People be very careful this virus is not done yet

zod16

Rising Star
Registered

About half of those hospitalizations were for kids under age 5, who are not eligible to be vaccinated.

But among the rest, in the most recent week, none of the admitted kids ages 5-11, and just a third of the kids ages 12-17, were fully vaccinated.


Look at the disparity in the 5-12 rates for Manhattan in particular :smh:

HAU6mSK.png
 

Non-StopJFK2TAB

Rising Star
Platinum Member
The next variant in March is going to go nowhere when it discovers everyone just was infected in January. I think people will probably be open to booster shots over the summer which should finally put an end to the virus by winter/spring 23 just as predicted.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Scores Of NYC High Schoolers Walk Out Of Classes Demanding Remote Learning During COVID Surge
BY JESSICA GOULD, WNYC AND SOPHIA CHANG
JAN 11, 9:54 PM





Students leave Brooklyn Tech High School mid-day, to protest school safety during the pandemic, on January 11, 2022
STEPHEN LOVEKIN/SHUTTERSTOCK

Students at several high schools in New York City coordinated a walkout from classes on Tuesday to call for remote learning as they protest what they say are unsafe learning conditions inside school buildings as COVID cases surged just as the spring semester began last week.

A campaign mounted by students and activists across some of New York’s best-known high schools – including Bronx Science, Brooklyn Tech and Stuyvesant – led to a walkout shortly before noon on Tuesday.

While precise numbers were not immediately available, organizers estimated hundreds of students participated, with about 400 students walking out at Brooklyn Tech alone.


“Students like me that have parents that are immunocompromised, students that are themselves immunocompromised, I can't imagine how anxious they are to go into a building and feel like they're putting their lives at risk every day,” said Sarah Ismile, a 16-year-old student standing outside Brooklyn Tech.

“The main goal we have is to have a temporary shutdown of schools in NYC and a hybrid option for students who have food insecurities or who need childcare. We also want more COVID testing for students and staff and an improved [Department of Education] health screening,” said Samantha Farrow, 16, a junior at Stuyvesant, in a phone interview. The city says it's testing 10 % of the unvaccinated students in each school, and an equal number of vaccinated students.




The Department of Education said they “wholeheartedly support civic engagement among New York City students.”

“Nothing is more important than the health and safety of our school communities, and we’ve doubled in-school testing and deployed 5 million rapid tests to quickly identify cases, stop transmission, and safely keep schools open. Student voice is key and we’ll continue to listen to and work closely with those most impacted by our decisions — our students,” said DOE spokesperson Katie O’Hanlon in a statement.

The students calling for remote options say in-person learning is currently hobbled, with curricula in holding patterns as scores of students, teachers and staff tested positive for COVID-19 while the highly-contagious omicron variant of COVID swept through the city after the winter holidays.
READ MORE: "Overwhelmed," "Surreal," And "Stressful": NYC Educators On The First Week Of School In 2022
“The first day I came back to school on January 3rd — all of my teachers were absent except for one. We had lots of substitutes – it was a lot of nothing,” Farrow said. “Some of us read, some of us just sat around. We weren’t learning anything.”




Dorothy Chan, a senior at Brooklyn Tech, said the most recent email from the administration cited 85 new cases among the school community. Brooklyn Tech is one of the biggest high schools in America with 5,921 students enrolled last year, and Chan pointed out the student body takes mass transit from across the city to get to school.

“We have students that come from all five boroughs. And we also take many different types of public transport. And there's also no social distancing in our classrooms, or staircases or hallways, and there are a lot of different avenues that COVID can transmit between students, and it's ultimately not a safe place for students to be,” Chan said.

On January 10th, the city reported 11,825 cases among students, or about 1.2% of the 930,000-person student body. There were 2,298 cases among staff reported.

“I have asthma and other medical conditions and so do the people in my household as well,” said Lauren, a 15-year-old sophomore at University Neighborhood High School in Lower Manhattan where 30-40 students walked out.

Lauren, who didn’t want to give her last name, said classrooms are “semi-empty” at the school. “We kept getting Covid alerts, first 11, then 28, and the numbers keep growing,” she said. “It’s very scary not seeing the teachers that I’m close to.”

Sarah said without enough staff, she’s not learning at all: “I think that my education right now … it's not really being prioritized,” she said. “We're prioritizing just having schools open and coming to school, whereas teachers aren't really able to provide a full day of instruction to a half class of students. That's not what's happening.”

