Greetings Beloved Family; Here is a very timely article by Elder George dealing with the masculine and feminine principles and how this present-day society exemplifies each, and why unbalancing these COMPATIBLE (not "equal") principles to cause the feminization of any society, is a precursor to its end. Please take some time to read it...
Dr. Phil Valentine-El
------------------------------<wbr style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 13.600000381469727px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">------------------------------<wbr style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 13.600000381469727px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">--------------
THE RECITORIAL SOCIETY
Western thinking established the genderless society, and it has devolved into a recitorial society in which all communication has been reduced to recitations. To encourage participation in the recitation of accumulated data awards are given such as certificates, licenses, and degrees, indicating the proficiency of memorization and recitation of the individual receiving the award. These awards have within them subdivisions further delineating the recitorial proficiency of the recipient.
Women love to recite because they know instinctively all information comes from outside of themselves; therefore a recitation serves as a public statement of what they know (or think that they know); furthermore, receiving awards caters to the “ME” aspect of their natures.
Receptive and accommodating by nature, and measuring their self-worth by performing in accordance with what is expected of them, women will do their utmost to comply with standards they have been motivated in, trained in, or forced to accept.
For millennia women have been raised to become proficient in providing for the material needs of the family such as sewing, cooking, cleaning, shopping, and decorating. Their many attributes were developed to also provide the non-tangible but extremely important function of nurturing, which had many applications such as consoling, healing, entertaining, socializing, and relating. The proficiency in household performance enabled by the application of these attributes and characteristics provided the opportunity to marry a man who was considered at the least capable of providing her with an environment that she was accustomed to, but preferably one at a higher level in which she would bring forth life, nurture it, and develop a family.
Men were raised to develop their natural characteristics such as constancy, reliability, honor, courage, assertiveness, and steadfastness that enabled them to lead and protect the family. Men and women working together developed families as a means of propagating and preserving the species and growing spiritually.
The family served as the center of activity in most societies throughout the world with the exception of Europe, which having a feminine and materialistic psyche, substituted information for knowledge, developed the recitorial system to a level not seen elsewhere, and had little regard for family or understanding of matters unseen.
In examining the recitorial effect on society, various vocations will be addressed, the first three being nutrition, social service, and the law.
Regarding nutrition, if an organization wanted to upgrade its members regarding eating healthier foods it would most likely call on a nutritionist or dietitian to address the group, who probably would probably be a young woman with a master’s degree. Why call upon a nutritionist to learn about healthy eating? If you wanted to learn how to fly a plane wouldn’t you go to a pilot, someone who could fly one? You wouldn’t go to someone who had a master’s degree in aeronautical engineering but never sat behind the controls of a plane.
Using the same reasoning, if you wanted to have a healthy body derived from the foods that you eat wouldn’t you go to a healthy person—preferably one who was old and healthy—which would give evidence that their diet maintained them in good health for many years? Ethnic cooking developed from those considerations; the elders of society knew which foods maintained healthy bodies and incorporated those foods into a standard diet, modified in accordance with the food available. What would a 25 year-old woman with a master’s in nutrition know about healthy eating? She could only recite, but she could not give evidence of the result of eating the diet she would recommend. Nevertheless, she would have the awards, which in our credentialized society would give her the right and salary rewards to lecture to people on nutrition, whether or not she herself was healthy.
This reminds me of a caption I read of a World Health Organization worker sent to a remote area of Malaysia to teach the people proper dental hygiene. As she taught them how to use a tooth brush properly it was observed that the only person in the group missing teeth was the health care worker. She was credentialized and authorized to promote dental care while she herself was missing teeth.
Getting back to nutrition, I will state four fundamentals that apply to most things relating to the care of the race:
1. God made food. Man made junk food. Eat the food that God made; most likely you will become healthy. Eat the food that man made; most likely you will become unhealthy. That covers all the knowledge about nutrition that the recitorial teachings in our universities can possibly offer.
