Dude he is 82 years old he ain't dickin nothin but a catheter
PELOSI HUSBAND ATTACKED WITH HAMMER IN HIS HOME, NANCY WAS TARGET!
- Thread starter 850credit
- Start date
These motherfuckers don't know shit about material dynamics. In super slow motion that impact ripples like water in a pond (wave function)
The "free-thinkers" still peddling debunked stories from non-credible sources.
Bigeaglepatriot.net isn't credible?
Cacs all on BGOL
Very credible to the self-proclaimed free-thinkers and the color-blind ("we don't see color")
THIS.
THIS.
Agreed.
Even if he was trying to dick down a fag he wouldn’t do it in his house with all the cameras around and he wouldn’t be doing it with a crazy Canadian.
this is a tucked up reality we living in where folks think this is a false flag operation. Like this???!!! On Paul Pelosi? Nobody gives two fucks about him aand they know people are not sympathetic to Pelosi at all.
This was just a sideways op by a nutcase that didn’t have his plan together. Pelosi wasn’t even there, she was in DC.
Americans are just fucking stupid is all. Niggas cant help but fabricate intricate realities where there aint none.
oNE
And understand at a 2nd grade level. Just a bunch of elementary school minded beings that somehow managed to pass a driver's license test.
Something is off about this Pelosi attack video.
According to the reports when the intruder came into the house looking for Nancy her husband went into another room to call the cops. So naturally you would assume the phone call would entail a potential assault or a sense of urgency cause an intruder had a weapon in your home.
So the cops showed up to a house with a guy holding a hammer close to another man's torso area. But yet their initial reaction from the footage tells me there was no sense of danger or imminent threat upon opening the door with Pelosi and the intruder in visible sight. The whole sequence of events are off or is missing something.
The reality of what unfolded and the cops initial reaction to a potential life or death scenario doesn't match up. If the was no backstory and the footage was all you knew, it's easy to assume there wasn't an imminent danger.
Something ain't right
According to the reports when the intruder came into the house looking for Nancy her husband went into another room to call the cops. So naturally you would assume the phone call would entail a potential assault or a sense of urgency cause an intruder had a weapon in your home.
So the cops showed up to a house with a guy holding a hammer close to another man's torso area. But yet their initial reaction from the footage tells me there was no sense of danger or imminent threat upon opening the door with Pelosi and the intruder in visible sight. The whole sequence of events are off or is missing something.
The reality of what unfolded and the cops initial reaction to a potential life or death scenario doesn't match up. If the was no backstory and the footage was all you knew, it's easy to assume there wasn't an imminent danger.
Something ain't right
Last edited:
This fake ass Hollywood production cia psyops falseflag distraction bullshit. Where is all the 10s of billions sent to Ukraine going?
***edit***
The police might have been thrown off by how calm he sounded on the phone.
Here's the 911 call.
Last edited:
This was a GAY / HOMO thing.
Nancy Pelosi's Husband Assault: Prosecutors Fighting Man Convicted of Hammer Attack Over Plea for New Trial
Prosecutors argued David DePape's intended to interfere with Nancy Pelosi's duties in Congress
David DePape, Man Convicted of Kidnapping and Assault of Nancy Pelosi's Husband, Demands New Trial Ahead of Sentencing
The man argued prosecutors failed to prove he intended to kidnap the then-House Speaker to interfere with her duties
Prosecutors urged a federal judge to reject a motion for a new trial for the man convicted in the brutal hammer attack against Nancy Pelosi’s husband, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned.
David DePape claimed his constitutional rights were violated because the government failed to prove he carried out the attack to prevent Pelosi from carrying out her official duties as a member of Congress.
In addition, DePape, who faces up to 50 years behind bars, claimed the federal judge erroneously instructed jurors to consider the prosecutors’ charge that he plotted to interfere with Pelosi’s duties.
But prosecutors argued DePape was hell-bent on kidnapping the then Speaker of the Houe simply because she was the leader of the Democrats and viciously walloped Paul Pelosi when he learned she was in Washington, D.C.
"The defense team was permitted to argue its theory to the jury – that the defendant targeted Speaker Pelosi because he believed she was part of an elite, corrupt cabal and because of her role as the head of the Democratic Party,” prosecutors argued in a 16-page motion.
“The Court properly instructed the jury on the legal requirements for both charges and the government did not misstate these requirements in its jury addresses. The jury rejected the defense theory of the case and instead convicted [the] defendant," the motion read. "A new trial is not warranted."
