Blacks for D.Trump how y’all feeling now? Trump signs Executive Order to revoke Civil Rights Era order to protect against discrimination in federal…

Do you support Trump’s policies?


  • Total voters
    66
Status
Not open for further replies.

Stop these faggits!

Jackie Reinhart is a lady
Registered

When you ignore the noise and look at his actual proposals, they make sense.​

From ChatGPT​

1. Immigration and Border Security

  • Border Wall: Trump continues to champion construction of a physical barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border. He argues that a wall (along with enhanced technology and manpower) is necessary to control illegal immigration and drug trafficking. Yes
  • “Remain in Mexico” and Related Policies: He has suggested reviving or toughening policies that require many asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their U.S. immigration proceedings are underway. YES
  • Deportation and Enforcement: Trump has signaled an intent to increase deportations for individuals without legal status and to expand resources for border enforcement.YES

2. Economy and Taxes

  • Tax Cuts: Trump has advocated for extending or expanding the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered individual and corporate tax rates. He often points to that legislation as a key economic achievement of his presidency and suggests additional cuts to spur growth.YES
  • Trade and Tariffs: Trump continues to promote an “America First” trade philosophy. He has hinted at new or higher tariffs (especially on products from China) as a means to protect U.S. industries and reduce the trade deficit.YES
  • Regulation: He emphasizes rolling back federal regulations to promote business growth, often citing deregulation efforts during his administration as a model.YES

3. Foreign Policy

  • “America First” Approach: Trump’s foreign policy outlook remains focused on minimizing U.S. involvement in “endless wars” overseas and renegotiating or withdrawing from international agreements he views as unfavorable to American interests.YES
  • China: Trump frequently cites competition with China—on trade, technology, and global influence—as a major focus. He advocates a tough stance, including tariffs and restrictions on Chinese firms operating in the U.S.YES
  • NATO and Alliances: He has criticized some traditional U.S. alliances if he deems partner nations are not contributing enough to mutual defense. Expect continued emphasis on allies spending more on defense.YES

4. Energy and Climate

  • Fossil Fuels: Trump has consistently supported expanded fossil fuel production (oil, natural gas, coal), rolling back restrictions that he views as hindrances to U.S. energy independence.NO
  • Renewable Energy Skepticism: While not outright opposed to renewables, he often criticizes policies that subsidize or mandate renewable energy, arguing they harm the economy or reliability of the energy grid.NO
  • Climate Change Policies: Trump has historically been critical of major international climate agreements like the Paris Agreement and suggests that overly strict regulations harm U.S. competitiveness.NO

5. Healthcare

  • Repealing or Replacing the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”): Trump continues to voice support for repealing the ACA’s key provisions. However, concrete details about a new plan—beyond promises of “better” and “cheaper” coverage—have been sparse in his recent public statements. NEUTRAL
  • Prescription Drug Costs: He has talked about reducing prescription drug prices by fostering competition and potential pricing reforms, although specifics are often general rather than tied to a detailed proposal.YES

6. Social Issues and Cultural Debates

  • Election Processes and Voting: Trump frequently calls for tighter voter ID requirements and other measures he says will ensure “election integrity,” though critics argue these measures may suppress voter turnout. YES
  • Education and “Parents’ Rights”: Trump has joined many in the Republican Party who advocate giving parents more control over school curricula and content, often citing concerns about instruction on race or gender issues. YES
  • Technology and Free Speech: Trump accuses major social media platforms of bias and censorship. He continues to advocate limits on legal protections for tech companies (e.g., changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act). YES

7. Law and Order

  • Criminal Justice: Trump typically takes a “tough on crime” stance, advocating strict sentencing and more resources for law enforcement. During his presidency he did back certain criminal justice reforms (like the First Step Act), though his recent rhetoric has largely focused on cracking down on violent crime. YES
  • Policing: He has rejected calls to reduce law enforcement funding, instead emphasizing increased police staffing and resources. YES

Important Caveats

  1. Not Official Policy: Since Trump is not in office, none of these positions are currently codified through federal action. They represent campaign promises or personal stances.
  2. Subject to Change: Campaign proposals can shift in response to political, economic, or global developments. If you’re looking for the most recent or detailed plans, you may wish to consult Trump’s official campaign communications or website.
  3. Context Matters: These policy positions are part of a broader debate and are met with a wide range of opinions from political opponents, independent analysts, and the general public.
For the latest and most specific information, it’s always a good idea to check:
  • Trump’s official campaign website or social media channels
  • Interviews and rallies, where he frequently lays out or revises policy views
  • Nonpartisan news sources and fact-checkers for context and analysis
Because the political climate can shift quickly—especially heading into the 2024 election—staying updated on Trump’s (and all candidates’) statements is essential if you want the most current snapshot of their policy platforms.
All that shit can walk because the snake bastard rolled back civil right s and all i see is red right now. Fuck anybody that voted for him and fuck all you undecided idiots that didnt vote
 

ghoststrike

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Is this the same Lions 15-1 account? If you notice the avatar is Dan Campbell.

It's the same troll with a new screen name. It previously trolled the board as @Skydove and was the OP of the thread about that scamming bitch Rhoda & the spirit brick. Damn near 20 years ago the OP was Acur. Most recently it's used names like the_male_feminist & Fuzzy McNutt.

