Chadwick Boseman’s tragedy is America’s tragedy: In colorectal cancer hot spots, young men are dying at higher rates

Gemini

Rising Star
BGOL Investor








"For many young, healthy people like Carter, colon cancer was never on their radar because it is typically seen as a disease that affects older people. But since the 1990s, even as colorectal cancer rates have declined for people 50 and older, they have more than doubled among American adults under 50, according to the National Cancer Institute. By 2030, predicts a study published in April, colorectal cancer will be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in people aged 20 to 49. The reason behind the rise remains a mystery. "


 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Chadwick Boseman’s Death Sheds Light on the Racial Disparity in Colon Cancer Rates

Black people are more likely to get—and die from—colon cancer than white people.
By Sarah Jacoby



Last week Chadwick Boseman, star of films including Black Panther and Da 5 Bloods, died at the age of 43, just four years after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Boseman, who did not share his diagnosis with the public, worked on numerous projects while privately managing the disease and undergoing treatment.

“It is with immeasurable grief that we confirm the passing of Chadwick Boseman,” a statement posted to Boseman’s Twitter account reads. Boseman was diagnosed with stage III colon cancer in 2016, but it progressed to stage IV over the past few years. “A true fighter, Chadwick persevered through it all, and brought you many of the filmsyou have come to love so much…,” the statement continues. “All were filmed during and between countless surgeries and chemotherapy.”


We don’t have any details beyond the statement that tell how he was privately treating this serious health condition while continuing to work, including any screening he may have received. But we do know that colon cancer is a condition that disproportionately affects and disproportionately kills Black people.

Colon cancer typically starts as small clumps of cells (polyps) in the colon that aren’t cancerous, the Mayo Clinic explains. The polyps might not cause any symptoms—especially at first—but over time they may become cancerous.

As the polyps grow and as the cancer becomes more advanced, however, someone may be more likely to notice symptoms such as a change in bowel habits (like more diarrhea or constipation than usual for a prolonged period of time) or feeling as though they haven’t emptied their bowels completely after going to the bathroom. The exact symptoms a particular person will have depends on the size of their cancer and exactly where it is within the colon.

Catching colon cancer earlier may make it easier to treat in some cases, which is why screening is important. For people without any extra risk factors for colon cancer, screening generally begins between ages 45 and 50 with regular tests, which could include stool tests and/or colonoscopies, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS).

Some people are at a higher risk for colon cancer, though, and may need to start screening earlier or have it done more frequently. For instance, those with underlying intestinal conditions (like Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis) or who have a family history of colon cancer, as well as those with certain lifestyle risks (like smoking, excessive use of alcohol, and eating a low-fiber diet), may be considered to have a higher risk for colon cancer. Unfortunately, young people (under age 55) are increasingly developing and dying from colon cancer, SELF explained previously, although the risk for people in this age group is still low overall.

Boseman’s death brings new light to another risk factor that doesn’t get discussed often enough: Overall, the five-year survival rate for colorectal cancer (which includes both colon and rectal cancers) is about 65%, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). But despite an overall drop in colon cancer diagnoses and mortality rates in the past few decades, research suggests that Black people are still significantly more likely to get colon cancer and die from it than white people in the U.S.
For every 100,000 white men in 2017, the most recent year for which CDC data are available, there were 41 new cases of colorectal cancer and 16 deaths. But for every 100,000 Black men, there were 48 new cases and 22 deaths. Colon cancer is less common among women, but the racial disparity is still there. For every 100,000 white women in 2017, there were 32 new cases of colorectal cancer and 11 deaths; for every 100,000 Black women, there were 35 new cases and 15 deaths.


Due to these disparities, there’s been a recent push among experts to start screening Black people for colon cancer earlier than age 50. In fact, the American College of Gastroenterology recently updated its guidelines to recommend that Black people with an average risk for colon cancer begin screening at age 45 while people in other racial groups with an average risk can wait until age 50. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends those with average risk start at age 50 regardless of race, and the ACS recently updated its recommendations to say that those with average risk should start screening at age 45, regardless of race.

Experts don’t totally understand why there’s such a significant disparity here, but part of it may have to do with the way colon cancer presents in Black people compared with white people. Among Black people, the cancer is more likely to appear deeper in the colon, where it’s less likely to present with noticeable worrying symptoms (like bright red blood in the stool), compared with white people, research suggests.

But that’s only one piece of the issue, as significant barriers to accessing health care, appropriate screening, and adequate treatment are often prevalent in communities of color due to structural inequities. For instance, research indicates that health care providers generally do not recommend colorectal cancer screening often enough—especially to Black patients. And once diagnosed, Black patients are less likely to receive chemotherapy and surgery than white patients. There are multiple factors at play here, but unequal access to health care seems to be a driving force in the racial disparities in colon cancer treatment.

