You obviously refuse to listen to what I’m saying.Dogs, because you can name a couple niggas don't make that the rule. And let's be real here, most of that with bigger named producers is gonna be SAMPLE CLEARANCE issues, not jacking songs damn near whole cloth and acting like wha who me?
Aside from Pharrell and Robin Thicke, what other producers had similar cases? The two other niggas you named haven't even been accused of that shit man lol you making stuff up.
Also, there's literally thousands of producers out here. Actual working producers and not niggas with fruity on a laptop that wouldn't recognize their own music if they heard it played through actual reference monitors. To state that these cases are the norm is just false bro.
Cite the cases though and prove me wrong.
And yeah I didn’t think about it but these definitely sound alike.
I think the biggest problem with music is that Subconscious plagiarism is a real thing and it’s also an actionable claim....
Ed might as well open up the wallet
Naw I'm not hearing it lol. I don't even know if these people have a case.....but initially when I first heard it I thought that shit sounded like Let's Get It On.
They don't have a case, they are similar in certain ways but not enough to sue.
This ones a bit of a stretch.
Ed will lose after the plaintiffs introduce as evidence this live performance of his from 2014. Skip to 4:28.Couple years ago I turned to Tom Joyner on the radio when they were doing the old school/new school remix. They were playing "Let's Get It On" and when it got to the chorus they dubbed Sheeran's vocals in rhythm...I was like
Ed will lose after the plaintiffs introduce as evidence this live performance of his from 2014. Skip to 4:28.
Ed will lose after the plaintiffs introduce as evidence this live performance of his from 2014. Skip to 4:28.
I was JUST coming to post this...
Lol naw nigga you just wrongYou obviously refuse to listen to what I’m saying.
Ed will lose after the plaintiffs introduce as evidence this live performance of his from 2014. Skip to 4:28.
Like I said you not listening to what I’m saying I’m not talking about actual court cases I’m talking about accusations of producers stealing from no name producers or past songs. It happens all the damn time b. It’s damn near impossible to prove but there have been mad no name people accusing big producers of stealing their shit. Niggas send un solicited beats trying to get on only to end up having that shit jacked. If you’re in demand you can’t do it all on your own , either you hire a ghost producer or you start stealing shit it happensLol naw nigga you just wrong
Cite them cases you was so sure about two posts ago famzu
We just debating. Prove me wrong pimp.
That's true.Like I said you not listening to what I’m saying I’m not talking about actual court cases I’m talking about accusations of producers stealing from no name producers or past songs. It happens all the damn time b. It’s damn near impossible to prove but there have been mad no name people accusing big producers of stealing their shit. Niggas send un solicited beats trying to get on only to end up having that shit jacked. If you’re in demand you can’t do it all on your own , either you hire a ghost producer or you start stealing shit it happens
Not at all b that’s what I was talking about the whole time lolThat's true.
But that is not this.
I feel like you switched that thang up on me mid discussion a lil bit lol
Yep.CACs doing what CACs do........leech.
White folks been doing it damn near from day one, which should tell you right there it's an unethical choice made by less than creative "creatives".
Somebody posted the nigga Elvis bit the other day. Them muhfuckas ain't shit.Chuck Berry had a profound influence on the Rolling Stones, particularly on Keith Richards, who said of Mr. Berry: “I’ve stolen every lick he ever played.”
Somebody posted the nigga Elvis bit the other day. Them muhfuckas ain't shit.
See that's the thing
first I didn't HEAR it until someone TOLD me what to listen for...
that to me that matters.
Ed will lose after the plaintiffs introduce as evidence this live performance of his from 2014. Skip to 4:28.
and this song has been out for YEARS now...
that should ALSO count for something.
Exactly right this is what a producer explained on a podcast I listened to a few yrs back imma try to find it in the morningYou let a song "live" in the world / on the charts to make as much money as possible, no need to kill its momentum, let it stay at #1 on billboard and ring up all those $ales so you can claim more in damage$$$ later. When they went after "Blurred Lines" they let it go almost 2 years for that very reason.
You can't get millions if you sue a song thats only been out 2 months, it probably hasn't made much money by then
A lot of ppl heard it, and this is damn near an admission of guilt... His song fits perfectly over the original.
You let a song "live" in the world / on the charts to make as much money as possible, no need to kill its momentum, let it stay at #1 on billboard and ring up all those $ales so you can claim more in damage$$$ later. When they went after "Blurred Lines" they let it go almost 2 years for that very reason.
You can't get millions if you sue a song thats only been out 2 months, it probably hasn't made much money by then
I see what they mean.
I think it's also sounds very similar to this...
Ed Sheeran - Thinking Out Loud (Instrumental Official)
Marvin Gaye - Let's Get It On (Official Instrumental)