Movie Debate: Ethan Hawke Doesn’t Think Superhero Movies Deserve Same Praise As All Other Movies UPDATE: ON SECOND THOUGHT!

gdatruth

A Man Apart
Certified Pussy Poster
as talented actor I respect his opinoin although i agree agree to disagree

personally as a black man living in America when i go to the movies i wanna be transported to world where:

violence reigns supreme
where the good guys win
when jokes are sophomoric and the jokes revolve around sex & drugs
when the good guys never miss and the bad guys cant shot for shit
where one man (denzel, liam, wilson, etc.) can take out out a shitload of ppl with a set of specific tools


basically I love action flicks, horror flicks, dumb comedies and COMIC flicks

life is hard...when i go to the movies I wanna have FUN
 

tallblacknyc

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
He starred in the original purge which hands down was 1 of the shittiest acting cast ever...the son sucked, the daughter sucked, the boyfriend, the neighbors, best actor was the blonde dude.. That movie had so many flaws in it... From a gun being shot in 1 hand and next sec the gun is in the other hand... 1 of the biggest movies with a great concept and a shitty execution... Booo that man... How the 4th installment is better than the first 3 movies combined
 

gene cisco

Not A BGOL Eunuch
BGOL Investor
as talented actor I respect his opinoin although i agree agree to disagree

personally as a black man living in America when i go to the movies i wanna be transported to world where:

violence reigns supreme
where the good guys win
when jokes are sophomoric and the jokes revolve around sex & drugs
when the good guys never miss and the bad guys cant shot for shit
where one man (denzel, liam, wilson, etc.) can take out out a shitload of ppl with a set of specific tools


basically I love action flicks, horror flicks, dumb comedies and COMIC flicks

life is hard...when i go to the movies I wanna have FUN

Exactly. But snobs want folks to pay all the money to go to see Lifetime moves.

The theater experience nowadays is basically really only necessary for special effects.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
@largebillsonlyplease
@ViCiouS
@fonzerrillii

Ethan Hawke Is Right About Superhero Movies — For Now
By Abraham Riesman@abrahamjoseph
28-logan.w700.h700.jpg

Is Logan as good as it gets? Photo: Twentieth Century Fox

My first instinct was to agree with Ethan Hawke.

The actor sat down with the Film Stage the other day to gab about an array of topics and the conversation eventually turned to the pillar upon which contemporary Hollywood is built: superhero movies. To put it simply, he’s not much of a fan, and he seemed particularly irked by the praise thrown at James Mangold’s 2017 X-Men spinoff Logan. Quoth Hawke:

Now we have the problem that they tell us Logan is a great movie. Well, it’s a great superhero movie. It still involves people in tights with metal coming out of their hands. It’s not Bresson. It’s not Bergman. But they talk about it like it is. I went to see Logan cause everyone was like, “This is a great movie” and I was like, “Really? No, this is a fine superhero movie.” There’s a difference but big business doesn’t think there’s a difference. Big business wants you to think that this is a great film because they wanna make money off of it.

Now, before we go any further, I have to point out that I love Logan. That’s a matter of record. I cried on no fewer than three occasions during the screening. It’s near the top of my list of the 30 best superhero movies of the 20-year-old superhero boom. I had a great conversation with Mangold about it. I wrote about how important it was that the film was nominated for a writing Oscar. I have, more times than I can count, recommended and praised it in casual conversation.

one essay by my colleague Matt Zoller Seitz, written in the wake of 2014’s abysmal The Amazing Spider-Man 2. Entitled “Things Crashing Into Other Things: My Superhero Problem,” it laid it all out: the complacency of commerce (“The fat bottom lines guarantee that neither studios nor producers nor writers nor directors will feel much pressure to make superhero films great, as opposed to better than expected”), the flatlined expectations of viewers (“The audience seems to have no interest in demanding better films, much less excellent ones. It settles for okay and better-than-okay. As long as the films aren’t unbearably bad or unnervingly personal, they’re content”), and the risk-averse sameness (“Their goal is to minimize financial risk and avoid a scenario in which viewers buy a ticket for the latest Marvel picture and get something substantially different from what they’ve been conditioned to expect”).

A counterpoint is often that Hollywood churned out a lot of Westerns (the genre Logan most wanted to ape) too, and they included genre pieces that are — at least now — regarded as great art: The Searchers, The Outlaw Josey Wales, High Noon, Shane, and so on. But even here, solid arguments can be made that Westerns were more open to innovation than superhero flicks are, for a variety of reasons. John Heath summed them up nicely in an essay that responded to Seitz’s: Westerns’ comparative cheapness made experimentation less risky; Westerns weren’t chained to telling the stories of literally the same characters (your Batmen and Captains America) over and over again; Western actors were more important to success than their characters while it’s vice versa for superheroes; and so on. A grim picture is painted.

