COVID, IVERMECTIN and VACCINE Information Full Feature Documentary

[therealjondoe]

Please cite the article exactly where it states this.

For treatment, at minimum, you need 10mg per 100 pounds. (1ml or 1cc of the liquid form is equal to 10mg of Ivermectin).
More if you are very sick. Which is 2-3x that dosage. What you may be reading is that in higher doses, which is is only for animals. Nut they still prescribe exactly the same for animal body weight is 0.2mg per kg.

So in the one case of the doctor in Ohio, he directed 30mg, ideal for someone like 300lbs and initially sick. I don't know the husband's weight, so can't say what exactly is recommended. But the doc is on it so he should know dosage recommendations.

As for @killagram he said he had Covid twice then the third time learned of Ivermectin and that's when he used it I believe. The last instance.

Bu the third time he should have some killer antibodies

 

[MistaPhantastic]

The discussion continues, Brother. Do what you feel is best for you. The article stated that in order for doses of Ivermectin to be effective enough to SARS-Cov-2, the dose would have to be 100 times greater than what's approved for humans, which could result in life-threatening side effects.

So then, I'm left with two questions. The first is, if this thing is unregulated, then how does one know that for example, pregnant women, people with auto-immune diseases, cancer or MS patients, elderly, severe diabetics or folks with a number of other pre-existing health conditions would not seriously be at risk for something going wrong and them dying if they take a high enough dosage of Ivermectin to inhibit Covid?

Second question, and I mean no disrespect, but you said you've had Covid three times and beat it- which I'm glad for. How are you coming down with Corona so much though?

I know this was directed at Killa but to answer your first question, read the studies I've posted from pubmed. That is a .gov site, not a .com There are others as well. Research data is published on .gov sites.
Overdosing any medicine is usually bad for you. A couple of Tylenol are great for aches and pains but if you take 16 at once you're done.
What you are doing is creating an if-then circumstance and asking for an answer to it. I've posted data that says that there have been tests that prove it effective at safe doses for humans.
I guess we're just going to ignore the research, eh?
What about the combination of hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin? All of these drugs are on the WHO's essential drug list...ALL OF THEM.
The truth is that most of you are still trying to make this political on the sly but its not. Ivermectin and other drugs should be the alternatives for immunocompromised people who can't get vaccinated. Proper testing will reveal if they can or can't use them.
The point is, science is showing there are several ways to fight this virus.
The FDA is not fighting remdesivir as a treatment because its expensive as hell and big pharma can make a lot of money off of it. Its FDA-approved. There's not a lot o talk about it because they don't want it to get in the way of vaccine promotion.
The point is, various re-purposed drugs seem to have some efficacy against covid-19.
Those are the facts. Yes, you should still get vaccinated but all of this attempt to shun what works is just political grandstanding.

 

[killagram]

The discussion continues, Brother. Do what you feel is best for you. The article stated that in order for doses of Ivermectin to be effective enough to SARS-Cov-2, the dose would have to be 100 times greater than what's approved for humans, which could result in life-threatening side effects.

So then, I'm left with two questions. The first is, if this thing is unregulated, then how does one know that for example, pregnant women, people with auto-immune diseases, cancer or MS patients, elderly, severe diabetics or folks with a number of other pre-existing health conditions would not seriously be at risk for something going wrong and them dying if they take a high enough dosage of Ivermectin to inhibit Covid?

Second question, and I mean no disrespect, but you said you've had Covid three times and beat it- which I'm glad for. How are you coming down with Corona so much though?

I be trapping and fucking hoes....I'm King of my City...been crowned a long time ago.. I also run one of the biggest black construction companies in my state.. I'm around 1000 people a week... Ivermectin Is like ibuprofen for 19....if you never used it..No disrespect brother...but you not qualified to talk about it.. brah

 

[Ryokurin]

