You are not from Africa. You are a Moor. Why are you worried
about what Africans do with Africa? Mind you own business.
You think we have forgotten or forgiven all the insults you have
said about Africa all these years?
Sierra Leon sells rainforest to China
- Thread starter RUDY RAYYY MO
- Start date
about what Africans do with Africa? Mind you own business.
You think we have forgotten or forgiven all the insults you have
said about Africa all these years?
I sold my house in Alaska that sat on a acre for that rate for more.
Man...WTF?!55 mill is a steal....oh well
Amid protests, Sierra Leone sells rainforest to China for industrial harbor in $55m deal - Face2Face Africa
Sierra Leone has sold 100 hectares of beach and protected rainforest to China to construct an industrial fishing harbor in $55m deal.face2faceafrica.com
You don't need horns to be a devil. The greatest lie was convincing man that dollars have more value than the environment, than your people, and your way of life. Those that participated in this did it for bribes and dollars. Dollars that only have value if you believe it does. Dollars that will depreciate, inflate, and deflate. One thing is for sure, In 50 years those same dollars will not have the same value as they were once believed.
This world is by design. Those that perpetuate these things do it for self interest. In the end these devils will make this world dry.
Like the slave barters of west Africa, or the Indians of the America's, some did it for beads and necklaces which they believed to have value just the same. It is no different the paper bills that is being barted for now. We all know what became of that.
This world is by design. Those that perpetuate these things do it for self interest. In the end these devils will make this world dry.
Like the slave barters of west Africa, or the Indians of the America's, some did it for beads and necklaces which they believed to have value just the same. It is no different the paper bills that is being barted for now. We all know what became of that.
This is cac bullshit! They think Africa is their's and when we doMan...WTF?!
things that do not benefit them, they howl. They know that their
asses are finished without our natural resources. Where the fuck
does German industry get all the raw materials to build so many
cars? How are the English building warships when they have no
iron ore?
Is it possible that Africans know what they are doing?
Last edited:
The Germans simply slaughtered 85% of the Narma and Herero and appropriated
Namibia. The Boers simply machine gunned the Zulu and took South Africa. Since
you are all so concerned about the well-being of Africa, how come you are not
saying anything about those situations? How come you are making so much noise
about the Chinese buying 10 football fields worth of land to invest in Sierra Leone?
You one of those "smart-dumb niggas", aren't you?
My comment wasn't a complaint. It was an observation.
It does not matter. You observation is critical of what Africans are
doing. So my question still applies. Please answer it.
How much of the United States does China really own?
China has slowly been buying big in America, dominating the global supply chain in an array of industries
By Hollie McKay | Fox News
Newt says China will 'dominate world' if tech theft isn't stopped, 'it's a matter of life and death'
The coronavirus pandemic may have shed light on China's influence in America over the supply chain, including life-saving medicines, technology and equipment.
But some analysts believe the ongoing crisis lays bare the inroads China has made on U.S. soil.
The American Security Institute recently released a report and launched a campaign, featuring a billboard in Times Square, to draw further attention to the extensive array of sectors the Chinese government and its partners have invested into. But, exactly how much does the nation own?
CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE
Times Square billboard endeavors to warn of creeping Chinese influence. (ChinaOwnsUs campaign)
Medicine:
China produces 97 percent of U.S. antibiotics and about 80 percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients used in American drugs, giving the Chinese Communist Party absolute control of potentially life-saving medicine. For example, Chinese pharmaceutical companies supply 70 percent of the world's acetaminophen, commonly used in Tylenol.
Food:
In 2017, the United States imported $4.6 billion in agricultural goods from China, which is also responsible for much of the global supply of soy and pea proteins that are found in nutritional supplements and synthetic meats. A Chinese firm has also purchased Smithfield, the world's largest pork processor and hog producer.
(Smithfield said in a later statement pertaining to their ownership structure that they are "a U.S. company that provides more than 40,000 American jobs and partners with thousands of American farmers. The company was founded in Smithfield, Virginia, in 1936 and was acquired by Hong Kong-based WH Group in 2013. WH Group is a publicly-traded company with shareholders around the world. Anyone anywhere can purchase shares of WH Group on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. WH Group’s shareholders include many large U.S.-based financial institutions."
Education:
The Chinese government's theft of intellectual property has been an open secret for decades. More recently, U.S. authorities have discovered China is funding American university researchers, who don't always disclose those contributions.
US PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AIMS TO WREST SOME DRUG PRODUCTION BACK FROM CHINA
Technology:
The manufacturing of smartphones and other household items is heavily reliant on China, which controls most of the rare earth minerals that make those items work. Additionally, China is seeking to build 5G networks in the United States and other Western countries, which could potentially feed personal information and sensitive data to the Chinese Communist Party.
Media:
Chinese firms have bought AMC Entertainment, Legendary Entertainment, and other media companies. Control of 8,000-plus of American theater screens and other media platforms allows China to project "soft power" and block unflattering depictions of the Chinese government from being presented, both in terms of creative production and mass distribution.
Citing the nonpartisan economic think-tank Paulson Institute, the American Security Institute report underscores that "Chinese firms and investors own a controlling majority in nearly 2,400 U.S. companies."
These include: AMC Entertainment (entertainment), Cirrus Wind Energy (energy), Complete Genomics (health care), First International Oil (energy), G.E. Appliances (technology), IBM—P.C. division (technology), Legendary Entertainment Group (entertainment), Motorola Mobility (technology), Nexteer Automotive (automotive), Riot Games (entertainment), Smithfield Foods (food), Teledyne Continental Motors and Mattituck Services (aerospace), Terex Corp. (machinery), Triple H Coal (mining), Zonare Medical Systems (health care).
"Under China's Communist Party dictatorship, private companies are forced to bend to the government's will," the report states.
"A recently passed law in China requires companies to share data with Chinese communist spy agencies if requested. nder Xi Jinping, the Communist party has returned to being the ultimate authority in business," writes The Guardian. And Human Rights Watch has written that China is an 'existential threat' to human rights."
And while the U.S. grants China permission to buy its companies, China does not allow U.S. companies to operate the same way on their soil.
"The first priority is to reclaim our critical supply chains so that we can become self-secure instead of reliant on the Chinese government," Will Coggin, managing director of the American Security Institute, told Fox News.
The extent of Chinese investment in recent years has also raised red flags around U.S. national security, particularly in the realm of rare earth minerals. These are especially vital not only for high-technology products such as smartphones and electric vehicles but for U.S. frontline weapons including the F-35 fighter, which requires 920 pounds of rare earth minerals.
"In 2017, the United States produced zero rare earth minerals. China, on the other hand, accounted for more than 80 percent of the world's supply," the report stated.
However, the full extent of the Chinese investment as it stands in the U.S. today is far from transparent.
"The Chinese have a strong foothold here in the U.S., and Chinese firms have access to what seems like infinite government lending, and because the country's goal of world dominance is ingrained into the minds of their business leaders," explained Paul Murad, president of Nevada-based real estate firm Metroplex. "It means our U.S. directors have a hard task on their hands when it comes to negotiation."
Milos Maricic, an international affairs expert and World Economic Forum contributor, concurred that while China owns close to $150 billion in U.S. companies – not particularly huge in comparison to the U.S. economy – there is a lot about the available figure that we simply do not know.
"The number is very difficult to gauge correctly due to complicated ownership structures that the Chinese sometimes employ. It could be bigger," he surmised.
Some U.S. lawmakers are pushing back amid the coronavirus fallout, which ignited an initial panic over concerns of critical medical shortages and Beijing's threats to withhold the needed goods.
In late May, the Senate unanimously passed the bipartisan Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act in a bid to force foreign companies – with China at the likely forefront – to adhere to U.S. securities law, and compel some to be removed from American stock exchanges. The bill, which is yet to move through the House, would necessitate that "an issuer must make this certification if the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is unable to audit specified reports because the issuer has retained a foreign public accounting firm not subject to inspection by the board.
More than 200 foreign firms – mostly Chinese with a combined market capitalization of almost $2 trillion – are said to not be meeting this standard; so their stocks are traded, but U.S. investors have limited insight into what is going on internally with the companies. Subsequently, China and other international players would be obligated to accede to an audit that can be reviewed by the nonprofit Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which oversees audits of all U.S. companies that endeavor to raise money in public markets.
"Chinese companies have been carrying out unchecked reverse mergers for years now, and the media (influence) has been going under the radar for years now," Murad added. "Under President Trump, the U.S. was the first to recognize their nonstop deceits, and now the rest of the world has a clearer picture of China's ambition."