But let’s take a deep breath and step back for a moment. These are all commercial considerations, not really thematic ones. Is the very idea of the superhero story broken at the core? I have to believe that’s not the case.

There are plenty of superhero stories that have risen to the level of great art. They just haven’t been found at the movie theater yet. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the debut of Superman, the first real superhero, in the pages of Action Comics No. 1. In the decades since that pivot point in global culture, a great many creators and creative teams have made superpowered narratives that are as rich as any piece of genre fiction in any medium: the unprecedented works of writer-artist Jack Kirby in the ’60s and ’70s, the soaring deconstructionist achievements of Watchmen in the ’80s, the pulpy brilliance of Kurt Busiek and Brent Anderson’s ongoing Astro City saga, Grant Morrison’s cosmic take on Batman, the recent young-adult genius of Ms. Marvel. I could go on.

What all of these stories have in common is their ability to riff on the fantastic, fundamental question of the superhero: What does it mean to use extraordinary power? It’s a theme that’s universally relatable, insofar as we all have unique abilities and advantages that make us special in one way or another, and we all need to grapple with the ways in which we deploy them — and the consequences of their misuse. There are trappings and tropes of the superhero genre that are fun — serialized storytelling, world-crushing threats, alternate universes, improbable technology, visually interesting shows of force, self-referential banter — but they’re empty if you don’t have an interesting take on the quandary of power.

All too often, superhero movies get caught up in the window dressing because they don’t have anything interesting to say about power. How many times have these pictures simply told us a variation of “with great power comes great responsibility” by showing us a person or a group who are reluctant or confused about how to use their power for the greater good, then get their shit together to do so in the end? You can obscure the sameness with new visuals (the boilerplate Doctor Strange had some terrific CGI whiz-bang) or topical jokes (Thor: Ragnarok is quite funny despite mostly being just another story about overcoming the odds against great evil), but rarely do you see anyone truly innovate with the narrative core of the genre. You can come up with extremely fun, well-crafted versions of the same old, same old (The Avengers and Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy come to mind), but you’ll only go so far.

There’s so much more to mine here! There have been steps in the right direction, like Unbreakable’s meditations on the self-doubt of the potentially powerful American middle class; or Black Panther’s grappling with how utopian societies and people of color use power; or, yes, Hawke’s bête noire Logan, in which we’re forced to wonder whether a violent man can be a kind of Christ figure, using his power to do terrible things as a way to take on the sins that a child shouldn’t be forced to commit. They’re all still held back by the considerations Seitz and Heath outlined (Unbreakable inserts a wholly unnecessary serial killer for easy shocks, Black Panther loses a lot of steam in its formulaic third act, Logan only really resonates if you’ve seen a ton of X-Men movies) but they stab toward greatness in a way that should give us cause for optimism.

Someday, hopefully not too far in the future, an auteur or an artistic collective will be given the freedom to ruminate on power in a way that cinema hasn’t seen before. That can even mean outright ripping off a comic that’s done it well already. There’s no shame in that. What matters is taking honest stock of all the commercial considerations that handicap so many superhero flicks and choosing to ignore them. I don’t hold out much hope that we’ll see that kind of experimentation en masse anytime soon. But I don’t think superhero narratives are fundamentally doomed to the kind of non-ambition that Hawke identifies. We don’t have to live in a world where superhero cinema regularly induces shame in people who want it to be better. The question is whether Logan will be a ceiling or a stepping stone.\

http://www.vulture.com/2018/08/ethan-hawke-is-right-about-logan-and-superheroes-for-now.html
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Sure we can discuss it

He used the worst example with Logan tho which let's me know he just mad he's not in them


Logan is about a guy who's life isn't where it's supposed to be who has no friends left only one family member who isn't blood working towards a dream remembering his past and having his unknown child dropped on his doorstep

He has to navigate that while evading ppl who want to take his daughter from him so he protects her reluctantly at first at all costs


The funny thing about what Ethan is saying is that if Logan wasn't about wolverine but instead about a Hitman or a reformed man he would've gotten an Oscar nomination for it.

