Debate: Are WE sleeping on Trump like the Jewish people slept on... YALL GOT WHAT YALL WANTED

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
I really hope Trump starts a third party. Or am I looking at this wrong?

I understand

but I have truly lost the will to try to comprehend these silly white folks.

At this point I don;t even think it really matters

Maybe it might SPLIT the right wing MAGA christian racist vote so damn much that it actually strengthens the Democrats?
 

xxxbishopxxx

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I understand

but I have truly lost the will to try to comprehend these silly white folks.

At this point I don;t even think it really matters

Maybe it might SPLIT the right wing MAGA christian racist vote so damn much that it actually strengthens the Democrats?
That's what I was thinking. But with so much division among the democrats and the majority of current Repubs pro trump, I see Trump as the first successful modern day third party President. Cause all those folks can go back to voting Republican when he is finished.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
That's what I was thinking. But with so much division among the democrats and the majority of current Repubs pro trump, I see Trump as the first successful modern day third party President. Cause all those folks can go back to voting Republican when he is finished.

But we have to honest...

While his presidency got a lot of movement for Republicans appointments laws etc and a following

Trump ALSO galvanized the OTHER SIDE

A WHOLE LOT and while I never under estimate my enemy

but I don't think they PREDICTED THAT LEVEL on the other side (shout out Georgia)

This has been a organized concerted effort for YEARS

for the right to modernize racism and make it acceptable to "good" white folk

But I think they completely under estimated the youth, social media and just the amount of UGLY the average American can take

at lest PUBLICLY

Don't get me wrong as we saw with voter turn out

TRUMP GOT A SOLID BASE

But it doesn't seem he has SMART people

he just has HORRIBLE cowardly despicable folk with no shame

I don't know how FAR that gets you

based of the level of DUMB we have seen the last few months

yeah it CAN get you far...

but PRESIDENT again?

A NEW viable THIRD party?

I don't know about that.

Lawd I HOPE NOT
 
Last edited:

illdog

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Literally every move this fucker has made...has been right out of the führer's playbook..would really love to FF to...

 

darth frosty

Dark Lord of the Sith
BGOL Investor
But we have to honest...

While his presidency got a lot of movement for Republicans appointments laws etc and a following

Trump ALSO galvanized the OTHER SIDE

A WHOLE LOT and while I never under estimate my enemy

but I don't think they PREDICTED THAT LEVEL on the other side (shout out Georgia)

This has been a organized concerted effort for YEARS

for the right to modernize racism and make it acceptable to "good" white folk

But I think they completely under estimated the youth, social media and just the amount of UGLY the average American can take

at lest PUBLICLY

Don't get me wrong as we saw with voter turn out

TRUMP GOT A SOLID BASE

But it doesn't seem he has SMART people

he just has HORRIBLE cowardly despicable folk with no shame

I don't know how FAR that gets you

based of the level of DUMB we have seen the last few months

yeah it CAN get you far...

but PRESIDENT again?

A NEW viable THIRD party?

I don't know about that.

Lawd I HOPE NOT
while this is true pussy ass democrats have failed to take advantage.

They have opted to play the role of republican lite and have not distinguished themselves in support of the people who rejected trump and his base.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
while this is true pussy ass democrats have failed to take advantage.

They have opted to play the role of republican lite and have not distinguished themselves in support of the people who rejected trump and his base.

I can't say they have COMPLETELY failed (shout out Georgia)

they have NOT TAKEN FULL ADVANTAGE

that is a FACT

and I don't see them doing so going forward

that is a massive failure
 
Last edited:

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Trump’s Republican Hit List at CPAC Is a Warning Shot to His Party
In his first public appearance since leaving office, Donald Trump went through, by name, every Republican who supported his second impeachment and called for them to be ousted.



28cpac-trump0-jumbo-v2.jpg



Former President Donald J. Trump speaking on Sunday at the Conservative Political Action Conference.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
By Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman
  • Feb. 28, 2021Updated 7:57 p.m. ET
ORLANDO, Fla. — After days of insisting they could paper over their intraparty divisions, Republican lawmakers were met with a grim reminder of the challenge ahead on Sunday when former President Donald J. Trump stood before a conservative conference and ominously listed the names of Republicans he is targeting for defeat.