She added, “I think it'd be better if we could go remote. If we go remote, then everybody can get the same education safely from their home. I understand it's an issue with childcare for younger ones. But I think it's just something that we have to get around.”

In an interview last week, Mayor Eric Adams remained firm on keeping schools open, pointing out that many students may be "in communities where they don't have high speed broadband Wi-Fi, where they can't go online and get the education they need."

While Schools Chancellor David Banks said in a tweet that he would welcome discussions with the student leaders, at least one school apparently notified participants that they would receive detention for leaving class during the walkout:

The DOE did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the detention.
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
 

easy_b

Easy_b is in the place to be.
BGOL Investor
Well CAC’s will continue to die…. Parts of this country is really fucked up
 

hardawayz16

Rising Star
Registered
About half of those hospitalizations were for kids under age 5, who are not eligible to be vaccinated.

But among the rest, in the most recent week, none of the admitted kids ages 5-11, and just a third of the kids ages 12-17, were fully vaccinated.


Look at the disparity in the 5-12 rates for Manhattan in particular :smh:


So.......please tell us....how many of those hospitalizations are WITH covid and not BECAUSE OF covid.....
 

tallblacknyc

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Scores Of NYC High Schoolers Walk Out Of Classes Demanding Remote Learning During COVID Surge
BY JESSICA GOULD, WNYC AND SOPHIA CHANG
JAN 11, 9:54 PM





Students leave Brooklyn Tech High School mid-day, to protest school safety during the pandemic, on January 11, 2022
STEPHEN LOVEKIN/SHUTTERSTOCK

Students at several high schools in New York City coordinated a walkout from classes on Tuesday to call for remote learning as they protest what they say are unsafe learning conditions inside school buildings as COVID cases surged just as the spring semester began last week.

A campaign mounted by students and activists across some of New York’s best-known high schools – including Bronx Science, Brooklyn Tech and Stuyvesant – led to a walkout shortly before noon on Tuesday.

While precise numbers were not immediately available, organizers estimated hundreds of students participated, with about 400 students walking out at Brooklyn Tech alone.


“Students like me that have parents that are immunocompromised, students that are themselves immunocompromised, I can't imagine how anxious they are to go into a building and feel like they're putting their lives at risk every day,” said Sarah Ismile, a 16-year-old student standing outside Brooklyn Tech.

“The main goal we have is to have a temporary shutdown of schools in NYC and a hybrid option for students who have food insecurities or who need childcare. We also want more COVID testing for students and staff and an improved [Department of Education] health screening,” said Samantha Farrow, 16, a junior at Stuyvesant, in a phone interview. The city says it's testing 10 % of the unvaccinated students in each school, and an equal number of vaccinated students.




The Department of Education said they “wholeheartedly support civic engagement among New York City students.”

“Nothing is more important than the health and safety of our school communities, and we’ve doubled in-school testing and deployed 5 million rapid tests to quickly identify cases, stop transmission, and safely keep schools open. Student voice is key and we’ll continue to listen to and work closely with those most impacted by our decisions — our students,” said DOE spokesperson Katie O’Hanlon in a statement.

The students calling for remote options say in-person learning is currently hobbled, with curricula in holding patterns as scores of students, teachers and staff tested positive for COVID-19 while the highly-contagious omicron variant of COVID swept through the city after the winter holidays.
READ MORE: "Overwhelmed," "Surreal," And "Stressful": NYC Educators On The First Week Of School In 2022
“The first day I came back to school on January 3rd — all of my teachers were absent except for one. We had lots of substitutes – it was a lot of nothing,” Farrow said. “Some of us read, some of us just sat around. We weren’t learning anything.”




Dorothy Chan, a senior at Brooklyn Tech, said the most recent email from the administration cited 85 new cases among the school community. Brooklyn Tech is one of the biggest high schools in America with 5,921 students enrolled last year, and Chan pointed out the student body takes mass transit from across the city to get to school.

“We have students that come from all five boroughs. And we also take many different types of public transport. And there's also no social distancing in our classrooms, or staircases or hallways, and there are a lot of different avenues that COVID can transmit between students, and it's ultimately not a safe place for students to be,” Chan said.

On January 10th, the city reported 11,825 cases among students, or about 1.2% of the 930,000-person student body. There were 2,298 cases among staff reported.