The only reason he didn't is because it is a super hero movie.
Winter Soldier,Civil War and Black Panther aren't your typical comic book movies. Hell,Winter Soldier and Civil War were your typical spy and thriller movies yet he acts like all comic book movies are the same......:smh::smh::smh:
what I'm saying is if the film makers don't respect comic characters legends & storytelling why should the academy?

as talented actor I respect his opinoin although i agree agree to disagree

personally as a black man living in America when i go to the movies i wanna be transported to world where:

violence reigns supreme
where the good guys win
when jokes are sophomoric and the jokes revolve around sex & drugs
when the good guys never miss and the bad guys cant shot for shit
where one man (denzel, liam, wilson, etc.) can take out out a shitload of ppl with a set of specific tools


basically I love action flicks, horror flicks, dumb comedies and COMIC flicks

life is hard...when i go to the movies I wanna have FUN

Daredevil’s Charlie Cox Says He Gets Why Ethan Hawke Resents All These Superhero Movies
By Halle Kiefer@hallekiefer
daredevil-6.w330.h330.jpg

Photo: David Lee/Netflix

Back in August, Ethan Hawke criticizedLogan and superhero films at large as universally substandard when compared to non-comic book-based movies. “Now we have the problem that they tell us Logan is a great movie,” he explained, pointing to the effusive praise received by Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine flick. “Well, it’s a great superhero movie. It still involves people in tights with metal coming out of their hands. It’s not Bresson. It’s not Bergman. But they talk about it like it is.” In a new interview, Marvel’s Daredevil star Charlie Cox says he gets Hawke’s critique. Not that Cox agrees with the actor’s assessment of the genre’s quality, but its quantity…well, that’s another question entirely.

“One of the things that has happened in the last few years is that the movies that typically make lots of money tend to be big franchises,” Cox admits in a recent Telegraph interview. “That means Marvel movies, DC movies, comic book movies… Harry Potter. Hollywood makes so many of these big franchises that there isn’t much space – literally cinema space – for smaller independent movies.”

But while he admits franchises have basically taken over the game, Cox also points out the obvious: people who love comic book movies really, really love comic book movies. To them, the cinematic translation that is Logan might very well be one of the best films they saw in 2017.

There is a massive appetite for this stuff,” Cox says. “I’m one of those people [who loves superhero movies]. I lap it up.” So much so that, yeah, he’ll go ahead and throw a little love at the ill-fated 2003 Daredevil movie. “I thought Ben Affleck did a great job,” Cox explains. “I really liked his Matt Murdock. It was in keeping with the characters in the comics.”
 

largebillsonlyplease

Large
BGOL Legend
Daredevil’s Charlie Cox Says He Gets Why Ethan Hawke Resents All These Superhero Movies
By Halle Kiefer@hallekiefer
daredevil-6.w330.h330.jpg

Photo: David Lee/Netflix

Back in August, Ethan Hawke criticizedLogan and superhero films at large as universally substandard when compared to non-comic book-based movies. “Now we have the problem that they tell us Logan is a great movie,” he explained, pointing to the effusive praise received by Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine flick. “Well, it’s a great superhero movie. It still involves people in tights with metal coming out of their hands. It’s not Bresson. It’s not Bergman. But they talk about it like it is.” In a new interview, Marvel’s Daredevil star Charlie Cox says he gets Hawke’s critique. Not that Cox agrees with the actor’s assessment of the genre’s quality, but its quantity…well, that’s another question entirely.

“One of the things that has happened in the last few years is that the movies that typically make lots of money tend to be big franchises,” Cox admits in a recent Telegraph interview. “That means Marvel movies, DC movies, comic book movies… Harry Potter. Hollywood makes so many of these big franchises that there isn’t much space – literally cinema space – for smaller independent movies.”

But while he admits franchises have basically taken over the game, Cox also points out the obvious: people who love comic book movies really, really love comic book movies. To them, the cinematic translation that is Logan might very well be one of the best films they saw in 2017.

There is a massive appetite for this stuff,” Cox says. “I’m one of those people [who loves superhero movies]. I lap it up.” So much so that, yeah, he’ll go ahead and throw a little love at the ill-fated 2003 Daredevil movie. “I thought Ben Affleck did a great job,” Cox explains. “I really liked his Matt Murdock. It was in keeping with the characters in the comics.”

And if they hate then let them hate and let the money pile up.-
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Ethan Hawke on the ‘Dark and Incendiary’ First Reformed— and His Own Stolen Journals
By Hunter Harris@hunteryharris
03-ethan-hawke.w600.h750.jpg

Ethan Hawke. Photo: Bobby Doherty for Vulture

First Reformed is like nothing Ethan Hawke is famous for. The hero in Paul Schrader’s movie about religion and corruption and the environment isn’t greasy and flirtatious or artfully disheveled; he’s not even funny. He’s desperate and jumpy, holding everything inside. Reverend Toller’s faith in the church has decayed somewhat, but he’s also got an epic case of mania. Toller pastors a small church — more of a somber tourist destination than a place of worship — and journals despairing, guilty pleas to feel God’s presence. When he’s asked to counsel an environmental extremist who’s about to become a father, the pastor stumbles upon a cause where he can channel all of his malaise.