As Democrats pursue a liberal agenda in Washington, the former president’s grievances over the 2020 election continue to animate much of his party, more than a month after he left office and nearly four months since he lost the election. Many G.O.P. leaders and activists are more focused on litigating false claims about voting fraud in last year’s campaign, assailing the technology companies that deplatformed Mr. Trump and punishing lawmakers who broke with him over his desperate bid to retain power.

In an address on Sunday at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, his first public appearance since he left the White House, Mr. Trump read a sort of hit list of every congressional Republican who voted to impeach him, all but vowing revenge.

“The RINOs that we’re surrounded with will destroy the Republican Party and the American worker and will destroy our country itself,” he said, a reference to the phrase “Republicans In Name Only,” adding that he would be “actively working to elect strong, tough and smart Republican leaders.”

Mr. Trump took special care to single out Representative Liz Cheney, the third-ranking House Republican, and Senator Mitch McConnell, the minority leader. He called Ms. Cheney “a warmonger” and said her “poll numbers have dropped faster than any human being I’ve ever seen.” Then he falsely claimed he had helped revive Mr. McConnell’s campaign last year in Kentucky.

Ms. Cheney and Mr. McConnell have harshly criticized Mr. Trump over his role in inciting the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, and Ms. Cheney has repeatedly said that the G.O.P. should cut ties with the former president.

With his refusal to concede defeat and his determination to isolate G.O.P. leaders who criticize him, the former president has effectively denied Republicans from engaging in the sort of reckoning that parties traditionally undertake after they lose power.

Even with Democrats controlling Congress and the White House for the first time in over a decade, many of the Republicans who spoke at the conference here said strikingly little about President Biden or the nearly $2 trillion stimulus measure the House passed early Saturday, which congressional Republicans uniformly opposed.

Mr. Trump was the exception, repeatedly taking aim at the Biden administration. “In just one short month, we have gone from America first to America last,” he said, criticizing the new president on issues ranging from immigration to the Iran nuclear deal. “We all knew that the Biden administration was going to be bad, but none of us even imagined just how bad they would be and how far left they would go.”

Image
Mr. Trump looked at himself in a mirror, held by an aide, before walking out to speak at CPAC.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times
Yet even as he dutifully read his scripted attacks on his successor, the former president drew louder applause for pledging to purge his Republican antagonists from the party.

“Get rid of them all,” he said.

Mr. Trump’s attack, and the enthusiastic response to his call for vengeance, illustrated the dilemma Republicans find themselves in.

Mr. Biden does little to energize conservative activists. Indeed, Mr. Trump and other speakers at the event drew more applause for their criticism of Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, Mr. Biden’s chief public health adviser for the virus and a figure of enmity on the far right, than for their attacks on the president.

The attention surrounding Mr. Trump and his potential plans for the future are forestalling a focused attack on Mr. Biden and the Democratic-controlled Congress.

Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who used his speech on Friday to hail Mr. Trump’s leadership of the party, said in a brief interview that his party’s voters would pivot to the present once Mr. Biden’s agenda became more clear.

“As the American people see the bad ideas that destroy jobs and strip away our liberties, there’s a natural pendulum to politics,” Mr. Cruz said, predicting that Republican activists would “absolutely” pay more attention to the current administration later this year.

Mr. Trump made a specific pitch for people to donate to two committees associated with him, a notable move given that he has been the Republican National Committee’s biggest draw for the last four years. He gave an explicit description of “Trumpism” as a political ideology focused on geopolitical deal-making and immigration restrictions, and painted the Republicans who voted for impeachment as decided outliers in an otherwise united party.

More consequentially for Republicans, the attention-craving Mr. Trump, denied his social media weaponry, knows he can reliably energize the G.O.P. rank-and-file and draw publicity by excoriating his intraparty critics.

In some ways, the former president’s re-emergence at CPAC represented a full-circle moment. He first tested the right’s political waters in 2011 when he appeared at the conference and used his speech to belittle other Republicans and denounce China as a growing power.

To the delight of the party’s current lawmakers, however, Mr. Trump announced on Sunday that he would not create a breakaway right-wing party.

“We’re not starting new parties,” he said of an idea he was privately musing about just last month. Less satisfying to many Republican leaders, at least those ready to move on, was the former president’s musing about a potential run in 2024. “Who knows, I may even decide to beat them for a third time,” he said, bringing attendees to their feet.

