Because if the poll said AOC after her tour, the far left would be praising it.Why must you redirect and attack the “far left”? Is the poll not evidence of very shallow politics and easily swayed people?
Because if the poll said AOC after her tour, the far left would be praising it.Why must you redirect and attack the “far left”? Is the poll not evidence of very shallow politics and easily swayed people?
Because if the poll said AOC after her tour, the far left would be praising it.
You are very predictable.That actually happened today. (Thank god)
It is quite literally a separate conversation.
Funny how I can defend far left ideas on the merit but you can only deflect and attack.
You are very predictable.
You say a poll that shows voters persuaded by Booker doing something performative means voters are shallow and easily manipulated, but a poll showing voters persuaded by AOC doing something performative is to be praised.
cult member behavior
Only predictable because you create your own reality.
Who said the “poll showing voters persuaded by AOC doing something performative is to be praised”? I thanked the good Lord but never claimed any objective difference.
Psych ward behavior.
There isn't a difference.
You thanked god for one and called out the other.
Thus proving my point.
Who says AOC is not corrupt? She’s a politician.In 2005, I spent some time living in a desert town. There was a drought and we were happy when it rained. Then I moved to New Orleans and wished for less rain when Hurricane Katrina hit.
In one instance, I was happy to see water fall from the sky, in the other I dreaded it. An idiot might yell "Hypocrite!" But it is a totally different circumstance.
Yes, I am happy to see a good non-corrupt person succeed and I am not happy to see a bad corrupt person succeed. An idiot will say "There is no difference! You can't thank god for one and dread the other! You cult member!!!" But it is a totally different circumstance.