“I have asthma and other medical conditions and so do the people in my household as well,” said Lauren, a 15-year-old sophomore at University Neighborhood High School in Lower Manhattan where 30-40 students walked out.

Lauren, who didn’t want to give her last name, said classrooms are “semi-empty” at the school. “We kept getting Covid alerts, first 11, then 28, and the numbers keep growing,” she said. “It’s very scary not seeing the teachers that I’m close to.”

Sarah said without enough staff, she’s not learning at all: “I think that my education right now … it's not really being prioritized,” she said. “We're prioritizing just having schools open and coming to school, whereas teachers aren't really able to provide a full day of instruction to a half class of students. That's not what's happening.”

She added, “I think it'd be better if we could go remote. If we go remote, then everybody can get the same education safely from their home. I understand it's an issue with childcare for younger ones. But I think it's just something that we have to get around.”

In an interview last week, Mayor Eric Adams remained firm on keeping schools open, pointing out that many students may be "in communities where they don't have high speed broadband Wi-Fi, where they can't go online and get the education they need."

While Schools Chancellor David Banks said in a tweet that he would welcome discussions with the student leaders, at least one school apparently notified participants that they would receive detention for leaving class during the walkout:

The DOE did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the detention.

Ummm

ehhh

uhhh

no need for me to even say it
 

easy_b

Easy_b is in the place to be.
BGOL Investor
This your fault Supreme Court
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
The Supreme Court - Maskless and inaccurate

When the Supreme Court justices emerged from the red drapes at the front of the courtroom last Friday and took their seats — to hear arguments about President Biden’s vaccine mandate — all but one of the justices there were wearing masks. The exception was Neil Gorsuch.

That Gorsuch would resist mask wearing is no surprise. He is a conservative judge with a libertarian streak who has spent his life around Republican politics. In conservative circles, masks have become a symbol of big-government subjugation.

But his decision not to wear one — while the other Republican appointees on the court all were — still felt surprising. The justices usually make an effort to treat one another respectfully. They disagree on the law, sometimes harshly, while maintaining productive and even warm relationships, like the famous friendship between Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“When you’re charged with working together for most of the remainder of your life, you have to create a relationship,” Sonia Sotomayor said a few years ago, describing her welcoming of Brett Kavanaugh. “This is our work family.”

Gorsuch had to know that his masklessness could make other justices uncomfortable, including the 83-year-old Stephen Breyer and the 67-year-old Sotomayor, who has diabetes, a Covid risk factor. Sotomayor sits next to Gorsuch on the bench and, notably, chose not to attend Friday’s argument in person. She participated remotely, from her chambers.

When Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post asked a Supreme Court spokesperson whether Sotomayor had done so because Gorsuch was maskless, Marcus got no response.

One of the few public comments from somebody close to Gorsuch came from Mike Davis, a conservative activist and former Gorsuch clerk. On Twitter, Davis defended his former boss by writing, “We know cloth masks don’t [work].” It was a statement that managed to be both exaggerated and beside the point.

Masks, especially medical masks like KN95 and N95 masks, reduce the spread of Covid, studies show. In response to that evidence, the Supreme Court tells lawyers and reporters in the courtroom to wear medical masks.

The effect of masks may not be as large as their advocates sometimes claim, and masks can impede communication. So I recognize that well-meaning people can disagree about when they should be worn. Still, Gorsuch’s lack of a mask inside the courtroom seemed needlessly risky and disdainful of his colleagues.

“Wearing a mask is the decent thing to do,” Marcus wrote in her Washington Post column, “especially when you are around vulnerable individuals.” This week, Gorsuch again appeared without a mask at the court.

His decision seems emblematic of a country where partisan loyalty can trump Covid reality. It also seems emblematic of a court on which the justices are increasingly willing to behave as partisan actors rather than impartial judges.

And if you’re a liberal reader who’s tempted to believe that those descriptions apply only to Republicans — or a conservative reader who’s frustrated that I have focused on Gorsuch — I hope you will read the rest of today’s newsletter.


A sketch from this week shows Gorsuch, with no mask, next to Sotomayor’s empty chair.Art Lien
‘Wildly incorrect’
During the first hour of last Friday’s two-hour argument, Sotomayor listed the evidence of Covid’s continuing threat, to illustrate the benefits of a vaccine mandate. (Yesterday, the court ruled in the case, blocking Biden’s vaccine mandate for large employers, while allowing a narrower one for health care providers. Gorsuch opposed both mandates, while Sotomayor favored both.)