Mr. Trump, of course, lost the election last year.

But that did not stop him from repeatedly, and falsely, claiming in his speech that he had won. After mostly sticking to his prepared text for the first hour of his 90-minute speech — and listing what he said were the accomplishments of his tenure — the former president grew animated and angry as he veered off the teleprompter to vent about his loss.

Image

A man wore a shirt featuring Mr. Trump on Sunday at CPAC. Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times

“The Supreme Court didn’t have the guts or the courage to do anything about it,” Mr. Trump said of a body that includes three of his appointees. He was met with chants of “You won, you won!”

At one point, Mr. Trump did something he never did as president — expressly called on people to take the coronavirus vaccines that he had pressed for and hoped would help him in his re-election effort. But he mocked Mr. Biden for stumbling during a CNN town hall event and attacked him over comments the president made about the limited number of vaccines available when he took office.

The former president’s aides had been looking for an opportunity for him to re-emerge and debated whether to put on a rally-type event of their own or take advantage of the forum of CPAC, which relocated to Mr. Trump’s new home state from suburban Washington because Florida has more lenient coronavirus restrictions.

Mr. Trump and his aides worked with him on the speech for several days at his newly built office above the ballroom at Mar-a-Lago, his private club near the Atlantic Ocean. Without his Twitter feed, Mr. Trump has been using specific moments — the death of the radio host Rush Limbaugh and Tiger Woods’s car crash — to inject himself into the news cycle.

Outside prepared statements, though, he has said far less since Jan. 20 about the future of the G.O.P. and his own lingering ambitions.

Interviews at CPAC suggested that a number of conservatives, while still supportive of Mr. Trump, are ambivalent about whether he should run again in 2024. That was borne out in the conference’s straw poll, during which the former president enjoyed overwhelming approval — but also more uncertainty about whether he ought to lead the party in three years.

Thirty-two percent of those who participated in the straw poll — a heavily conservative and self-selecting constituency — said they did not want Mr. Trump to run again or were unsure if he should.

A number of would-be candidates, most notably Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida and Gov. Kristi Noem of South Dakota, enjoyed rousing receptions at the conference.

Yet Mr. Trump has essentially frozen the field for the moment. And he made clear in his speech that for now, he is serious about a third bid. t
This is new territory for Republicans, who were mostly eager to move on from their losing nominees in 2008 and 2012.

For now, though, Mr. Trump and the 2020 election are far more resonant. From the start on Sunday, the crowd provided Mr. Trump with the adulation he craves, chanting, “We love you! We love you!” at one point. And he made clear that he believes that news organizations, and his supporters, still want the sugar high of his appearances.

After stepping up to the lectern, Mr. Trump, gone for just five weeks, asked the room, “Do you miss me yet?”

Jonathan Martin reported from Orlando, Fla., and Maggie Haberman f


@easy_b @Camille
 

Mo-Better

The R&B Master
OG Investor
would think after ALL we have seen...Trump's bullshit would UNIFY us AGAINST them instead of divide us further

Its just like shaking a sugar bag, you never get every grain out. Also you said would, you should've said should. I've been watching our people disappoint their own people since MLK's March on Washington.

I suggest you focus on those who want to be united and move toward equality. Just having someone with us because they were invited is not helping us at all. Understand not everyone wants to see the truth. Focus on those that understand.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
As G.O.P. Blocks Inquiry, Questions on Jan. 6 Attack May Go Unanswered

The demise of an independent panel to investigate the riot means that the country is unlikely to get a definitive accounting for one of the most serious domestic attacks on the government in history.


A mob stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 after a rally where President Donald J. Trump spoke, urging supporters to reject the results of what he falsely claimed was a stolen election.
A mob stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 after a rally where President Donald J. Trump spoke, urging supporters to reject the results of what he falsely claimed was a stolen election.Credit...Jason Andrew for The New York Times
By Luke Broadwater
May 29, 2021, 11:51 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON — In blocking the formation of an independent commission to investigate the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Republicans in Congress have all but closed off the possibility of a full and impartial accounting for one of the most serious assaults on American democracy in history, leaving unanswered critical questions with broad implications for politics, security and public trust.

