GNX-Kendrick Lamar (new Album and video out 2024)Drake Is Suing lol
for the last time...
Why do you guys keep using reason logic and maturity in this situation?
How many dead rappers in the past 10 years? Over bullsh*t threats?
How many bad music contracts signed STILL?
Didn't Puff claim in public Cassie was liar and he never touched and even after the video men defended him?
What more horrible stuff T.rump has to say and do? And still win?
How many gay gifs does a bgol member need to post before...
Let me stop I think you get the point.
Yall all claim to this higher sys Dard but I never see evidence to support it.
Drake doing and done what most of yall would and some if yall done worse for. free.
@D24OHA
Don't trust them bro. When they get it they feelings?
Anything is possible
He joking but the irony is the MODERN rap fan is so dumb they DID believe the pedo stuff.
That's exactly what drove Aubrey insane and led to this.
AFTER Push Ups. Let's not forget the timeline.
PUSH UPS started the ball rolling with the family attack bullshit. "DAVE FREEEEEEEEE" You called his woman a whore, his best friend a snake, and his son a bastard then BEGGED him to respond. All his proxies DARED him to respond.
He responded with EUPHORIA and 6:16 where Kendrick warned him not to escalate this shit.
FAMILY MATTERS dropped calling Kendrick a woman beater.
THENNNNNNNNNNNNN MEET THE GRAHAMS drops addressing Drake's family.
NLU follows calling him a pedo.
This shit is on Drake, his hubris, and his lack of smart counsel. None of this had to happen. But Drake is obsessed with bringing people's women into the battle. He did it with Meek (award tour, or your girl's tour), he did it with Pusha (..like Virigina William) and he did it with both Rocky and Kendrick. And now he wants to fucking sue. Fuck off, Aubrey.
OK, that’s hilarious lol
Most pussy shit I’ve seen from him.Drake Files Second Action Against UMG, Alleging Defamation Over Kendrick Lamar’s ‘False’ Song
The new filing, which claims UMG "funneled payments" to iHeartRadio as part of a "pay-to-play scheme," sheds new light on the blockbuster dispute.
BY BILL DONAHUE
Drake performs during Wicked (Spelhouse Homecoming Concert) Featuring 21 Savage at Forbes Arena at Morehouse College on Oct. 19, 2022 in Atlanta. Prince Williams/Wireimage
Drake has launched a second bombshell legal action against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” accusing the music giant of defamation and claiming it could have halted the release of a song “falsely accusing him of being a sex offender.”
RELATED
Drake Accuses UMG & Spotify of Scheme to ‘Artificially Inflate’ Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us…
A day after filing an action in New York accusing UMG of illegally boosting Lamar’s track on Spotify, Drake’s company leveled similar claims in Texas court regarding radio giant iHeartRadio. The new filing, filed late Monday and made public on Tuesday, claims UMG “funneled payments” to iHeart as part of a “pay-to-play scheme” to promote the song on radio.
But the filing also offers key new details about Drake’s grievances toward UMG, the label where he has spent his entire career. In it, he says UMG knew that Kendrick’s song “falsely” accused him of being a “certified pedophile” and “predator” but chose to release it anyway.
“UMG … could have refused to release or distribute the song or required the offending material to be edited and/or removed,” Drake’s lawyers write. “But UMG chose to do the opposite. UMG designed, financed and then executed a plan to turn ‘Not Like Us’ into a viral mega-hit with the intent of using the spectacle of harm to Drake and his businesses to drive consumer hysteria and, of course, massive revenues. That plan succeeded, likely beyond UMG’s wildest expectations.”
Like the New York filing on Monday, the new petition isn’t quite a lawsuit. Instead, it’s so-called pre-action filing aimed taking depositions from key figures at UMG and iHeart in order to obtain more information that might support Drake’s accusations in a future lawsuit.
In seeking that information, Drake’s lawyers say they already have enough evidence to pursue a “claim for defamation” against UMG, but that they might also tack on claims of civil fraud and racketeering based on what they discover from the depositions.
UMG and iHeartRadio did not immediately return requests for comment on the new filing. Lamar is not named as a respondent in the filing and is not legally accused of any wrongdoing.
Universal Music Group responded to yesterday’s filing with a statement provided to Billboard. “The suggestion that UMG would do anything to undermine any of its artists is offensive and untrue,” the company said. “We employ the highest ethical practices in our marketing and promotional campaigns. No amount of contrived and absurd legal arguments in this pre-action submission can mask the fact that fans choose the music they want to hear.”