In making the case for mandates last week, Sotomayor first noted that Covid cases were surging and hospitals were near capacity. She then turned her attention to children: “We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition and many on ventilators.”

That last sentence is simply untrue.

PolitiFact called it “way off.” Khaya Himmelman of The Dispatch described it as false and misleading. Daniel Dale of CNN wrote that Sotomayor had made “a significant false claim.” Glenn Kessler, The Washington Post’s fact checker, called it “wildly incorrect.”

Fewer than 5,000 U.S. children were in the hospital with Covid last week, and many fewer were in “serious condition” or on ventilators. Some of the hospitalized children probably had incidental cases of the virus, meaning they had been hospitalized for other reasons and tested positive while there.

Covid, as regular Morning readers have heard before, is overwhelmingly mild in children, even those who are unvaccinated. The risks are not zero, and they have risen during the current wave of infections, especially for children with major underlying health problems. But the risks remain extremely low.

Consider these numbers: Over the past week, about 870 children were admitted to hospitals with Covid, according to the C.D.C. By comparison, more than 5,000 children visit emergency rooms each week for sports injuries. More than 1,000 are hospitalized for bronchiolitis during a typical January week.

Similarly, the risk of Covid hospitalization for children — even in recent weeks — has been much lower than the risk from the respiratory virus known as R.S.V., as the epidemiologist Katelyn Jetelina has shown.

Or consider this: Vaccinated elderly people are at much more risk of severe Covid illness than unvaccinated children.

Sotomayor’s statement may not have been central to the case. But it was not a random error, either. Many other Americans on the left half of the political spectrum have also been exaggerating Covid’s risks to children. As the authors of a Gallup poll last year wrote, “Republicans consistently underestimate risks, while Democrats consistently overestimate them.”

I understand that these exaggerations often stem from an admirable desire to protect children from harm. But the result has been the opposite: The pandemic’s disruptions have led to lost learning, social isolation and widespread mental-health problems for children. Many American children are in crisis — as a result of pandemic restrictions rather than the virus itself.

Last week’s Supreme Court session was striking because it highlighted both halves of the country’s partisan-based self-deceptions. Many conservatives are refusing to wear masks — or, even worse, refusing to be vaccinated — out of a misplaced belief that Covid is harmless. Many liberals are sensationalizing Covid’s risks out of a misplaced belief that it presents a bigger threat to most children and vaccinated adults than continued isolation and disruption do.

Partisanship, as some political scientists like to say, is a helluva drug.
 
Last edited:

easy_b

Easy_b is in the place to be.
BGOL Investor
Maskless and inaccurate
When the Supreme Court justices emerged from the red drapes at the front of the courtroom last Friday and took their seats — to hear arguments about President Biden’s vaccine mandate — all but one of the justices there were wearing masks. The exception was Neil Gorsuch.

That Gorsuch would resist mask wearing is no surprise. He is a conservative judge with a libertarian streak who has spent his life around Republican politics. In conservative circles, masks have become a symbol of big-government subjugation.

But his decision not to wear one — while the other Republican appointees on the court all were — still felt surprising. The justices usually make an effort to treat one another respectfully. They disagree on the law, sometimes harshly, while maintaining productive and even warm relationships, like the famous friendship between Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

“When you’re charged with working together for most of the remainder of your life, you have to create a relationship,” Sonia Sotomayor said a few years ago, describing her welcoming of Brett Kavanaugh. “This is our work family.”

Gorsuch had to know that his masklessness could make other justices uncomfortable, including the 83-year-old Stephen Breyer and the 67-year-old Sotomayor, who has diabetes, a Covid risk factor. Sotomayor sits next to Gorsuch on the bench and, notably, chose not to attend Friday’s argument in person. She participated remotely, from her chambers.

When Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post asked a Supreme Court spokesperson whether Sotomayor had done so because Gorsuch was maskless, Marcus got no response.

One of the few public comments from somebody close to Gorsuch came from Mike Davis, a conservative activist and former Gorsuch clerk. On Twitter, Davis defended his former boss by writing, “We know cloth masks don’t [work].” It was a statement that managed to be both exaggerated and beside the point.

Masks, especially medical masks like KN95 and N95 masks, reduce the spread of Covid, studies show. In response to that evidence, the Supreme Court tells lawyers and reporters in the courtroom to wear medical masks.