Hawke has been acting for 30 years, but says Toller gave him more of an opportunity than any job he’s ever taken. “There aren’t very many times that I’ve felt that connection to a role the way that I did this one,” Hawke told Vulture as he drove on the FDR to rehearsals for True West, the Sam Shepard revival he’s starring in opposite Paul Dano. “Often, I’ll get a great role, like in True West or in Tennessee Williams or Shakespeare, but it’s been played a lot before. There’s been other interpretations. But when you get a great role in a movie, it’s a wonderful challenge, because you can define it yourself.”

Hawke’s performance is hard to shake: In every scene, it’s like Toller is wearing an invisible straitjacket. He spends much of the movie not even trying to remedy the moral corruption he sees in his own neighborhood and his own soul — he’s just trying to make sure everyone else acknowledges it. Toller has earned Hawke the best reviews of his career (or at least the best reviews since the last Hawkaissance, for Boyhood). In long, loose loops, he told Vulture about the movie that’s earned him trophies from Gotham, New York Film Critics Circle, and Los Angeles Film Critics Association for Best Actor — and maybe even his fifth Oscar nomination.

LEARN MORE »
It’s strange when you work with somebody who others call legend — you never know if they’re going to be interested in collaborating, and you never know what the experience is going to be like. When you have ideas that you think could help a script that’s written by somebody who’s writing level is so high … It doesn’t matter if you’re in rehearsals with Tom Stoppard or Sam Shepard, you still have to have your own opinion. That’s what they hired you for, you know? But it’s very hard to voice your opinion when you have a tremendous amount of respect for the person you’re working with.


ADVERTISEMENT
So I remember I was confused about what the collaboration was going to bring. I’ve been acting for more than 30 years now, and there aren’t very many times that I’ve felt that connection to a role the way that I did this one.

Can you tell me why?First off, I come from a long line of very serious Christians. My family were Quakers who came over on a couple boats after the Mayflower. My grandparents and my mother and my father are all extremely religious people. There’s a slight scowling glance that might sneak out in regards to when a young person says they want to pursue the arts, you know? ‘Cause he might be choosing to live a frivolous life, that might be their first assumption.

I see a real connection between that life and the artistic life. The artistic life tends to function at its highest when its really deeply connected to an awareness of your own inner life, whatever that word means. You study great painters, or great poets — W.H. Auden or Egon Schiele, Nina Simone — artists at a great level tend to connect their work to something spiritual.

Did working on this make you reconsider your own faith or spirituality?No. I think what a great writer does when they’re on their game is give voice to something a lot of people are feeling. There’s a tremendous amount of anxiety in the air, a lack of political and spiritual leadership. Fear collects in your chest.

Even working on True West right now — Sam really writes a lot about the masculine war with itself on a personal level. When it’s amplified, it’s exactly what we’ve done to the whole world. Beating up women, beating up the female part of ourselves, beating up the planet, beating up Mother Earth. All that stuff is very much on Shepard’s mind as he writes about these self-loathing men. A lot of men’s only manifestations of masculinity is their wallet or how many people are afraid of them, you know? And that’s not leadership.

Something I really like about your performance in this is that Toller’s physicality feels so limited. I think of it as a sort of manic restraint. Can you tell me how you arrived at that?
One of the first times I had coffee with Paul, in regards to this movie, he asked me if I knew what a recessive performance was. And I did. Most performances are trying to entertain you, to capture your imagination, thrill you, make you curious, make you laugh, make you cry. A recessive performance avoids the audience. If it works right, it draws you in and invites you in, and lets you participate, because it doesn’t tell you what you’re supposed to think all the time.

For Toller, it invites you into his inner mania, as you said. I think that’s really well put. On the surface, he has to create a feeling of everything being fine. Inside, there’s kind of an Edvard Munch–like scream happening all the time.

Was it uncomfortable to live in that for the whole shoot?
Oh, yeah. It’s always a challenge. You don’t have a movie like this without really looking hard into depression. I think Paul’s writing and work has some clear insight, whether it’s Taxi Driver or First Reformed, it’s been a long time with him meditating on depression and on a fraudulent society. Just ‘cause you’re depressed doesn’t mean you don’t have clear-sighted insights into others.

I want to go back to those journals he had you write. Do you journal yourself?I did, meticulously, every day, from when I was about 16 until I was about 44. And then — it’s kind of a funny story, but it’s true — someone stole my journal.

