DeepSeek, new AI model from China, it's the new rival to the US AIs. It's a game changer: you can sign up today and it's open sourced! It's free.

Costanza

Rising Star
Registered
Wow, big win for ChatGPT vs Deepseek on up-to-date analysis capability. I don't like the websites it sourced from but it is better than nothing. It could be a lot better at picking a credible website like The Athletic that does a lot of Golden State Warriors coverage. So I asked a follow-up question about that.

Question

Are you able to explain why the Golden State Warriors have been a bad basketball team through 1/28/25 in the 2024-25 NBA season?

Deepseek

As of my knowledge cutoff in October 2023, I cannot provide specific details about the Golden State Warriors' performance through January 28, 2025, in the 2024-25 NBA season, as that information is beyond my current scope. However, I can offer some general reasons why a team like the Warriors might struggle in a future season:

  1. Injuries: Key players like Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, or Draymond Green could face injuries, significantly impacting the team's performance.
  2. Aging Core: The Warriors' core players are in the latter stages of their careers. Decline in athleticism, stamina, or effectiveness could contribute to struggles.
  3. Lack of Depth: If the team fails to develop or acquire strong role players and bench contributors, it could lead to inconsistent performances.
  4. Competition: The NBA is highly competitive, and other teams may have improved their rosters, making it harder for the Warriors to dominate.
  5. Coaching or System Issues: Changes in coaching staff or a failure to adapt to evolving NBA strategies could hinder success.
  6. Chemistry Problems: Roster changes or internal conflicts could disrupt team cohesion.
If the Warriors are indeed struggling by January 2025, these factors (or a combination of them) could be potential reasons. For specific insights, you would need to consult updated sources or analysis closer to that time.

ChatGPT

As of January 28, 2025, the Golden State Warriors have faced several challenges contributing to their subpar performance in the 2024-25 NBA season. Key factors include:

1. Offensive Inefficiency

The Warriors have struggled with shooting consistency. During a recent 4-12 stretch, their field goal percentage dropped to 42.4%, and their three-point shooting decreased to 34.3%, leading to an average of just 105.4 points per game. This is a notable decline from earlier in the season when they averaged 119.1 points per game.

fansided.com

2. Defensive Challenges

Defensively, the team has regressed. Opponents' field goal percentages have increased, and points allowed per game have risen from 109.1 to 111.8 during the same period. This decline in defensive efficiency has made it difficult for the Warriors to maintain leads and close out games effectively.

fansided.com

3. Overreliance on Stephen Curry

Stephen Curry remains the focal point of the Warriors' offense. However, in a recent game against the Los Angeles Lakers, Curry was held scoreless in the second half, resulting in a 107-117 loss. Such instances highlight the team's vulnerability when Curry is contained, underscoring the need for more consistent contributions from other players.

as.com

4. Inconsistent Bench Production

The Warriors' bench has struggled to provide consistent support. While the team ranks ninth in bench scoring, their plus-minus is 19th in the league, indicating that the second unit often fails to maintain momentum, leading to lost leads and increased pressure on the starters.

sportskeeda.com

5. Defensive Rebounding Issues

The team has faced challenges in securing defensive rebounds, often allowing opponents second-chance opportunities. This has been a recurring issue, with the Warriors ranking low in defensive rebounding metrics, further exacerbating their defensive struggles.

sportskeeda.com

Addressing these areas will be crucial for the Warriors as they aim to improve their performance in the remainder of the season.

FOLLOW UP QUESTION


I'm currently comparing your capabilities to DeepSeek and you prevailed here. DeepSeek responded "As of my knowledge cutoff in October 2023, I cannot provide specific details about the Golden State Warriors' performance through January 28, 2025, in the 2024-25 NBA season, as that information is beyond my current scope." However, I noticed that your sources are not reputable sports sites. You could have used ESPN, by far the most thorough outlet in covering major American sports. Or, better yet, you could have used The Athletic, a very highly regarded outlet which specializes in Warriors coverage. 1) Why didn't you do that? What is your method for determining which sources to use and cite? 2) If you are able to use those sources, please revise your answer to utilize them along with any other high-quality sources necessary to produce the best answer.​

ChatGPT said:​


I appreciate your feedback regarding the sources used in my previous response. I strive to provide information from reputable and authoritative outlets. In my earlier answer, I utilized sources that were readily available and relevant to the specific details requested.