I know this was directed at Killa but to answer your first question, read the studies I've posted from pubmed. That is a .gov site, not a .com There are others as well. Research data is published on .gov sites.
Overdosing any medicine is usually bad for you. A couple of Tylenol are great for aches and pains but if you take 16 at once you're done.
What you are doing is creating an if-then circumstance and asking for an answer to it. I've posted data that says that there have been tests that prove it effective at safe doses for humans.
I guess we're just going to ignore the research, eh?
What about the combination of hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin? All of these drugs are on the WHO's essential drug list...ALL OF THEM.
The truth is that most of you are still trying to make this political on the sly but its not. Ivermectin and other drugs should be the alternatives for immunocompromised people who can't get vaccinated. Proper testing will reveal if they can or can't use them.
The point is, science is showing there are several ways to fight this virus.
The FDA is not fighting remdesivir as a treatment because its expensive as hell and big pharma can make a lot of money off of it. Its FDA-approved. There's not a lot o talk about it because they don't want it to get in the way of vaccine promotion.
The point is, various re-purposed drugs seem to have some efficacy against covid-19.
Those are the facts. Yes, you should still get vaccinated but all of this attempt to shun what works is just political grandstanding.

You have one test that proved it effective. A test that has a lot of flaws and questions. No other tests has confirmed it. We just went though this last year with Chloroquine, and almost no one is talking about that now. Since this will likely still be going on this time next year what will it be next?

Your whole basis is from two guys who aren't really doctors, who's promoting a guy as the father of mRNA when in reality he wrote some papers on it 30 years ago when the technology was brand new. They insist he says to never take it under any circumstances, when he's actually has taken it and has said that because it's in short supply it should be given to the immunocompromised first.

Show us more than one test that proves it's effective. Actual data, not "we gave it to these people and they didn't die". And along with that show us actual proof that mRNA is as deadly as it's claimed, or all the various doomsday claims are actually happening. It shouldn't be too hard half of America has at least one dose, we should have concrete numbers now, not just "I know someone who knows someone" anecdotes.

The only people making it political are the people who are growing more and more frustrated because for the first time in their life they can't say "oh that happens to other people, not me".

 

[killagram]

Bu the third time he should have some killer antibodies

Nope...every variant Is different...I have had every variant thus far...it seems as if 5 to 6 months later...natural immunity wanes. Folk

 

[killagram]

If you don't @ their names, they won't see this.

I got a whole hammer..and gone whack they ass in the head... cause I don't like no bitch ass nigga.. show up...I'm gone beat they drawls in they ass....til they throw up... kinsfolk

 

[killagram]

You have one test that proved it effective. A test that has a lot of flaws and questions. No other tests has confirmed it. We just went though this last year with Chloroquine, and almost no one is talking about that now. Since this will likely still be going on this time next year what will it be next?

Your whole basis is from two guys who aren't really doctors, who's promoting a guy as the father of mRNA when in reality he wrote some papers on it 30 years ago when the technology was brand new. They insist he says to never take it under any circumstances, when he's actually has taken it and has said that because it's in short supply it should be given to the immunocompromised first.

Show us more than one test that proves it's effective. Actual data, not "we gave it to these people and they didn't die". And along with that show us actual proof that mRNA is as deadly as it's claimed, or all the various doomsday claims are actually happening. It shouldn't be too hard half of America has at least one dose, we should have concrete numbers now, not just "I know someone who knows someone" anecdotes.

The only people making it political are the people who are growing more and more frustrated because for the first time in their life they can't say "oh that happens to other people, not me".

Ivermectin Is the way...the truth, and the light... All will be revealed in 2022...if y'all boys can make it...brah

 

[killagram]

You have one test that proved it effective. A test that has a lot of flaws and questions. No other tests has confirmed it. We just went though this last year with Chloroquine, and almost no one is talking about that now. Since this will likely still be going on this time next year what will it be next?

Your whole basis is from two guys who aren't really doctors, who's promoting a guy as the father of mRNA when in reality he wrote some papers on it 30 years ago when the technology was brand new. They insist he says to never take it under any circumstances, when he's actually has taken it and has said that because it's in short supply it should be given to the immunocompromised first.

Show us more than one test that proves it's effective. Actual data, not "we gave it to these people and they didn't die". And along with that show us actual proof that mRNA is as deadly as it's claimed, or all the various doomsday claims are actually happening. It shouldn't be too hard half of America has at least one dose, we should have concrete numbers now, not just "I know someone who knows someone" anecdotes.

The only people making it political are the people who are growing more and more frustrated because for the first time in their life they can't say "oh that happens to other people, not me".

Brah..and to be honest...I ain't proving shit...I don't care...long as me and Mines still alive..I don't care what none of y'all do...ain't no one gone suffer but you.. do what the fuck you want to do...this is just conversation...I drank ivermectin...you drank Robitussin...it's cool... brah

 

[Mixd]

For those that keep doubting and keep saying there's no evidence, if you care to click away from BGOL, can peruse...

