Cancel Student Debt and Eliminate Tuition- Elizabeth Warren’s Higher Education Plan

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Elizabeth Warren releases sweeping student debt cancellation and free college plan
By MJ Lee and Katie Lobosco, CNN
Mon April 22, 2019

Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Monday proposed eliminating the student loan debts of tens of millions of Americans and making all public colleges tuition-free, staking out an ambitious stance on one of the central policy debates of the 2020 Democratic primary.

Student debt and college affordability have become a key dividing line in the Democratic race, between more progressive candidates who favor sweeping new tuition and student-loan benefits and others who support more incremental adjustments to the way Americans pay for education.

Warren's new plan would forgive $50,000 in student loans for Americans in households earning less than $100,000 a year. According to analysis provided by her campaign, that would provide immediate relief to more than 95% of the 45 million Americans with student debt. The Massachusetts Democrat and 2020 contender is also calling for a drastic increase in federal spending on higher education that would make tuition and fees free for all students at two- and four-year public colleges and expand grants for lower-income and minority students to cover costs like housing, food, books and child care.

The campaign estimates that the plan would cost $1.25 trillion over 10 years.

The revenue from Warren's wealth tax proposal -- a 2% tax on wealth above $50 million and a 3% tax on wealth above $1 billion -- would pay for her newest proposal, her campaign said. According to details shared by her campaign, the massive debt cancellation and free college plan additionally asks states to chip in to cover the cost of tuition and fees. Warren has also said her universal child care proposal would be paid for by her wealth tax.

Asked about connecting the viability of her new proposal to another, Warren insisted that there is broad support for the idea of taxing the ultra-rich.

"For two cents on the dollar, we could pay for universal child care, universal pre-K, universal college and knock back the student loan debt burden for about 43 million Americans and still have nearly, just short, of $1 trillion leftover," Warren said in an interview with CNN. "It tells you how badly out of whack our economy is right now."

Warren -- a co-sponsor of Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2017 legislation that would make four-year public colleges tuition-free for some students -- said her new plan is "bigger" and "goes further" than Sanders', who is also vying for the Democratic nomination.

"It covers more and it addresses both the access question of going to college and the problem of the debt burden for our students," she said.

The former college dropout and law professor described the proposal as one of the most "personally important" of her growing White House platform.

"I got married at 19 and I took a job answering phones and I thought that was going to be my whole life. And the fact that there was a commuter college about 45 minutes away that I could pay for on a part-time waitressing job -- you know, it opened a door," said Warren, who has made the story a fixture of her stump speech. "It all started with that chance in college."

"Free college" has become a popular progressive rallying cry in recent years, with Sanders helping bring the idea mainstream during his 2016 presidential campaign. Hillary Clinton also ran on a tuition-free proposal for low-and middle-income students, and several states, including New York, Oregon, Tennessee and Rhode Island have recently implemented some form of a tuition-free plan. Public polls have shown broad support for tuition-free colleges and making higher education more affordable.

But Warren's proposal of forgiving outstanding student debt goes a significant step further than previous Democratic policy plans. (One bill introduced in Congress last year did call for using revenue from President Donald Trump's tax cuts to cancel all student loans, but it was largely viewed as a political rebuttal to the President and gained little traction in Congress.)

Warren's plan would offer debt relief based on income. Households that make less than $100,000 a year would get $50,000 in loan cancellation, with the amount of relief getting gradually smaller as income level goes up, with households that make more than $250,000 not eligible for any debt relief.

Altogether, it would wipe out all student debt -- including both federal and private loans -- for more than 75% of Americans with outstanding loans, according to analysis provided by Warren's campaign.

The "Universal Free College" portion of Warren's plan makes public college free for everyone, regardless of their finances. While Sanders' 2015 proposal offered free tuition for everyone, a 2017 bill scaled back eligibility based on income -- language built on a compromise proposal agreed on between Sanders and Clinton during the 2016 election.

Warren's proposal also makes significant investments to help lower-income and minority students afford the non-tuition costs associated with attending college. She wants to invest an additional $100 billion in Pell grants over the next 10 years, making them available to more students and increasing the size of the award. Currently, the lowest-income students are eligible to receive about $6,200 a year from the federal Pell program.

"It's not just paying the tuition. It's how they pay for books," Warren told CNN. "It's how they pay for the expenses of having a baby taken care of if they already have a child at home or being able to cover commuting expenses or maybe it's a chance to live in a dorm and have the kind of college experience that other kids can."

There is broad support among the Democratic presidential candidates for making college more affordable, though they differ on how to do so. Sens. Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, and Kirsten Gillibrand -- along with Warren -- are all co-sponsors of Sen. Brian Schatz's Debt-Free College Act. It would establish a matching grant to states that commit to helping students pay for the full cost of attendance without taking out loans.

But other candidates -- including Sen. Amy Klobuchar and South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg -- have stopped short of embracing a free-college platform.

