Debate: Are WE sleeping on Trump like the Jewish people slept on... Trump running in 2024

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

How MAGA Took Back Murdochland​

As Rupert appears to be once again amplifying the Republican ex-president, his heir, Lachlan, is being courted by Trump.

BY LACHLAN CARTWRIGHT
Plus Icon






APRIL 11, 2024 5:00AM
Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch looking in a mirror as Trump places a red MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN hat on Murdoch's head

After essentially banning Trump from going live on its airwaves for two years, Rupert Murdoch's Fox News welcomed the ex-president back for a town hall event in January. ILLUSTRATION BY LÆMEUR
Just minutes before the White House Correspondents’ Dinner was set to get underway in April 2023, New York Post Editor-in-Chief Keith Poole and star columnist Miranda Devine were on a mission to find an extra seat. Inside the Washington Hilton hotel, the pair had a very special guest that they needed to accommodate and their table was oversubscribed. After some musical chairs among staffers, Vivek Ramaswamy spent much of the evening talking with Poole, a Brit feted as a “boy wonder” in Murdoch circles.
Poole, who like all Murdoch editors has a direct line to “the boss,” had already created waves in his handling of Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential announcement. “Been There, Don That” was the headline that was tucked away on page 26 of the Nov. 22, 2022 edition of the Post. But it was the teaser at the bottom of the front page that went viral. “Florida man makes announcement.”




Soon, Poole would be in a pickle. It was nearly six months on from his newspaper’s trolling of Trump and he, like all Murdoch editors, was trying to identify a viable competitor to Trump. In November 2022, the paper had declared Ron DeSantis “DeFuture.” By May 2023, the paper doubled down with “Off and Ronning: DeSantis pitches ‘Great American Comeback,’” but insiders now acknowledge that what followed was inevitable. By January of this year, the paper ran a front-page “Don It Again” after Trump won the New Hampshire primary, and by March 5 it was declaring, “It’s a Don Deal.” In an even more blunt turn as campaigning for the general election got underway, the March 29 issue of the paper led with a split screen of Trump and Joe Biden and headlined it: “Give and Take — Trump attends wake for killed hero NYPD cop…as 3 Dem presidents shut down city for glitzy $25M fundraiser.”

If it all feels familiar for the Post, it didn’t have to be that way. In 2020, Rupert Murdoch was angered that Trump was going to lose what he thought was a winnable election. When Fox called the results for a Biden Arizona win, the audience was outraged. The mogul, shocked by the backlash, told confidants he was concerned viewers would decamp for alternatives such as Newsmax and OAN.
Now, four years later, those close to Trump tell The Hollywood Reporter the ex-president is keen to establish more of a relationship with Murdoch’s eldest son and Fox Corp. CEO Lachlan, 52. The two first met at a state dinner for Scott Morrison, then Australia’s prime minister, at the White House in 2019. “The leadership baton has passed, and there’s recognition that [Trump] does not have the history or depth of relationship with Lachlan that he’s always been able to count on with Rupert,” says a person familiar with the matter. Reps for Trump, Murdoch and Fox declined to comment.


Like the Post, Fox News has been subject to contortions over the former president. After essentially banning Trump from going live on its airwaves for two years, it welcomed the president back for a town hall event in January. Before that, Trump’s interviews were pretaped — an insurance mechanism after the network was forced to pay out almost $800 million to settle the Dominion lawsuit, which had scarred the Murdochs’ prized asset. (During testimony for the case, the elder Murdoch, now 93, was asked directly if he believed Trump’s claims that he won by “millions of votes that were shifted by Dominion software” in 2020. “No, I’ve never believed that,” Murdoch replied. In an email disclosed in discovery, Murdoch sent a longtime lieutenant, Col Allan, who edited the Post, his take on Rudy Giuliani. “Just saw Rudy ranting. Terrible influence on Donald,” Murdoch wrote, days after the Nov. 3 presidential election.)

For a long time after the settlement, Fox had pushed alternatives to Trump. DeSantis. Ramaswamy. Nikki Haley. But around Christmas last year it became clear Trump would be making a triumphant return.
“I can’t escape a feeling that it’s with great reluctance on the part of Lachlan and Rupert that Fox News finds itself with no alternative but to support Trump,” Lachlan’s biographer Paddy Manning, author of The Successor, says from Adelaide, Australia, where Rupert Murdoch got his start in newspapers. “Lachlan has got to put his personal politics and preferences to one side and focus on the business, which is entirely premised on providing a right-leaning political diet to a base that is increasingly radicalized.”



With Rupert Murdoch moving last year into a new role as chairman emeritus of both Fox Corp. and News Corp. and now planning his fifth wedding, all eyes will be on his son, who is based in Sydney with his wife and children. “I think the reality is Lachlan is calling the shots, but he is also never going to stop his father from emailing or speaking to anyone in the company that he built,” Manning says. “Lachlan’s personal politics, worldview and preference for this coming election are beside the point. What matters is what goes to air and whether he supports it, endorses it or otherwise, the impact is the same.”