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 266 studies

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 266 studies

c19ivermectin.com

Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 113 studies, 73 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups. FLCCC provides treatment recommendations

There's also

https://ivmmeta.com/

 

[respiration]

I be trapping and fucking hoes....I'm King of my City...been crowned a long time ago.. I also run one of the biggest black construction companies in my state.. I'm around 1000 people a week... Ivermectin Is like ibuprofen for 19....if you never used it..No disrespect brother...but you not qualified to talk about it.. brah

I'm always qualified to talk about things, brother, as are you and everyone else. That's what we do here. Discuss things. Respectfully, I asked my questions not to come at you, but because I was seeking to understand. I want to be clear about that.

You answered one of my questions. And @Mixd came through with the assist on that one as well.

My other question is open to you and to others who advocate Ivermectin.

 

[MistaPhantastic]

You have one test that proved it effective. A test that has a lot of flaws and questions. No other tests has confirmed it. We just went though this last year with Chloroquine, and almost no one is talking about that now. Since this will likely still be going on this time next year what will it be next?

Your whole basis is from two guys who aren't really doctors, who's promoting a guy as the father of mRNA when in reality he wrote some papers on it 30 years ago when the technology was brand new. They insist he says to never take it under any circumstances, when he's actually has taken it and has said that because it's in short supply it should be given to the immunocompromised first.

Show us more than one test that proves it's effective. Actual data, not "we gave it to these people and they didn't die". And along with that show us actual proof that mRNA is as deadly as it's claimed, or all the various doomsday claims are actually happening. It shouldn't be too hard half of America has at least one dose, we should have concrete numbers now, not just "I know someone who knows someone" anecdotes.

The only people making it political are the people who are growing more and more frustrated because for the first time in their life they can't say "oh that happens to other people, not me".

I have posted several studies. Do the research yourself.
I don't serve you or need to prove anything to you because what you think or believe is insignificant to me.
My "whole basis" is that there are other drugs out there used to treat covid that have been successful.
That is all.

And along with that show us actual proof that mRNA is as deadly as it's claimed, or all the various doomsday claims are actually happening. It shouldn't be too hard half of America has at least one dose, we should have concrete numbers now, not just "I know someone who knows someone" anecdotes.

You idiot, I'm vaccinated.
You have just shown proof of exactly what I was talking about when I referred to people trying to make it political.
I'm not anti-vaccine; I'm pro solution.
Go virtue-signal on another thread with your idiot friends that wait for the news to tell them what to think.

 

[therealjondoe]

Nope...every variant Is different...I have had every variant thus far...it seems as if 5 to 6 months later...natural immunity wanes. Folk

You had genomic sequencing done?

 

[Ryokurin]

I have posted several studies. Do the research yourself.
I don't serve you or need to prove anything to you because what you think or believe is insignificant to me.
My "whole basis" is that there are other drugs out there used to treat covid that have been successful.
That is all.

You idiot, I'm vaccinated.
You have just shown proof of exactly what I was talking about when I referred to people trying to make it political.
I'm not anti-vaccine; I'm pro solution.
Go virtue-signal on another thread with your idiot friends that wait for the news to tell them what to think.

And the studies you've posted are all variations from people who are actually referring to the same problematic test. Also did I say you were antivax? I told you exactly why people aren't going along with the "Big pharma just wants your money" argument and you don't want to accept it. That's fine. But don't put words in my mouth. No one's virtue signaling anything, and the only one name calling or being political is you.

 

[killagram]

And the studies you've posted are all variations from people who are actually referring to the same problematic test. Also did I say you were antivax? I told you exactly why people aren't going along with the "Big pharma just wants your money" argument and you don't want to accept it. That's fine. But don't put words in my mouth. No one's virtue signaling anything, and the only one name calling or being political is you.

You fuck wit the mectin..brah?

 

[killagram]

You had genomic sequencing done?

I ain't gone lie...I'm here for all the smoke..... That's why I'm here...need to call one of these bitch niggas on the phone...or see em in person...and show how I cut...brah

 

[killagram]

You had genomic sequencing done?