China has slowly been buying big in America, dominating the global supply chain in an array of industries
By Hollie McKay | Fox News
Newt says China will 'dominate world' if tech theft isn't stopped, 'it's a matter of life and death'
The coronavirus pandemic may have shed light on China's influence in America over the supply chain, including life-saving medicines, technology and equipment.
But some analysts believe the ongoing crisis lays bare the inroads China has made on U.S. soil.
The American Security Institute recently released a report and launched a campaign, featuring a billboard in Times Square, to draw further attention to the extensive array of sectors the Chinese government and its partners have invested into. But, exactly how much does the nation own?
CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE
Times Square billboard endeavors to warn of creeping Chinese influence. (ChinaOwnsUs campaign)
Medicine:
China produces 97 percent of U.S. antibiotics and about 80 percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients used in American drugs, giving the Chinese Communist Party absolute control of potentially life-saving medicine. For example, Chinese pharmaceutical companies supply 70 percent of the world's acetaminophen, commonly used in Tylenol.
Food:
In 2017, the United States imported $4.6 billion in agricultural goods from China, which is also responsible for much of the global supply of soy and pea proteins that are found in nutritional supplements and synthetic meats. A Chinese firm has also purchased Smithfield, the world's largest pork processor and hog producer.
(Smithfield said in a later statement pertaining to their ownership structure that they are "a U.S. company that provides more than 40,000 American jobs and partners with thousands of American farmers. The company was founded in Smithfield, Virginia, in 1936 and was acquired by Hong Kong-based WH Group in 2013. WH Group is a publicly-traded company with shareholders around the world. Anyone anywhere can purchase shares of WH Group on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. WH Group’s shareholders include many large U.S.-based financial institutions."
Education:
The Chinese government's theft of intellectual property has been an open secret for decades. More recently, U.S. authorities have discovered China is funding American university researchers, who don't always disclose those contributions.
US PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AIMS TO WREST SOME DRUG PRODUCTION BACK FROM CHINA
Technology:
The manufacturing of smartphones and other household items is heavily reliant on China, which controls most of the rare earth minerals that make those items work. Additionally, China is seeking to build 5G networks in the United States and other Western countries, which could potentially feed personal information and sensitive data to the Chinese Communist Party.
Media:
Chinese firms have bought AMC Entertainment, Legendary Entertainment, and other media companies. Control of 8,000-plus of American theater screens and other media platforms allows China to project "soft power" and block unflattering depictions of the Chinese government from being presented, both in terms of creative production and mass distribution.
Citing the nonpartisan economic think-tank Paulson Institute, the American Security Institute report underscores that "Chinese firms and investors own a controlling majority in nearly 2,400 U.S. companies."
These include: AMC Entertainment (entertainment), Cirrus Wind Energy (energy), Complete Genomics (health care), First International Oil (energy), G.E. Appliances (technology), IBM—P.C. division (technology), Legendary Entertainment Group (entertainment), Motorola Mobility (technology), Nexteer Automotive (automotive), Riot Games (entertainment), Smithfield Foods (food), Teledyne Continental Motors and Mattituck Services (aerospace), Terex Corp. (machinery), Triple H Coal (mining), Zonare Medical Systems (health care).
"Under China's Communist Party dictatorship, private companies are forced to bend to the government's will," the report states.
"A recently passed law in China requires companies to share data with Chinese communist spy agencies if requested. nder Xi Jinping, the Communist party has returned to being the ultimate authority in business," writes The Guardian. And Human Rights Watch has written that China is an 'existential threat' to human rights."
And while the U.S. grants China permission to buy its companies, China does not allow U.S. companies to operate the same way on their soil.
"The first priority is to reclaim our critical supply chains so that we can become self-secure instead of reliant on the Chinese government," Will Coggin, managing director of the American Security Institute, told Fox News.
The extent of Chinese investment in recent years has also raised red flags around U.S. national security, particularly in the realm of rare earth minerals. These are especially vital not only for high-technology products such as smartphones and electric vehicles but for U.S. frontline weapons including the F-35 fighter, which requires 920 pounds of rare earth minerals.
"In 2017, the United States produced zero rare earth minerals. China, on the other hand, accounted for more than 80 percent of the world's supply," the report stated.
However, the full extent of the Chinese investment as it stands in the U.S. today is far from transparent.