As RadarOnline.com previously reported, the 42-year-old conspiracy theorist broke into Pelosi’s Richmond, California mansion in 2002 and used a hammer to assault her horrified 83-year-old husband.
During police questioning, DePape railed against Hillary Clinton and accused Nancy of being the “leader of the pack” viciously targeting former President Donald Trump, and then blathered about several right-wing QAnon conspiracy theories.
DePape argued he was entitled to the new trial because prosecutors were unable to prove his intent to interfere with Nancy’s duties.
“The Court’s refusal to give this instruction (or any other instruction) defining ‘on account of the performance of official duties’ requires reversal of Mr. DePape’s convictions on both counts because this instruction is both supported by law and has a foundation in the evidence presented at trial,” his lawyer argued.
Prosecutors argued DePape told police he planned to break Pelosi’s kneecaps and then wheel her into Congress and insisted the confession is evidence enough to show he wanted to interfere with her duties.
“Far from misstating the law, the government explained that the evidence supported the conclusion that defendant targeted Speaker Pelosi because of the performance of her official duties, and that those official duties included a political role as the lead Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives,” the court documents stated.
You guys need to learn how to use the snipe tool to take content from websites without credit like Twitter. Don't embed shit, they take your shit in a second.
Here is another tactic of taking the pictures and copy paste the text.
I deal with mentally ill/delusional whites and indians all the time that are attracted to me for some reason. The minute you see them winding up, you need to confront them. I had to smash one of them up into the concrete causing frontal lobe damage.
They think I have a bunch of time to waste on them with their peon battles. I am tied up in court right now dealing with their nonsense. I hoping to sever my links, but they are gearing up to chase me into other countries looking crazy and possessive.
I always wonder if it worse for Congress than what I am dealing with. Based on what Cori Bush is saying having to hire security, it seems like it is worse.
Federal Prosecutors Seek 40-Year Sentence for the Man Who Brutally Attacked Nancy Pelosi’s Husband
DePape still faces additional legal proceedings at the state level for charges of attempted murder and assault with a deadly weapon.
DOJ wants 40 year sentence for man who attacked Nancy Pelosi's husband with a hammer
Prosecutors are arguing David DePape's crimes should be treated as terrorism. He attacked Nancy Pelosi's husband with a hammer inside their home.
www.usatoday.com
Man who attacked Nancy Pelosi's husband in brazen hammer break-in is sentenced
David DePape was sentenced to 30 years for the 2022 attempted kidnapping and assault of Paul Pelosi, former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's husband.
lawandcrime.com
Paul Pelosi Attacker David DePape Spews Odd Conspiracies in Last Words Before Getting Life Sentence: 'I'm a Psychic'
David DePape was convicted of aggravated kidnapping in state court for the violent 2022 hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi. Just before learning his sentence, he spoke for more than 45 minutes, spouting conspiracy theories about 9/11, his ex-wife and his lawyers
Paul Pelosi attack: David DePape sentenced to life without parole on state conviction
David DePape, the man who attacked Nancy Pelosi’s husband in their San Francisco home two years ago, was sentenced to life without parole Tuesday on his state conviction.
www.nbcbayarea.com
I think it's crazy to give him life, why, because if this happened to one of us, dude would get a year in jail and a fine.Paul Pelosi Attacker David DePape Spews Odd Conspiracies in Last Words Before Getting Life Sentence: 'I'm a Psychic'
David DePape was convicted of aggravated kidnapping in state court for the violent 2022 hammer attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi. Just before learning his sentence, he spoke for more than 45 minutes, spouting conspiracy theories about 9/11, his ex-wife and his lawyerspeople.com
Paul Pelosi attack: David DePape sentenced to life without parole on state conviction
David DePape, the man who attacked Nancy Pelosi’s husband in their San Francisco home two years ago, was sentenced to life without parole Tuesday on his state conviction.
Absurd.
I agree but he should be locked up for life. That big goofy bastard is a danger to society.
Not disagreeing. Just pissed that he's treated differently than if he did that to a regular person. The only reason he got life was cause it was Pelosi.
People get murdered and I've seen dudes get a 5-7 bid.
But threaten a politician and you get life.
Yeah, I understood your point and completely agreed with it. I don't care if this dude attacked a homeless person like this, he still should've gotten the same sentence but we know he wouldn't had. There's definitely a double standard.