Movie Debate: In Defense Of The MATRIX Sequels ( I know Colin...)
- Thread starter playahaitian
- Start date
yep
some of you guys are missing what the issue is..
the OP review is bogus for a couple reasons.
1. he admits the sequels are not as good as the first one which is what everyone complains about. Too many characters who go nowhere nor have anything truly interesting to say or do, too many long drawn out action scenes, too many plotholes. If your movie is riddled with that stuff...its not a good movie..
2. if you have to explain it then you fucked up. he talks about the symbolism and subtext but if its not detectable or understandable after viewing then its pointless. Its one thing to have minute detail and easter eggs that you only see after multiple viewings or someone points out. But symbolism and subtext is the point of the story and if people miss that then whats the point? Thats why most people walked out of the theater going WTF?? NO ONE did that with the first movie because it laid out the story pretty straightforward and much of the symbolism and subtext was easy to pick up on.
The wachowskis blew the KISS rule with matrix sequels...plain and simple
the OP review is bogus for a couple reasons.
1. he admits the sequels are not as good as the first one which is what everyone complains about. Too many characters who go nowhere nor have anything truly interesting to say or do, too many long drawn out action scenes, too many plotholes. If your movie is riddled with that stuff...its not a good movie..
2. if you have to explain it then you fucked up. he talks about the symbolism and subtext but if its not detectable or understandable after viewing then its pointless. Its one thing to have minute detail and easter eggs that you only see after multiple viewings or someone points out. But symbolism and subtext is the point of the story and if people miss that then whats the point? Thats why most people walked out of the theater going WTF?? NO ONE did that with the first movie because it laid out the story pretty straightforward and much of the symbolism and subtext was easy to pick up on.
The wachowskis blew the KISS rule with matrix sequels...plain and simple
Thank you sir, good read. This really puts all the bullshit together in a Colin Powell friendly article. Good luck to this lady, looks like shenannigans was in play by her own lawyers.
One may read reports on the internet that Ms. Stewart won a multi-billion dollar lawsuit when, in fact, she received some funds but not the damages. “The Wachoskis Brothers lost on a default judgment in 2004,” she says. “They never answered the complaint ever.” On June 4, 2012, she won a judgment against her now deceased attorney, Jonathan Lubell (alias Jon Lubell) for failure to appear at a pre-trial conference in December 2011, and failure to appear to show cause in January 2012 causing her to lose hundreds of thousands of dollarSophia Stewart Lawrence Fishburn1 Sophia Stewart: Matrix, Terminator Author Battles Ons in revenue and, more important, causing the dismissal of her $300 million 2003 California lawsuit. Her judgment is for $150 million.
Okay hold up wait a minute hold the phone!
I usually blow off this type of stuff as paranoid conspiracy illuminati fodder but this actually sounds legit. This is a horrible case of hollywood with all their billions blowing off a brilliant and legitimate author and writer who also happens to be a black woman and stealing this woman's work and then having the audacity to malign her name and discredit the woman.
That said those 2 movies Terminator and Matrix along with Lord Of The Rings are 3 of my all time favorite action flicks that I watch repeatedly memorizing line by line and scene by scene. That includes the trilogies even if they are not as great as or sometimes greater than the originals.
Anybody who didn’t like the sequels is probably a fag. Ijs
I know he may say otherwise but that’s got to sting. Shit, I’m disappointed too. How the fuck you don’t have no Morpheus
Shit this economy is built off people as batteries. Why do you think they mad because people survived without a job
Why do people call the Matrix a trilogy when it's actually a quadrilogy (The Matrix, Matrix Revolutions, Matrix Reloaded & The Animatrix)?
Well, a pentalogy now (because of Matrix Resurrections).
The Animatrix is VERY important in understanding the backstory of the entire franchise. I'm actually shocked that they didn't make another one.
Also, I never played the video game but apparently, it also shares some importance in establishing the franchise.
Well, a pentalogy now (because of Matrix Resurrections).
The Animatrix is VERY important in understanding the backstory of the entire franchise. I'm actually shocked that they didn't make another one.
Also, I never played the video game but apparently, it also shares some importance in establishing the franchise.