I want to rumble on a hoe...I'm past ivermectin and Saving...I'm bout that action....brah

 

[MistaPhantastic]

YOU SAID:

... And along with that show us actual proof that mRNA is as deadly as it's claimed, or all the various doomsday claims are actually happening. It shouldn't be too hard half of America has at least one dose, we should have concrete numbers now, not just "I know someone who knows someone" anecdotes.

You will not find anywhere in my history where I have ever said this. I approached the vaccine with caution, read as much as I could on it and its mechanisms and waited a bit to see if there were adverse effects and then I took it.
If you felt any kind of way from my post, its because of this quote from YOU. Don't back down from it. You said it, implying that I somehow believed that mRNA tech was deadly. Hell, I was one of the earlier posters on here to talk about mRNA vaccines.

Also hydroxychloroquine, when used with azithromycin has proven to be an effective drug cocktail. It was less successful on its own against covid.
There is research confirming this. Research it for yourself...or not. I don't care.
When people are dying, its amazing how quickly they shed their high horse attitudes. If you were on your death bed, I bet you'd be willing to try anything that might work once all other avenues have been exhausted rather than die virtue signaling. Keep on political grandstanding, though.
I beat covid-19 before there was a vaccine for it and still got vaccinated and am still prepared if thae vaccine fails me. I'm not worried about you or any other font on this site and what they think. Do you. I'mma do me.

 

[phanatic]

For those that keep doubting and keep saying there's no evidence, if you care to click away from BGOL, can peruse...

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 266 studies

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of 266 studies

c19ivermectin.com

Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 113 studies, 73 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups. FLCCC provides treatment recommendations

There's also

https://ivmmeta.com/

Is this the horse kind or an actual pharma drug? Are you taking the ivermectin?

 

[killagram]

I'm always qualified to talk about things, brother, as are you and everyone else. That's what we do here. Discuss things. Respectfully, I asked my questions not to come at you, but because I was seeking to understand. I want to be clear about that.

You answered one of my questions. And @Mixd came through with the assist on that one as well.

My other question is open to you and to others who advocate Ivermectin.

Have you taken it? Have you had 19? If not explain to me..how you qualified? Other than listening to the news...or googling...no fire...just asking...brah

 

[phanatic]

I'm always qualified to talk about things, brother, as are you and everyone else. That's what we do here. Discuss things. Respectfully, I asked my questions not to come at you, but because I was seeking to understand. I want to be clear about that.

You answered one of my questions. And @Mixd came through with the assist on that one as well.

My other question is open to you and to others who advocate Ivermectin.

I don't think you are using "qualified" in the correct sense. Reading some websites or confirming an existing bias doesn't make you qualified. Unless I'm being a total dick, and you've been studying a field of science for years.

 

[respiration]

Have you taken it? Have you had 19? If not explain to me..how you qualified? Other than listening to the news...or googling...no fire...just asking...brah

No brother. I have not had Covid and I haven't taken Ivermectin. I've had close fam get Covid but not myself. That's why I asked YOU the questions I did. Because you have had Covid and know a lot about Ivermectin and could drop some knowledge my way on the subject. I'm here to share my perspective but I'm also here to learn. I don't do subliminals. I hate motherfuckers who do that. I don't know if you are reading more into my questions than what I asked. But I don't do the signifying shit, family. I come in peace.

I don't think you are using "qualified" in the correct sense. Reading some websites or confirming an existing bias doesn't make you qualified. Unless I'm being a total dick, and you've been studying a field of science for years.

Respectfully, I was using it in the correct sense. If my intent was to troll or to tear someone down it would be one thing. Killa never came at me and I wasn't coming at him (like some of these cats on here have done). I regard him as my brother. This space called BGOL is a place of discourse, debate, sharing of ideas... and hopefully mutual learning.

Furthermore, I have a viewpoint on Ivermectin and vaccines but not one that is black and white. I don't do confirmation bias. That's why I engage others with differing perspectives and experiences.

 

[respiration]

Please cite the article exactly where it states this.

For treatment, at minimum, you need 10mg per 100 pounds. (1ml or 1cc of the liquid form is equal to 10mg of Ivermectin).
More if you are very sick. Which is 2-3x that dosage. What you may be reading is that in higher doses, which is is only for animals. Nut they still prescribe exactly the same for animal body weight is 0.2mg per kg.

So in the one case of the doctor in Ohio, he directed 30mg, ideal for someone like 300lbs and initially sick. I don't know the husband's weight, so can't say what exactly is recommended. But the doc is on it so he should know dosage recommendations.