Of course, since its launch in 1996, Fox News has always been programmed for an audience that bought into the idea of countering the “mainstream media.” Late founder Roger Ailes (and current CEO Suzanne Scott) was said to have a sixth sense for what their viewers want. But Fox’s strength isn’t making a unilateral decision about what they are going to put on; it’s audience strategy. Now it’s obvious: The audience wants Trump. And since the $71.3 billion sale of assets like 20th Century Studios, FX and National Geographic to Disney in 2019, Fox News plays an outsize role in revenue and profits for Fox Corp.
Murdoch insiders say the pivot back to Trump by the Post and Fox was as predictable as the real estate mogul’s rants on his bully pulpit Truth Social, where he assails Biden and, also, Fox News coverage. (“They don’t want to discuss how ridiculous the Corrupt Judge’s fine of 450 Million Dollars is. It should be $ZERO,” Trump wrote of Fox and New York Attorney General Letitia James’ case in March.)


Meanwhile, at Murdoch’s financial broadsheet, editor-in-chief of The Wall Street Journal Emma Tucker is preparing to manage her first U.S. presidential election in the role. Tucker, who joined the paper last year from The Sunday Times, has overseen several high-profile layoffs, including in the Journal’s D.C. bureau.
Across the pond, another election could see the Murdochs change allegiances. The U.K.’s Labour Party, under opposition leader Keir Starmer, is expected to seal a victory in the general election, which must be held no later than January 2025, and Murdoch’s The Sun is considering throwing its weight behind Starmer, two sources say. (The Sun lost $82 million last year as the costs for the phone-hacking scandal continue to add up. Times Media, owner of the Times and Sunday Times, had a more positive result reporting a profit just shy of $76 million.) That political flip might be mercenary, but it’s right out of the playbook that Murdoch has been using for decades: He always backs the winner.
 

Non-StopJFK2TAB

Rising Star
Platinum Member

Hitler didn’t walk those Jews into the chambers. Regular-ass Germans did. Americans voting to elect that loser isn’t a revolutionary decision. Stupid people do stupid things all the time. It’s the idea that it’s the one-one simplification that’s really the issue.
 

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Hitler didn’t walk those Jews into the chambers. Regular-ass Germans did. Americans voting to elect that loser isn’t a revolutionary decision. Stupid people do stupid things all the time. It’s the idea that it’s the one-one simplification that’s really the issue.
Like voting for obama
 

Non-StopJFK2TAB

Rising Star
Platinum Member
I've told you this before. Say what you mean. I'm a busy man. I don't have time to decipher your comments.
Do you think you don’t understand the language of the earthworms because you’re a busy man? Western Civilization was started in Alexandria and it ends in Alexandria near the Potomac.

Empires only exist to feed their ego. The by-product of the ego is culture. The question is how long does it take the contents of the culture to be absorbed by the soil to be useful.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Where Trump's 'Unified Reich' Reference Came From​

Published May 21, 2024 at 10:22 AM EDTUpdated May 21, 2024 at 10:52 AM EDT

Trump Slams Hush Money Trial: 'Kangaroo Court'
By Carlo Versano
Editor, Live News
FOLLOW
39 comments

Former President Donald Trump's official Truth Social account posted a campaign video Monday that included a reference to a "unified Reich" if he returns to the presidency, drawing immediate criticism from President Joe Biden's campaign and many Democrats who said the video shows that Trump intends to rule as a "dictator" if he is elected to a second White House term in November.
The phrase, which briefly appears on screen as a narrator reads off hypothetical newspaper clippings if Trump wins the presidency again, is visible under the headline: "What's next for America?"

The slightly blurred text reads: "Industrial strength significantly increased ... driven by the creation of a unified Reich."
Truth social screenshot

A screenshot of the Truth Social post, with the "unified Reich" phrase visible in the first line of text on the left. TRUTH SOCIAL/@REALDONALDTRUMP

The wording appears to be lifted from the Wikipedia entry for World War I. Under the Background section of the Wiki entry, the subsection 'Arms Race' starts: "German industrial strength and production had significantly increased after 1871, driven by the creation of a unified Reich, French indemnity payments, and the annexation of Alsace-Lorraine."

The word "Reich," which means "empire" in German, is often associated with the Nazis, specifically Adolf Hitler's rise to power and his Third Reich that ruled Germany from 1933 to 1945. In the Wikipedia entry, the word is being used to refer to the unification of Germany that happened 50 years prior.


In a statement to Newsweek, Karoline Leavitt, Trump's campaign press secretary, denied that Trump had anything to do with the video, or knew of the phrase's inclusion in the mocked up headlines.

"This was not a campaign video, it was created by a random account online and reposted by a staffer who clearly did not see the word, while the [former] President was in court. The real extremist is Joe Biden who has turned his back on Israel and the Jewish people by bowing down to radical antisemites and terrorist sympathizers in his party like Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."

The video was removed from Trump's Truth Social account early Tuesday.


The Biden campaign was quick to jump on the phrase, saying in a statement that Trump is "telling America exactly what he intends to do if he regains power: rule as a dictator over a 'unified reich.' "

Speaking to Newsweek, Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the University of Surrey in the U.K., said he thought the video was posted deliberately.

"While the Trump campaign often seems less-than-discerning in the choice of material they amplify through Truth Social, they're always conscious of the content. The 'mistakes' they make are conscious and deliberate.

"This story, rather than the conclusion of the prosecution case in the trial against the former president in New York, will dominate the news agenda today. It will be dismissed as a staffer's error while the media wrings its hands over Trump's totalitarian leanings. That's the deflection the GOP wants. Happenstance or a 'mistake' by design? Probably the latter."

 
Top