Update: Vice President Kamala Harris is now the Democratic presidential nominee

[DC_Dude]

I uploaded the transcript of Kamala’s interview with Dana Bash, and asked ChatGPT to give its feedback on Dana as a journalist

Here’s what it said:

1. **Focus on Past Statements and Contradictions**: Bash repeatedly pressed Harris on her past positions, such as her stance on fracking and immigration. While it's important to address shifts in policy positions, the emphasis on these questions seemed designed to highlight contradictions rather than provide a platform for Harris to explain her broader policy agenda or the reasoning behind any changes in stance.

2. **Repetition of Right-Wing Talking Points**: Some of the questions seemed to echo right-wing criticisms or talking points, such as pressing Harris on Trump's racially charged comments or repeatedly questioning her commitment to banning fracking. These questions could be viewed as attempts to put Harris on the defensive rather than engage in a substantive discussion on policy differences between her and her opponents.

3. **Missed Opportunities for In-Depth Policy Discussion**: Bash could have used the interview to explore Harris' specific policy proposals in greater detail, such as her plans for the "opportunity economy," healthcare reform, or climate change. Instead, many questions were framed around potential vulnerabilities or criticisms, which limited the scope of the conversation and perhaps didn't provide viewers with a comprehensive understanding of Harris' platform.

4. **Lack of Probing on Policy Details**: While Bash did ask Harris about her economic plans and stance on energy policy, she didn't press for specifics or challenge Harris to explain the feasibility or expected impact of her proposals in detail. This suggests a focus more on generating headline-worthy responses than on fostering a deeper understanding of the candidate's vision and policy nuances.

In summary, while it's crucial for journalists to hold candidates accountable and address inconsistencies, the interview seemed to prioritize confrontation and controversy over substantive engagement with policy issues. This approach might appeal to some viewers but could also leave others wanting a more thorough exploration of what Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz, actually plan to do if elected.

 

[DC_Dude]

Smart business men know what side is the best side. Might need a favor one day lol

 

[DC_Dude]

 

[DC_Dude]

 

[SWATLANTA]

He called her gay yet? Everyone is gay except him.

I watched dude for like 2 years straight because he was funny...but then I noticed he falls out with everybody and like you say, as soon as he falls out with folks, he immediately calls them gay. Anybody who has any modicum of success that he can't attain is gay and they got their success through homosexual activities. It got to the point where I realized how ignorant and hateful this dude really was...Bitter nigga syndrome smh

 

[Dr. Truth]

this is the worst looking political poll I have ever seen in my life

poll is fake

 

[Dr. Truth]

I don’t know why Trump is beefing with the military right now. This makes me really wonder. Is he doing this on purpose for something. Motherfucker, trying to create another January 6 scenario this time with the military. CIA, you guys know what y’all may have to do

Where you been? He’s been shitting on the military since day one and they still vote for him.

 

[Dr. Truth]

I hate this closet fag . Also all those coons and bots in the comments need to die

 

[easy_b]

 

[easy_b]

I don’t wanna hear any other questions about her not being black….

 

[easy_b]

Trump supporters are dumb as fuck

 

[HeathCliff]

 

[donwuan]

Marc kicking ass and taking names.

​

 

[donwuan]

​

 

[donwuan]

​

 

[Costanza]

I uploaded the transcript of Kamala’s interview with Dana Bash, and asked ChatGPT to give its feedback on Dana as a journalist

Here’s what it said:

1. **Focus on Past Statements and Contradictions**: Bash repeatedly pressed Harris on her past positions, such as her stance on fracking and immigration. While it's important to address shifts in policy positions, the emphasis on these questions seemed designed to highlight contradictions rather than provide a platform for Harris to explain her broader policy agenda or the reasoning behind any changes in stance.

2. **Repetition of Right-Wing Talking Points**: Some of the questions seemed to echo right-wing criticisms or talking points, such as pressing Harris on Trump's racially charged comments or repeatedly questioning her commitment to banning fracking. These questions could be viewed as attempts to put Harris on the defensive rather than engage in a substantive discussion on policy differences between her and her opponents.