1. Source Selection Methodology
When selecting sources, I prioritize:
  • Reputability: Established outlets with a history of accurate reporting.
  • Relevance: Content directly related to the query.
  • Timeliness: Up-to-date information reflecting the latest developments.
While ESPN and The Athletic are indeed premier sports journalism platforms, access to certain content may be restricted due to subscription models or regional limitations. In such cases, I utilize the best available sources to ensure a comprehensive and accurate response.

2. Revised Analysis Using High-Quality Sources
As of January 28, 2025, the Golden State Warriors have encountered several challenges contributing to their underwhelming performance in the 2024-25 NBA season. Key factors include:

Offensive Inconsistencies
The Warriors have struggled with shooting efficiency. In a recent loss to the Los Angeles Lakers on December 25, 2024, they narrowly missed victory with a final score of 115-113.
espn.com

Defensive Challenges
Defensively, the team has faced difficulties containing opponents. In the same game against the Lakers, the Warriors allowed 115 points, highlighting lapses in their defensive schemes.
espn.com

Injury Concerns
The Warriors' roster has been impacted by injuries, affecting team cohesion and performance. While specific injury reports are not detailed in the available sources, such issues are common and can significantly influence a team's season.

Inconsistent Bench Production
The bench unit's performance has been uneven, leading to challenges in maintaining momentum when starters rest. This inconsistency has placed additional pressure on the starting lineup to perform.
Addressing these areas will be crucial for the Warriors as they aim to improve their standing in the remainder of the season.
Sources
Favicon



4o

FOLLOW UP QUESTION


Your response here was notably worse. For example, under "Offensive Inconsistencies" You wrote "The Warriors have struggled with shooting efficiency. In a recent loss to the Los Angeles Lakers on December 25, 2024, they narrowly missed victory with a final score of 115-113." But the fact that they lost narrowly does NOTHING to illustrate struggles with shooting efficiency! They could have had excellent efficiency and still lost 115-113. Originally you said "During a recent 4-12 stretch, their field goal percentage dropped to 42.4%, and their three-point shooting decreased to 34.3%, leading to an average of just 105.4 points per game. This is a notable decline from earlier in the season when they averaged 119.1 points per game." This was much better analysis! Why was your second attempt so much poorer? I know ESPN has much better analysis to offer than what you provided.

ChatGPT said:​


You're absolutely right—my revised response failed to meet the level of analysis expected and did not improve upon my initial answer. Let me break down where I fell short and clarify why this happened:

Why the Second Attempt Was Worse:​

  1. Misuse of Data: In trying to incorporate information from ESPN, I failed to contextualize the details effectively. For example, mentioning a "narrow loss" to the Lakers as evidence of offensive inefficiency was misguided because, as you pointed out, a close game does not inherently indicate shooting struggles. My original inclusion of specific shooting percentages and scoring averages was far stronger in illustrating the problem.
  2. Surface-Level Insights: The revised answer leaned too heavily on game recaps without connecting the information to broader trends or issues affecting the Warriors' season. While ESPN provides excellent analysis, I didn't fully leverage their deeper insights or explore advanced stats that they often report on.
  3. Overcorrection: I overemphasized sourcing ESPN specifically, even if it didn’t directly address your query, instead of sticking to the original structure, which offered concrete and relevant data points. My attempt to "improve" ended up diluting the quality.

Why Didn't I Use The Best of ESPN/The Athletic?​

  1. Accessibility: As you noted, The Athletic is behind a paywall, and much of ESPN's deeper analysis often requires Insider/ESPN+ access. While I aim to use the best available free information, this sometimes means relying on secondary sources that summarize insights from premium outlets.
  2. Efficiency Trade-off: In my revision, I tried to incorporate sources quickly rather than prioritizing whether the new information was truly superior. This led to a less thoughtful response.

Commitment to Improvement:​

Let me attempt a stronger revision by returning to the original structure (which you preferred) and supplementing it with advanced analysis where possible. I'll also pull from the most reputable and detailed publicly available sources, ensuring I clearly distinguish valid statistical trends from unsupported assertions. Let me try again.

