I don't understand your perspective.
Kang appeared in Ant-Man 3. That was his 1st appearance.
How was he "lame as fuck"? Because you didn't understand the ending of Ant Man 3?
Again, the 1st appearance of Thanos did not show him as a threat at all. At all.
Majors' personal issues derailed the plans so we can't compare what Kang was going to be vs that Thanos ended up being.
However if there was to be King Dynasty, then it is freaking obvious that Kang could not be "lame as fuck".
He would have a fucking "dynasty" dude.
Are you thinking?
Yeah from your usual responses in these threads I figured I'd have to break it down for you so I'm not surprised you don't understand
Kang appeared in ant man three and was defeated by ants and ant man the world's least threatening and cared for superhero lol then in the lame as CGI after credit scene we get the Kang dynasty which wasn't well executed and no one cared. Whatever they did to make Kang come off as a threat failed miserably and the general comic book fandom and especially the casuals responded in kind. Majors was the wrong choice for Kang and the writers did a terrible job of setting him up or making him seem dangerous, I couldn't even finish garbage ass Loki season 2 because of all the corny Jonathan majors acting.
On the flipside Thanos first appearance is ominous and created a sense of impending doom and mystery, they let's us know they were building to bigger things, then thanos was slowly built up as a threat over several movies until we first see him on screen in all his glory, and that's besides the general visual of a giant purple alien beast vs a small overacting Jonathan majors.
the character in the comics is a major threat and if done right would have been great. Unfortunately they miscast Jonathan majors who is an okay at best actor and not threatening or intimidating in any way shape or form, the best thing that ever happened to the MCU was Jonathan majors getting arrested and destroying all future plans of what was already shaping up to be the worst phase of the MCU and will be remembered as a complete failure.
Tent
(However if there was to be King Dynasty, then it is freaking obvious that Kang
could not be "lame as fuck".
He would have a fucking "dynasty" dude)
I don't even know what you could mean by this lol it's thoughts like this that makes me not want to speak about or debate people on here lmao your argument was of he had a dynasty he could not be lame? LMFAO holy shit.
It was presented lame, just because you say something is a dynasty does not make it a well executed or set up story beat, up until it's unfortunate/fortunate ending the set up for kamg had been poorly thought out at best and completely idiotic at its Worst.
Tent
(How was he "lame as fuck"? Because you didn't understand the ending of Ant Man 3?)
What didn't I understand about this critically lambasted embarrassment of a movie? Lmao what do you think that this movie was somehow deep or Difficult to understand vs incredibly stupid, sloppily written and full of glaring plot holes? Lol
I'm not going back and forth with anyone who defends ant man 3 lol