The effect of masks may not be as large as their advocates sometimes claim, and masks can impede communication. So I recognize that well-meaning people can disagree about when they should be worn. Still, Gorsuch’s lack of a mask inside the courtroom seemed needlessly risky and disdainful of his colleagues.

“Wearing a mask is the decent thing to do,” Marcus wrote in her Washington Post column, “especially when you are around vulnerable individuals.” This week, Gorsuch again appeared without a mask at the court.

His decision seems emblematic of a country where partisan loyalty can trump Covid reality. It also seems emblematic of a court on which the justices are increasingly willing to behave as partisan actors rather than impartial judges.

And if you’re a liberal reader who’s tempted to believe that those descriptions apply only to Republicans — or a conservative reader who’s frustrated that I have focused on Gorsuch — I hope you will read the rest of today’s newsletter.


A sketch from this week shows Gorsuch, with no mask, next to Sotomayor’s empty chair.Art Lien
‘Wildly incorrect’
During the first hour of last Friday’s two-hour argument, Sotomayor listed the evidence of Covid’s continuing threat, to illustrate the benefits of a vaccine mandate. (Yesterday, the court ruled in the case, blocking Biden’s vaccine mandate for large employers, while allowing a narrower one for health care providers. Gorsuch opposed both mandates, while Sotomayor favored both.)

In making the case for mandates last week, Sotomayor first noted that Covid cases were surging and hospitals were near capacity. She then turned her attention to children: “We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition and many on ventilators.”

That last sentence is simply untrue.

PolitiFact called it “way off.” Khaya Himmelman of The Dispatch described it as false and misleading. Daniel Dale of CNN wrote that Sotomayor had made “a significant false claim.” Glenn Kessler, The Washington Post’s fact checker, called it “wildly incorrect.”

Fewer than 5,000 U.S. children were in the hospital with Covid last week, and many fewer were in “serious condition” or on ventilators. Some of the hospitalized children probably had incidental cases of the virus, meaning they had been hospitalized for other reasons and tested positive while there.

Covid, as regular Morning readers have heard before, is overwhelmingly mild in children, even those who are unvaccinated. The risks are not zero, and they have risen during the current wave of infections, especially for children with major underlying health problems. But the risks remain extremely low.

Consider these numbers: Over the past week, about 870 children were admitted to hospitals with Covid, according to the C.D.C. By comparison, more than 5,000 children visit emergency rooms each week for sports injuries. More than 1,000 are hospitalized for bronchiolitis during a typical January week.

Similarly, the risk of Covid hospitalization for children — even in recent weeks — has been much lower than the risk from the respiratory virus known as R.S.V., as the epidemiologist Katelyn Jetelina has shown.

Or consider this: Vaccinated elderly people are at much more risk of severe Covid illness than unvaccinated children.

Sotomayor’s statement may not have been central to the case. But it was not a random error, either. Many other Americans on the left half of the political spectrum have also been exaggerating Covid’s risks to children. As the authors of a Gallup poll last year wrote, “Republicans consistently underestimate risks, while Democrats consistently overestimate them.”

I understand that these exaggerations often stem from an admirable desire to protect children from harm. But the result has been the opposite: The pandemic’s disruptions have led to lost learning, social isolation and widespread mental-health problems for children. Many American children are in crisis — as a result of pandemic restrictions rather than the virus itself.

Last week’s Supreme Court session was striking because it highlighted both halves of the country’s partisan-based self-deceptions. Many conservatives are refusing to wear masks — or, even worse, refusing to be vaccinated — out of a misplaced belief that Covid is harmless. Many liberals are sensationalizing Covid’s risks out of a misplaced belief that it presents a bigger threat to most children and vaccinated adults than continued isolation and disruption do.

Partisanship, as some political scientists like to say, is a helluva drug.
One or two of them is going to catch this shit badly
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Insurers Say Saturday Is Too Soon to Meet White House Goals on Rapid Tests
Not all health plans will be ready for the Covid tests to be free upfront at stores, relying at first on receipts and reimbursement.