2. The adulteration of the food that God created by chemical additives and various forms of processing has reduced the energy levels in it. Praying over food will restore the energy to its intended level.
3. For balanced nutritional menu planning consult your grandmothers, preferably your great-grandmothers as the food they prepared made it possible for you to be here. They did it without attending any credentialized recitorial programs.
4. There are no such things as vitamins, anti-oxidants, free radicals, etc. All those things are made up and have no more validity than the Arctic Circle or International Dateline. They do not exist.
5. The above fundamentals come from a man with impeccable credentials; he is 83 years-old and does not take any medications. Do any professors in the field of nutrition, dietetics, and general health care have those credentials?
Regarding an example of the recitorial training in social service, in speaking to a young woman studying at John Jay College of Criminal Justice I asked her to what she attributed America having the most violent boys in the world? Her immediate response was that it was in their genes; a response ranking with free radicals, anti-oxidants and all the other recitorial claptrap of Western society. During a radio interview on Father’s Day 2007 I mentioned that on that night 24 million American children would go to bed in a home without a father it. The primary source of the most violent boys in America comes from that pool of children raised without a father at home. They are denied the warm, nurturing, attentive love which can only come from a mother living in the safe and secure environment provided by a good husband. After school programs and assorted governmental child care facilities cannot effectively substitute for a mother’s love or the stability of a two parent home.
The third vocation I will address is the legal profession, which I will refer to as the law. The law is female—it deals with what is seen—and can be recited. The feminine materialistic psyche of the European loves the law. It worships it. It makes it the final arbiter of all relationships. Great edifices are built to house those who practice and preserve the law. The Supreme Court building in the United States and the various Ministries of Justice buildings in Europe serve as sacred monuments in which reference, submission, and obedience to the law by the populace takes place.
From the earliest European Greeks there existed a great dependency on the law. Draco instituted a system of law based on an aristocracy (the feminine form of government.) Solon developed a system of law in which eligibility for political power was based on wealth (a feminine value.) From Draco, to Solon, to Justinian, to Napoleon, the Europeans prided themselves on their legal institutions. After a 2,000 year history based on law, when the Europeans came to America the indigenous people said of them, “white man speak with forked tongue.” Indeed he did, by lying, cheating, and breaking almost every treaty he made, he took their land out from under the “the law”, as he did to the Maoris in Hawaii and to other peoples of the world who befriended and welcomed him to their land.
There is no morality in the law. Laws are enacted when and where morality is lacking.
France’s Minister of Justice Rachida Dati reached the pinnacle of accomplishment in the legal profession. She is also an unwed mother and the father is yet to be identified. Of course this behavior is no longer considered immoral, but rather an indication of liberation. Also, Minister Dati is a Muslim and has jurisdiction over a prison system in which 60% of the inmates are Muslim men.
Moral behavior does not come from the law. Moral behavior comes from ethics, which are unseen and come from those men who realize their objective in life is to provide the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture it as humankind progresses on its spiritual journey. Ethics do not come from any place else.
The lack of ethics is but one of the many chinks in the recitorial system that we are addressing.
The educational system was referred to indirectly when three vocational aspects of society were addressed and now I will take this opportunity to go into greater detail concerning the efficacy of a college education.
A test given to high school graduates in America 60 years ago and then given to college seniors 50 years later, resulted in the college seniors not doing as well as the high school graduates 50 years earlier. In practical terms, this means if you are a college student, your grandmothers and great-grandmothers who graduated from high school know more than you do. I went to school with your grandmothers and great-grandmothers and can assure you that they know more than you. They also can darn a sock and dress a chicken.
This bit of information does not faze college women because they do not go to school to learn. As said earlier, everything a woman does is to excel at what is expected of her. Today she is expected to get a college degree. It does not matter that she is not learning anything other than to do the reciting necessary to fulfill that requirement.
