In the military, risk in training have to go through a process, during which a particular task or scenario is assessed by: *In a nutshellI kinda wish Garrett had hit Rudolph with the crown of that helmet and layed him out with his head split open to see if these dudes would still be talking that “but what about Rudolph, he started it” talk. It’s like some of y’all really don’t understand what could have happened on that field that night, All that Garret taking Rudolph down, Rudolph getting mad and trying to take Garret helmet off, Garret getting mad and taking Rudolph helmet off is stuff that has happened plenty of times before in football and would of been talked about for about 5 minutes the next day. Myles Garret hitting Rudolph in the head with a helmet is being talked about so much because that was a move that could have been deadly for Rudolph and not only got Garret banned for life but could have landed him in prison. I saw some people saying Baker was wrong for not defending his teammate and saying what Garret was wrong but what Garret did was beyond football
What is the desired outcome?
What is the worst outcome?
What is the most probable outcome?
After the task or scenario is completed, an AFTER ACTION REVIEW is conducted. What was the ACTUAL outcome?
It's like some of y'all keep focusing on what COULD HAVE happened in a worst case scenario instead of what ACTUALLY happened. He wasn't phased by the blow and only THEN did he look around for an Official.
Garret COULD'VE sustained a shoulder injury in the process...didn't happen so it has no place in the final outcome.
Folks talking about what COULD'VE happened to Garrett getting kicked in his well protected head...nothing happened, so let's focus on what DID happen when all was said and done.
It was outrageously risky of him to swing that helmet and hit Rudolph in the head, but Rudolph didn't suffer any significant damage in this instance.