Fearing political damage from any sustained scrutiny of the attack, Republicans united in large numbers against the inquiry, moving to shift an unwelcome spotlight away from former President Donald J. Trump, his election lies that fueled the attack, and the complicity of many G.O.P. lawmakers in amplifying his false claims of widespread voter fraud.

The result is that key details about a shocking act of domestic extremism against the United States government are likely to remain shrouded in mystery, and anything new that may be revealed about the assault at the Capitol will most likely be viewed through a partisan lens, with a substantial proportion of the country rejecting the reality of what transpired.

The public may never know precisely what Mr. Trump and members of his administration did or said as a throng of his supporters stormed the Capitol while Congress met to formalize President Biden’s victory, threatening the lives of lawmakers and the vice president. The full story may never be revealed of why security officials were so unprepared for the breach of the building, supposedly one of the most secure in the nation, despite ample warnings of potential violence. The extent of the role of Republican lawmakers closely allied with Mr. Trump in planning the Jan. 6 “Stop the Steal” rally that spiraled into a brutal onslaught may remain unexplored.

Despite its divisions, the United States formed fact-finding commissions after the attack of Pearl Harbor in 1941, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The failure to do so in this case, said those involved in some of the inquiries, would further erode trust in the government, and deprive the public of the kinds of lessons that could prevent another such attack.

“After many of the national tragedies we’ve experienced over the last 50 or more years, the response was to have a bipartisan investigation that would lay out the facts in a way that would be definitive,” said Michael Chertoff, who served as homeland security secretary under President George W. Bush in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks. “It builds trust. It shows the public at a time of crisis, we can all come together and put the good of the country ahead of partisan interests.”

ImageSenator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, united most members of his party in blocking the Jan. 6 commission, which he said Democrats would use to try to harm them politically.
Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, united most members of his party in blocking the Jan. 6 commission, which he said Democrats would use to try to harm them politically.Credit...Erin Scott for The New York Times
Mr. Chertoff and three other former homeland security secretaries who served presidents of both parties had lobbied Republicans to support the creation of a Jan. 6 commission, saying the nation needed a better understanding of “how the violent insurrection at the Capitol came together to ensure the peaceful transfer of power in our country is never so threatened again.”

“We need to get a definitive explanation of what actually happened,” Mr. Chertoff said in an interview after the vote.

Even as the Justice Department moves to prosecute the rioters, congressional committees hold hearings and inspectors general examine their agencies’ responses to the attack, there is no outside group of experts charged with getting to the bottom of the myriad failings that led to the deadliest assault on the Capitol since the War of 1812.

What has been uncovered about the attack has only raised more questions:

Why did it take hours for the D.C. National Guard to receive approval to deploy to the Capitol to fight off the mob? Maj. Gen. William J. Walker, the D.C. National Guard commander at the time, has said he did not receive approval to mobilize troops until more than three hours after he had requested it. Defense Department and Capitol security officials have given conflicting statements about what happened.

What was Mr. Trump doing during the attack? He reportedly watched television as a mob stormed the Capitol, but later claimed that he had called in the National Guard, despite his defense secretary testifying that he never spoke to Mr. Trump that day. A Republican member of Congress said she was told that when Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the House Republican leader, phoned Mr. Trump to ask him to call off the mob, he refused, siding with the rioters whom he said were evidently more upset about the election than Mr. McCarthy was.

What accounts for the lax precautions taken as right-wing extremists and militias openly planned to converge and wreak havoc on the Capitol that dark day? Leaders with the Capitol Police instructed officers to not to use their most forceful crowd control techniques and missed concerning intelligence reports. Security officials reportedly feared the “optics” of sending the National Guard to face off against supporters of Mr. Trump.

How much coordination was there among extremist groups, and to what extent were members of Congress involved in the planning of the rally that preceded the violence? An organizer of the “Stop the Steal” rally said three members of Congress “schemed up” the event with him, though two of the three have denied that claim.

Some on the right who support creating a commission have put forward their own questions, such as demanding more information about the shooting death of a protester, Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a Capitol Police officer as she tried to force her way into a lobby just off the House floor where lawmakers were taking cover.

And perhaps most importantly, how can the country prevent another similar scenario from happening again?