Of course women will raise the question, aren’t men being subjected to the same education? The answer is yes, and they are leaving college in droves as the percentage of men comprising the college student population continues to decline. The truancy rate of male high school students in New York City has reached an all time high, and grade school boys are given the drug Ritalin to help them endure the unnatural recitorial genderless environment they are forced to participate in.The purpose of education is to enable people to read, write, count, think, and express themselves properly, and should be accomplished by high school graduation at the latest. Any education after high school is vocational in nature.
The vocation of women for millennia has been to bring forth life and to nurture it. The vocation of men has been to provide the environment and means for women to do that as we all grow spiritually. These activities are no longer held in high esteem. Making money has top priority now. That’s called whoredom; prophets from the first book of the Bible to the last have railed against individual whoredom and national whoredom, pointing out that focus on the material world inhibits spiritual growth.
The recitorial society does not recognize the unseen world, and can only deal with what it sees such as symptoms and effects. We have shown that moral behavior comes from unseen ethics, and the vocations of nutrition, social work, and the law--all based on what is seen—are ineffective in serving the physical and moral well-being of society.
This essay is gender slanted, and will become more so, as it becomes increasingly obvious that recitorial activity is feminine in nature and as attempts to neutralize the masculine influence increase, the recitorial practices of society will increase as well.
One of the rallying themes of feminists called for removing women from what they called the drudgery of cooking, sewing, and all stereotypical socially constructed activities of women. Now that women have come into bloom in the commercial world, what are the vocations in which they have risen to prominence?
The top American business women who do not have inherited wealth are Debbie Fields of Mrs. Fields Cookies, Mary Kay Ash of Mary Kay Cosmetics, Martha Stewart of Martha Stewart Living, and Oprah Winfrey of Harpo Productions. There are also a couple of newcomers who have established successful clothing companies. These women earned their wealth from their talents in cooking, sewing, talking, and self-adornment, the same activities that feminists railed against 60 years ago. Why are these activities not called drudgery now?
My mother could bake cookies better than Debbie Fields, aunts on both sides of my family could cook as well as Martha Stewart, and most of the women I knew in my childhood could make their own dresses. Those women used their God-given talents for the betterment of the race through service to the family. Today we herald those few women who made a lot of money for themselves, the rest have been lured out of the homes, stripped of the ability to provide nurturing household functions, given recitorial training that will eventually become obsolete, reducing them to lonely unhealthy women dependent upon the government for their survival.
Where are the female engineering and science majors that are the equivalents of Bill Gates of Microsoft, Steve Jobs of Apple Computers, and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, none of whom graduated from college? College graduation and recitations are not necessary for inventiveness. The requirement for new is conceptual thinking, a male characteristic that is not recitorial. How can anything new possibly come from non-conceptual thinking? In my first book Dear Brothers and Sisters: Gender and Its Responsibility in the chapter titled It’s New, I pointed out that new comes from the creative will of the masculine gender.
We have discovered another chink in the armor of recitorial thinking—its inability to create new. The psyche of Western thought being female is materially oriented; therefore, the conceptual thinking of the male is limited to material inventiveness, which he has excelled in to an unprecedented degree. However, as gender differences become more subdued the natural drive and conceptual thinking of the male becomes subdued as well resulting in a decrease in inventiveness. The Soviet Union failed economically because it legislated away the source of new, which the Western world has also done, the result being the degree of inventiveness of the last 50 years is but a fraction of what it was during the first half of the 20th century. Most of what we call new today consists of adaptations and modifications to existing products.
The economy, an object of worship in the Western world, is rapidly grinding to a halt, and no amount of stimulus can save it, because the modern economy depends on the new; and the source of new—the creative will of the masculine gender—has been suppressed.
When a task can be recited, it can then be automated, and finally robotized. The reduction of job functions to recitations is occurring at an accelerating rate, with the resultant loss of jobs and decrease in service. Service representatives trained to recite answers instead of being equipped to handle questions have been replaced by robots. All information can eventually be recited and thus robotized. The law is recited. Medical protocols are recitations.
