Music Biz: Taylor Swift NEW Tortured Poets Department - the largest streaming week for an album ever, UPDATE TEAM KAMALA!

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour Could Gross $1.4 Billion: Report​


By Chris Willman
Plus Icon
EAST RUTHERFORD, NEW JERSEY - MAY 27: EDITORIAL USE ONLY Taylor Swift performs onstage during Taylor Swift | The Eras Tour at MetLife Stadium on May 27, 2023 in East Rutherford, New Jersey. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/TAS23/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management)

Getty Images for TAS Rights Mana

Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour is headed for a couple of important benchmarks that have a “B” attached, according to a report in Pollstar. As the global trek moves on from America and proceeds to Europe in 2024, it will assuredly become the first tour in the history of the business to gross a billion dollars. It won’t stop there, though; Pollstar is estimating that the final gross will wind up around $1.4 billion.
The live music trade publication concedes that it is doing a fair amount of estimating on current and future grosses, but says its “crack numbers team” believes the tour will cross the historic $1 billion mark at some point during Swift’s shows in Singapore, which will take place during the March 2-9, 2024 window.


ADVERTISING

Related Stories​


VIP+

HBO’s Potential Netflix Deal Isn’t So Shocking — but It Is Significant​



Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour: Every Surprise Song She’s Played So Far​



But the tour still has a long way to go after that before it wraps up (barring extensions) at Wembley Stadium in London on Aug. 17, 2024. By that point, Pollstar writes, the Eras Tour will have grossed $1.4B — a figure the publication pegs as being on the “conservative” side.
Pollstar may actually have to revise its numbers upwards, already; since the trade’s report was published earlier this week, a number of dates have been added to the European tour routing. For instance, Pollstar’s story mentions a three-night stand in Singapore, whereas just within the last few days she added three more shows there to arrive at a total of six. (She even just added one last show in the U.S., a sixth night at L.A.’s SoFi Stadium, this week.)
ADVERTISEMENT

Bear in mind that the “conservative” $1.4 estimate is just counting the face value of the tickets as they originally sold out. The actual amount of money being spent on the Swift tour by consumers is far, far higher, with nearly all resold tickets going on the secondary market for several times their original value. Pollstar’s figures cover only the face value of the tickets, which topped out under $500. The Swift camp is not the recipient of the jacked-up prices that have seen virtually all tickets now on the market in the U.S. selling into the four figures. Without any hoopla about it, Swift turned off the “platinum pricing” option on Ticketmaster that proved so controversial on the Bruce Springsteen tour, wherein artists’ camps benefit from escalating face value.
The average face value for Swift’s nightly concert tickets in the U.S., according to Pollstar, has been $253.56 — a fraction of their IRL value, as it has turned out. Needless to say, though, being in line to become music’s biggest grosser on a single tour, Swift probably isn’t spending much time lamenting her decision to forego dynamic pricing.


Whose record will she be beating? That of Elton John, whose “Farewell Yellow Brick Road” tour is said by Billboard to be at the $887 million mark — and still counting, but just barely, since that tour is scheduled to wrap up in just over than a week, on July 8 in Stockholm. It was in January of this year that Elton’s tour became the first to cross the $800 million mark.
Prior to Elton pushing ahead, the previous record was held by Ed Sheeran, whose Divide Tour grossed $776.4 million over a period of several years. U2’s 360 tour was on top, historically, before Sheeran moved up.
Pollstar says Swift would have had a shot at passing the billion-dollar mark in a single calendar year if she had kept on touring through the end of 2023. But she chose to take a two-and-a-half-month break between her 13 shows in Latin America, which start in Mexico City on Aug, 13 and wind up Nov. 26 in Brazil, and resuming the tour early next year in Tokyo on Feb. 7, heading through Asia, Australia and ultimately Europe.
ADVERTISEMENT

The dollars related to the tour that have nothing to do with tickets are impressive, too. Pollstar cites an online research group, QuestionPro, as estimating the U.S. leg of the tour will generate $5 billion in economic impact in the cities where she tours (“more than the gross domestic product of 50 countries”).
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor

Taylor Swift rewrites controversial ‘actress’ lyric from ‘Better Than Revenge’ on Speak Now (Taylor’s Version)​



Taylor Swift has changed up a “slutshaming” lyric in the new version of “Speak Now” from her re-recorded album Speak Now (Taylor’s Version).

Swift’s 2010 album has become the latest to be reimagined by the singer following her rights dispute with producer Scooter Braun.

The album arrived on Friday (7 July), following on from previous Swift re-releases Fearless (Taylor’s Version) and Red (Taylor’s Version) in 2021.

Among them is “Better Than Revenge”, in which Swift shares her desire to get revenge on a female romantic rival.

The original version of the song features the controversial line: “She’s an actress, whoa / She’s better known for the things that she does on the mattress, whoa,” which many have suggested is sexist or slutshaming.

However, when the album was released, the “Taylor’s version” of the song featured a new line.

After “she’s an actress”, Swift now sings: “He was a moth to the flame, she was holding the matches.”

Fans were left divided by the change. While many praised the more feminist take on the song, others suggested that it should have been kept to preserve Swift’s past feelings. The singer was just 20 when Speak Now was originally released in 2010.

“She deserves some applause for Better Than Revenge (Taylor’s Version),” one fan wrote.

“‘Better Than Revenge (Taylor’s Version)’ has the lyrics she wishes she would’ve written all along and I respect the hell out of that,” another tweet read. “She’s repeatedly told us this is her passion project, she’s doing this for herself – as she should! It’s HER project!!”

However, one fan joked: “I need Better Than Revenge (Slut Shaming Version) now.”

“If Paramore can perform ‘Misery Business’ in the year 2023 then Taylor Swift can keep the lyrics to ‘Better Than Revenge’ the same,” another wrote


@playahaitian @ThaBurgerPimp

your girl is fucking up! trying to stay PC and within the movement by changing some lyrics in past songs is the WRONG move...

1. Art is a snapshot of a person's mind state at the time they created it...for better or worse.

2. If the goal to is devalue the original songs others own by recreating it and driving traffic to the new joints then changing the lyrics to a song fans like works against that and raises the value of the original. People who want to hear the old song will seek it out more than the remake.
 
Last edited:

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend
 

RoomService

Dinner is now being served.
BGOL Investor
What I mean is she's 30...is her celebrity bigger or smaller than those two at the age and point in their careers?
Yes, only because of the Internet and social media. She can reach people the other two celebrities could only dream of in their early 30s.
 
Top