What!
Like at an airport, yeah. About five years ago. I left my bag for a minute, and somebody went in my bag and stole my journal. It freaked me out. We live in such a weird time where it’s like, Oh my God. I’m going to have to read my journal on the internet. This is going to be hugely embarrassing.

Remember when that would happen in high school? Somebody’d keep a journal and somebody’d read it out loud in the lunchroom or something, just humiliate another person. Well, I was just incredibly petrified of who this person was that stole my journal. And I just stopped keeping a journal. I tried to start again, but I have not been able to do it. One funny thing that is different today is that we write so many emails that all of my emails to my friends turn into de facto journals. But I miss my journals.

But you still have all the other journals?I still have all the old ones.

Do you ever reread them?
I haven’t in a long time. When you’re going through really hard times — when I was in my early 20s, and when I went through a divorce — a journal is incredibly helpful to make sense out of your thoughts. Sometimes your thoughts need to be controlling you, and keeping a journal helps you understand how much you’re repeating yourself, how much you’re … I don’t know. I’ve always found it extremely helpful.

I’m at my childhood home right now, and I came across my high-school journals the other day — I can’t bear to read them.
I know. It’s scary, isn’t it? I found my journals the other day from Explorers.

Oh, wow.I know. I literally have these journal entries about how River’s getting on my nerves. It’s really weird.

I’d like to talk about two scenes in First Reformed that really took me by surprise. The first is when Toller and Mary float through the earth and space and the cosmos. What was your read on that moment?
It’s so clear how lonely he is, that simply being near a kind woman gives him some ecclesiastical vision. Thomas Merton was this great Catholic writer, and a lot of the hippies liked a lot of what he had to say, ‘cause he wasn’t as dogmatic as a lot of the great Catholic thinkers. Joan Baez came to visit him, and she was barefoot. He hadn’t seen a woman’s foot in like 20 years or something. He writes in his journal that he couldn’t take his eyes off her foot. He’s trying to be serious and talk to her, and address her concerns about politics and Vietnam, but all he kept thinking about was her foot. I thought about that when she’s asking him to touch her hand. Toller basically levitated, you know? That’s how good it felt.

Also, it prepares you for the end of the movie: There’s kind of another spiritual plane that the movie’s happening on that isn’t exactly naturalistic.

The other scene is when Toller sits in the office with Jeffers, the pastor at Abundant Life. All of Toller’s anxieties come to a head: “Well, somebody has to do something!” There are a lot of good memes of that moment.
I haven’t seen them, but there should be memes to that. Who hasn’t felt that way? Can’t somebody do something, please? Isn’t someone in charge with a brain in their head?

That’s the one place where I pushed outside the box of what Paul wanted me to do in the movie. Rules are made to be broken, and even Paul agrees with this. If I’m doing a recessive performance, at some point he has to explode out of his little box. I can go back in the box, but that was the moment where the cracks show.

Is there something that you appreciate about acting now that you couldn’t, or didn’t, when you first started?A little slows down, you know? When you’re young, there’s a slight sense of desperation, of wanting to be noticed, of wanting to be seen, and wanting to believe in yourself. For some reason, the movements of it all has slowed down as I’ve gotten older. I’ve enjoyed it a lot more.

There’s an expression they have at Juilliard called, “Let your habit not be your only choice.” I really love that expression, because if you slow down enough and break your habits, you can see choices, paths, that you didn’t see when you were rushing. And that is certainly one of the advantages of getting older.

When did you notice that you’d started to slow down in your process, that you weren’t rushing in the same way you used to?
I did this play, The Coast of Utopia. It was a Tom Stoppard play. It’s actually nine hours long about these mid-nineteenth-century Russian radicals. We did it at Lincoln Center for nine months, and it was a lot like going back to grad school. I was in my mid-to-late 30s, and I was surrounded by a large group of people — Billy Crudup, and Josh Hamilton, and Jennifer Ehle, and obviously Tom Stoppard and Jack O’Brien. A lot of the cast was extremely good. We were in a community for a long period of time, and sometimes it’s in seeing how other people work, being close to it.

Somehow, some kind of adult relationship to acting started there. Martha Plimpton was one of my friends when we were children actors, and she was there. Checking in with her, and feeling what her experiences had been as a woman, and what parts of our passions had remained, talking about the friends we’d lost and the friends that are still around, who’d given over to bitterness and who was getting smarter — you watch your own generation, you know?

That was a very pivotal experience for me, I think. I had three very pivotal experiences with the director, Jack O’Brien. He directed me in Shakespeare’s Henry IV, in Coast of Utopia, and then Macbeth. I would say those three experiences pushed my growth as an actor more than anything else I can directly identify.

