okay!, small letters,bruh ! we're on the same page as far as it goes,
i dont understand why folks cant see the bs and they start deflecting, but some of us like our porn mostly black on black, hell i dont mind watching white on white porn,IRR or even "EBONY"
its just facts, but ,like u ,i am wondering why the trend for new black chicks is always 100 scenes with cacs before 1 scenes with a black man?
the white chix who do "BLACKED" dont do 100scenes with blackman before 1 scene with cac men.. and folks cant say its "market" or bs , my question remains and no one seems to want to answer it or they start to deflect
1: "if porn is about the female,(atleast for most of us heteromales ,) we watch it for the female, she should be paid well for her "work" whether shes fuckin a blackman or whiteman, she should get her standard rate ! right?
2: so, if folks r tuning in to see the chick get fucked then it shouldnt matter what man she is fucking ,(for the most part) ..right ?
2b: becos, if the male in the scenes doesnt matter (as it shouldnt, in hetero porn) then why r new blackchix only gettin booked with cac males and white chix are getting booked with white males and also doing "blacked" etc?
3: do porn companies book those new white girl to do 100 irr scenes with only blackmen before doin b4 1 single scene with a whitemale?
3b: is there 1 whitegirl or company who ever booked a whitechik for only IRR scenes with blakmen?
4: is it that the companies dont want to book blackmen to do scenes with new blackchix? (becos as we've agreed ,what does it matter what male shes fucking if the porn is about the female? ) right ?
or are they saying they only want to shoot new blackchix if they're only fucking cac men on film but not blackmen ? but they book whitechix who do "BLACKED" but dont book blackchix to do scenes with blackmen
u cant tell me theres no subliminals going on ..aint buying it