agreed -I'm calling it collusionI think I've been the biggest offender on this one. There really isn't a federal law for collusion... that's what I mean by doesn't amount to Federal Collusion. But there are other things that he could be charged with.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/07/12/what-is-collusion-215366
Yep he has some medical condition he always was lukewarm on tromp anyway but I guess now he's like fuck itI always thought this guy was like half dead , cadaver they just brought out
I remember him from the bush years
What I really want to see prosecuted - according to section 110 of Article III. of the Constitution of the United States:But there are other things that he could be charged with.
As well as campaign finance laws. You can't accept anything of value from a foreign entity.Section 110 of Article III. of the Constitution of the United States
Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them,
or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court.
yepAs well as campaign finance laws. You can't accept anything of value from a foreign entity.
I mean... Dude just can't help himself...
The only way that he would possibly know about the Watching the too much TV jab... would be from watching TV... LOL
Thanks for clarifying this for me.you are misinformed ...
Rosenstein directly controls the budget for Mueller and the FBI director will still report up to Rosenstein for all things russia collusion / obstruction
If the FBI director refuses to enforce warrants and indictments - well- he will be in a world of trouble
I mean... Dude just can't help himself...
Also.... Did dude even fucking sleep last night...
Dude Started tweeting at 3 in the morning and didn't stop until... 6:39 in the morning.
his stripper wife won't let him fuck so he has plenty of time to tweet.Also.... Did dude even fucking sleep last night...
Dude Started tweeting at 3 in the morning and didn't stop until... 6:39 in the morning.
Again, white peopling.How this guy has support still is mind blowing. Shows how pathetic a segment of the population is.
Shit is fucking unreal the shit crackas get away with. If you can't answer that fucking question, you don't need to be the FBI director..
Man my fucking head is hurting..... this shit is fucking wild.
This shit literally dropped today.
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are questioning the Trump administration’s decision to settle a money laundering case with a Russian real estate firm in light of revelations that the company was represented by the same Russian lawyer who met last year with President Donald Trump’s son.
The letter sent by House Judiciary ranking member John Conyers and other Democrats asks whether lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was involved in settlement negotiations between Russian real estate firm Prevezon Holdings Ltd. and the Justice Department. Prevezon agreed last May to pay $6 million to the government to avoid a trial on charges the firm laundered proceeds from a $230 million tax fraud.
Veselnitskaya represented Dennis Katsyv, Prevezon’s owner. Katsyv backed a lobbying campaign last year aimed at scuttling Magnitsky Act sanctions against Russian interests.
Man I almost feel like this shit needs a spin off thread... you can't make this shit up.
So basically... Sessions is right back on the hook again because Trump Jr said that this same lawyer was trying to talk to him Magnitsky Act. So now you have to ask... why was this company that was alleged to have laundered 230 million randomly allowed to settle for only 6 million.
Man my fucking head is hurting..... this shit is fucking wild.
This shit literally dropped today.
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee are questioning the Trump administration’s decision to settle a money laundering case with a Russian real estate firm in light of revelations that the company was represented by the same Russian lawyer who met last year with President Donald Trump’s son.
The letter sent by House Judiciary ranking member John Conyers and other Democrats asks whether lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was involved in settlement negotiations between Russian real estate firm Prevezon Holdings Ltd. and the Justice Department. Prevezon agreed last May to pay $6 million to the government to avoid a trial on charges the firm laundered proceeds from a $230 million tax fraud.
Veselnitskaya represented Dennis Katsyv, Prevezon’s owner. Katsyv backed a lobbying campaign last year aimed at scuttling Magnitsky Act sanctions against Russian interests.
Yeah I thought that Preet got fired because he was investigating Trump related crimes, but I read yesterday that the lawyer they met with is the one that Preet was arguing (I think) against. At the very least the case was being handled by his office. I'm also reading that the WH was the one who crafted Jr's response about the adoptions. So this may also go back to obstruction and trying to protect Don Jr instead of just Flynn when he fired Comey.
I'm on another site semi-arguing with folks. They are saying there is no quid pro quo if the Russian's weren't getting anything from providing information, but the Trump campaign changed the RNC platform, discussed removing sanctions, and the adoption bit was regarding Magnitsky Act (sanctions). Russia has the ban on abortions in response to that act, and they want the act abolished.
Prevezon agreed last May to pay $6 million to the government to avoid a trial on charges the firm laundered proceeds from a $230 million tax fraud.
also remind them about the seized diplomatic compoundsYeah I thought that Preet got fired because he was investigating Trump related crimes, but I read yesterday that the lawyer they met with is the one that Preet was arguing (I think) against. At the very least the case was being handled by his office. I'm also reading that the WH was the one who crafted Jr's response about the adoptions. So this may also go back to obstruction and trying to protect Don Jr instead of just Flynn when he fired Comey.
I'm on another site semi-arguing with folks. They are saying there is no quid pro quo if the Russian's weren't getting anything from providing information, but the Trump campaign changed the RNC platform, discussed removing sanctions, and the adoption bit was regarding Magnitsky Act (sanctions). Russia has the ban on abortions in response to that act, and they want the act abolished.
Shits fucking wild... Repubs calling other Repubs Nazis...
You made your career on being a conservative American patriot and now you are cheering for putin.