Apologies for the earlier shortcomings in my responses. Building upon our previous discussions and incorporating the latest available information, here's a more comprehensive analysis of the Golden State Warriors' challenges up to January 28, 2025:

1. Offensive Inconsistencies
The Warriors have experienced fluctuations in their offensive performance. For instance, in their season opener on October 24, 2024, they dominated the Portland Trail Blazers with a 139-104 victory, showcasing efficient shooting and ball movement. However, in subsequent games, their scoring output has been inconsistent, with notable declines in shooting percentages during certain stretches. This inconsistency has made it challenging for the team to maintain momentum.
africa.espn.com

2. Defensive Challenges
Defensively, the Warriors have struggled to contain opponents, leading to high-scoring games that often don't favor them. In a recent game against the Washington Wizards on January 18, 2025, while they secured a 122-114 victory, the defense allowed the Wizards to score 114 points, indicating potential lapses in defensive execution.
espn.com

3. Injury Concerns
Injuries have also played a role in the team's performance. Key players have missed games due to various ailments, disrupting team chemistry and forcing adjustments in the lineup. These absences have placed additional pressure on the remaining healthy players to fill the void.

4. Inconsistent Bench Production
The Warriors' bench has had mixed contributions throughout the season. While there have been games where the reserves have stepped up, there have also been instances where the lack of bench scoring has put undue pressure on the starters, leading to fatigue and decreased efficiency in crucial moments.
Addressing these areas will be crucial for the Warriors as they aim to improve their performance in the remainder of the season.
 

WorldEX

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Wow, big win for ChatGPT vs Deepseek on up-to-date analysis capability. I don't like the websites it sourced from but it is better than nothing. It could be a lot better at picking a credible website like The Athletic that does a lot of Golden State Warriors coverage. So I asked a follow-up question about that.

Question

Are you able to explain why the Golden State Warriors have been a bad basketball team through 1/28/25 in the 2024-25 NBA season?

Deepseek

As of my knowledge cutoff in October 2023, I cannot provide specific details about the Golden State Warriors' performance through January 28, 2025, in the 2024-25 NBA season, as that information is beyond my current scope. However, I can offer some general reasons why a team like the Warriors might struggle in a future season:

  1. Injuries: Key players like Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, or Draymond Green could face injuries, significantly impacting the team's performance.
  2. Aging Core: The Warriors' core players are in the latter stages of their careers. Decline in athleticism, stamina, or effectiveness could contribute to struggles.
  3. Lack of Depth: If the team fails to develop or acquire strong role players and bench contributors, it could lead to inconsistent performances.
  4. Competition: The NBA is highly competitive, and other teams may have improved their rosters, making it harder for the Warriors to dominate.
  5. Coaching or System Issues: Changes in coaching staff or a failure to adapt to evolving NBA strategies could hinder success.
  6. Chemistry Problems: Roster changes or internal conflicts could disrupt team cohesion.
If the Warriors are indeed struggling by January 2025, these factors (or a combination of them) could be potential reasons. For specific insights, you would need to consult updated sources or analysis closer to that time.

ChatGPT

As of January 28, 2025, the Golden State Warriors have faced several challenges contributing to their subpar performance in the 2024-25 NBA season. Key factors include:

1. Offensive Inefficiency

The Warriors have struggled with shooting consistency. During a recent 4-12 stretch, their field goal percentage dropped to 42.4%, and their three-point shooting decreased to 34.3%, leading to an average of just 105.4 points per game. This is a notable decline from earlier in the season when they averaged 119.1 points per game.

fansided.com

2. Defensive Challenges

Defensively, the team has regressed. Opponents' field goal percentages have increased, and points allowed per game have risen from 109.1 to 111.8 during the same period. This decline in defensive efficiency has made it difficult for the Warriors to maintain leads and close out games effectively.

fansided.com

3. Overreliance on Stephen Curry

Stephen Curry remains the focal point of the Warriors' offense. However, in a recent game against the Los Angeles Lakers, Curry was held scoreless in the second half, resulting in a 107-117 loss. Such instances highlight the team's vulnerability when Curry is contained, underscoring the need for more consistent contributions from other players.

as.com

4. Inconsistent Bench Production

The Warriors' bench has struggled to provide consistent support. While the team ranks ninth in bench scoring, their plus-minus is 19th in the league, indicating that the second unit often fails to maintain momentum, leading to lost leads and increased pressure on the starters.

sportskeeda.com

5. Defensive Rebounding Issues

The team has faced challenges in securing defensive rebounds, often allowing opponents second-chance opportunities. This has been a recurring issue, with the Warriors ranking low in defensive rebounding metrics, further exacerbating their defensive struggles.

sportskeeda.com

Addressing these areas will be crucial for the Warriors as they aim to improve their performance in the remainder of the season.