For the United States, which holds itself out as a beacon of democracy, the rule of law and transparency, the death of the commission has also raised a more fundamental question: What happens when one political party effectively squelches any effort to look inward to assess government failings that have shaken the public’s faith in the nation’s institutions?

Image
Mr. Trump at the “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6. The Justice Department’s investigation into the Capitol riot includes several defendants who claim they were merely following the orders of Mr. Trump.Credit...Pete Marovich for The New York Times
“This was not just a random event; it was existential in nature,” said Lee H. Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana who was vice chairman of the 9/11 commission. “How in the world could this happen in this country? It was unbelievable that this far along in a democracy, we could have this kind of an event occur. It needs exploration.”

Many Republicans in Congress, whose leaders initially supported the idea of an independent commission, have spent the months since the assault trying to rewrite its history and downplay its severity. Their efforts appear to be working; a recent Quinnipiac Poll found that while 55 percent of Americans said they viewed what happened on Jan. 6 as an attack on democracy that should never be forgotten, nearly three-quarters of Republicans said that too much was being made of it and it was time to move on.

Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the minority leader, argued in advance of the vote that there was “no new fact about that day we need the Democrats’ extraneous commission to uncover.”

Mr. Hamilton said when he heard that, he thought to himself, “How does he know that?”

In the absence of a bipartisan commission, Democratic congressional leaders could create a select committee to investigate the attack, one with a broad mandate and subpoena power. Mr. Biden could also appoint a commission of his own, as some past presidents have done after national tragedies.

Alvin S. Felzenberg, a top aide and spokesman for the commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks, said there was a chance that such an inquiry could address some pressing questions, citing the Truman Committee that examined war profiteering in the 1940s and the Ervin committee that investigated Watergate in the 1970s. But an independent commission would have benefited from the full-time attention of the investigators, he argued, and its conclusions would have been more likely to be trusted by the public.

“Sitting members of Congress are pulled away from their work to address ongoing business before Congress,” Mr. Felzenberg said. “They also are starting to think about the next election. The 9/11 Commission and staff tended to nothing other than to their charge, spelled out in legislation.”

Former Gov. Bill Weld of Massachusetts, who worked as a lawyer on the Watergate inquiry, said the country was being denied “closure” by Republicans’ refusal to embrace a Jan. 6 commission. He said a select committee investigation would need buy-in from both parties to be seen as legitimate.

“It would have to be bipartisan to be credible,” Mr. Weld said. “Everybody’s got to be on board for it.”

Image
Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, spoke out against members of her party that voted against creating the commission.Credit...Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times
Many of the Republicans who opposed the commission conceded there were a litany of unanswered questions about the events of Jan. 6, but they argued the independent commission’s work would be duplicative of several continuing investigations.

Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, said he favored inquires by Senate committees to explore “the many legitimate questions that remain to be answered” over what he viewed as a “political” commission.

Unlike the work being done by Senate committees, which are focused on security breakdowns, the commission — a panel of 10 experts, evenly split between Republican and Democratic appointees — would have had the broad authority to connect various threads of inquiry and compile a single comprehensive record for American history, as the 9/11 Commission did after those terrorist attacks.

Mr. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney both testified before that commission, and supporters of a Jan. 6 commission were hopeful it could force testimony from Mr. Trump or at least those who spoke with him as the violence escalated, such as Mr. McCarthy.

“Is it going to reveal anything more than we would have gotten otherwise?” Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, said before breaking with her party to vote to move ahead with the commission. “I don’t know and I guess now we’ll never know. But isn’t that part of the problem — that we’ll never know?”

The Justice Department’s investigation into Jan. 6 is, at this point, one of the largest criminal inquiries in U.S. history, with more than 400 defendants. In court filings, several of the defendants have said that they were merely following the orders of Mr. Trump, saying the former president urged them on to storm the Capitol. But none of those prosecutions are looking into security or governance breakdowns.

“We need to figure out who knew what when,” said Lt. Gen. Russel L. Honoré, who was chosen by Speaker Nancy Pelosi to lead a security review of the Capitol in the aftermath of the riot, adding that an independent commission was still badly needed. “Our government did not work that day.”

Republican leaders, he said, had killed the commission because it “might make them look bad in the next election.”

