And by your poll choices… my initial response to you still applies. You obviously don’t grasp the evidence of evolution.
Notice I said evidence
Notice I said evidence
Do you believe in evolution?
- Thread starter lazarus
- Start date
i don't know either way but evolution theory has a lot of holes
you realize it's a theory not a proven occurrence, right?
it's comical you believe it's a fact.
The way he worded the poll is telling...
show me another with advanced intelligence.
a fish from 20000 BC still is a dumbass fish.
everyone else evolves having comparably the same intelligence.
we come from apes and magically have the ability to wonder about our existence .
FOH
I believe the science. I believe we came from a common ancestry and mutated/evolved into what we are today. We are still evolving now. Mutation = rapid change
Evolution = slow change
Much like climate ≠ weather
Evolution = slow change
Much like climate ≠ weather
And my theory shouldn't be talked about in Science circles! This goes back to the https://www.bgol.us/forum/threads/atheist-are-pissed-christian-owns-atheist.1253524/ thread. My faith in how GOD created man is not something science should strive to prove or disprove. Nor should I take my theory to science circles
We evolved from a common ancestor of the great apes. Humans share what, 93% or more of the same genetic codes? Our ancestors harnessed fire and tools. That allowed them to extract more nutrients from food sources that led to more brain fuel like bone marrow.
This was started by pro Humans in Africa. All humans evolved from them except cac's whom many of them have Neanderthal genes.
This was started by pro Humans in Africa. All humans evolved from them except cac's whom many of them have Neanderthal genes.
We share 90% DNA to mice, and 60% genetic coding to bananas. That's not proof of anything but that all living things share the same original design of life.
Hyenas eat brain marrow routinely. I don't see them coming up with nuclear physics.
The problem with evolution is that they can't come up with a valid reason why our intelligence increased exponentially, and ours alone, as we adapted. It doesn't work that way. You had to have the capacity to existential thought to begin with, it can't be created.
Once you are pigeon-holed into believing in evolution, you have to make some very circumstance reason to try to explain it which can easily be refuted.
Last edited:
OMG this nigga.
ALL VERTABRATES have some common DNA. At this point, you're choosing to be this fuckin' dumb.
I was wrong, we share 98.8% of DNA with the great apes.
Bill Gates doesn't know shit about genetics, so he's isn't qualified to speak on it.
The scientific definition of "theory" doesn't have the same meaning as its use colloquially.
It's Richard Dawkins speaking in the vid, not Bill Gates.
insult...no explanation, no rebuttal.
yeah, you don't know what you are talking about, only what was told to you.
When whites teach evolution they are teaching about their history. These devils lived in caves walking on all fours. They mated with monkeys, apes, etc. to learn how to walk upright again.
But there was a time when the only thing existed was black people. We are God and everything obeyed us, animals, birds, fish, etc. But during that time animals were not predator and prey like they are today. That came thru evolution. I could tell the whole story but am struggling to get the money to prove it also. We know white devils are allowed to tell their story, even if their is no proof of it. Mind control is powerful. Why are they still leading the whole world to hell?
But there was a time when the only thing existed was black people. We are God and everything obeyed us, animals, birds, fish, etc. But during that time animals were not predator and prey like they are today. That came thru evolution. I could tell the whole story but am struggling to get the money to prove it also. We know white devils are allowed to tell their story, even if their is no proof of it. Mind control is powerful. Why are they still leading the whole world to hell?
The difference between science and religion is science-based ideas are open to new ideas and theories. Science has and will make admission to being wrong, it would step aside and allow it's pages to be rewritten. Historically we know this to be true by in large. Faith-based religion will not. 9 planets is a really bad example you gave. They simply reclassified the size of celestial objects to be considered as planets. They didn't say it didn't exist as a religion would do in this case saying evolution doesnt exist or occur. Our intelligence isn't exponentially more advanced than other species, we simply have a few nuanced advantages. Reasoning and the ability to plan, complex language, complex social communities. The single advantage of reasoning takes the cake though. It envelops all others. It's the one gift that really sets us apart which was developed and passed down from generation to generation, from homo erectus to modern day man. It was time and pressure that created us, challenged by famine, the elements, warring groups, these forced our early ancestors to plan, like ants plan for winter, to use of memories like elephants, whales and even turtles, and to execute objectives and work together like wolves, ants, tigers, and chimps. Humans just brought it in a little tighter and combined it all together to give themselves an advantage. Having faith in science is a whole lot more productive than having faith in these false gods. Evolution is real. God did not plant two naked white people into the wilderness talking about some fucking apple, what kind of madness is that? Evolve from that wickedness bruh. Evolve. Science is what got you delivered out of you mom did it not? Now you in here debating it's not intelligent as you type on your scientific instrument that uses radio waves and signals, light diodes, electricity, computer science (programming) , metallurgy, mathematics, etc etc etc. Cmon man. Science is all around you, but it doesn't apply when talking about evolution, science is wrong at that point huh.
my argument is not based on faith and never mentioned it so when you are done with your tangent, let me know.
my skepticism towards evolution from apes has nothing to do with faith.
This is what the scientists want you to believe:
www.vice.com
The First Buttholes Might Have Been for Sperm Instead of Poop
Forget everything you thought you knew about your asshole. It turns out, buttholes might have originally been used to dispel sperm.
www.vice.com
Is this really the direction in which you would like to take this thread?This is what the scientists want you to believe:
The First Buttholes Might Have Been for Sperm Instead of Poop
Forget everything you thought you knew about your asshole. It turns out, buttholes might have originally been used to dispel sperm.
i wasn't expecting this left turn dawgThis is what the scientists want you to believe:
The First Buttholes Might Have Been for Sperm Instead of Poop
Forget everything you thought you knew about your asshole. It turns out, buttholes might have originally been used to dispel sperm.
Nah, not totally true.
Scientific theories are not considered absolute facts. Rather, they are well-substantiated explanations of natural phenomena, based on a robust body of evidence. A scientific theory is developed through repeated observation and experimentation and is supported by facts, but it remains open to revision or refinement as new evidence becomes available.
For example, the theory of gravity explains the forces between objects with mass, and the theory of evolution describes the process of change in living organisms over generations. Both are backed by extensive evidence and provide reliable frameworks for understanding the natural world, yet they could be further refined as science progresses. Think of theories as the best explanations science can offer at a given time—always adaptable and built on evidence.
Science primarily focuses on understanding the natural world through observation, experimentation, and evidence, while the concept of God often pertains to spirituality, metaphysics, and matters beyond physical reality. Science doesn't directly support or refute the theory of God, but some argue that certain scientific discoveries can be interpreted as evidence pointing toward the existence of a higher power or creator.
- Many scientists observe that the fundamental constants of the universe (like the strength of gravity or the speed of light) are finely tuned to allow for the existence of life. Some interpret this fine-tuning as evidence of intentional design, though others propose theories like the multiverse.
- The idea that the universe had a beginning—a moment of creation—raises philosophical and theological questions. Some people view this as aligning with the idea of a divine creator.
- The intricate design and complexity of life, from DNA structures to ecosystems, lead some to argue for intelligent design. However, evolutionary theory explains these complexities without invoking a divine presence.
- Science continues to grapple with understanding consciousness and morality, which some argue could point to something beyond physical explanation, like a divine source.
I got a better question: *sings* do you belieeeve inlife after looove.....?