Trump vows to fight 'anti-white feeling' in the United States. His allies have a plan

VAiz4hustlaz

Proud ADOS and not afraid to step to da mic!
BGOL Investor
The problem is that on bgol there isnt any nuance. The super democrat guys can't step out of character to have a layered conversation. I don't know if it's a lack of intelligence or ignorance. Even @Camille refuses to dig deeper than surface level shit

It baffles me as well. Everyone has their role to play, I guess. But you can even post hard economic data from reputable sources and you'll still get hit with :hmm: or o_O or :angry:.

And don't get me started on Camille! You could even try discussing issues as they pertain to Black women specifically and still get no where with her.

You support the Democratic Party right? If so then too late for you, brotha :smh:

He said that shit as if the Democratic Party is "pro-Black". :smh:
 

Camille

Kitchen Wench #TeamQuaid
Staff member
The problem is that on bgol there isnt any nuance. The super democrat guys can't step out of character to have a layered conversation. I don't know if it's a lack of intelligence or ignorance. Even @Camille refuses to dig deeper than surface level shit

Few things shift dramatically, and few people notice things unless they substantially change with stark differences, but it's the little things compounded that can affect you most.

Wages weren't suppressed all at once, but as the cost of living increased they didn't keep up. So the pain was gradual. The inflation and greedflation fallout from covid was felt immediately because prices were dramatically different. People sensed it and complained. The wage increases that we are seeing as a result of the Biden administration also will be gradual, but it will cause improvement overtime.

SCOTUS had been slowly chipping away at reproductive rights, then they ended Roe causing a stark difference in care. There was immediate harm with women dying and bleeding out. People noticed and fought back and it is being reflected in election results. Had they continued to act incrementally, they would have achieved what they wanted with no alarm bells.


The book bans and attacks on our history started on one city and is spreading. The rollback of diversity programs at schools and businesses will eventually compound to do us harm. It may not be apparent now because it hasn't directly impacted anyone's current situation at work and work and school cultures change over time, but just because the threat is subtle and difficult to discern, doesn't mean it's not there.

We have decades of harm that need to be undone. When changes are made it takes time to see results. When the fed gives money to states, the projects and programs they support don't spring up and complete overnight and you have to hope you live in a state that will appropriate the money as intended and to benefit everyone and not just wealthy areas.

Like the frog in the pot of water over the flame, some folks seem content to let incremental harm increase and compound because they are not able to discern the incremental improvements that are taking place to counteract it. I understand it, but I'm thinking long term not short term.

The programs and policies the Biden administration is putting in place is a net benefit and I'd really like to see them win this November and get overwhelming majorities in both the house and senate to see what they could do long term instead of having to fight the same battles over and over and having to reclaim the same ground lost over and over because dems sit out midterms and let the GOP get back in power to stall and undo progress made.

You do you tho.
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
What's there to respond to? Supersav summed it up: "it won't be materially different for black people than Biden has been or trump was the first time."

So unless we're going to seriously discuss how things are MATERIALLY different for Black people in 2024 under Biden vs 2019 under Trump and how voting for Biden in 2024 will have us in a materially better condition in 2028 then there's really nothing else I'm interested in discussing.
so you just wrote off the trump years and pretty much are writing them off again if he gets elected and hes got a 50/50 chance...so what do you think will happen to the reparation movement if trump gets into off this fall?? how will his presidency impact it???

see if he can answer this without mentioning biden :popcorn:
 
Last edited:

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
This sums it up right here. Close thread.
Trump said he would prevent police from being prosecuted. He's basically saying that the George Floyd shit, that cop that got 20 years for killing George Floyd and the other cops that have been tried would not be tried at all.

Cops will be able to get away with murder and God knows what else.

The reason that's materially different than the current administration is black people are stopped more often than white people, so there are more opportunities for cops to kill us than any other race, or even put false charges on us

So you go ahead and keep on supporting Trump. Because preventing cops from being prosecuted doesn't affect you at all, right?
 

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Trump said he would prevent police from being prosecuted. He's basically saying that the George Floyd shit, that cop that got 20 years for killing George Floyd and the other cops that have been tried would not be tried at all.