“That’s a damn crying shame,” General Honoré said in an interview. “What a damning message this sends to the Capitol Police.”

Image
Officer Brian Sicknick’s mother, Gladys, made a last-ditch effort to lobby for an independent investigation, visiting Republican senators’ offices before the vote to urge them to drop their opposition.Credit...Erin Scott for The New York Times
About 140 officers were injured in the attack on the Capitol. Many were smashed in the head with baseball bats, flag poles and pipes. Officer Brian D. Sicknick, who was allegedly sprayed with bear spray, collapsed and died afterward, and two officers who clashed with the mob later took their own lives.

Officer Sicknick’s mother, Gladys, and a small group of officers who survived the assault made a last-ditch effort to lobby for an independent investigation, visiting Republican senators’ offices this week to urge them to drop their opposition.

“If Jan. 6 didn’t happen, Brian would still be here,” Harry Dunn, a Black Capitol Police officer who fought the mob as they hurled racial slurs at him, told reporters between visits.

But ultimately, Republicans rallied behind Mr. McConnell, who told his colleagues that Democrats would try to use the commission to hurt their party in the 2022 midterm elections, and urged them to block it.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Trump attempted a coup. Now there are emails that prove it.
Judd Legum15 hr ago524
President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump prepare to depart the White House on January 20, 2021. (Photo by Eric Thayer/Getty Images)

After he lost the election, Trump attempted a coup to keep himself in power. Trump hasn't been successful — but his no-holds-barred effort to overturn the election continues.

Trump's effort to cast aside the results of the 2020 presidential election and install himself for a second term was obvious from his tweets, his public statements, and the actions of his motley crew of lawyers. But a trove of emails and other documents, released on Tuesday by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, provide new insight into the intensity of Trump's efforts to stay in the Oval Office.

The new documents involve communications between the White House and the Department of Justice in the last few weeks of Trump's presidency. They suggest that Trump sacked Barr in mid-December in an effort to find a new Attorney General who would assist him in overturning the election result.

On December 14, Trump's personal assistant, Molly Michael, sent an email to then-Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen with the subject line "From POTUS." Attached to the email was a document full of wild accusations about the vote in Michigan.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9ba69ba2-7246-409e-8ca2-9ba575902352_786x310.jpeg


The "report" was prepared by Russell Ramsland Jr. "a Republican businessman who has sold everything from Tex-Mex food in London to a wellness technology that beams light into the human bloodstream." It argued, without valid evidence, that machines from Dominion Voting Systems were "intentionally and purposefully designed with errors to create systemic fraud." Ramsland previously told the Washington Post that he was in contact with Trump's lawyer, Rudy Guiliani, after the election.

The claims in the document are familiar to anyone who listened to Guiliani — or another Trump-aligned lawyer, Sidney Powell. But what's striking is what happened next. Two minutes after Trump's assistant sent the documents, "Associate Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, through his assistant, sent the same documents to the U.S. Attorneys for the Eastern and Western Districts of Michigan."

Just 40 minutes later, "Trump tweeted that Attorney General Barr—who had said publicly that he had not seen widespread election fraud—would be stepping down, that Mr. Rosen would serve as Acting Attorney General, and that Mr. Donoghue would serve as Acting Deputy Attorney General."

Trump apparently viewed Rosen and Donoghue as potentially more open to assisting in his efforts to throw out the results of the election. Donoghue, in particular, seemed willing to play along.

But that was only the beginning.

The Supreme Court brief that was never filed

After dispensing with Barr, Trump attempted to convince the Department of Justice's new leadership to file an extraordinary brief with the United States Supreme Court.
On December 29, 2020, Michael emailed Donoghue and Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall. The message included a draft complaint to file in the Supreme Court and instructions of how to contact Trump to discuss.

The complaint was prepared by Kurt Olsen, a private attorney working with Trump. The same day Michael sent the email to Donoghue and Wall, Olsen contacted Rosen's Chief of Staff. Olsen said that Trump wanted him to meet with Rosen to discuss filing the complaint on behalf of the United States against Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Nevada.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F0fcf4888-29a4-4f31-aef9-c86e70847689_565x673.jpeg


The lengthy complaint claimed the statistical odds of Biden beating Trump in Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania were "one in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000." It repeated debunked conspiracy theories about Dominion voting machines saying there were "grave questions" about their "vulnerability." As a remedy, it asked the Supreme Court "[d]eclare that the electoral college votes" in all five states were void and "[a]uthorize" a new "special election" to determine the winner.

