Spielberg, what struck me about the movie isn’t how “escapist” it is. It’s that every moment of “Jaws” works as enthrallingly as it does because the entire movie feels so real. Spielberg staged it with a verisimilitude that emerged directly out of the New Hollywood ethos of the ’70s.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Jaws” wasn’t some sharply angled turn away from the artistically staggering films of the first half of that decade; it was all of a piece with them. The opening sunset beach party now plays like a free-flowing anticipation of “Dazed and Confused,” and in the morning-after scene, set in the home of Martin Brody (Roy Scheider), the new police chief of Amity, you can feel how much “Jaws” was directed by a filmmaker who wasn’t rich yet; he still knew what it felt like to wake up in an ordinary house. In the kitchen, Brody takes a police call as his wife (Lorraine Gary) deals with his son’s cut hand in the background, and the scene is pure Robert Altman: two simultaneous overlapping realities. Watching “Jaws” again, it hit me with full force how influenced by Altman the film was. It’s there in the sound design, in the multiple interactions taking place at the same time. You feel it on the beach, where the people we see never come off as extras in swimsuits — they’re all true characters intersecting at random.




Yet that documentary-like sense of life that was Altman’s trademark, and that Spielberg drew on in “Jaws,” putting his own kinesthetic stamp on it, isn’t just a matter of background-dialogue recording technique, or of how the action was framed. It’s really about empathy. Spielberg saw everyone on screen as an individual, and in doing so he turned scenes into dramatic juggling acts. He even does that, in a very Spielberg way, in our first full-on view of the shark, that famous off-the-beat moment when Brody is tossing chum and talking to someone behind him and the beast suddenly looms. Spielberg has so much empathy that even his monster fish occupies its own reality.

“Jaws” was a lavishly authentic B horror film; a ’70s greedhead conspiracy thriller; a “Moby Dick”-for-the-age-of-land-lovers adventure saga; a drama of three men — old macho (Robert Shaw), new macho (Roy Scheider), and post-macho (Richard Dreyfuss) — competing on a boat; the ultimate scary funhouse prank on the audience; and one of the most perfectly executed movies ever made. Through it all, the film’s reality-based quality is there in a thousand ways, big and small. It’s there in Lee Fierro’s brilliant one-scene performance as the mother of the boy who gets eaten by the shark. It’s there in the unnerving ocean images shot at water level. It’s even there in the shark itself: After all the stories of how difficult it was to get the three animatronic sharks to work, and how fake they could look (which is why the editor Verna Fields had to disguise it all with quicker cuts), when I saw “Jaws” the other day I found the shark — its eyes, movement, skin texture, and jaws — to be astonishingly genuine, blowing away the kind of digital effects we now routinely accept as eye-popping.

“Jaws” didn’t so much end the New Hollywood as cap it off, demonstrating that the impulses of Hitchcock and Altman could be fused. In the film’s second half, which is set entirely aboard Quint’s fishing boat, the movie takes a turn into pure “action,” yet nothing that happens during the extended man-.vs.-nature battle is hyped or implausible, staged in some over-obvious screw-tightening way. It’s all spontaneous and organic, from the firing of the harpoons attached to yellow barrels to how the infrastructure of the boat slowly starts to come apart to the undersea cage face-off to the way that Quint slides, inexorably, into the shark’s mouth, as if karma had decided he belonged there.




Half a century after it was made, the message of “Jaws” — the lesson of it, to moviemakers and audiences today – is that a great piece of “escapism” isn’t about escaping reality. It’s about using reality to create a catharsis that allows us, for a few moments, to escape ourselves. “Jaws” may have been Hollywood’s first official summer blockbuster, but the truth is that it was the yin to the yang of “Star Wars”: the opposite of fantasy, a movie that honored the deepest premise of movies — to hold up a mirror to the world and have us look upon it with awe.
 
Back
Top