There are some things you can do to help reduce your own risks. As with any serious health condition, it’s important to be aware of the risk factors for colon cancer, to monitor yourself for any changes in your bathroom habits that could signal an issue, and to have open, honest discussions about your situation—and whether or not early screening is appropriate—with your doctor. Ultimately, though, it’s beyond any single individual’s power to change a broken system that continually fails to provide Black people and other communities of color with access to the knowledge, tools, and care they need to stay safe and healthy.


 

SmoothD

Smooth*****
BGOL Investor
I had put off my colonoscopy for years. Finally decided to have it done after Chadwick's passing.
All clear.
I will say this, you MUST take the day off to fast and drink that shitty medication to clean your system out, the day prior to the procedure.
Because when you go, is going to feel like Hoover Dam burst out if your ass.
 

Gemini

Rising Star
BGOL Investor












'Smart toilet' recognizes users and checks for signs of disease

A team at Stanford Medicine has developed gadgets that can be fitted in an ordinary toilet to screen urine and feces and upload the encrypted health data. The technology may be particularly useful for monitoring individuals at high risk of developing particular illnesses.

Many people will be uncomfortable with the idea of cameras and sensors in their toilet. It may seem like an unthinkable intrusion into what is perhaps the most private of all activities.

But a team of developers at Stanford Medicine in Stanford, CA, believe the clinical benefits of their “smart toilet” could be far-reaching.
They are also confident that their toilet can safeguard the privacy of users.

Technologies that continually monitor a person’s health play a growing role in healthcare.

Existing devices include smartwatches for collecting data, such as heart rate, and wearable blood pressure monitors. A skin patch is in development that tracks movement, heart rate, and breathing.

“The thing about a smart toilet, though, is that unlike wearables, you can’t take it off,” says Prof. Sanjiv Gambhir, chair of radiology at Stanford Medicine.

“Everyone uses the bathroom — there’s really no avoiding it — and that enhances its value as a disease-detecting device.”
High-risk patients

Prof. Gambhir believes the smart toilet may be particularly useful for monitoring people at high risk of conditions, such as prostate cancer, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and kidney failure, due to their genetic predispositions, for example.

His team developed a suite of gadgets that a person can fit in the bowl of an ordinary toilet. “It’s sort of like buying a bidet add-on that can be mounted right into your existing toilet,” he says. “And like a bidet, it has little extensions that carry out different purposes.”
In a pilot study, 21 volunteers tested the device over several months.

“The smart toilet is the perfect way to harness a source of data that’s typically ignored — and the user doesn’t have to do anything differently.”
– Prof. Sanjiv Gambhir

A motion sensor activates the smart toilet to start capturing video data, which are then digitally analyzed.

One of the smart toilet’s algorithms can detect abnormal urine flow rate, stream time, and volume, which could be useful for flagging prostate problems in men, for example.

Another gauges the consistency of fecal matter from the images and classifies it according to the Bristol stool chart. This is a standardized system used by clinicians worldwide to diagnose problems such as constipation, gut inflammation, and a lack of dietary fiber.

The smart toilet’s software can also identify color changes in urine using urinalysis strips (“dipstick tests”). It can detect 10 different markers, including the number of white blood cells and the levels of specific proteins in the urine. These biomarkers can provide early warnings of diseases, such as kidney infections and bladder cancer.

According to an article describing the technology in Nature Biomedical Engineering, the toilet’s abilities are “comparable to the performance of trained medical personnel.”
Integrated health data

Encrypted data from the toilet upload to a secure cloud server. In the future, this information could integrate with a healthcare provider’s record-keeping system for easy access by the individual’s doctor.

The Stanford team envisages an app sending a text alert to the healthcare team if the device detects an urgent issue, such as blood in someone’s urine.
Identifying who is using the toilet will be critical in a household of several people.

“The whole point is to provide precise, individualized health feedback, so we needed to make sure the toilet could discern between users,” Prof. Gambhir said. “To do so, we made a flush lever that reads fingerprints.”

However, in case someone uses the toilet and another flushes it, or if the toilet has an auto-flush system, a camera captures what the article calls “the distinctive features of their anoderm [skin tissue lining of the anus].”

“We know it seems weird, but as it turns out, your anal print is unique,” says Prof. Gambhir.

The recognition system is fully automatic, which means that no human will see the scans.

Despite the team’s best efforts to ensure user privacy and data confidentiality, the smart toilet may prove a hard sell.

A survey conducted by the researchers of 300 prospective users revealed that only 15% described themselves as “very comfortable” with the concept.
Smart toilet 2.0

The researchers’ plans include recruiting more volunteers to test the toilet and individualizing the available tests. A patient with diabetes might want glucose levels in their urine checked, for example.