"I am not for free four-year college for all, no," Klobuchar said at a CNN town hall in February, though she noted she would support making community colleges free.

Buttigieg has argued that free college would result in those who earn less because they didn't go to college subsidizing those who did go to college and tend to enter higher-paying careers. But he has called for expanding Pell grants and incentivizing states to invest more money in higher education.

Asked whether she agrees with Buttigieg's analysis, Warren answered: "No."

"The way we build a future where everyone's got a chance is we start out by investing in their education," Warren said.

Since announcing an exploratory campaign on New Year's Eve, Warren has released sweeping policy proposals at a rapid clip. They include the wealth tax, universal child care and a proposal to break up the biggest tech companies.

Warren is unapologetic about her heavy focus on policy.

"Look. Policy is personal. It touches people's lives," she said. "People come up to me in tears talking about their student loan debt. People talk to me about their fear that healthcare is going to be taken away. People talk to me about drugs, prescription drugs that they take that they simply can't afford. The way we fixed these problems? It's with policy. It's policy that touches where people live."
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
As someone who went to public college to avoid massive debt, I've always felt that people who were wealthier than me and more able to risk taking debt on unfairly benefited from these policies. Ultimately, the debt system is unfair and it should be wiped out but I always saw this as more beneficial to upper-income people, even when considering 2 out of 3 people don't go to college at all.

However, it seems the facts say that the beneficiaries of this are not disproportionately white and well-off as I assumed.

Here’s who would benefit from Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to cancel student debt
Annie Nova, John W. Schoen, CNBC

More than 95% of student loan borrowers would see at least some of their debt canceled under Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s new higher education proposal released on Monday.

That’s the finding in an analysis of the plan by leading experts on student loan debt.

The Massachusetts senator outlined her proposal in a Medium post on Monday. “I’m calling for something truly transformational — the cancellation of up to $50,000 in student loan debt for 42 million Americans,” she wrote.

SD.1555942416598.png


Under Warren’s plan, all but 5% of borrowers would walk away from at least a portion of their student debt. Meanwhile, more than 75% of student loan borrowers would have all of their debt erased.

Borrowers need not apply for the relief: The government would automatically cancel the debt of eligible borrowers, using already available income and loan data.

According to the researchers’ analysis, Warren’s proposal would greatly benefit borrowers with the least ability to repay their loans. (By 2023, nearly 40% of borrowers are expected to default on their student loans, an event that only increases their debt and devastates their credit.)

Borrowers with household incomes under $100,000 would be eligible to have $50,000 of their student debt scrubbed.

People who earn between $100,000 and $250,000 would be eligible for less forgiveness. For example, Warren writes, “a person with household income of $130,000 gets $40,000 in cancellation, while a person with household income of $160,000 gets $30,000 in cancellation.”

And those who earn more than $250,000 would not be eligible for any debt forgiveness.

The researchers of the analysis also found that Warren’s proposal would reduce the racial wealth gap.

“Gains to net worth for households of color would be meaningful under the policy,” the authors write, adding that median wealth would rise by $6,741 for black households and $3,280 for Latino households.

The benefits would especially help those with less education.

For example, 87% of those with just an associate’s degree would have all of their debt cancelled, compared with 47% of those with a master’s degree.


“The time for half-measures is over,” Warren writes. “My broad cancellation plan is a real solution to our student debt crisis. It helps millions of families and removes a weight that’s holding back our economy.”



^^^^

The article is worth clicking for a graph on the bolded section on the racial gap that could not be copied over.
 

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
Who pays for free college? I’ll be damned if I pay more taxes for that shit

You'd rather pay for more jails? And live in a less productive and less competitive society?

And, your court side flossing aside, who is paying? You probably aren't getting hit with that wealth tax. If you are, you and your 99% white counterparts have my sympathies but society as a whole benefits.
 

KA$H

GoldMember
BGOL Investor
That's a "build the wall" promise. That shit ain't happening....ever.

I'm here for it, but nah not happening
 

comment101

Rising Star
Platinum Member
She's actually the best candidate.

Absolutely but she won't win. She has a lot going against her especially ONE BIG FACTOR. She's a woman. It's different to vote women into congress than it is to vote for a female president. I'd vote for her though.
 

hardawayz16

Rising Star
Registered
You'd rather pay for more jails? And live in a less productive and less competitive society?

And, your court side flossing aside, who is paying? You probably aren't getting hit with that wealth tax. If you are, you and your 99% white counterparts have my sympathies but society as a whole benefits.

How would society benefit? Free college means regular jobs will eventually require masters and PHDs. Basic undergrad degree with non-stem major will be as worthless as a HS Diploma.
 

sharkbait28

Unionize & Prepare For Automation
International Member
She's actually the best candidate.

She's awesome and low key has the most robust, practical and forward thinking policy platform in the game. :yes:

Donate to her campaign if you haven't yet y'all.