Ministry is a vocation — “many are called, but few are chosen,” and all that. Do you feel like being an artist is your vocation?Definitely. I definitely feel that way. I don’t know if you ever saw it, but I made this documentary called Seymour: An Introduction, and one of the things that I’ve come to believe is that when people ask themselves that question about who am I — a very difficult question to answer — but one of the ways in which we can answer it is with what we love. And the closer you are to what you love, the more time you spend inside that love, the more what you love opens up and becomes bigger and expands, and you expand. The more time you spend away from love, away from what you love, the less you grow.

It’s just like water and light, you know? It sounds a little airy-fairy, but it’s not rocket science. It’s pretty simple. You take care of yourself. I think that how to define taking care of yourself is to put yourself in a position to be near people you admire, work that you admire, freer thoughts. From the Bible: “Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in thy sight.” It’s something to aspire for. None of us are there. Very few of us are there.

For me, making movies, doing plays, helping other people make movies and do plays, righting wrongs, being in it, helping … Trying as much as you can not to give into the great pull to just celebrate what makes money. ‘Cause, you know, crack makes a lot of money, too.

That’s a funny way of putting it.It’s true! People think just ‘cause the movie makes them money it’s good. Or just ‘cause a restaurant makes money, it’s good. Or just ‘cause a person makes money, they’re good. It doesn’t mean they’re bad, but it doesn’t mean they’re good, either

You’ve been promoting First Reformed for eight or nine months now — has your perspective of it changed as you’re talking about it so much?
The movie’s really about hope and despair. It’s hard not to have hope when a little tiny movie as dark and incendiary as this one is finds an audience. Paul and I did a Q&A at Brooklyn Academy of Music a couple days ago, and we looked at each other, like, we’ve been doing Q&As for this movie since May. This doesn’t happen. It just doesn’t happen very much at all, especially without somebody spending a lot of money to push you forward.

I have a great sense of gratitude around it, that it’s still in the dialogue. I’m as surprised as anyone. I thought when they decided to release it in May that we were headed for the lost aisles, streaming into the void. When they make that decision to release the movie in the spring, it generally means that they’ve made a decision that you’re not going to be a part of the end-of-the-year dialogue. So it’s kind of awesome that we’re here.

Does the awards-season stuff feel grueling? How do you keep perspective in this time?
It would feel grueling if I felt like I was selling. One of the things that’s hard about making commercial movies is that you have to sell it. But when you’re making a movie that is as personal and radical and strange as First Reformed, it doesn’t feel like you’re selling. It feels like you’re sharing, and it has a different energy around it. The whole thing — even the way you talk to me about it — is different than the way that you would talk to me about the fun of shooting Magnificent Seven or something, which was really fun. But it’s got a different goal.

I really like the way you talk about celebrity and art and this industry. I’ve sort of pitched this to my editors, that I want you to have a Vulture column.
[Laughs.] How’d you get the name Hunter?

My parents just wanted a unisex name. They didn’t want to know my sex before I was born.It’s a really cool name. I’ve never met a woman named Hunter before, and I really like it. My wife’s name is Ryan. She’s always actually explaining to people who call that she’s a woman. But Hunter’s a cool name, and it’s a great name for a woman because … what’s the god? Dionysus? The god of hunting is a woman. I always forget her name. It might be Athena, for crying out loud. But anyway, I remember thinking it’s really interesting that the god of hunting was female. She protects the animals and is cool.

I can’t wait to use that as the story from now on — “Actually I’m named for the god of hunting.” Just one last question: Have you ever heard of Hawkecast, the Ethan Hawke podcast?
God, no. Really?

So there are a couple guys in Boston, and they go through all of your movies, and just talk about you all the time. It’s fun.Well, I already love these guys and think they’re brilliant.

I’m sure they would love to hear that.
There’s a great James Joyce line. He’s asked what he expects from his reader. He says, “A lifetime dedication to his work.” I always thought that was funny.

RELATED
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Ethan Hawke says Marvel is 'extremely actor-friendly,' not very 'director-friendly'

The actor also contends MCU critics Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola are not "stuck up" due to their film philosophies.
By Jessica WangJuly 19, 2022 at 05:36 PM EDT




Ethan Hawke will not become a casualty in the war between iconic film directors and the Marvel Cinematic Universe, thank you very much.
The Academy Award-nominated actor, who made his Marvel debut in the Disney+ series Moon Knight, remained diplomatic when asked about Martin Scorsese's criticism of MCU films (they're "not cinema," he says) in an interview with IndieWire published Tuesday. Scorsese and fellow MCU critic Francis Ford Coppola are "not stuck up," Hawke said.
"If people like Scorsese and Coppola don't come out to tell their truth about how there are more important things than making money, who's going to?" Hawke inquired.

