North Carolina musician arrested, accused of Artificial Intelligence-assisted fraud caper

Database Error

You're right dawg
OG Investor

North Carolina musician arrested, accused of Artificial Intelligence-assisted fraud caper​

Larry Neumeister
Wed, September 4, 2024 at 5:20 p.m. CDT2 min read

Michael-Smith-1725540024.jpg


NEW YORK (AP) — A North Carolina musician was arrested and charged Wednesday with using artificial intelligence to create hundreds of thousands of songs that he streamed billions of times to collect over $10 million in royalty payments, authorities in New York said.

Michael Smith, 52, of Cornelius, North Carolina, was arrested on fraud and conspiracy charges that carry a potential penalty of up to 60 years in prison.

U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in a news release that Smith’s fraud cheated musicians and songwriters between 2017 and this year of royalty money that is available for them to claim.

He said Smith, a musician with a small catalog of music that he owned, streamed songs created with artificial intelligence billions of times “to steal royalties.”

A lawyer for Smith did not immediately return an email seeking comment.

Christie M. Curtis, who leads New York's FBI office, said Smith “utilized automatic features to repeatedly stream the music to generate unlawful royalties.”

“The FBI remains dedicated to plucking out those who manipulate advanced technology to receive illicit profits and infringe on the genuine artistic talent of others,” she said.

An indictment in Manhattan federal court said Smith created thousands of accounts on streaming platforms so that he could stream songs continuously, generating about 661,000 streams per day. It said the avalanche of streams yielded annual royalties of $1.2 million.

The royalties were drawn from a pool of royalties that streaming platforms are required to set aside for artists who stream sound recordings that embody musical compositions, the indictment said.

According to the indictment, Smith used artificial intelligence to create tens of thousands of songs so that his fake streams would not alert streaming platforms and music distribution companies that a fraud was underway.

It said Smith, beginning in 2018, teamed up with the chief executive of an artificial intelligence music company and a music promoter to create the songs.

Smith boasted in an email last February that he had generated over four billion streams and $12 million in royalties since 2019, authorities said.

The indictment said that when a music distribution company in 2018 suggested that he might be engaged in fraud, he protested, writing: “This is absolutely wrong and crazy! ... There is absolutely no fraud going on whatsoever!”

Larry Neumeister, The Associated Press

 

PlayerR

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
If there was no existing law on the books deeming this illegal, then they just made one up to imprison him.
This move was brilliant on his part. He played the game, found a loophole, and profited majorly

It could violate laws if AI took parts of existing songs to create the ones that he used.
 

OutlawR.O.C.

R.I.P. shanebp1978
BGOL Investor
If there was no existing law on the books deeming this illegal, then they just made one up to imprison him.
This move was brilliant on his part. He played the game, found a loophole, and profited majorly

Not really.

Even if the music were AI generated he'd still be violating multiple laws by using the artist's likeness and voice without permission.

No different than using their likeness to promote products with no deal in place.
 

APOPHIS

Autodidact / Polymath
Platinum Member
Not really.

Even if the music were AI generated he'd still be violating multiple laws by using the artist's likeness and voice without permission.

No different than using their likeness to promote products with no deal in place.


Artist vocal likeness is relative. There have been plenty of Michael Jackson sound-alikes and wannabes, but none even got sued for sounding similar. I would understand if they took his written music and produced beats, as there may be more of a case there than just vocal likeness alone.
 

PlayerR

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

YouTube Develops Tool to Allow Creators to Detect AI-Generated Content Using Their Likeness​

One of the side effects of generative artificial intelligence tools proliferating is a surge of misuse. Actors, musicians, athletes, digital creators and others are seeing their likenesses digitally copied or altered, sometimes for less-than-noble reasons.

The video platform YouTube says that it is developing new tools to tackle those problems, as well as the issue of AI companies attempting to scrape its content.

In a blog post published Thursday morning, YouTube announced a pair of tools meant to detect and manage AI-generated content that uses their voice or likeness. The first tool, a "synthetic-singing identification technology" that will live within its existing Content ID system, and will "allow partners to automatically detect and manage AI-generated content on YouTube that simulates their singing voices."

The company says that it is refining the tech, with a pilot program planned for early 2025.

The second tool, which is still in development, "will enable people from a variety of industries-from creators and actors to musicians and athletes-to detect and manage AI-generated content showing their faces on YouTube." The company did not indicate when it thinks it will be ready to roll out.

It is not immediately clear what creators will be able to do with the new tools, though Content ID gives rightsholders a menu of options, from pulling it down, removing rights-impacted content, or splitting ad revenue.

YouTube is leaning into AI, releasing new tools like Dream Screen and a tool that uses AI to help creators come up with ideas for videos, but is is also leaning into the tech to help identify misuses.

And the platform is also grappling with the insatiable demand for training data from AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic. YouTube notes that it is a violation of its terms to scrape its data, and will fight efforts to do so. However, it also adds that some of its creators may have their own views on the subject, and is planning tools that would let creators have more say in how third-parties use their data.

"As AI evolves, we believe it should enhance human creativity, not replace it," the company wrote in the blog post. "We're committed to working with our partners to ensure future advancements amplify their voices, and we'll continue to develop guardrails to address concerns and achieve our common goals."
 

xxxbishopxxx

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Artist vocal likeness is relative. There have been plenty of Michael Jackson sound-alikes and wannabes, but none even got sued for sounding similar. I would understand if they took his written music and produced beats, as there may be more of a case there than just vocal likeness alone.
My guess none of these wannabes were making millions off of Michael's likeness. People that do it for fun and nonprofit probably get a pass.

I bet you that Michael Jackson Broadway show is paying proper royalties to the Mike's estate and to whoever owns the rights to the music being used.
 
Top