-ELDER GEORGE
Dr. Phil Valentine-El
------------------------------<wbr style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 13.600000381469727px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">------------------------------<wbr style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12.800000190734863px; line-height: 13.600000381469727px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">--------------
THE RECITORIAL SOCIETY
Western thinking established the genderless society, and it has devolved into a recitorial society in which all communication has been reduced to recitations. To encourage participation in the recitation of accumulated data awards are given such as certificates, licenses, and degrees, indicating the proficiency of memorization and recitation of the individual receiving the award. These awards have within them subdivisions further delineating the recitorial proficiency of the recipient.
Women love to recite because they know instinctively all information comes from outside of themselves; therefore a recitation serves as a public statement of what they know (or think that they know); furthermore, receiving awards caters to the “ME” aspect of their natures.
Receptive and accommodating by nature, and measuring their self-worth by performing in accordance with what is expected of them, women will do their utmost to comply with standards they have been motivated in, trained in, or forced to accept.
For millennia women have been raised to become proficient in providing for the material needs of the family such as sewing, cooking, cleaning, shopping, and decorating. Their many attributes were developed to also provide the non-tangible but extremely important function of nurturing, which had many applications such as consoling, healing, entertaining, socializing, and relating. The proficiency in household performance enabled by the application of these attributes and characteristics provided the opportunity to marry a man who was considered at the least capable of providing her with an environment that she was accustomed to, but preferably one at a higher level in which she would bring forth life, nurture it, and develop a family.
Men were raised to develop their natural characteristics such as constancy, reliability, honor, courage, assertiveness, and steadfastness that enabled them to lead and protect the family. Men and women working together developed families as a means of propagating and preserving the species and growing spiritually.
The family served as the center of activity in most societies throughout the world with the exception of Europe, which having a feminine and materialistic psyche, substituted information for knowledge, developed the recitorial system to a level not seen elsewhere, and had little regard for family or understanding of matters unseen.
In examining the recitorial effect on society, various vocations will be addressed, the first three being nutrition, social service, and the law.
Regarding nutrition, if an organization wanted to upgrade its members regarding eating healthier foods it would most likely call on a nutritionist or dietitian to address the group, who probably would probably be a young woman with a master’s degree. Why call upon a nutritionist to learn about healthy eating? If you wanted to learn how to fly a plane wouldn’t you go to a pilot, someone who could fly one? You wouldn’t go to someone who had a master’s degree in aeronautical engineering but never sat behind the controls of a plane.
Using the same reasoning, if you wanted to have a healthy body derived from the foods that you eat wouldn’t you go to a healthy person—preferably one who was old and healthy—which would give evidence that their diet maintained them in good health for many years? Ethnic cooking developed from those considerations; the elders of society knew which foods maintained healthy bodies and incorporated those foods into a standard diet, modified in accordance with the food available. What would a 25 year-old woman with a master’s in nutrition know about healthy eating? She could only recite, but she could not give evidence of the result of eating the diet she would recommend. Nevertheless, she would have the awards, which in our credentialized society would give her the right and salary rewards to lecture to people on nutrition, whether or not she herself was healthy.
This reminds me of a caption I read of a World Health Organization worker sent to a remote area of Malaysia to teach the people proper dental hygiene. As she taught them how to use a tooth brush properly it was observed that the only person in the group missing teeth was the health care worker. She was credentialized and authorized to promote dental care while she herself was missing teeth.
Getting back to nutrition, I will state four fundamentals that apply to most things relating to the care of the race:
1. God made food. Man made junk food. Eat the food that God made; most likely you will become healthy. Eat the food that man made; most likely you will become unhealthy. That covers all the knowledge about nutrition that the recitorial teachings in our universities can possibly offer.
2. The adulteration of the food that God created by chemical additives and various forms of processing has reduced the energy levels in it. Praying over food will restore the energy to its intended level.