3. **Missed Opportunities for In-Depth Policy Discussion**: Bash could have used the interview to explore Harris' specific policy proposals in greater detail, such as her plans for the "opportunity economy," healthcare reform, or climate change. Instead, many questions were framed around potential vulnerabilities or criticisms, which limited the scope of the conversation and perhaps didn't provide viewers with a comprehensive understanding of Harris' platform.

4. **Lack of Probing on Policy Details**: While Bash did ask Harris about her economic plans and stance on energy policy, she didn't press for specifics or challenge Harris to explain the feasibility or expected impact of her proposals in detail. This suggests a focus more on generating headline-worthy responses than on fostering a deeper understanding of the candidate's vision and policy nuances.

In summary, while it's crucial for journalists to hold candidates accountable and address inconsistencies, the interview seemed to prioritize confrontation and controversy over substantive engagement with policy issues. This approach might appeal to some viewers but could also leave others wanting a more thorough exploration of what Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz, actually plan to do if elected.

I do not believe his prompt was simply for it to give feedback based on the criticism generated.

 

[donwuan]

​

 

[Costanza]

 

[DC_Dude]

Trump said this at his speech today in Michigan
“"We're going to bring back the car industry," Trump said in our interview. "We're not going to let it disappear. We're going to bring back jobs, we're going to bring back factories and make Michigan very successful again. And we can do that very easily through the TAXATION OF FOREIGN NATIONS”

Can someone explain to me how we would tax a foreign nation ?

 

[BlackGoku]

I watched dude for like 2 years straight because he was funny...but then I noticed he falls out with everybody and like you say, as soon as he falls out with folks, he immediately calls them gay. Anybody who has any modicum of success that he can't attain is gay and they got their success through homosexual activities. It got to the point where I realized how ignorant and hateful this dude really was...Bitter nigga syndrome smh

We mature and they don't..same thing with Tariq going from Mack Lessons and hidden colors. Going from one bag to another. I realized that I'm too old to be on the internet watching dude calling someone and playing Lexington Steele screaming . there's always a moment of clarity.

 

[praetor]

 

[DC_Dude]

 

[DC_Dude]

 

[DC_Dude]

 

[DC_Dude]

 

[4 Dimensional]

One of the biggest ones I've ever seen is down here in Huntersville. You can go inside and sit down. But you're right. He'll we got grown adults down here working and acting a fool. Lol

We got one in Greensboro we can sit in, but is ran by teenagers. I don’t have an issue with teenagers working but the food is just sloppy, man.

I remember Cook Out when it had old black men working there. Mofos that look like they could be your uncle for real. Food used to be on point.

 

[Darrkman]

 

[VAiz4hustlaz]

why do you care?? youre not voting for her anyway so this is just trolling at its most boring.

black or white she's still a female and last I heard black women didnt get a pass when roe v wade was struck down...next on the conservative agenda..banning contraceptives...if that doesnt give her a chill then forget it.

Who said I cared? You're the one who begged for a response from me!!

whats the problem with what she said???

I will say that when Kamala isn't in prosecutor mode she tends to give a bit of rambling all around the bend to get to the barn type responses...she needs to tighten that up but the response in itself wasn't "wrong".

And if it was I'm still waiting for @VAiz4hustlaz to explain in what way???

 

[Dr. Truth]

​

So this was the last straw? Fuck this guy

 

[Dr. Truth]

Media acting like that Trump speech was normal. Nothing about how crazy it was

 

[carsun1000]

 

[easy_b]

​

Thank you I’m glad they mentioned it because I kept telling everyone the economy was going south before Covid ever hit. Trump Benefited from Obama economy his first two years but after he did that tax cut shit started going downhill quickly and then Covid hit.

 

[dugington]

It's just "payback" for her not doing what they (media) wanted her to do earlier in the campaign: Which is, talk to them.

 

[playahaitian]

We don't but Charlamagne has been nothing but consistent. His and Nick Wrights rise has me even more puzzled than the rise of Trump. Thing about it is, both of them just throw stuff against the wall and occasionally will say something correct. They are not as bad as Emanuel Acho with the majority of their guests looking at them like

Agreed

 

[therealjondoe]