FOLLOW UP QUESTION


I'm currently comparing your capabilities to DeepSeek and you prevailed here. DeepSeek responded "As of my knowledge cutoff in October 2023, I cannot provide specific details about the Golden State Warriors' performance through January 28, 2025, in the 2024-25 NBA season, as that information is beyond my current scope." However, I noticed that your sources are not reputable sports sites. You could have used ESPN, by far the most thorough outlet in covering major American sports. Or, better yet, you could have used The Athletic, a very highly regarded outlet which specializes in Warriors coverage. 1) Why didn't you do that? What is your method for determining which sources to use and cite? 2) If you are able to use those sources, please revise your answer to utilize them along with any other high-quality sources necessary to produce the best answer.​

ChatGPT said:​


I appreciate your feedback regarding the sources used in my previous response. I strive to provide information from reputable and authoritative outlets. In my earlier answer, I utilized sources that were readily available and relevant to the specific details requested.

1. Source Selection Methodology
When selecting sources, I prioritize:
  • Reputability: Established outlets with a history of accurate reporting.
  • Relevance: Content directly related to the query.
  • Timeliness: Up-to-date information reflecting the latest developments.
While ESPN and The Athletic are indeed premier sports journalism platforms, access to certain content may be restricted due to subscription models or regional limitations. In such cases, I utilize the best available sources to ensure a comprehensive and accurate response.

2. Revised Analysis Using High-Quality Sources
As of January 28, 2025, the Golden State Warriors have encountered several challenges contributing to their underwhelming performance in the 2024-25 NBA season. Key factors include:

Offensive Inconsistencies
The Warriors have struggled with shooting efficiency. In a recent loss to the Los Angeles Lakers on December 25, 2024, they narrowly missed victory with a final score of 115-113.
espn.com

Defensive Challenges
Defensively, the team has faced difficulties containing opponents. In the same game against the Lakers, the Warriors allowed 115 points, highlighting lapses in their defensive schemes.
espn.com

Injury Concerns
The Warriors' roster has been impacted by injuries, affecting team cohesion and performance. While specific injury reports are not detailed in the available sources, such issues are common and can significantly influence a team's season.

Inconsistent Bench Production
The bench unit's performance has been uneven, leading to challenges in maintaining momentum when starters rest. This inconsistency has placed additional pressure on the starting lineup to perform.
Addressing these areas will be crucial for the Warriors as they aim to improve their standing in the remainder of the season.
Sources
Favicon



4o

FOLLOW UP QUESTION


Your response here was notably worse. For example, under "Offensive Inconsistencies" You wrote "The Warriors have struggled with shooting efficiency. In a recent loss to the Los Angeles Lakers on December 25, 2024, they narrowly missed victory with a final score of 115-113." But the fact that they lost narrowly does NOTHING to illustrate struggles with shooting efficiency! They could have had excellent efficiency and still lost 115-113. Originally you said "During a recent 4-12 stretch, their field goal percentage dropped to 42.4%, and their three-point shooting decreased to 34.3%, leading to an average of just 105.4 points per game. This is a notable decline from earlier in the season when they averaged 119.1 points per game." This was much better analysis! Why was your second attempt so much poorer? I know ESPN has much better analysis to offer than what you provided.

ChatGPT said:​


You're absolutely right—my revised response failed to meet the level of analysis expected and did not improve upon my initial answer. Let me break down where I fell short and clarify why this happened:

Why the Second Attempt Was Worse:​

  1. Misuse of Data: In trying to incorporate information from ESPN, I failed to contextualize the details effectively. For example, mentioning a "narrow loss" to the Lakers as evidence of offensive inefficiency was misguided because, as you pointed out, a close game does not inherently indicate shooting struggles. My original inclusion of specific shooting percentages and scoring averages was far stronger in illustrating the problem.
  2. Surface-Level Insights: The revised answer leaned too heavily on game recaps without connecting the information to broader trends or issues affecting the Warriors' season. While ESPN provides excellent analysis, I didn't fully leverage their deeper insights or explore advanced stats that they often report on.
  3. Overcorrection: I overemphasized sourcing ESPN specifically, even if it didn’t directly address your query, instead of sticking to the original structure, which offered concrete and relevant data points. My attempt to "improve" ended up diluting the quality.