3. For balanced nutritional menu planning consult your grandmothers, preferably your great-grandmothers as the food they prepared made it possible for you to be here. They did it without attending any credentialized recitorial programs.
4. There are no such things as vitamins, anti-oxidants, free radicals, etc. All those things are made up and have no more validity than the Arctic Circle or International Dateline. They do not exist.
5. The above fundamentals come from a man with impeccable credentials; he is 83 years-old and does not take any medications. Do any professors in the field of nutrition, dietetics, and general health care have those credentials?
Regarding an example of the recitorial training in social service, in speaking to a young woman studying at John Jay College of Criminal Justice I asked her to what she attributed America having the most violent boys in the world? Her immediate response was that it was in their genes; a response ranking with free radicals, anti-oxidants and all the other recitorial claptrap of Western society. During a radio interview on Father’s Day 2007 I mentioned that on that night 24 million American children would go to bed in a home without a father it. The primary source of the most violent boys in America comes from that pool of children raised without a father at home. They are denied the warm, nurturing, attentive love which can only come from a mother living in the safe and secure environment provided by a good husband. After school programs and assorted governmental child care facilities cannot effectively substitute for a mother’s love or the stability of a two parent home.
The third vocation I will address is the legal profession, which I will refer to as the law. The law is female—it deals with what is seen—and can be recited. The feminine materialistic psyche of the European loves the law. It worships it. It makes it the final arbiter of all relationships. Great edifices are built to house those who practice and preserve the law. The Supreme Court building in the United States and the various Ministries of Justice buildings in Europe serve as sacred monuments in which reference, submission, and obedience to the law by the populace takes place.
From the earliest European Greeks there existed a great dependency on the law. Draco instituted a system of law based on an aristocracy (the feminine form of government.) Solon developed a system of law in which eligibility for political power was based on wealth (a feminine value.) From Draco, to Solon, to Justinian, to Napoleon, the Europeans prided themselves on their legal institutions. After a 2,000 year history based on law, when the Europeans came to America the indigenous people said of them, “white man speak with forked tongue.” Indeed he did, by lying, cheating, and breaking almost every treaty he made, he took their land out from under the “the law”, as he did to the Maoris in Hawaii and to other peoples of the world who befriended and welcomed him to their land.
There is no morality in the law. Laws are enacted when and where morality is lacking.
France’s Minister of Justice Rachida Dati reached the pinnacle of accomplishment in the legal profession. She is also an unwed mother and the father is yet to be identified. Of course this behavior is no longer considered immoral, but rather an indication of liberation. Also, Minister Dati is a Muslim and has jurisdiction over a prison system in which 60% of the inmates are Muslim men.
Moral behavior does not come from the law. Moral behavior comes from ethics, which are unseen and come from those men who realize their objective in life is to provide the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture it as humankind progresses on its spiritual journey. Ethics do not come from any place else.
The lack of ethics is but one of the many chinks in the recitorial system that we are addressing.
The educational system was referred to indirectly when three vocational aspects of society were addressed and now I will take this opportunity to go into greater detail concerning the efficacy of a college education.
A test given to high school graduates in America 60 years ago and then given to college seniors 50 years later, resulted in the college seniors not doing as well as the high school graduates 50 years earlier. In practical terms, this means if you are a college student, your grandmothers and great-grandmothers who graduated from high school know more than you do. I went to school with your grandmothers and great-grandmothers and can assure you that they know more than you. They also can darn a sock and dress a chicken.
This bit of information does not faze college women because they do not go to school to learn. As said earlier, everything a woman does is to excel at what is expected of her. Today she is expected to get a college degree. It does not matter that she is not learning anything other than to do the reciting necessary to fulfill that requirement.