Ethan Hawke

| CREDIT: MICHAEL TULLBERG/GETTY IMAGES
"It's easy for them, but it needs to be somebody in the community saying, 'Hey, everybody, this is not Fanny and Alexander," Hawke added. "If you keep reviewing these movies that are basically made for 14-year-olds like they're Fanny and Alexander or Winter Light, then who the hell's going to get to make Winter Light? I appreciate the elder statesmen of the community reminding people not to set the bar too low."

He continued, "I know it makes some people think they're stuck up, but they're not stuck up." Hawke, for his part, said he had a "really good experience" on Moon Knight opposite Oscar Isaac, but suggested that Marvel films aren't always the most "director-friendly." "That group of people is extremely actor-friendly — they might not be director-friendly, and that could be what Scorsese and Coppola are talking about," he explained.
"I think Kevin Feige had a great thing happen with Robert Downey Jr. and he understood that Downey's passion was a large part of the success," Hawke said. "When actors are excited by a part, audiences get excited about watching them. Feige understood the algorithm there, so they're extremely respectful toward the process. The best thing about Moon Knight for me was Oscar's performance. It's a gonzo thing that happens to have a giant budget — a pretty out-there performance."


Ethan Hawke in 'Moon Knight'

| CREDIT: MARVEL STUDIOS
Hawke played villain Arthur Harrow, a former avatar of the god Khonshu who previously held the Moon Knight title, opposite Isaac's titular hero. Isaac himself pitched the series to Hawke after they bumped into each other at a coffee shop in Brooklyn. Hawke previously told EW that Isaac's enthusiasm emboldened him to join the MCU. "I had a feeling that if Oscar was this convincing to me [about Moon Knight], he might be that convincing to the world as this character," he explained.
"He really wanted to play this part and his reasons were sound and he was dedicated, and I just felt right about it immediately," Hawke continued. "Plus, I'd already been in talks with [director[ Mohamed [Diab]. I'd been working on another project with Mohamed that he had to drop out of to do this, and so it seemed like such synchronicity that both these guys would come at me with a Marvel job. I felt like, well, if I was ever going to jump into this playground, the time is obviously now."
Moon Knight is available to stream on Disney+.
 

tallblacknyc

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Ethan Hawke says Marvel is 'extremely actor-friendly,' not very 'director-friendly'

The actor also contends MCU critics Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola are not "stuck up" due to their film philosophies.
By Jessica WangJuly 19, 2022 at 05:36 PM EDT




Ethan Hawke will not become a casualty in the war between iconic film directors and the Marvel Cinematic Universe, thank you very much.
The Academy Award-nominated actor, who made his Marvel debut in the Disney+ series Moon Knight, remained diplomatic when asked about Martin Scorsese's criticism of MCU films (they're "not cinema," he says) in an interview with IndieWire published Tuesday. Scorsese and fellow MCU critic Francis Ford Coppola are "not stuck up," Hawke said.
"If people like Scorsese and Coppola don't come out to tell their truth about how there are more important things than making money, who's going to?" Hawke inquired.

Ethan Hawke

| CREDIT: MICHAEL TULLBERG/GETTY IMAGES
"It's easy for them, but it needs to be somebody in the community saying, 'Hey, everybody, this is not Fanny and Alexander," Hawke added. "If you keep reviewing these movies that are basically made for 14-year-olds like they're Fanny and Alexander or Winter Light, then who the hell's going to get to make Winter Light? I appreciate the elder statesmen of the community reminding people not to set the bar too low."

He continued, "I know it makes some people think they're stuck up, but they're not stuck up." Hawke, for his part, said he had a "really good experience" on Moon Knight opposite Oscar Isaac, but suggested that Marvel films aren't always the most "director-friendly." "That group of people is extremely actor-friendly — they might not be director-friendly, and that could be what Scorsese and Coppola are talking about," he explained.
"I think Kevin Feige had a great thing happen with Robert Downey Jr. and he understood that Downey's passion was a large part of the success," Hawke said. "When actors are excited by a part, audiences get excited about watching them. Feige understood the algorithm there, so they're extremely respectful toward the process. The best thing about Moon Knight for me was Oscar's performance. It's a gonzo thing that happens to have a giant budget — a pretty out-there performance."


