The point is the bench player doesn't necessarily work on his craft. For the record, im not saying that is universally true. It's just an example of someone who puts in their 8 hours and nothing more. It goes without saying someone can change their behavior. My real point is there are people who just show up for work and there are people who strive to be the best or love what they do. There are people who care enough about their craft that they'll do it for nothing.
Taking it back to rap JCole is an example of a rapper who seems to take his craft seriously. I didn't want to get into who fits what I'm describing, but Blueface doesn't seem to care about his craft and more or less said as much. An extreme example that I shouldn't use , but what are the chances Chrisean Roc really cares about her craft. Not saying JCole wouldn't use AI when it benefits, but I don't see him allowing AI to write for him or replace him so he can avoid going in the booth. I could see the other two doing that especially since Chrisean is more of an entertainer. I'm clearly going to the bottom, but that is what I've been speaking on.
Babies do not instinctively understand emotions. They learn them from you. That is why you are encouraged to interact with your babies. If you are thinking of crying as an display of emotions, initially it is not. It's just their method of communicating.
The AI is not creating things on its own. Humans are telling the AI what it wants. The humans will then decide what is useful or what needs to be modified. You are talking as if the AI is sentient. That's is not what I'm speaking on. In this instance, AI is not operating independently of the human. The elements you believe the AI would miss will be corrected by humans. Even with that, AI seems to be moving so fast that human intervention may happen less and less over time.
From the perspective of what our original point of showing human emotions, yes background actors is a small thing. My point was you didn't seem to be looking at actors as a whole and seemed to be strictly focused lead actors. However, I still stand by my stance the AI will be able to replicate human enough for lead roles. Again, any error the AI creates would be modified by a human. The way you are talking is like whatever the AI creates I'd the finale product and there's nothing that can be changed.
Like I said before, the different guilds are already considering the threat of AI. That said, the guilds are basically unions right. I don't know that studios have to listen. They likely will, but that doesn't speak to the independent movie/tv creators. AI in general would need to be addressed by law makers who seem to be more focused on issues that should be left to the individual citizen. The politicians seem to be more concerned about how elections will be impacted from AI rather than other aspects of society. I don't recall hearing much from them until America's favorite white girl Taylor Swift was negatively impacted.