Of course women will raise the question, aren’t men being subjected to the same education? The answer is yes, and they are leaving college in droves as the percentage of men comprising the college student population continues to decline. The truancy rate of male high school students in New York City has reached an all time high, and grade school boys are given the drug Ritalin to help them endure the unnatural recitorial genderless environment they are forced to participate in.The purpose of education is to enable people to read, write, count, think, and express themselves properly, and should be accomplished by high school graduation at the latest. Any education after high school is vocational in nature.
The vocation of women for millennia has been to bring forth life and to nurture it. The vocation of men has been to provide the environment and means for women to do that as we all grow spiritually. These activities are no longer held in high esteem. Making money has top priority now. That’s called whoredom; prophets from the first book of the Bible to the last have railed against individual whoredom and national whoredom, pointing out that focus on the material world inhibits spiritual growth.
The recitorial society does not recognize the unseen world, and can only deal with what it sees such as symptoms and effects. We have shown that moral behavior comes from unseen ethics, and the vocations of nutrition, social work, and the law--all based on what is seen—are ineffective in serving the physical and moral well-being of society.
This essay is gender slanted, and will become more so, as it becomes increasingly obvious that recitorial activity is feminine in nature and as attempts to neutralize the masculine influence increase, the recitorial practices of society will increase as well.
One of the rallying themes of feminists called for removing women from what they called the drudgery of cooking, sewing, and all stereotypical socially constructed activities of women. Now that women have come into bloom in the commercial world, what are the vocations in which they have risen to prominence?
The top American business women who do not have inherited wealth are Debbie Fields of Mrs. Fields Cookies, Mary Kay Ash of Mary Kay Cosmetics, Martha Stewart of Martha Stewart Living, and Oprah Winfrey of Harpo Productions. There are also a couple of newcomers who have established successful clothing companies. These women earned their wealth from their talents in cooking, sewing, talking, and self-adornment, the same activities that feminists railed against 60 years ago. Why are these activities not called drudgery now?
My mother could bake cookies better than Debbie Fields, aunts on both sides of my family could cook as well as Martha Stewart, and most of the women I knew in my childhood could make their own dresses. Those women used their God-given talents for the betterment of the race through service to the family. Today we herald those few women who made a lot of money for themselves, the rest have been lured out of the homes, stripped of the ability to provide nurturing household functions, given recitorial training that will eventually become obsolete, reducing them to lonely unhealthy women dependent upon the government for their survival.
Where are the female engineering and science majors that are the equivalents of Bill Gates of Microsoft, Steve Jobs of Apple Computers, and Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, none of whom graduated from college? College graduation and recitations are not necessary for inventiveness. The requirement for new is conceptual thinking, a male characteristic that is not recitorial. How can anything new possibly come from non-conceptual thinking? In my first book Dear Brothers and Sisters: Gender and Its Responsibility in the chapter titled It’s New, I pointed out that new comes from the creative will of the masculine gender.
We have discovered another chink in the armor of recitorial thinking—its inability to create new. The psyche of Western thought being female is materially oriented; therefore, the conceptual thinking of the male is limited to material inventiveness, which he has excelled in to an unprecedented degree. However, as gender differences become more subdued the natural drive and conceptual thinking of the male becomes subdued as well resulting in a decrease in inventiveness. The Soviet Union failed economically because it legislated away the source of new, which the Western world has also done, the result being the degree of inventiveness of the last 50 years is but a fraction of what it was during the first half of the 20th century. Most of what we call new today consists of adaptations and modifications to existing products.
The economy, an object of worship in the Western world, is rapidly grinding to a halt, and no amount of stimulus can save it, because the modern economy depends on the new; and the source of new—the creative will of the masculine gender—has been suppressed.
When a task can be recited, it can then be automated, and finally robotized. The reduction of job functions to recitations is occurring at an accelerating rate, with the resultant loss of jobs and decrease in service. Service representatives trained to recite answers instead of being equipped to handle questions have been replaced by robots. All information can eventually be recited and thus robotized. The law is recited. Medical protocols are recitations.
-ELDER GEORGE
are you high?