If only she hadn't gotten caught up in that weird Native American narrative....they will use that to eliminate her from contention....shame

Only the dumb-dumbs give af about that fake controversy. But yeah she has an uphill battle given her lack of charisma and her professorial vibes.
 

thismybgolname

Rising Star
OG Investor
If only she hadn't gotten caught up in that weird Native American narrative....they will use that to eliminate her from contention....shame

She is the poster child for white folks claiming native heritage to get benefits in Oklahoma and so on.

More people that look like her in Oklahoma, getting native benefits than people that look like John Redcorn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 216

slewdem100

Rising Star
OG Investor
She's awesome and low key has the most robust, practical and forward thinking policy platform in the game. :yes:

Donate to her campaign if you haven't yet y'all.



Only the dumb-dumbs give af about that fake controversy. But yeah she has an uphill battle given her lack of charisma and her professorial vibes.
The number of so called dumb dumbs is not insignificant...remember, this is a short attention span society...to many she is just the lady who wants to be an Indian....overlook the dumb dumbs all you want....remember who the current President is
 

sharkbait28

Unionize & Prepare For Automation
International Member
The number of so called dumb dumbs is not insignificant...remember, this is a short attention span society...to many she is just the lady who wants to be an Indian....overlook the dumb dumbs all you want....remember who the current President is

She could have handled it better and made the mistake of playing into Trump's dumb abd dishonest game but realistically this sort of shit only animates folks dumb enough to be moved by Trumpism in the first place (who sang along to his Birther tune for example). It's a non issue but she needs to learn how to sidestep this stuff if she makes it out of the Dem primaries.
 

gene cisco

Not A BGOL Eunuch
BGOL Investor
Who pays for free college? I’ll be damned if I pay more taxes for that shit
Cut the military budget. All a candidate has to do is come out and say the U.S. isn't the world police and home comes first and that's where money will be spent. All these bases around the globe, money on bombs/equipment, and shit pissed away on Israel. :smh:

America basically running around the globe like :money: and comes back home like :( "I ain't got it!!!"
 

^SpiderMan^

Mackin Arachnid
BGOL Investor
Absolutely but she won't win. She has a lot going against her especially ONE BIG FACTOR. She's a woman. It's different to vote women into congress than it is to vote for a female president. I'd vote for her though.
If a black man can get it, a white woman definitely can get it. If she doesn't get it, it wont be solely because she is a woman.
 

MistaPhantastic

Rising Star
Platinum Member
This is partially a women's issue, as they have more student loan and unpaid college debt than men do.
I like Liz but I don't support this shit. Free health care, I'll pay for. We all need that.
Free college - nope. The way we learn is changing because of technology. Eventually college will be online and subsequently, free anyway.
I payed for mine; you pay for yours. I'm not paying for your education, and the alternative is not jail, either. That's a scare tactic.
The world is not fair. You are not special. I am not special. Grow up and be responsible. Take agency for your actions, be it college or criminal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cnc

Rembrandt Brown

Slider
Registered
If a black man can get it, a white woman definitely can get it. If she doesn't get it, it wont be solely because she is a woman.

It makes me just a little bit angry that people say that because it's so dumb.

The sad irony is they can speak it into reality-- Journalists have documented likely voters who voted for Hillary and are weary of supporting another woman because Hillary is every woman so if she lost because she's a woman the nominee should be a man so we can actually beat Trump.
 

comment101

Rising Star
Platinum Member
If a black man can get it, a white woman definitely can get it. If she doesn't get it, it wont be solely because she is a woman.

Yes, definitely. She's saying the right things too. I wish she'd get it and wipe off my student loans. First she has to secure the nomination. We all know the democrats are going to screw her in favor of Biden just like the screwed Bernie in favor of Hillary.
 

Quek9

K9
BGOL Investor
This alone buys my vote.

Fuck the BS. The extra money in all of our relative pockets would be great for us and the economy.
If she would extrapolate it further to cover college for us 100%, she would get the black vote but this racist country wouldn't go for it
 

jagu

Rising Star
Platinum Member
Nah... fuck that. I paid for mine and you younger dudes are gonna have to pay too. No free rides.
 

blackbull1970

The Black Bastard
Platinum Member
Cut the military budget. All a candidate has to do is come out and say the U.S. isn't the world police and home comes first and that's where money will be spent. All these bases around the globe, money on bombs/equipment, and shit pissed away on Israel. :smh:

America basically running around the globe like :money: and comes back home like :( "I ain't got it!!!"

Trump actually campaigned on that.....but he turned around and has done the opposite.
 

doggish_098

Rising Star
Registered
Nah... fuck that. I paid for mine and you younger dudes are gonna have to pay too. No free rides.
Had this convo with a dude at work. My parents weren’t rich they paid for what they could the rest I had to go to aunt sallie for. I ain’t for giving all these free education handouts
 
Top