"The Chinese have a strong foothold here in the U.S., and Chinese firms have access to what seems like infinite government lending, and because the country's goal of world dominance is ingrained into the minds of their business leaders," explained Paul Murad, president of Nevada-based real estate firm Metroplex. "It means our U.S. directors have a hard task on their hands when it comes to negotiation."
Milos Maricic, an international affairs expert and World Economic Forum contributor, concurred that while China owns close to $150 billion in U.S. companies – not particularly huge in comparison to the U.S. economy – there is a lot about the available figure that we simply do not know.
"The number is very difficult to gauge correctly due to complicated ownership structures that the Chinese sometimes employ. It could be bigger," he surmised.
Some U.S. lawmakers are pushing back amid the coronavirus fallout, which ignited an initial panic over concerns of critical medical shortages and Beijing's threats to withhold the needed goods.
In late May, the Senate unanimously passed the bipartisan Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act in a bid to force foreign companies – with China at the likely forefront – to adhere to U.S. securities law, and compel some to be removed from American stock exchanges. The bill, which is yet to move through the House, would necessitate that "an issuer must make this certification if the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is unable to audit specified reports because the issuer has retained a foreign public accounting firm not subject to inspection by the board.
More than 200 foreign firms – mostly Chinese with a combined market capitalization of almost $2 trillion – are said to not be meeting this standard; so their stocks are traded, but U.S. investors have limited insight into what is going on internally with the companies. Subsequently, China and other international players would be obligated to accede to an audit that can be reviewed by the nonprofit Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, which oversees audits of all U.S. companies that endeavor to raise money in public markets.
"Chinese companies have been carrying out unchecked reverse mergers for years now, and the media (influence) has been going under the radar for years now," Murad added. "Under President Trump, the U.S. was the first to recognize their nonstop deceits, and now the rest of the world has a clearer picture of China's ambition."
I have family and friends who currently live in Sierra Leone. That's why this thread caught my attention and not the German's actions in Namibia.
No... you are not gonna escape so easily. Please answer the question
"Tonner, who lives in London, has set up a crowdfunding page to fund a judicial review into the deal. The government could be acting unconstitutionally if it acquired the land compulsorily, he said, because the constitution requires any such move to be in the public interest. The compensation stated by the government was also unfair, he argued, claiming that the rate was about 30 times lower than the market value of the land.
“Under the constitution, the government can sequester land if it is in the public interest,” Tonner said. “Even if this just a deep-water harbour, it is not in the public interest because it’s not a suitable site. There are fish breeding sites in the lagoon. It will wipe out the local fish people live on.”
Tito Gbandewa, Tonner’s stepfather, is a former fisherman who runs an ecotourism business on the beach and owns about 1.2 hectares. He said: “If they do this here, the water will be dirty, there will be a lot of oil and noise, the trawlers will be all around.
“Our own fishermen won’t have a place to fish. Everything will be spoiled. Tourism will be finished.”
Dr Sama Banya, president emeritus of the Conservation Society of Sierra Leone, echoed Gbandewa’s comments, saying the proposed development would have a “disastrous” impact on tourism and “the very fish industry that it’s supposed to support”.
Emma Kowa Jalloh, Sierra Leone’s fisheries minister, insisted that the plan was for a harbour and not a fishmeal factory. She said: “I can categorically tell you there is no fish mill [sic] going in at Black Johnson. What we are doing is a fish harbour that will be built by the Chinese government. A fish mill is something where you go and catch all the baby fish and grind it into food to give to piggeries, and fish in aquaculture – and that is so not true.”
It would be built with a Chinese government “grant” and equity from Sierra Leone in the form of lan0d, she said. Half of the land needed was government-owned, she said, including the seafront, up to 200 metres from the sea. The rest has been acquired through compulsory acquisition, she said.
“People are making this fuss about it,” the minister added. “I would just appeal to people: ‘be patient, we want to be developed, we want to grow, we want to be classified as an upcoming country. There must be development and somebody has to sacrifice.’
“I’m not saying everything is going to be 100% perfect but we will make sure that it is near-perfect.”
I don't understand why these countries need other countries from other continents to develop within the African continent.
“Under the constitution, the government can sequester land if it is in the public interest,” Tonner said. “Even if this just a deep-water harbour, it is not in the public interest because it’s not a suitable site. There are fish breeding sites in the lagoon. It will wipe out the local fish people live on.”