Cops will be able to get away with murder and God knows what else.

The reason that's materially different than the current administration is black people are stopped more often than white people, so there are more opportunities for cops to kill us than any other race, or even put false charges on us

So you go ahead and keep on supporting Trump. Because preventing cops from being prosecuted doesn't affect you at all, right?
Trump says a lot of shit...Biden DOES shit
 

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
Trump says a lot of shit...Biden DOES shit
I know Trump says a lot of shit, but some of the shit that he says is scary and that's what people need to be paying attention to.

You are going to keep on supporting Trump if you want to. Nothing I will say will change your vote. I just hope there are more of us than there are of you
 

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
I know Trump says a lot of shit, but some of the shit that he says is scary and that's what people need to be paying attention to.

You are going to keep on supporting Trump if you want to. Nothing I will say will change your vote. I just hope there are more of us than there are of you
You did well in the first paragraph until u ended with the bullshit. I don't support any of these racist crackers. Never will
 

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
You did well in the first paragraph until u ended with the bullshit. I don't support any of these racist crackers. Never will
What are you talking about slick? There are two options for president. Is Donald Trump and there's Joe Biden. One is way worse than the other.

When you talk about the lesser of two evils, this is what we're talking about. So when I say I hope there's more of us than there are of you, I mean that.

You can put that vote towards a dictator if you want to, but I'm voting for the other guy and that the white supremacists don't like. You keep on voting for the guy the white supremacists love
 

xfactor

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Man, that's not even a debate. If you find yourself voting for the same dude as the Neo-nazis, then who is really too late for?

Trust me the conservatives are never going to love you. But, do you.
:lol: you vote in lockstep with Richard Spencer, so you may want to check your words. I actually know what I’m talking about and do not need television to tell me how to think.
 

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
What are you talking about slick? There are two options for president. Is Donald Trump and there's Joe Biden. One is way worse than the other.

When you talk about the lesser of two evils, this is what we're talking about. So when I say I hope there's more of us than there are of you, I mean that.

You can put that vote towards a dictator if you want to, but I'm voting for the other guy and that the white supremacists don't like. You keep on voting for the guy the white supremacists love
Ironic that you say that considering biden's relationship with one of the most notorious white supremacist
 

VAiz4hustlaz

Proud ADOS and not afraid to step to da mic!
BGOL Investor
so you just wrote off the trump years and pretty much are writing them off again if he gets elected and hes got a 50/50 chance...so what do you think will happen to the reparation movement if trump gets into off this fall?? how will his presidency impact it???

see if he can answer this without mentioning biden :popcorn:

I never wrote off the “Trump years.” The reparations movement isn’t predicated on who’s in office. Hell, it kicked off under Obama, and there’s a reason for that you won’t catch because you “don’t care to look at numbers.” Remember that? Which is why when Supersav mentions a material difference it goes right over your head.

Man these Russian bots are out in full force tonight.

Oh yes, of course. Vladimir Putin has to think for us because Black Americans lack the ability to think or advocate for ourselves. :rolleyes2:

I'm serious tho.. more Walter rodneyist lenin

It amazes how these idiots don’t get this. You’re way further to the Left than the goddamn Democratic party and candidates they insist on all Black people voting for.

Trump said he would prevent police from being prosecuted. He's basically saying that the George Floyd shit, that cop that got 20 years for killing George Floyd and the other cops that have been tried would not be tried at all.

Cops will be able to get away with murder and God knows what else.

The reason that's materially different than the current administration is black people are stopped more often than white people, so there are more opportunities for cops to kill us than any other race, or even put false charges on us

So you go ahead and keep on supporting Trump. Because preventing cops from being prosecuted doesn't affect you at all, right?

Cops already “get away with murder and God knows what else.” It was Obama who signed a “Blue Lives Matter” bill into law: https://www.policemag.com/patrol/news/15333380/obama-signs-blue-alert-law-to-protect-police

Being a Black man in America who is a descendant of American chattel slavery affects me. You keep voting for trannies and LGBTQ and money to Israel and the Ukraine. When my people get the same priority and money directed at us is when I’ll be supporting the candidate and party and agenda that does it.

