And that holster he has is specifically for covering the trigger guard. Once she started fiddling with it trying to remove the gun, it was only a matter of time before it discharged cuz she obviously had no idea what she was doing
Female cop fired after shooting Black man in the leg with his own gun during traffic stop.
- Thread starter DaAssWatcher
- Start date
You don't need to put your hand in the trigger housing to pull it out of the holster..that was either complete incompetence or intentional..either way she shouldn't be in law enforcement anymore..if she is she needs to be like prez..behind a desk
thats why i dont buy glocks i need a safety on mines...
I mean it's got the lil thing on the trigger that has to be pressed in before the trigger will go.
which just means she was pulling his gun off him with her finger fully on his trigger
Dude gonna be chillinFor a traffic stop, huh? Time to get paid.
Take a quick look at the video I posted, when you get a chance
Especially between the 4:15--6:45 mark
This youtuber explains exactly whats happens
He slows down & pauses the vid, to show how stupid this cop was at handling the gun
Last edited:
yea thats mos-def how she grabbed it...
Finger on the trigger confirmed..case closed
Most holsters yes. That one in particular is designed to lock around the trigger guard to minimize the overall footprint
Your brain is your safety. Following proper gun safety at all times especially the rule of treating the firearm as if it's loaded at all times is enough of a safety to prevent negligent discharges. You typically need to break 2 rules before an incident like that happens and if you follow the primary rule, then all of the others becomes common sense
More cops are nonproficient in handling firearms than ppl realize. A lot of them only do the bare minimum in training just to keep their badges
I had a cop reach in thru my window and take it off my hip. I was definitely worried about this happening
or you could just buy one with a safety.
It's a fuckin ticket for running a red light...there's no reason to pull out a licensed to carry holder to take his weapon..you simply give em a ticket and keep it movin - unless of course he's automatically seen as another scary armed black dude. Folks don't even notice my safe...
Last edited:
Your brain should always be your safety. If you prefer to have one then cool but the majority of quality pistols do not have that switch on them. There are other safety components built-in but at the end of the day properly following gun safety rules should always be the primary safety before relying on any physical features on a firearm.
Sort of defeats the purpose for concealed carry
If you have young kids it's understandable. Otherwise it's not that difficult not to put five pounds of pressure on the trigger
I've heard of cops shooting themselves accidentally
Do you always keep a round chambered while you're carrying?
Totally different situationsLest we forget
One was murder
One was a incident
Both variables had a female cop who should have been playing with her cats or baking cookies with their kids.
Always. Not keeping 1 chambered is like waiting til right before an accident to put on your seatbelt.
i dont even let them disarm me during traffic stops when i let them know i have a gun.
you have a right to refuse to be disarmed.
They'll give that whole "oh its for our safety" speech.
Naw mf....for my safety, i want to keep my gun on me. I'm not gonna make any sudden movements and keep my hands in plain sight,
but i'm not giving you my weapon.
And the purpose is......just like they run a background check on you when they have your ID, they run a background check on your weapon too once its in their possession.
you have a right to refuse to be disarmed.
They'll give that whole "oh its for our safety" speech.
Naw mf....for my safety, i want to keep my gun on me. I'm not gonna make any sudden movements and keep my hands in plain sight,
but i'm not giving you my weapon.
And the purpose is......just like they run a background check on you when they have your ID, they run a background check on your weapon too once its in their possession.
If he's legally carrying there is no reason they should be disarming him in the first place. But since these cops are too PUSSY nowadays they always "fear" for their lives.
Y'all peeped the X comments?It's some majority cacs against their own cac bitch.
This...
Of course. Defeats the purpose of carrying to leave your chamber empty. Defense situations can happen too fast to be chambering a round and I would never train myself to be fiddling with safeties on a handgun. The word for today is trigger discipline.
I have a cousin and an old schoolmate who are cops. I put in more training time than both of them combined. I saw my cousins duty weapon once, fool had dorito crumbs lodged in front of the barrel hood.
I carry Glocks and Sigs because they DON'T have safeties. The word for today is trigger discipline.
I don't have to "fiddle" with it , just click it off with my thumb.
i hear you. Nobody has ever accidently discharged a weapon while the safety is on... meanwhile....I carry Glocks and Sigs because they DON'T have safeties. The word for today is trigger discipline.
https://www.xinsurance.com/blog/con...mon are accidental,well as many more injuries.
But how common are accidental discharges?
More than a few of those cases involve accidents. The National Safety Council reports that about 1% of all gun deaths are preventable, unintentional discharges. That figure may sound small, but it amounts to about 535 accidental gun deaths a year, as well as many more injuries