Why Didn't I Use The Best of ESPN/The Athletic?​

  1. Accessibility: As you noted, The Athletic is behind a paywall, and much of ESPN's deeper analysis often requires Insider/ESPN+ access. While I aim to use the best available free information, this sometimes means relying on secondary sources that summarize insights from premium outlets.
  2. Efficiency Trade-off: In my revision, I tried to incorporate sources quickly rather than prioritizing whether the new information was truly superior. This led to a less thoughtful response.

Commitment to Improvement:​

Let me attempt a stronger revision by returning to the original structure (which you preferred) and supplementing it with advanced analysis where possible. I'll also pull from the most reputable and detailed publicly available sources, ensuring I clearly distinguish valid statistical trends from unsupported assertions. Let me try again.

Apologies for the earlier shortcomings in my responses. Building upon our previous discussions and incorporating the latest available information, here's a more comprehensive analysis of the Golden State Warriors' challenges up to January 28, 2025:

1. Offensive Inconsistencies
The Warriors have experienced fluctuations in their offensive performance. For instance, in their season opener on October 24, 2024, they dominated the Portland Trail Blazers with a 139-104 victory, showcasing efficient shooting and ball movement. However, in subsequent games, their scoring output has been inconsistent, with notable declines in shooting percentages during certain stretches. This inconsistency has made it challenging for the team to maintain momentum.
africa.espn.com

2. Defensive Challenges
Defensively, the Warriors have struggled to contain opponents, leading to high-scoring games that often don't favor them. In a recent game against the Washington Wizards on January 18, 2025, while they secured a 122-114 victory, the defense allowed the Wizards to score 114 points, indicating potential lapses in defensive execution.
espn.com

3. Injury Concerns
Injuries have also played a role in the team's performance. Key players have missed games due to various ailments, disrupting team chemistry and forcing adjustments in the lineup. These absences have placed additional pressure on the remaining healthy players to fill the void.

4. Inconsistent Bench Production
The Warriors' bench has had mixed contributions throughout the season. While there have been games where the reserves have stepped up, there have also been instances where the lack of bench scoring has put undue pressure on the starters, leading to fatigue and decreased efficiency in crucial moments.
Addressing these areas will be crucial for the Warriors as they aim to improve their performance in the remainder of the season.
Bro it is not a big win! Deepseek has not unleash the sauce as yet. They are playing chickens with Chatgpt to pull them out. How can you say it's win when Chatgpt spent Billions and they spent less than 6 Million?
The data may not be updated, but it beating chatgpt hands with eyes closed!
 

Costanza

Rising Star
Registered
Bro it is not a big win! Deepseek has not unleash the sauce as yet. They are playing chickens with Chatgpt to pull them out. How can you say it's win when Chatgpt spent Billions and they spent less than 6 Million?
The data may not be updated, but it beating chatgpt hands with eyes closed!

I understand your point-- I just meant as far as assessing the two products from a consumer standpoint. So I meant "big win" to mean it is the vastly superior product in that regard right now.
 

Mixd

Duppy Maker
BGOL Investor
I'm not pointing any fingers at some in the thread asking either ChatGPT or Deepseek is "opinion" on views.

I personally feel you guys are not using it's real capabilities for real life uses.

For example. My son is in school for Game Development. He does a alot of complex coding and problem solving when coding to design many of the games or reactions within.

He pays for ChatGPT and it's helped him a lot in college. Professors do not frown upon their use and some of his professors encourage it. Last year some code had him stumped for months and ChatGPT got him across a major hurdle for which he praises it.

I've personally used it for copy on items I sell online for stuff I have mass produced and a variety of other items I sell or promote.

I could care less about it's opinions on why the sky is blue or how it feels about a yellow polka dotted duck.

This shit is a tool. Use it.
I have many times and eaten from it.

Ask it how to automate lead generation for your business. Ask it for copy for a sales email or advertisement.

It's madd versatile.

And I'm not worried about logging my keystrokes. I'm not using it for anything criminal. Just biz.

These tools are truly invaluable

End of rant
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
AI is scam, it won't be replacing you on a job anytime soon. It is a catalyst to pump and dump stocks.

I've looked over the research on it.
 

Journey

Rising Star
Registered
they are doing the same thing that every other tech company is doing....

you think amazon...meta....google isn't doing the same thing?
the US govt?



your passwords....search histories are all being stored and have been for decades now....people have their banking info stored with their cable company....phone provider...electric company....etc
but suddenly are wary of the chinese company but not the dozens of american companies that ALREADY have and sell their info
I would rather have China have certain
partial or minimal identifiable information about me than home soil or home country. Your not a threat to China if you don't live there.
 