Ironic that you say that considering biden's relationship with one of the most notorious white supremacist

It wasn’t just a “relationship” either. He collaborated with and was mentored by motherfuckers like this!

Biden Rejects Calls to Apologize for Praise of Segregationist​

2020 rivals slam the former vice president, who spoke fondly of the "civility" of his relationship with a Mississippi senator who once called to "abolish the Negro race"

……..
Eastland was a giant in the Senate and an avatar of the darkest racism of the Civil Rights-era South. He was a plantation owner who championed white supremacy in language that now shocks the conscience. During the Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycotts of the mid-1950s, Eastland appeared at a rally of the White Citizens Council to deliver remarks that stopped just short of a call for racial genocide. As memorialized by the historian Robert Caro, Eastland said:

In every stage of the bus boycott we have been oppressed and degraded because of black, slimy, juicy, unbearably stinking ******* … African flesh-eaters. When in the course of human events it becomes necessary to abolish the Negro race, proper methods should be used. Among these are guns, bows and arrows, slingshots and knives… All whites are created equal with certain rights, among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of dead *******.

Eastland brought such language with him to Washington. According to his obituary in the Los Angeles Times, when President Kennedy wanted to seat Thurgood Marshall on the federal bench, Eastland worked out a political horse trade with Bobby Kennedy, then the attorney general. Eastland sought, and won, a judicial seat for a friend, Harold Cox, who shared his racist worldview. “You tell your bother,” Eastland told RFK, “if he gives me Cox, I will give him his ******.”

By the 1970s Eastland was firmly on the wrong side of history. But according to his biographer, the senator took a shine to a young Joe Biden in the Senate — both because of the tragic loss of Biden’s wife and daughter in a car crash, and because of their shared opposition to forced school integration through student bussing. “Eastland was particularly anxious to mentor young members,” writes J. Lee Annis in Big Jim Eastland: The Godfather of Mississippi. “One favorite over his last term was Joseph Biden. … Aware that Biden shared his opposition to bussing and admiring that he had contemplated resigning his seat to take care of his two surviving sons, Eastland took an interest in him. … Two years later, Eastland guided Biden to a seat on the prestigious Foreign Relations Committee.

:rolleyes2:
 

xfactor

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Like I said in another thread, the funniest thing to me is the cowards are in fear over what Trump says he is going to do while Biden is actually doing the shit right now.

It is mind boggling how ignorant some of the OG posters on BGOL have gotten over the years. Trump was destroying middle America and white trash during COVID and Biden gets in office and diverts that chaos back to the so-called black community.

It really isn’t a debate anymore but again, the people for Biden are immigrants, LGBT and feminists. They’re just too chicken shit to admit it.
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
It is these black demon female prosecutors, focused on their self interest and moving up the Democrat political ladder. Marilyn Mosby, the Republicans built their case up and handed it off to the Biden administration. We should have done the same thing, instead they want to use this failed political strategy, which is rushing out to get criminal charges before the election:



They should have sat on him like Bin Laden, shifted the case to a white prosecutor, than sent in Seal Team Six in stealth helicopters to take him out while he was chilling with his six preteen wives.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Biden needs to talk about real issues if he wants to win, having black female demon prosecutors sully his rival, is a failed political strategy. You can see this is their strategy with how Hillary Clinton is talking.

Letitia James went chasing after Trump with this weak case. She should have made it about the bank allowing white applicants to inflate their assets to get a disparate share of the bank capital. LJ should have attached a discrimination lawsuit. Publicly, she should have stated that the bank is FDIC insured and regulated by the state, falsified records throws off bank examining and concentrates risk (S&L crisis). Better yet, handed it off to a white AG instead of rushing out the gate with this weak case.

Thank God, Fani Willis is going to get removed.
 
Last edited:

godofwine

Supreme Porn Poster - Ret
BGOL Investor
Only on BGOL will you see fake black screen names trying to trick authentic black members to vote for their favorite racist
Nah, that shit happens on Twitter too. Either way, it doesn't matter. We can spot the motherfuckers. And, black people aren't as into following other black people for no reason other than running

If black people see people or other black people running, we will start running with them. Other than that, we do what the fuck we feel like, we ain't doing shit just because Joe blow next to us is doing it. That's the confusion with Republicans. It's white people who are blind lemming followers.
 