Some insurers say it will probably take weeks to fully set up the system the White House envisions for free rapid Covid tests.Credit...Ted S. Warren/Associated Press
By Sarah Kliff
Jan. 14, 2022Updated 10:02 a.m. ET

Starting Saturday, new federal rules will require private insurers to cover the at-home coronavirus tests that Americans buy in pharmacies and other stores. The new system could, in theory, allow millions of consumers to pick up tests at thousands of locations without spending any money.
The reality, at least in the short term, is likely to be messier: Some insurers say it will probably take weeks to fully set up the system the White House envisions.

The new process will be hard, the insurers say, because over-the-counter coronavirus tests are different from the doctor’s visits and hospital stays they typically cover.

The tests do not currently have the type of billing codes that insurers use to process claims. Health plans rarely process retail receipts; instead they’ve built systems for digital claims with preset formats and long-established billing codes.

Because of this, some insurers plan to manage the rapid test claims manually at the start.

“This is taking things back to the olden days, where you’ll have a person throwing all these paper slips in a shoe box, and eventually stuffing it into an envelope and sending it off to a health insurer to decipher,” said Ceci Connolly, president and C.E.O. of the Alliance of Community Health Plans, which represents smaller, nonprofit insurers.

Ms. Connolly also criticized the implementation timeline as too rushed, with the government issuing rules on a Monday that are to take effect on a Saturday.

“It is going to be exceedingly difficult for most health plans to implement this in four days,” she said.
The challenges of insurers may soon trickle down to consumers, who will be responsible at first for navigating their health plans’ reimbursement rules to get their tests covered.

“There will be some people who buy them, and then have a six-month nightmare trying to get reimbursed,” said Jenny Chumbley Hogue, a Texas-based insurance broker. She has not yet seen a plan she works with that has sent out member guidance on how coverage will be handled.

Uncertain of what the rules will be, Ms. Hogue is advising her clients to save not just receipts but also the boxes that the tests come in, because some plans may require the boxes as proof of purchase.

The White House gave a statement to The New York Times on Friday encouraging patients to hold on to receipts for the tests they purchase: “If Americans are charged upfront, it is important that they keep their receipts and be prepared to submit them for reimbursement. The most important thing is that starting Saturday those tests are covered free of charge.”

Some public health experts have criticized the plan as unnecessarily complex, saying they would have preferred the Biden administration to provide free kits directly to patients.

“The direct provision of inexpensive tests for the American public would be the simplest from a consumer standpoint,” Lindsey Dawson, an associate director at the Kaiser Family Foundation, previously told The Times. “Someone will need to know it’s reimbursable, navigate the reimbursement process, and front the cost to begin with.”

Other countries have spent more heavily on rapid testing. In Britain, citizens can use a government website to order free rapid tests for home use. Germany invested hundreds of millions of dollars to create a network of 15,000 rapid testing sites. The United States has instead focused public purchasing on vaccines, and efforts to encourage their uptake.

Some local governments in the United States have invested heavily in rapid testing to counter the latest wave of cases. Washington, which has experienced a substantial surge in virus cases, now allows residents to pick up four free rapid tests daily at libraries across the city.

The Biden administration has instead relied more heavily on tests delivered in doctor’s offices. Federal laws have required insurers to cover those at no cost to the patient since the early months of the pandemic.

The new rules require private insurers to cover eight at-home coronavirus tests for each person, every month. The rules will not apply retroactively to at-home tests that Americans have already purchased, and do not cover patients with public insurance such as Medicare and Medicaid.
Under the new rules, consumers who get tests at their health plan’s “preferred” location will have the costs covered upfront, meaning the patient will pay nothing out of pocket. What counts as a “preferred” location will vary from one plan to another, although many expect those facilities to be ones that are already in-network with a given insurer.
Consumers that go to an out-of-network store will need to submit receipts for reimbursement, and the plan will only have to pay $12 per test (or $24 for a kit with two tests). If the sticker price is higher, the patient will be responsible for the additional charges.
Health plans that do not designate a set of “preferred” locations will have to cover the full costs of test receipts that their members submit.

Test prices currently range from $17.98 for a pack of two to $49.99 for an individual test, according to research Ms. Dawson conducted last week.