As for @killagram he said he had Covid twice then the third time learned of Ivermectin and that's when he used it I believe. The last instance.

It was in my response to you in the article I linked to, in bold letters in red.

But people have clung to the idea that ivermectin can treat COVID after a study early in the pandemic suggested that it disrupted SARS-CoV-2’s ability to infect cells. What’s often overlooked is that study was limited to cells in Petri dishes. What’s more, when the NIH looked into it, the agency found that to achieve the ivermectin’s reported disruptive effects, the dose would have to be 100-times greater than what’s currently approved in humans. At those levels, the side-effects would likely be serious. The FDA has pleaded with people not to take ivermectin for COVID.

Judge’s order requiring hospital to give COVID patient ivermectin called “unethical”

“If I were these doctors, I simply wouldn’t do it.”…

arstechnica.com

 

[killagram]

No brother. I have not had Covid and I haven't taken Ivermectin. I've had close fam get Covid but not myself. That's why I asked YOU the questions I did. Because you have had Covid and know a lot about Ivermectin and could drop some knowledge my way on the subject. I'm here to share my perspective but I'm also here to learn. I don't do subliminals. I hate motherfuckers who do that. I don't know if you are reading more into my questions than what I asked. But I don't do the signifying shit, family. I come in peace.



Respectfully, I was using it in the correct sense. If my intent was to troll or to tear someone down it would be one thing. Killa never came at me and I wasn't coming at him (like some of these cats on here have done). I regard him as my brother. This space called BGOL is a place of discourse, debate, sharing of ideas... and hopefully mutual learning.

Furthermore, I have a viewpoint on Ivermectin and vaccines but not one that is black and white. I don't do confirmation bias. That's why I engage others with differing perspectives and experiences.

Ivermectin works...no bullshit... get a bottle for shits and giggles...trust me..it's God in a bottle...brah

 

[respiration]

I know this was directed at Killa but to answer your first question, read the studies I've posted from pubmed. That is a .gov site, not a .com There are others as well. Research data is published on .gov sites.
Overdosing any medicine is usually bad for you. A couple of Tylenol are great for aches and pains but if you take 16 at once you're done.
What you are doing is creating an if-then circumstance and asking for an answer to it. I've posted data that says that there have been tests that prove it effective at safe doses for humans.
I guess we're just going to ignore the research, eh?
What about the combination of hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin? All of these drugs are on the WHO's essential drug list...ALL OF THEM.
The truth is that most of you are still trying to make this political on the sly but its not. Ivermectin and other drugs should be the alternatives for immunocompromised people who can't get vaccinated. Proper testing will reveal if they can or can't use them.
The point is, science is showing there are several ways to fight this virus.
The FDA is not fighting remdesivir as a treatment because its expensive as hell and big pharma can make a lot of money off of it. Its FDA-approved. There's not a lot o talk about it because they don't want it to get in the way of vaccine promotion.
The point is, various re-purposed drugs seem to have some efficacy against covid-19.
Those are the facts. Yes, you should still get vaccinated but all of this attempt to shun what works is just political grandstanding.

Just got home from band practice and am just now seeing this post.

I haven't seen all of this thread, but sure, I'd be glad check out the studies you posted. If you have time, it would be helpful if you would quote some of them in a response, seeing as this is a 15 page thread.

Also, the article I posted stated that according to the NIH, in order for Ivermectin to stop Covid it would have to be taken in much larger doses than are recommended for human beings. So then IF what that article says is true, then that would mean that one would have to overdose on it in order to have it be effective.

On the other side, is @killagram who has testified that he has taken Ivermectin himself, been saved by it and has given it to a score of other people and prevented them from dying from Covid. IMO, both sides are worth considering.

 

[Mixd]

It was in my response to you in the article I linked to, in bold letters in red.

That's where they lie to the public. My bad didn't catch that.

Ivermectin, as I've stated, 10mg per 100lbs
Which is 1ml of the injectable (which one should only take orally), is nothing.

I've taken it. My whole immediate fam has done two rounds. Once for 3 days of Covid while I had it. After two weeks, took higher doses for 5 days after following the FLCCC protocols, as I found out I under dosed myself. And took it the second time to get rid of remnants of Covid. Now they're gone as of the 3rd day taking it. That was two weeks ago.