Tito Gbandewa, Tonner’s stepfather, is a former fisherman who runs an ecotourism business on the beach and owns about 1.2 hectares. He said: “If they do this here, the water will be dirty, there will be a lot of oil and noise, the trawlers will be all around.
“Our own fishermen won’t have a place to fish. Everything will be spoiled. Tourism will be finished.”
Dr Sama Banya, president emeritus of the Conservation Society of Sierra Leone, echoed Gbandewa’s comments, saying the proposed development would have a “disastrous” impact on tourism and “the very fish industry that it’s supposed to support”.
Emma Kowa Jalloh, Sierra Leone’s fisheries minister, insisted that the plan was for a harbour and not a fishmeal factory. She said: “I can categorically tell you there is no fish mill [sic] going in at Black Johnson. What we are doing is a fish harbour that will be built by the Chinese government. A fish mill is something where you go and catch all the baby fish and grind it into food to give to piggeries, and fish in aquaculture – and that is so not true.”
It would be built with a Chinese government “grant” and equity from Sierra Leone in the form of lan0d, she said. Half of the land needed was government-owned, she said, including the seafront, up to 200 metres from the sea. The rest has been acquired through compulsory acquisition, she said.
“People are making this fuss about it,” the minister added. “I would just appeal to people: ‘be patient, we want to be developed, we want to grow, we want to be classified as an upcoming country. There must be development and somebody has to sacrifice.’
“I’m not saying everything is going to be 100% perfect but we will make sure that it is near-perfect.”
I don't understand why these countries need other countries from other continents to develop within the African continent.
Last edited:
I think this has to do with many Black Americans who became slaves because Africans didn't give 2 shits about them. Its relevant to this very topic because Africans still don't give 2 shits about Africans. They just sell you out over nothing. They are an embarrassment. They sit on 60% of the world's natural resources yet we are some of the poorest people on the planet. You cant see the correlation between their fuckery and the plight of blacks worldwide? No other group of countries forsake their own like these fuckers. Blacks here love the idea of unity but they hate us , yet they sold us out. That shit is very evil. They are white supremist in black skin. Fuck all of them who sell us out and don't move us forward globally.
The sad thing is that money will probably not be used in a manner that will benefit the nation. Like restore the train station Siaka Stevens rooted apart.
Nzinga is gay stalking me again, what do you want to sell me as a slave again to white people? You weak piece of shit that is on ignore, get the fuck out of here.
You know there is somebody that has a side deal hustle on this and don't care about you. We got these lame niggas here in the U.S. fucking with the black business community.
You know there is somebody that has a side deal hustle on this and don't care about you. We got these lame niggas here in the U.S. fucking with the black business community.
Real penis
Shit had me sad smh
Just checked it up says the story that had outrage was false
How he stalking you if you iggin' him?
A buncha fuckin' idiots. They deserve whatever destruction those chinks bring to 'em.
Faggot.
Faggot.
No need. Looks like it was bs.
Would this be the equivalence to being a house slave rather than a field one?
At the end of the day, you're still a slave (a debt slave) at the whim of your Chinese master.
No land, no control, and no resources of you own but that which China deems acceptable.
Has Africa traded in one devil for another? I seriously wish to know.
In all honesty we don't know if this a good thing or bad thing
Most of us don't know shit about Africa
I just feel like all this selling they doing will come back to haunt them
Then again they not doing shit with the land they selling so fuck it
They need structure over there and to get out the corrupt parties that collect money that don't get used on the ppl or environment
Most of us don't know shit about Africa
I just feel like all this selling they doing will come back to haunt them
Then again they not doing shit with the land they selling so fuck it
They need structure over there and to get out the corrupt parties that collect money that don't get used on the ppl or environment
Last edited:
Why is it slavery, when everywhere else it is called trade?
Again, all of you are busy pillorying the Chinese for what
you say they are doing, but are completely silent about
the Europeans and Americans who are doing far much
worse. This is not about Africa or Africans. It is about you
You think the Chinese are taking something from you, and
you are also afraid that the Africa will help China be stronger
than the countries you were born in. You want Africa to be poor
and suffer so that you can remain rich. If not, why are you not
complaining about the fact that the Germans own everything in
Namibia and got it by the murder of Africans?