RELATED
Universal Music Group Responds to Drake Legal Filing Over ‘Not Like Us’: ‘Offensive & Untrue…
Like Monday’s bombshell petition, the new filing in Texas is another remarkable escalation in the high-profile beef between the two stars, which saw Drake and Lamar exchange stinging diss tracks over a period of months earlier this year. Such beefs happen frequently in the world of hip-hop, but few thought either side would file legal actions over the insults.
It also represents a deepening of the rift between Drake and UMG, where the star has spent his entire career — first through signing a deal with Lil Wayne’s Young Money imprint, which was distributed by Republic Records, then by signing directly to Republic. Lamar, too, has spent his entire career associated with UMG and is currently signed to a licensing deal with Interscope.
In Tuesday’s new petition, Drake essentially accused the music giant of using illegal means to unfairly prioritize one of its artists over the other.
“Before it approved the release of the song, UMG knew that the song itself, as well as its accompanying album art and music video, attacked the character of another one of UMG’s most prominent artists, Drake, by falsely accusing him of being a sex offender, engaging in pedophilic acts, harboring sex offenders and committing other criminal sexual acts,” his lawyers write.
This is what happens when you let white boys in the game, they try to change the rules. In battles you always said some shit to hurt the other persons credibility, no matter what it was. It can be made up, that's like when we used to bag on each other and say shit like your mom's got a ped leg with a kickstand. We knew that shit wasn't true but that's part of the game to get the other person upset. Drake said shit about Kendrick but Dot didn't try to sue, he put pen to paper and made hits. Drake going to mess around and have an investigation opened up on him. It's not like he doesn't have videos of him doing weird shit whith underage girls, that's why calling him a pedo isn't far off. Any nigga doing what he did or said about underage girls would be called a pedo. I hope he gets questioned on all of that stuff.
who started it tho?
I said this during the battle. Kendrick made the reaction channels a bag when he whitelisted the music they were reacting to. Kendrick whitelisted EVERYONE to make bread. OVO could've whitelisted the music too and just let the chips fall where they will with the reactions but they tried to pick and choose whoever was gonna carry their narrative
Okay... Aubrey don't give a f*ck about all that
Neither do his fans
Yall wasting keystrokes trying to rationalize with the irrational
Let me keep it simple
Drake lost but yall had to make it that he KEPT losing
You cannot have been in a fist fight, argued with a woman or worked in corporate and not understand the basic rule of engagement
Know when to stop and take the win
Or else be fully prepared to lose in a way you never expected.
The horse was long dead
yall kept beating it.
So here we are.
And I got no issues with it as much as I wish Drake didn't do this b*tch move.
No matter what?
I completely understand.
Last edited:
It doesn't matter
Where is all this justice and reason for EVERYTHING ELSE?
Why all of sudden yall found religion over THIS?
FAR FAR FAR worse has been done in hip hop and in black culture. All don't care this much about right and wrong.
Hell I seen worse on bgol and I ain't seen all this emotion. YAll like to call everything feminine you don't like, well... Stop being feminine. Aubrey sent the dogs to eat the case.
Now what's Kendrick 5D chess move.
I thought he sees all and knows all?
He should be prepared like Batman for this right?
This ain't nothing
Yall got yall panties in a bunch and pearls clenched.
Black Baba Yaga gonna be just fine
Sit back and watch the show.
But this is why folks are still laughing because he did the same thing to Meek. He carried tf outta that W and was posting memes about Meek on the screen behind him after at his shows. Does he think that L didn't affect Meek's image? I know Meek gotta be like, "Wait, i could've sued?"
Last edited:
how?
specially if one side says no low shit?
Yes you do!
It doesn't matter
Everything all ready happening
Yall don't REALLY care who stated this.
They hate Drake even if he didn't start it.
It is what it is.
Drake had lots of haters prior, that's true. But he DID start it. And he made the mistake after the Pusha debacle AND getting two warnings from Kendrick.
First I was just fuckin witcha, it's jokes.
And in this thread we've been talking about and struggling to find songs Wayne could perform.
And yes Lollipop is his biggest hit that unfortunately because of the lyrics, it's not acceptable for the Super Bowl.
So what would I have him play at the Super Bowl?
Kendrick
i am in no way advocating for trust.
im saying we cant learn anything from people who use intimidation, threats, coercion, manipulation, rape and other physical violence to keep EACH OTHER in lock step.
once white people are programmed they are completely brainwashed. they're just robots with no sense of individuality beyond the surface.
we do not need to be like that.
Fresh Air break
Last edited:
Drake Files Second Action Against UMG, Alleging Defamation Over Kendrick Lamar’s ‘False’ Song
The new filing, which claims UMG "funneled payments" to iHeartRadio as part of a "pay-to-play scheme," sheds new light on the blockbuster dispute.