I feel like I'm back. I started brisk walking/jogging again today. Walked 3 miles yesterday. Ran and walked 5 miles today.

So yeah fuck Covid. Ivermectin works.
And not at 100x to kill Covid. I posted sites that collect all studies of Covid data. Showing the effectiveness.

The media is spewing lies.
Will be the only thing that will save many lives.

 

[killagram]

Just got home from band practice and am just now seeing this post.

I haven't seen all of this thread, but sure, I'd be glad check out the studies you posted. If you have time, it would be helpful if you would quote some of them in a response, seeing as this is a 15 page thread.

Also, the article I posted stated that according to the NIH, in order for Ivermectin to stop Covid it would have to be taken in much larger doses than are recommended for human beings. So then IF what that article says is true, then that would mean that one would have to overdose on it in order to have it be effective.

On the other side, is @killagram who has testified that he has taken Ivermectin himself, been saved by it and has given it to a score of other people and prevented them from dying from Covid. IMO, both sides are worth considering.

If you got the vaccination...this should be a unstoppable combination... ivermectin is enough by itself...if you don't use it...it will be a conversation for years and years to come... grandchildren night time stories...jackk

 

[respiration]

That's where they lie to the public. My bad didn't catch that.

Ivermectin, as I've stated, 10mg per 100lbs
Which is 1ml of the injectable (which one should only take orally), is nothing.

I've taken it. My whole immediate fam has done two rounds. Once for 3 days of Covid while I had it. After two weeks, took higher doses for 5 days after following the FLCCC protocols, as I found out I under dosed myself. And took it the second time to get rid of remnants of Covid. Now they're gone as of the 3rd day taking it. That was two weeks ago.

I feel like I'm back. I started brisk walking/jogging again today. Walked 3 miles yesterday. Ran and walked 5 miles today.

So yeah fuck Covid. Ivermectin works.
And not at 100x to kill Covid. I posted sites that collect all studies of Covid data. Showing the effectiveness.

The media is spewing lies.
Will be the only thing that will save many lives.

Appreciate your perspective.

 

[respiration]

If you got the vaccination...this should be a unstoppable combination... ivermectin is enough by itself...if you don't use it...it will be a conversation for years and years to come... grandchildren night time stories...jackk

Now THAT'S interesting. Food for thought.

 

[Mixd]

Is this the horse kind or an actual pharma drug? Are you taking the ivermectin?

That's the actual prescribed drug from a doctor. Those are doctor results from usage.

The media will over emphasize that this med is for horses and all the nonsense because it was first invented for that purpose. But for decades now has been approved and prescribed for humans. It has been given over 3 billion times globally over the past 50 years.

Yes I've taken it twice, once for 3 days while I had Covid and then two weeks later taken for 5 days. This is following protocols on flccc.net website which a group doctors there advise about its use.

 

[Mixd]

More stats

Global adoption of COVID-19 early treatments

Global adoption of COVID-19 early treatments

ivmstatus.com

Global ivermectin adoption for COVID-19: 30%

​

Ivermectin effectiveness from all studies

	Studies	Prophylaxis	Early treatment	Late treatment	Patients
All studies	63	86% [75‑92%]	72% [55‑82%]	40% [24‑52%]	26,422
Peer-reviewed	44	86% [73‑92%]	75% [61‑84%]	43% [21‑59%]	17,082
RCTs	31	84% [25‑96%]	61% [46‑71%]	30% [2‑50%]	6,561

https://ivmmeta.com/

_____________________________________________
Then showing the effectiveness of HCQ

Total	281 studies	4,583 authors	407,627 patients
Positive effects	206 studies	3,285 authors	289,245 patients

Early treatment	64% improvement	RR 0.36 [0.28-0.46]
Late treatment	21% improvement	RR 0.79 [0.74-0.84]

https://hcqmeta.com/

_____________________________________________
Then the effectiveness of taking Melatonin at night while infected.

​

Melatonin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 44 studies

Melatonin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 44 studies

c19melatonin.com

Ivermectin is most effective, protocols call for Melatonin (nightly), so added it here in the comparison to HCQ to show its effectiveness as I was curious. Vit D is also critical. As is Zinc and Vit C of course.