Last edited:
"Tonner, who lives in London, has set up a crowdfunding page to fund a judicial review into the deal. The government could be acting unconstitutionally if it acquired the land compulsorily, he said, because the constitution requires any such move to be in the public interest. The compensation stated by the government was also unfair, he argued, claiming that the rate was about 30 times lower than the market value of the land.
“Under the constitution, the government can sequester land if it is in the public interest,” Tonner said. “Even if this just a deep-water harbour, it is not in the public interest because it’s not a suitable site. There are fish breeding sites in the lagoon. It will wipe out the local fish people live on.”
Tito Gbandewa, Tonner’s stepfather, is a former fisherman who runs an ecotourism business on the beach and owns about 1.2 hectares. He said: “If they do this here, the water will be dirty, there will be a lot of oil and noise, the trawlers will be all around.
“Our own fishermen won’t have a place to fish. Everything will be spoiled. Tourism will be finished.”
Dr Sama Banya, president emeritus of the Conservation Society of Sierra Leone, echoed Gbandewa’s comments, saying the proposed development would have a “disastrous” impact on tourism and “the very fish industry that it’s supposed to support”.
Emma Kowa Jalloh, Sierra Leone’s fisheries minister, insisted that the plan was for a harbour and not a fishmeal factory. She said: “I can categorically tell you there is no fish mill [sic] going in at Black Johnson. What we are doing is a fish harbour that will be built by the Chinese government. A fish mill is something where you go and catch all the baby fish and grind it into food to give to piggeries, and fish in aquaculture – and that is so not true.”
It would be built with a Chinese government “grant” and equity from Sierra Leone in the form of lan0d, she said. Half of the land needed was government-owned, she said, including the seafront, up to 200 metres from the sea. The rest has been acquired through compulsory acquisition, she said.
“People are making this fuss about it,” the minister added. “I would just appeal to people: ‘be patient, we want to be developed, we want to grow, we want to be classified as an upcoming country. There must be development and somebody has to sacrifice.’
“I’m not saying everything is going to be 100% perfect but we will make sure that it is near-perfect.”
I don't understand why these countries need other countries from other continents to develop within the African continent.
Tonner who lives in London. What about Tonner who lives in Free Town Sierra Leone, why
is he not seeing the same problem? Who is the employer of this Tonner who lives in London?
Fact. Most of us have been programmed with all the negative associations our op
No one said "anything" about safari. You're reaching in an attempt to trivialize the topic. 55 million dollars is pennies on the world market, and while our people would rather stay in a place where the dollars are welcomed, but we are not the preferred company...is hustling backwards.
Maybe you are not idealistic or don't have a progressive mind, but tourist dollars are HUGE for any economy. Your statement went directly to exploitation, and that paranoid talk has no place in a discussion of forward thought. Where YOU say "Africans don't want tourist", I can find those who would welcome the economy boost. When YOU mention "should you not be blaming the Africans?", I see an ridiculous statement from someone who virtually claims to represent an entire continent of people, and speak for them and their whims and desires. It's just not the case.
How many of those Africans who "did not give 2 shits about
Black Americans being slaves" are still alive and selling the
land to the Chinese today? Are the Africans living today guilty
of something their forefathers did? Or is the invocation of
slavery just an emotional lever by foreigners to try and have
a say in business that is strictly African?
Have you spoken to any of those Africans, and been told by
them that they do not give "2 shits" about other Africans?
How are they an embarrassment to you? Have they ever told
you that they were living their lives in order to please you???
Have they ever asked you for approval for how they do things?
Are these embarrassing Africans allowed to look into your bank
account in the US and demand to know why you do not spend
money in the way they like? Are they allowed to ask you why in
a country full of so many universities so few students are black
American males?
Are you saying that, you in America, are poor or suffering in some
way because Africans are not using their natural resources in some
way that you want?
These people that you say have forsaken you, what have you ever
done for them? When they got guns from the Chinese to fight
Europeans oppression, were you there in that cause, or was getting
those guns to overthrow 500 years of Portuguese tyranny, larceny
and pogroms, simply another form of slavery to the Chinese?
Are you able to point out the name of person living today who sold
you personally, into slavery?
Again, I want to know how this personally affects you; and how it
has taken something from you. Are you expecting to profit from
something Africans do on their own in Africa? Why?
You live in the US, how is something done, and happening in Africa
today, affecting, much less selling, you?
Last edited: