These Women Do Not Exist ..... The NSFW A.I. Art Open Thread
- Thread starter Duece
- Start date
Another thing to keep in mind...
If this thread looks like it has a lot of Porn Pen-esque images, its because I intentionally tried to post more images of Black women and other women of color because this is a Black forum.
Some of the most impressive and realistic looking A.I. generated images I have found are generally of white women (with Asian women being a close second).
Black women in A.I. are seemingly confined to be totally fantasy with realism taking a back seat.
If this thread looks like it has a lot of Porn Pen-esque images, its because I intentionally tried to post more images of Black women and other women of color because this is a Black forum.
Some of the most impressive and realistic looking A.I. generated images I have found are generally of white women (with Asian women being a close second).
Black women in A.I. are seemingly confined to be totally fantasy with realism taking a back seat.
I see, this is crazy.You're not getting detail this extensive with Porn Pen.
Found a sub with this stuff. Some use this unstable diffusion and other stuff called F222
I've never seen this stuff B4.
Check it
With Midjourney is there a way ti privately generate images? im thinking about going premium for nft shit
Yes you can mark your images as private on Midjourney
I saw his work.
Those negative prompts are just as, if not more important than the positive prompts because they are the prompts that prevent the nightmarish glitches such as multiple heads, multiple arms and legs, women having multiple rows of breasts, or having both a penis and a vagina.
So those negative prompts have to be set up and be very extensive, even more than the positive ones.
Here you can see how the A.I. gets a bit tripped up a bit. The person wanted a generate a Playboy Bunny. In this case the "bunny" refers to the bunny suit (worn by Ashley Doris on the right). As you can see, the A.I. kinda gets it, because the woman is wearing an outfit that is obviously inspired by the bunny suit, including the choker which was inspired by the bowtie and the cuffs are turned into leaves.
Finally, Instead of giving the woman the bunny ear headband, the woman is given actual bunny ears and is sort of a mixture of a girl and a bunny.
Finally, Instead of giving the woman the bunny ear headband, the woman is given actual bunny ears and is sort of a mixture of a girl and a bunny.
In this image, the person was not going for photo-realism, they were going more for a painted art style.
In this case, the prompts and wildcards are used to depict a woman who is seemingly fed with life in the convent and as a protest takes off her clothes and leaves the church nearly naked, while the image the background shows another nun and another woman.
In this case, the prompts and wildcards are used to depict a woman who is seemingly fed with life in the convent and as a protest takes off her clothes and leaves the church nearly naked, while the image the background shows another nun and another woman.
I use Midjourney and Bluewillow, haven't messed with porn with thia stuff. No interest in it to generate stuff. It's work, lolHere you can see how the A.I. gets a bit tripped up a bit. The person wanted a generate a Playboy Bunny. In this case the "bunny" refers to the bunny suit (worn by Ashley Doris on the right). As you can see, the A.I. kinda gets it, because the woman is wearing an outfit that is obviously inspired by the bunny suit, including the choker which was inspired by the bowtie and the cuffs are turned into leaves.
Finally, Instead of giving the woman the bunny ear headband, the woman is given actual bunny ears and is sort of a mixture of a girl and a bunny.
I'll just admire from the sidelines. It's just funny, friends sending me pics on WhatsApp, like check this chit, and this one. I'm like bruh that AI. They like wtf.
But also now I see dudes making gifs, I'm sure they gonna have detailed AI porn. Companies are gonna get in on this cause they don't have to pay people or producers.
Check this.
Photo-realistic porn should be an interesting thing because as you said, its going to be cheaper and less of a headache than dealing with actual humans and although you will lose the human element of porn, you can step further into the fantasy aspect at a cheaper price.
As you can see in this thread, AI has allowed people to create fantasy scenarios featuring sexually rebellious nuns, naked female warriors, beautiful fairies, and high-tech, cyber-punk-themed women and settings. If you do that in real porn, that's gonna be extremely expensive.
Dudes are gonna start doing celebs in porn scenes at this rate. Lol
I'm loving improvements on afro-textured hair, as well as other types of hair.
While vaginas still can be a bit of a struggle, I am also liking that breasts are being depicted with freckling around the areola and areolas are not always shown to be perfect circles (Although I know there are women who have perfectly round areolas).
While vaginas still can be a bit of a struggle, I am also liking that breasts are being depicted with freckling around the areola and areolas are not always shown to be perfect circles (Although I know there are women who have perfectly round areolas).
Speak of vaginas, here is some very impressive and detailed work on these vaginas.
Prompt: photo of smiling woman spreading legs showing pssy
Steps: 30, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7.0, Seed: 2571770906, Size: 512x704, Model hash: c2215274e0, Model: model_pussy_v1_5000, Seed resize from: -1x-1, Denoising strength: 0.3, Hires upscale: 2.35, Hires upscaler: ESRGAN_4x
Prompt: photo of smiling woman spreading legs showing pssy
Steps: 30, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7.0, Seed: 2571770906, Size: 512x704, Model hash: c2215274e0, Model: model_pussy_v1_5000, Seed resize from: -1x-1, Denoising strength: 0.3, Hires upscale: 2.35, Hires upscaler: ESRGAN_4x
Given the fact that A.I. is influenced by what it finds on the net, I think the issue with vaginas is that most of what it's referencing is from porn.
So it's referencing vaginas that are being spread or are freshly fucked and you're not always getting a more clinical reference or image of a woman's vagina.
So it's referencing vaginas that are being spread or are freshly fucked and you're not always getting a more clinical reference or image of a woman's vagina.
"Thank you for being a friendddddd!/
Time to bounce that ass and tits again./
When a nig roll through, drop those drawz and suck on my balllllsssss."
Last edited:
Tell me they didn't use Dominika for this reference lolSpeak of vaginas, here is some very impressive and detailed work on these vaginas.
Prompt: photo of smiling woman spreading legs showing pssy
Steps: 30, Sampler: DPM++ 2M Karras, CFG scale: 7.0, Seed: 2571770906, Size: 512x704, Model hash: c2215274e0, Model: model_pussy_v1_5000, Seed resize from: -1x-1, Denoising strength: 0.3, Hires upscale: 2.35, Hires upscaler: ESRGAN_4x
Someone need to use the "old" Pammie Lee pussy pics for reference. Lawd!
Now you know you wrong for that
I checked every pic and feel shame for the first time in years
Last edited:
I'm referring to Tik Tok/Snapchat filters where it tracks the subjects every move. Like a basic body chick no ass or tits applies the filter and does videos with AI enhancements. She'll have the "perfect" tits and phat ass and we won't be able to tell the difference.