 

[killagram]

More stats

Global adoption of COVID-19 early treatments

Global adoption of COVID-19 early treatments

ivmstatus.com

Global ivermectin adoption for COVID-19: 30%

​

Ivermectin effectiveness from all studies

	Studies	Prophylaxis	Early treatment	Late treatment	Patients
All studies	63	86% [75‑92%]	72% [55‑82%]	40% [24‑52%]	26,422
Peer-reviewed	44	86% [73‑92%]	75% [61‑84%]	43% [21‑59%]	17,082
RCTs	31	84% [25‑96%]	61% [46‑71%]	30% [2‑50%]	6,561

https://ivmmeta.com/

_____________________________________________
Then showing the effectiveness of HCQ

Total	281 studies	4,583 authors	407,627 patients
Positive effects	206 studies	3,285 authors	289,245 patients

Early treatment	64% improvement	RR 0.36 [0.28-0.46]
Late treatment	21% improvement	RR 0.79 [0.74-0.84]

https://hcqmeta.com/

_____________________________________________
Then the effectiveness of taking Melatonin at night while infected.

​

Melatonin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 44 studies

Melatonin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 44 studies

c19melatonin.com

Ivermectin is most effective, protocols call for Melatonin (nightly), so added it here in the comparison to HCQ to show its effectiveness as I was curious. Vit D is also critical. As is Zinc and Vit C of course.

Brah...you holding real classes in here...you a professa of the class..jackk

 

[unknownsoldier]

Ivermectin is made by Merck. They are not making any money because they don't have a vaccine. Where are you getting this dumb shit from?

​

I have some, its made by Edenbridgdge Pharmaceuticals. Not Merck, get your info from real life & not dumb ass tweets for propaganda. The drug is generic, that means more than one company makes it fam.

 

[doe moe]

Judge orders Ohio hospital to treat Covid patient with ivermectin

The FDA actively discourages the use of ivermectin to treat Covid-19 patients.

www.nbcnews.com

Judge orders Ohio hospital to treat Covid patient with ivermectin


Sept. 1, 2021, 4:00 PM EDT / Updated Sept. 1, 2021, 4:42 PM EDT
By Ben Kesslen

A Ohio judge ordered a hospital to give the horse drug ivermectin to a Covid-19 patient last month despite the doctors’ protest.

The Butler County judge said in an Aug. 23 ruling that West Chester Hospital must fulfill the patient's wife's request and administer the drug prescribed to Jeffrey Smith, 51, by a doctor unaffiliated with the hospital.

Ivermectin is a drug primarily used to deworm animals and has become the latest false cure for Covid-19. The FDA has not approved it and actively discourages its use to treat Covid-19 in humans.

Jeffrey Smith, of Hamilton, Ohio, tested positive for Covid-19 on July 9 and was admitted to the hospital in West Chester Township on July 15, the lawsuit his wife, Julie Smith, brought against the hospital said. On Aug. 1, Jeffrey Smith was intubated and placed on a ventilator. His condition worsened on Aug. 3 after his sedation drug ran out, which caused him to wake up and “rip the air tube out of his esophagus, disturbing and/or breaking the feeding tube, which caused food particles and toxins to escape into his lungs,” the complaint alleged.

By Aug. 19, Jeffrey Smith’s chances of survival dropped below 30 percent and the hospital had "exhausted its course of treatment and Covid-19 protocol in treating Jeffrey," the complaint said.

Julie Smith, looking for treatments to save her husband, requested the hospital administer ivermectin, which was prescribed to her husband by Fred Wagshul, an Ohio doctor who told the Ohio Capital Journal it was akin to “genocide” to not use the drug in Covid-19 treatment.

 

[donwuan]

I have some, its made by Edenbridgdge Pharmaceuticals. Not Merck, get your info from real life & not dumb ass tweets for propaganda. The drug is generic, that means more than one company makes it fam.

Stromectol is the brand name like Motrin. Ivermectin is the drug like Ibuprofen. Same shit. Their patent expired in 1996 but was extended to 2004. Most are generics but the drug is exactly the same. If anything is added it's not Ivermectin. Generic are always cheaper. It's no conspiracy theory.

Did the short bus just arrive and we 15 pages deep? Did you buy it from the same dude that sold Jack the magic beans? Clown.

 

[darth frosty]

Ivermectin works...no bullshit... get a bottle for shits and giggles...trust me..it's God in a bottle...brah

curious how do you store it?
just keep it in a cabinet or refrigerated?