The Coronavirus Pandemic: Key Things to Know
Card 1 of 5
The latest Covid data in the U.S. As the Omicron surge causes case counts to reach record highs and hospitalizations to surpass last winter’s peak, here’s how to think about the data and what the early numbers suggest about the variant’s potential toll and possible peaking in parts of the United States.
Vaccine mandates. The Supreme Court blocked the Biden administration from enforcing a vaccine-or-testing mandate for large employers, but the justices allowed a more modest mandate requiring health care workers at facilities receiving federal money to be vaccinated.
The U.S. Covid response. President Biden announced that the U.S. government will buy 500 million more tests for distribution to Americans, doubling its previous purchase. He also said he will deploy military personnel to help overwhelmed hospitals in six states and pledged to provide free high-quality masks.
Around the world. The future of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is in doubt after he admitted attending a party that violated lockdown rules. In France, teachers staged a one-day walkout against relaxed Covid testing rules that they fear will lead to more infections.
Staying safe. Worried about spreading Covid? Keep yourself and others safe by following some basic guidance on when to test and how to use at-home virus tests (if you can find them). Here is what to do if you test positive for the coronavirus.




Highmark Health, a nonprofit plan in Pennsylvania with around six million members, plans to create a network of “preferred” locations but will not have it ready by this Saturday.

“The guidance came out Monday, and we started working on it immediately, but I don’t have a mechanism ready to go, Day 1, where you don’t have to pay upfront,” said Bob Wanovich, a Highmark vice president who works on provider contracting.

One challenge Mr. Wanovich and others described was that insurers typically do not cover over-the-counter items at the pharmacy, like a pregnancy test or a nonprescription medication.

“Retailers need to have a process to capture the right codes, and submit it, and we need to be able to accept it on our end,” he said. “These are the pieces that aren’t there yet.”

Until they set up that infrastructure — a process that could take weeks — Highmark Health will be advising patients to submit receipts along with a photograph of their test kit’s bar code for reimbursement.

Capital District Physicians’ Health Plan, a small insurer in upstate New York, plans to instruct members to hold on to their test receipts as it sorts out a system for processing them.

“We’re getting a ton of calls from consumers asking about it, so we’re trying to arm our member service staff with the right information,” said Ali Skinner, the plan’s vice president for communications.

Ms. Skinner said the insurer was still working to have “preferred” locations designated by Saturday, so patients could pick up tests without the reimbursement process, but she was uncertain about whether it would meet the deadline.

“We’re up against the clock right now,” she said. “It’s a big lift for us. We found out at the same time as consumers did on Monday.”
Even as insurers sort out systems for processing claims, they noted one major factor will remain out of their control: testing supply, and the shortages that consumers have confronted in recent weeks.

“The bigger frustration our members have is over finding a test, and I don’t have any control over the supply,” said Mr. Wanovich of Highmark Health. “We’re working with our providers to figure out who has them, but we know it’s in short supply.”
 

dHustla

Rising Star
Registered
I'm finna order some.

The N95 masks have the straps that go behind the head instead of ear loops, I got locs.. shit is a hassle.

And how I get a tight seal with a beard? Took me over 2 years to grow dis hoe.
 

FLoss

Call 1-866-DHS-2-ICE to report suspicious activity
BGOL Investor
I see the narrative is shifting just ahead of election season. You nigros are being played.

 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
I mean you can't eat with it on lol.
Seems like some fake attempt to make people feel like they're doing something idk
I haven't eaten in a restaurant since the pandemic began

^^^^
You ain't say nothing wrong bro.

I been in a space where I haven't really either.

But when I have?

It's been outside or we had like the whole spot to ourselves. And understand most can't do that but my situation with my kids Condition? I gotta use all the pull I got.

People just gotta do their best

These folks doing NOTHING AT ALL are the real problem.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Darth Furious

Master
Platinum Member
When did I say covid doesn't kill anyone. If your under 70 without existing cormorbidies you are almost certain to survive infection.

No famo. Dont believe that.

My cousin told me this same thing around Christmas and I believed him. This nigga cant hoop with us no more because he still aint got his breathing right. A month after he got over Covid.

Then, We - well he really - just buried his girlfriend last week. She choked trying to smoke and loss consciousness. We just found out she had Covid Thanksgiving and never told anyone because she said she didn’t believe any damage was done to her lungs. She died in her sleep.


i know it seems exaggerated. I know THEY dont know what the hell they are doing and thats why the science keeps changing. They trying to figure this shit out on the fly.


Girl was 35 years old and went to the gym like it was the club.

SMH

It affects everyone diffently. That’s why folks are so afraid. You cant be sure you’ll be unharmed afterwards. I aint taking no more chances on positive thinking. It aint worth it. I got kids.


oNE
 
Last edited:
Top