Ethan Hawke in 'Moon Knight'

| CREDIT: MARVEL STUDIOS
Hawke played villain Arthur Harrow, a former avatar of the god Khonshu who previously held the Moon Knight title, opposite Isaac's titular hero. Isaac himself pitched the series to Hawke after they bumped into each other at a coffee shop in Brooklyn. Hawke previously told EW that Isaac's enthusiasm emboldened him to join the MCU. "I had a feeling that if Oscar was this convincing to me [about Moon Knight], he might be that convincing to the world as this character," he explained.
"He really wanted to play this part and his reasons were sound and he was dedicated, and I just felt right about it immediately," Hawke continued. "Plus, I'd already been in talks with [director[ Mohamed [Diab]. I'd been working on another project with Mohamed that he had to drop out of to do this, and so it seemed like such synchronicity that both these guys would come at me with a Marvel job. I felt like, well, if I was ever going to jump into this playground, the time is obviously now."
Moon Knight is available to stream on Disney+.
Ethan hawke dosent care about superhero movies and it showed when he prob starred in the worst marvel series..I said it
 

Non-StopJFK2TAB

Rising Star
Platinum Member

@ViCiouS

these dudes are straight comedy central

went from super hater to super fan with one paycheck
Actors are products selling a product. They’re nuns and priests. Lowly paid servants. You have a whole thread on The Hobbit prequel with 20 views.

Rass Kass already gave you the science, “ if the next hip hop fad was … you would find some of these thugs in drags.”

You are part of the problem.
 

The Plutonian

The Anti Bullshitter
BGOL Investor

@ViCiouS

these dudes are straight comedy central

went from super hater to super fan with one paycheck
Make up your mind asshole. :rolleyes2: Dudes like him is so flaky. MF flake more than Kellogg
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Ethan Hawke says Marvel is 'extremely actor-friendly,' not very 'director-friendly'

The actor also contends MCU critics Martin Scorsese and Francis Ford Coppola are not "stuck up" due to their film philosophies.
By Jessica WangJuly 19, 2022 at 05:36 PM EDT




Ethan Hawke will not become a casualty in the war between iconic film directors and the Marvel Cinematic Universe, thank you very much.
The Academy Award-nominated actor, who made his Marvel debut in the Disney+ series Moon Knight, remained diplomatic when asked about Martin Scorsese's criticism of MCU films (they're "not cinema," he says) in an interview with IndieWire published Tuesday. Scorsese and fellow MCU critic Francis Ford Coppola are "not stuck up," Hawke said.
"If people like Scorsese and Coppola don't come out to tell their truth about how there are more important things than making money, who's going to?" Hawke inquired.

Ethan Hawke

| CREDIT: MICHAEL TULLBERG/GETTY IMAGES
"It's easy for them, but it needs to be somebody in the community saying, 'Hey, everybody, this is not Fanny and Alexander," Hawke added. "If you keep reviewing these movies that are basically made for 14-year-olds like they're Fanny and Alexander or Winter Light, then who the hell's going to get to make Winter Light? I appreciate the elder statesmen of the community reminding people not to set the bar too low."

He continued, "I know it makes some people think they're stuck up, but they're not stuck up." Hawke, for his part, said he had a "really good experience" on Moon Knight opposite Oscar Isaac, but suggested that Marvel films aren't always the most "director-friendly." "That group of people is extremely actor-friendly — they might not be director-friendly, and that could be what Scorsese and Coppola are talking about," he explained.
"I think Kevin Feige had a great thing happen with Robert Downey Jr. and he understood that Downey's passion was a large part of the success," Hawke said. "When actors are excited by a part, audiences get excited about watching them. Feige understood the algorithm there, so they're extremely respectful toward the process. The best thing about Moon Knight for me was Oscar's performance. It's a gonzo thing that happens to have a giant budget — a pretty out-there performance."


Ethan Hawke in 'Moon Knight'

| CREDIT: MARVEL STUDIOS
Hawke played villain Arthur Harrow, a former avatar of the god Khonshu who previously held the Moon Knight title, opposite Isaac's titular hero. Isaac himself pitched the series to Hawke after they bumped into each other at a coffee shop in Brooklyn. Hawke previously told EW that Isaac's enthusiasm emboldened him to join the MCU. "I had a feeling that if Oscar was this convincing to me [about Moon Knight], he might be that convincing to the world as this character," he explained.
"He really wanted to play this part and his reasons were sound and he was dedicated, and I just felt right about it immediately," Hawke continued. "Plus, I'd already been in talks with [director[ Mohamed [Diab]. I'd been working on another project with Mohamed that he had to drop out of to do this, and so it seemed like such synchronicity that both these guys would come at me with a Marvel job. I felt like, well, if I was ever going to jump into this playground, the time is obviously now."
Moon Knight is available to stream on Disney+.

 
Top