Ok, so it's the $5 tits-suck chick from Youtube that got knocked up later. Got it.
 

^SpiderMan^

Mackin Arachnid
BGOL Investor
...no I'm not :D

Still think ChatGPT is a suitable source?...you know what don't bother, I've seen your bullshyt through here. All you'll do is talk about ANYTHING but the topic, so carry on.
You don't dispute that the information in my post is accurate. Your opinion on ChatGPT is irrelevant to the topic.
 

Non-StopJFK2TAB

Rising Star
Platinum Member
All that shit can walk because the snake bastard rolled back civil right s and all i see is red right now. Fuck anybody that voted for him and fuck all you undecided idiots that didnt vote
They didn’t roll back anything. They want you to accept your new-old-new position and then innovate your way back into their graces.

How badly do you want to be white? Do you want to devote the next 100 years trying to curry their favor? Is that your ancestors wildest dream?
 

Lexx Diamond

Art Lover ❤️ Sex Addict®™
Staff member
Wait. That's Acur?? I don't know. He doesn't sound the same.

It is quite possible the OP is of a consortium of trolling cunts. Either way the OP's IP's are a dead giveaway and all of those IP's are from Detroit. Some of those IP's matched IP's used by Acur. We need that hand verification but it seems like the OP doesn't have any Black folks around to use for such a ruse.
 

0utsyder

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
You don't dispute that the information in my post is accurate. Your opinion on ChatGPT is irrelevant to the topic.
source.gif
 

Yahawashi_Returns

BANNED TROLL
Registered
It is quite possible the OP is of a consortium of trolling cunts. Either way the OP's IP's are a dead giveaway and all of those IP's are from Detroit. Some of those IP's matched IP's used by Acur. We need that hand verification but it seems like the OP doesn't have any Black folks around to use for such a ruse.
I already told you that ain’t me.
 

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Worried about those Seats I see
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:


Vulnerable House Republicans warn leaders against cutting Obamacare
The group of centrists also said the party needed to be careful about deep cuts to social safety net programs.

Meredith Lee Hill

01/23/2025, 3:26pm ET

House Republicans in competitive districts warned GOP leaders Thursday: We could lose our seats if you gut Obamacare to pay for a massive border, energy and tax bill.

A group of about a dozen centrist Republicans delivered the message in a meeting with GOP Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) and other senior lawmakers, according to four Republicans familiar with the meeting who were granted anonymity to speak frankly. GOP members are already concerned that they’re poised to lose their trifecta and a swath of seats in the 2026 midterms — they worry GOP efforts to pare back the Affordable Care Act could pour fuel on the fire.


Centrists conveyed to leaders in the meeting that they needed to “learn the lessons” from the last GOP attempt to undercut the Affordable Care Act in 2017, according to one of the Republicans. The party went on to lose more than 40 House seats in the 2018 midterms.

Instead, they argued, Republicans needed to embrace the GOP’s role as the working class party. Leaders would counter that message by slashing programs working Americans rely on, they said. GOP lawmakers in the room included Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Young Kim (Calif.), David Valadao (Calif.), Andrew Garbarino (N.Y.), Tom Barrett (Mich.) and Don Bacon (Neb.).

And the group asserted that Republicans need to protect more than just Obamacare. A large swath of the GOP is discussing significant spending cuts, including to social safety net programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps. Centrists warned their colleagues not to pursue deep cuts to those programs, which benefit low-income Americans, according to the four Republicans.

Thursday’s meeting was part of the series of listening sessions GOP leaders are holding with members as they try to outline their massive party-line reconciliation package. They’re also trying to figure out how to stave off a government shutdown that would kick in on March 15 and lift the debt ceiling.

The conversation was a broad “temperature check” among the more centrist members on what sort of spending cuts they could support, according to another Republican familiar with the meeting. Some members indicated they were more open to securing funding cuts by rescinding unspent Covid-19 funds and clawing back money from Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act, including credits for electric vehicles.

Emmer’s team ticked through slides of possible cuts to “feel out problems,” according to another person familiar with the meeting. As they went down the list, it became clear there were still many points of disagreement.

“Almost everything is: ‘That’s a problem. That’s a problem,'” said one of the people who was in the room.
 

Stop these faggits!

Jackie Reinhart is a lady
Registered
They didn’t roll back anything. They want you to accept your new-old-new position and then innovate your way back into their graces.

How badly do you want to be white? Do you want to devote the next 100 years trying to curry their favor? Is that your ancestors wildest dream?
Your limey ass dont ever know what your talking about. Fuck you mean I want to be white ? You know what you on ignore e every thing you post irritates me. I hope your visa expires and ice comes for you next. You give cool brits like slick rick a bad name.
 

Maweriman

Star
Platinum Member
During the campaign Trump asked: "What do Blacks have to lose by voting for me?" The ones who voted for him just "phucked" around and found out: They just lost equal opportunities to secure Govt contracts! Without that law, Blacks do not have the hook-ups, connections that White contractors have.
Trump did not fool cerebral Blacks into voting for him who recognized a white supremacist/Klansman in a blue suit and red necktie -- instead of a white Klan robe and hood!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top