Buzz Aldrin Reveals Existence of Monolith on Mars Moon

Damn,

IF this wasn't C-SPAN, IF this wasn't Aldrin himself, I would simply have just been amused. [Skeptic]]I need to see the full program in its' entirety, to make sure it's not a mock for/from some movie or something.[/Skeptic]

Got me wanting to visit an observatory.

It would be REALLY incredible IF John Von Neumann & Arthur Clarke got it right? (see: Von Nuemann probe)

Some backstory, F.Y.I.
The 'Monolith' in Clarke's '2001 Odyssey' is an adaptation of the 'Von Nuemann probe' concept, theorized by John Von Neumann (mathemetician/physicist). Which Clarke used to engender scientific realism as a basis for the 'characters' and plots in his books (Space Odyssey series).


JG
[/QUOT


Fact dressed up as fiction has always been one way to get the message out to the masses. It' like when comedians say something serious then dress it up in comedy.
 
just finished watchin that moon risin shit and u definitly should made another thread for it
good shit
 
Wtf moon rising is set to private on youtube and they trying to get ppl to rent it thru youtube
 
Wow! Buzz is a serious Obama man. Why does that trouble me though?

A lot of current and former astronauts are cursing Obama bigtime.

Obama is trying to kill manned space flight for NASA.

With the Obama plans we will have to pay the Russians $300 million per person to travel on a Soyuz to space.

Obama plan benefits the Russsian space program and fucks NASA up.

Guys like Neil Armstrong are now going after Obama.

http://papundits.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/cartoon-giant-leap-backwards-alg-500.jpg

cartoon-giant-leap-backwards-alg-500.jpg
 
Last edited:
So what, there's a naturally formed monolith shaped geological structure, or, more likely, what appears to be from a distance on the Martian moon. Big deal.
 
MK,

Thanks for the videos post . . . but I can't access them. Says that the "videos are private"

Any thoughts/fixes.

JG

Don't know why he changed it. All I can say is friend the guy so you can see the movie. Sorry about that.


Looks like T.O.R. found an open posting of the Moon Rising movie on youtube tho.
 
Last edited:
So what, there's a naturally formed monolith shaped geological structure, or, more likely, what appears to be from a distance on the Martian moon. Big deal.

Only thing is ... these type of formations, when formed on the Earth, are the result of water and wind erosion. Neither of that happens in the vacuum of space. The anomaly may be natural, and that's just as good a reason to examine it more closely to answer how it was formed.
 
So what, there's a naturally formed monolith shaped geological structure, or, more likely, what appears to be from a distance on the Martian moon. Big deal.


Yeah BUT . . . (D-Nice had a similar reaction, my response below from thread page 1)


"I get that, and agree generally regarding the (un)impressive-ness of geological anomalies. It's however not fruitful, scientifically, to lump terrestrially distinct phenomenon together with generalities. The astrophysical events that explain the craters didn't provoke the discussion because those are understood and expected. Whereas, the feature described as the Phobos monolith cannot be accounted for with the same explanation. I don't see a pyramid (which, is a naturally occurring feature . . . under the 'right' conditions). Asteroids and comets impacting a rock like structure can produce (and often do) many shapes depending on the elemental composition, angle of impact, shearing, etc.

However, what I see is an isolated towering rectangular protrusion, that seems to be fairly well formed for an image captured at a distance. I wouldn't ascribe any technological capability to it. BUT a rule of thumb in the physical & natural sciences is nature REPEATS itself. And I see no other similar objects, hence being anomalous. I said all that to say all anomalies are not created equal . . . or are equal I should say. In which case there could be several explanations for this. Perhaps there are many more buried deeper, and THIS one is just tall enough to pierce the surface.

If the photo is genuine, I wouldn't be too quick to glossed over it, because the greater question, how or what event took place that resulted in its' existence, isn't easily explained away by the same things that produce the impact craters. That thing is bizarre."

JG
 
man has not went to moon you jack azz!

man could not survive the travel thru the Van Allen radiation belt.In one hour you would be dead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt



But instead all the guessing.Just go to the Palomar Observatory in CA.

Their telescope can see 4 billion light years away.

http://www.astro.caltech.edu/palomar/


4 billion light years = 3.78421136 × 1025 meters
this wiki link does not prove your point. it doesn't say that the van allen belts would prevent manned space travel.
 
Back
Top