IN her defenseShe lost because:
1. She is on the wrong side of most policies
2. She switched on 80% of her previously held policies - untrustworthy
3. She is legit a stupid person
4. She can't articulate her opinions on camera. See #3 for "stupid person"
This is a depressing list. I see a whole generation of Americans getting priced out of society because of the capitalization of everything.This is why they lost right here.
11 Things That Were Affordable 10 Years Ago That The Middle Class Can’t Afford Anymore
It's not just luxury goods that are inaccessible for many families now, but also basic necessities.www.yourtango.com
I really don't understand your intense hatred of gays... I'm just trying to reason with you man to man. We have different perspectives with regard to gay people but we're both straight black men and it's a fact that the LGBT population is on pace to outnumber the black population by the end of the century. That's just a fact, nothing moronic about it.
You do realize you are talking about a sexual preference and a race of people?
IN her defense
She's not used to socializing with regular folks like that and I don't mean to crap on any brothers or sisters on here papered up and doing well but alot of us when we get status like that only really socialize to certain folks on our level, I think crackers really know how to dumb themselves down to appeal to the poor but we not that good at this skill and for politicians it's a very important skill.
They cheated
Same thing they said when they lost. So that's where American politics is. Whoever loses it's because the other side cheated.
Same thing they said when they lost. So that's where American politics is. Whoever loses it's because the other side cheated.
They went to court with no evidence. That's the difference. Usually the the accusers are the ones doing it - projection.I mean that's fine, maybe Repubs did cheat.
But are you willing to give the same possibility to those who said Dems stole the last election? Or does cheating only happen one way?
Both sides see themselves as the saviors of democracy in the ultimate Good vs Evil battle.
They went to court with no evidence. That's the difference. Usually the the accusers are the ones doing it - projection.
They had 4 years to work their plan and they are relying on reactions like yours to assist them. "We don't want to look crazy like them, so let's just stand down".
They backed her into a corner, they always do that to black folks running for positions in office, back them into the educated black spaces but they can't translate too well into the non-educated black spaces, and they struggle.Indeed. We saw that when her campaign was constantly pushing the HBCU/AKA angle.
I would say this, most Americans think like this...1. Clothing/Fashion Design
2. Liar/Political scamster
3. Naturalized citizen just barely in the country
4. Lack of Experience besides a courtroom, no accomplishments.
5. Indian heritage.
Why is it always on us? The numbers do not bear out that we make that much difference especially with millions of voting age Black folk locked up.
Because WE can and do make a difference in those swing states! Arizona and Nevada don't apply here, but think Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Those states all have sizable Black populations and/or major cities with sizable Black population that can make the difference between whether a Dem or Repub presidential candidate wins the state. If there is limited Black turnout or Black enthusiasm, then the Democratic candidate loses. Simple as that. Go look at the results of the 2024 election. Kamala lost Wisconsin and Michigan by ONE PERCENT or so each. And the other three states she lost by THREE percent or so each. That percentage lost could be made up by increasing the Black turnout.
And if we properly understood this and organized correctly, we could leverage this voting power as well.
Check out the 8:40 Mark.
So a Black man should not be on a major corporate board and get paid in a capitalist system?