BY BILL DONAHUE
Drake performs during Wicked (Spelhouse Homecoming Concert) Featuring 21 Savage at Forbes Arena at Morehouse College on Oct. 19, 2022 in Atlanta. Prince Williams/Wireimage
Drake has launched a second bombshell legal action against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” accusing the music giant of defamation and claiming it could have halted the release of a song “falsely accusing him of being a sex offender.”
RELATED
Drake Accuses UMG & Spotify of Scheme to ‘Artificially Inflate’ Kendrick Lamar’s ‘Not Like Us…
A day after filing an action in New York accusing UMG of illegally boosting Lamar’s track on Spotify, Drake’s company leveled similar claims in Texas court regarding radio giant iHeartRadio. The new filing, filed late Monday and made public on Tuesday, claims UMG “funneled payments” to iHeart as part of a “pay-to-play scheme” to promote the song on radio.
But the filing also offers key new details about Drake’s grievances toward UMG, the label where he has spent his entire career. In it, he says UMG knew that Kendrick’s song “falsely” accused him of being a “certified pedophile” and “predator” but chose to release it anyway.
“UMG … could have refused to release or distribute the song or required the offending material to be edited and/or removed,” Drake’s lawyers write. “But UMG chose to do the opposite. UMG designed, financed and then executed a plan to turn ‘Not Like Us’ into a viral mega-hit with the intent of using the spectacle of harm to Drake and his businesses to drive consumer hysteria and, of course, massive revenues. That plan succeeded, likely beyond UMG’s wildest expectations.”
Like the New York filing on Monday, the new petition isn’t quite a lawsuit. Instead, it’s so-called pre-action filing aimed taking depositions from key figures at UMG and iHeart in order to obtain more information that might support Drake’s accusations in a future lawsuit.
In seeking that information, Drake’s lawyers say they already have enough evidence to pursue a “claim for defamation” against UMG, but that they might also tack on claims of civil fraud and racketeering based on what they discover from the depositions.
UMG and iHeartRadio did not immediately return requests for comment on the new filing. Lamar is not named as a respondent in the filing and is not legally accused of any wrongdoing.
Universal Music Group responded to yesterday’s filing with a statement provided to Billboard. “The suggestion that UMG would do anything to undermine any of its artists is offensive and untrue,” the company said. “We employ the highest ethical practices in our marketing and promotional campaigns. No amount of contrived and absurd legal arguments in this pre-action submission can mask the fact that fans choose the music they want to hear.”
RELATED
Universal Music Group Responds to Drake Legal Filing Over ‘Not Like Us’: ‘Offensive & Untrue…
Like Monday’s bombshell petition, the new filing in Texas is another remarkable escalation in the high-profile beef between the two stars, which saw Drake and Lamar exchange stinging diss tracks over a period of months earlier this year. Such beefs happen frequently in the world of hip-hop, but few thought either side would file legal actions over the insults.
It also represents a deepening of the rift between Drake and UMG, where the star has spent his entire career — first through signing a deal with Lil Wayne’s Young Money imprint, which was distributed by Republic Records, then by signing directly to Republic. Lamar, too, has spent his entire career associated with UMG and is currently signed to a licensing deal with Interscope.
In Tuesday’s new petition, Drake essentially accused the music giant of using illegal means to unfairly prioritize one of its artists over the other.
“Before it approved the release of the song, UMG knew that the song itself, as well as its accompanying album art and music video, attacked the character of another one of UMG’s most prominent artists, Drake, by falsely accusing him of being a sex offender, engaging in pedophilic acts, harboring sex offenders and committing other criminal sexual acts,” his lawyers write.
I never thought I'd see the day that a rapper would go full Alonzo.
I hope drake is okay
@ViCiouS
Mal has starting mainlining that pink Tide
And sharing with the other 2 hosts
Saying GNX ain't fire?
Yall bugging
white boys
Last edited:
Even calling something a red button ( this is what they dubbed it) is lame pump faking behavior
Disgrace ass rapper
They love you today and hate you tomorrow,that's how it goes.But to sue after you started the shit?where they do that at?.You and Jcole need to partner up and become the Mario and Luigi of rap because ya'll are both half Crackers and it's showing..."Ya song is talking about me,my lable,my brand,staff, my record lable and I'm suing you motherfucker","I-I-I got beside myself,I don't know what came over me.I should of never dissed you guys,can you just act like it never happened,please?"
While rappers in ATL,Chicago,Miami,NYC,N.O,Texas,LA are going to prison or getting killed over battles and street shit,while ya'll are at the top making millions and ya'll playing games......
Now ask yourself......
While rappers in ATL,Chicago,Miami,NYC,N.O,Texas,LA are going to prison or getting killed over battles and street shit,while ya'll are at the top making millions and ya'll playing games......
Now ask yourself......