In addition to urine tests, the team would also like to build into their toilet the ability to carry out molecular analysis of stool samples.
 

blackbull1970

The Black Bastard
Platinum Member
I turned 50 last year and the VA started hounding me to get pre-tested.

Took the pre-test back in May and got the results back in June and I am negative!!!

Still need to take pre-test yearly.

My pre-test was a stool specimen sample. They mailed the test stuff to me and I sent it back to the VA lab.
 

Hey Julian!

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I have a family history and I had my first one in December. All clear. Biggest hurdle was getting my insurance to approve it "early" since I'm only in my 40's. Brothas have to get over it and get checked out. It's very treatable if caught early.
I just see images of somebody sticking a finger up my ass and that shit as silly as it sounds makes me delay the shit. I just turned 40 this year and I’m gonna get it done. I blame “pause cultural” for this. :lol:
 
Last edited:

blackbull1970

The Black Bastard
Platinum Member
I just images of somebody stocking a finger up my ass and that shit as silly as it sounds makes me delay the shit. I just turned 40 this year and I’m gonna get it done. I blame “pause cultural” for this. :lol:

They are not gonna stick a finger up your ass.

They can do test without doing that.
 

illlit

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Damn they need to figure out what’s causing this.


Colon cancer like many other cancers are caused from consumption of meat. Red meat, pork and basically any other Dead animal consumed. Our bodies are not built to break down decaying, rotten dead animal contrary to popular belief. Those protien, biotics and chemicals in the animal transfers to us. What our body can't break down than converts to a form of sugar that than feeds tumor cells and the rest as we say is history....

We all need to change our diets and eating habits for real.
 

swoop1

Circle the wagons.
Registered
Colon cancer like many other cancers are caused from consumption of meat. Red meat, pork and basically any other Dead animal consumed. Our bodies are not built to break down decaying, rotten dead animal contrary to popular belief. Those protien, biotics and chemicals in the animal transfers to us. What our body can't break down than converts to a form of sugar that than feeds tumor cells and the rest as we say is history....

We all need to change our diets and eating habits for real.

I recently saw a video of a woman who claimed that we as humans should not be eating meat. She made the point that all the strongest animals in the wild are plant eaters. Like the elephants, gorilla’s and such, they are the biggest and strongest. I’m not saying I disagree with her, but why did we start eating meat in the first place then?
 

cnc

BGOL vet down since the “56k stay out!” days
BGOL Gold Member
Colonoscopy is no trouble at all. The cleanse alone was worth it.


Looked in the mirror after I finished my cleanse and thought I caught my third eye blinking...


That shit you drink to get the cleanse going….taste horrible and gets EVERYTHING out; I finally understood what Ice Cube meant in ‘Steady Mobbin’ when he said “comin out feelin about 10 pounds lighter…..
 
Last edited:

tajshan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I recently saw a video of a woman who claimed that we as humans should not be eating meat. She made the point that all the strongest animals in the wild are plant eaters. Like the elephants, gorilla’s and such, they are the biggest and strongest. I’m not saying I disagree with her, but why did we start eating meat in the first place then?
Probably back before we - "became 'human' to supplement protein we didn't get in plants at the time.

But yeah, I remember this post on this board where this broke down that anything in nature designed to eat meat can naturally catch it's prey.
 

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Detox and cleanse on a regular. It still amazes me the number of people who don’t take a shit on a daily basis. Diet plays a major role also, but if you not cleansing yourself out on a regular basis you are doing yourself a injustice
 

God-Of-War-420

Mr. Pool
Although very true we both know the real truth with the majority. We don't handle business until we can't stand the pain.
True story, I been to the doctor around 6 times as an adult lol who the fuck knows what's going on, by the time anything bothers me enough to get checked it'll probably be too late lol
 

ViCiouS

Rising Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
Colon cancer like many other cancers are caused from consumption of meat. Red meat, pork and basically any other Dead animal consumed. Our bodies are not built to break down decaying, rotten dead animal contrary to popular belief. Those protien, biotics and chemicals in the animal transfers to us. What our body can't break down than converts to a form of sugar that than feeds tumor cells and the rest as we say is history....

We all need to change our diets and eating habits for real.
maybe meat is carcinogenic...
what they feed / inject livestock to increase yield is definitely not good for us


I recently saw a video of a woman who claimed that we as humans should not be eating meat. She made the point that all the strongest animals in the wild are plant eaters. Like the elephants, gorilla’s and such, they are the biggest and strongest. I’m not saying I disagree with her, but why did we start eating meat in the first place then?




1. Gorillas are omnivores that in addition to plants, eat immense numbers of insects worms etc
2. Gorillas have much longer digestive tracks than humans - allowing them to break down plants much more efficiently than humans
 
Last edited:
Top