D24OHA

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

"Nvidia shares plunged 17% on Monday, wiping nearly $600 billion from its market value, after Chinese AI firm DeepSeek's breakthrough, but analysts are questioning the cost narrative. DeepSeek said to have trained its December V3 model for $5.6 million, but chip consultancy SemiAnalysis suggested this figure doesn't reflect total investments. "DeepSeek has spent well over $500 million on GPUs over the history of the company," Dylan Patel of SemiAnalysis said. "While their training run was very efficient, it required significant experimentation and testing to work."

Unnn huh
 

D24OHA

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I would rather have China have certain
partial or minimal identifiable information about me than home soil or home country. Your not a threat to China if you don't live there.

The Supreme Leader thanks you for your submission and compliance.

They are collecting massively more of your data than US companies are
 
Last edited:

D24OHA

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Exactly this is nothing new. Every social meda space, app and website does it. The main difference being here is that China is just upfront with it where the US hides behind the legal curtain of the terms and conditions that they know most people don’t read.

Keystrokes, file names / directories and etc.....

Monitoring what apps you use outside of theirs and for how long....

These are not things US are legally allowed to ask for, and for the most part they do not monitor them.

As far as cookies and seeing what sites/ads you view, YES they all are collecting that!

But your personal files on your personal device outside of cookies in the web browser or their app, that is a totally different thing!
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
These American AI companies were scamming us requiring unnecessary compute power so they charge for AI processors and other unneeded garbage. There needs to be a class action lawsuit brought against these AI companies.

Microsoft and Intel did the same type of scam. This is payback for banning Tiktok. American IT products if they aren't spying on you they're scamming you with these schemes. They were definitely looking to pump and dump stocks.

First it started with the self-driving cars that had all this nonsense features. Self driving cars can be done at a fraction of the cost.
 
Last edited:

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
Some of these companies have falsely alleged that they needed to process your personal data for AI reasons off site. I know Apple discussed encrypting this traffic which deep-seek has shown is unnecessary.

Another clever way to get their hooks into your private data to spy on you.

The sad thing is the nuclear reactors they were planning to build for their scam schemes.
 

Kaotix

wannabe star
BGOL Patreon Investor
All this talk about data collection... bruh... Just go to https://lmstudio.ai/ download and install the free, offline IDE, then download deepseek, ollama, or whatever other model you want and run the shit LOCALLY. No huge rig required. No data collection. Don't even need to be online to use it.

And THAT'S the part that has got the techclowns shittin' themselves. Not only does it expose the over-inflated price tags they fleeced their investors with, but who's gpnna pay OpenAI $200/month when you can run the shit yourself and get the same if not better results for the free? AND it doesn't phone home, because it can't?

Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit...

Media is calling this a "Sputnik" moment. Nah. This is like when Pro Tools and Autotune dropped and anyone who thought they had talent started making music.
 

praetor

Rising Star
OG Investor
All this talk about data collection... bruh... Just go to https://lmstudio.ai/ download and install the free, offline IDE, then download deepseek, ollama, or whatever other model you want and run the shit LOCALLY. No huge rig required. No data collection. Don't even need to be online to use it.

And THAT'S the part that has got the techclowns shittin' themselves. Not only does it expose the over-inflated price tags they fleeced their investors with, but who's gpnna pay OpenAI $200/month when you can run the shit yourself and get the same if not better results for the free? AND it doesn't phone home, because it can't?

Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit...

Media is calling this a "Sputnik" moment. Nah. This is like when Pro Tools and Autotune dropped and anyone who thought they had talent started making music.

The rig may not be physically big, but it'll either be pricey or slow, and/or stupid.

IMO small models (13B and below) tend to be stupid and will be no where near chatgpt. Larger models with quants lower than Q4 have draw backs as well.

That's all in addition to the fact that the larger the context, the more memory needed.

A 123B parameter model at Q8 with 131k context will need ~190GB of total ram. Dual channel DDR5 will yield less than one token/sec even on Intel platforms.
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
Self driving cars is a perfect example with all the cameras and microphones.

Many of us don't want their terrorists spyware garbage products. Spewing nonsense all day, annoying the f*** out of you.
 
Top