The emails indicate that Olsen was able to talk to Rosen on December 29, 2020. Rosen asked Olsen for Supreme Court precedent backing up his argument. This request was a bad sign because the complaint itself should have contained all relevant precedent. The complaint was never filed.

But the emails reveal that Trump was absolutely serious about overturning the election results to stay in power. He was willing to do anything and everything possible to achieve this goal. Trump is no longer in the White House, but his quest to overturn the election results continues.

The coup continues

Trump has continued his quest to overturn the election from his properties in Florida and New Jersey. The facts and the law continue to be against him. But he presses forward anyway. Trump reportedly believes he will be "reinstated" as president sometime in August.

Recently, his focus has been on the recount of Maricopa County, Arizona. The recount, which is unofficial and cannot impact the results, is being run by Cyber Ninjas, an obscure firm with no experience in election audits. The CEO of Cyber Ninjas is Doug Logan, "who has a history of posting unsubstantiated claims of election fraud online." Logan deleted his Twitter account, @securityvoid, in January. But archives of the account preserved online shows that he trafficked in numerous conspiracy theories alleging the election was stolen from Trump.

The process has dragged on for months but is apparently nearing completion. Republican politicians from around the country, seeking to establish their MAGA bonafides, are making pilgrimages to Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix where the count is taking place.

Trump is pushing for similar recounts in other key states that Biden won, including Pennsylvania. He published the following statement to his website on June 4:
Great patriots led by State Senator Doug Mastriano, Senator Cris Dush, and State Representative Rob Kauffman went to Maricopa County, Arizona, to learn the best practices for conducting a full Forensic Audit of the 2020 General Election. Now the Pennsylvania Senate needs to act. Senate President Jake Corman needs to fulfill his promise to his constituents to conduct a full Forensic Audit. Senator Dave Argall, Chairman of the State Government Committee, has to authorize the subpoenas, if necessary. The people of Pennsylvania and America deserve to know the truth. If the Pennsylvania Senate leadership doesn’t act, there is no way they will ever get re-elected!
Republicans in states Trump won last November are now pushing for audits because "[f]ocusing on fraud claims allows Republican officials to raise money and attention from devoted Trump supporters."

None of this activity will put Trump back in the White House. But it has been effective in convincing millions of people to believe the lie that the election was stolen from Trump. As the world saw on January 6, that is very dangerous.

The enablers

Despite his obsessive focus on undermining the democratic process, Trump remains a revered figure in the Republican Party. Key Republican leaders in Congress are validating Trump's conduct by continuing to embrace Trump and his message.

One particularly close ally of Trump in 2021 is the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), which is chaired by Senator Rick Scott (R-FL). In April, Scott traveled to Florida to present Trump with an award on behalf of the NRSC. There have been no other winners of the award. It was made up for Trump.

Rick Scott @ScottforFlorida
This weekend I was proud to recognize President Donald Trump with the inaugural @NRSC Champion for Freedom Award. President Trump fought for American workers, secured the border, and protected our constitutional rights.
bit.ly/NRSC_184
April 12th 2021
357 Retweets1,680 Likes



In June, Trump appeared in a fundraising video on behalf of the NRSC. In the video Trump said, "we’re gonna take back the White House, and… sooner than you think." The message appears intended to bolster the conspiracy theory that Trump will be "reinstated" later this summer.
The NRSC, despite legitimizing and publicizing Trump's efforts to undermine the democratic process, has attracted significant corporate support. The corporate PACs of Walmart ($30,000), General Electric ($30,000), Pfizer ($15,000), T-Mobile ($15,000), GM ($15,000), Ford ($15,000), and Altria ($15,000) have all donated to the NRSC this year.
 

ORIGINAL NATION

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
There is a little Hitler in every white person. It seems Hitler was scouting for America. Look at the power and wickedness of Bush, the Nazis that run NASA,etc. It seems to me the plan purifity the world by getting rid of anybody that does not have blue eyes, blonde hair and pale skin is working very well right in front of our eyes. The foundation of America is based on what Hitler represented.
 
Top