Politic Negro

Rising Star
BGOL Investor


Over the past 30 years, the American political landscape has been characterized by a growing divide between rural and urban voters, almost as if they’re on two opposing teams, according to Suzanne Mettler, the John L. Senior Professor of American Institutions in the College of Arts and Sciences (A&S).

But the divide is confined largely to white Americans, Mettler and collaborators have found in an examination of the racial and ethnic facets of the trend.

When it comes to politics, Black and Latino residents of rural America differ far less, if at all, from their urban counterparts than do non-Hispanic white residents, the researchers report. With one in four residents of rural America now identifying as nonwhite, the study’s findings raise concerns about political representation of Black and Latino Americans and highlights a need for further research on rural people of color broadly, including racially marginalized groups beyond Black and Latino people.

A Rural-Urban Political Divide Among Whom? Race, Ethnicity, and Political Behavior Across Place” published in Politics, Groups, and Identities on March 31, with a summary of the findings appearing in the United States Politics and Policy blog of the London School of Economics, June 7. Mettler is corresponding author, and co-authors are doctoral students Trevor E. Brown, Marissa Rivera and Gisela Pedroza Jauregui.

“Rural and urban Americans began moving apart politically in the late 1990s, and the division has widened and deepened since then, transforming the nation’s politics,” Mettler said. “We wanted to know whether all Americans, regardless of race and ethnicity, are swept up in this growing cleavage.”

Mettler and Brown are writing a book investigating the divide, supported by a New Frontier Grant.

“The rural-urban political divide is a major problem threatening the foundations of American democracy for everyone,” Brown said. “But the stakes seem especially high for people of color in rural areas. They tend to be ignored by our two major political parties and, as a result, lack much voice in the political process.”

From 1970 through the 1990s, there was relative balance between Democratic and Republican leanings in rural areas, the researchers said, but “since the late 1990s, rural and urban areas have increasingly become bastions of support, respectively, for Republicans and Democrats.”

During the same time period, the share of the U.S. population identifying as nonwhite increased in both urban areas and rural, so that by the 2020 census, 25% of rural residents identified as nonwhite, the study points out.

To find out whether a rural-urban divide exists among people of color, the researchers analyzed data from the Cooperative Election Studies survey, which includes a wide array of policy questions and a large sample size. Using survey respondents’ county information, they were also able to designate each as living in a “rural” or “urban” area, according to the White House Office of Management and Budget.

The study compared Black, Latino and white voters, urban and rural, between 2008 and 2020. Black support for the Democratic Party was very high – around 90% – in both rural and urban areas from 2008 to 2020, with support for Republicans consistently very low. Latino support for Democrats remained consistent nationally for this period with only a few points of variation among both rural and urban voters.

White support in urban areas was split almost 50% Democrat/50% Republican from 2008 to 2020, with a slight Republican edge.

It was only among white voters that a large and growing disparity appears between rural and urban residents, the researchers found.

Why haven’t rural Black and Latino Americans shifted to the Republican party alongside their white peers? The question needs further study, the researchers said, theorizing that varying degrees of “linked fate” – a term coined by political scientist Michael Dawson, implying the belief that one’s individual fate is tied to that of their racial or ethnic group – can help explain why Black and Latino Americans do not diverge.

Another possible explanation is a theory, proposed by political scientists Ismail K. White and Chyrl N. Laird, that Black Americans who hold more conservative views follow social pressures to continue supporting the Democratic Party.

“Untangling the mechanisms that hold the voting behavior of rural and urban Black and Latino Americans together is a crucial avenue for future research,” the researchers wrote.

Kate Blackwood is a writer for the College of Arts and Sciences.
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
if trump gets back in office he WILL be UNLEASHED. As it stands SCOTUS just confirmed that the president can do pretty much ANYTHING and it been deemed for national security or public interest. Basically the argument Nixon used in Watergate that was never answered because he was shamed into resigning before it could be. Trump has no shame. So youre looking at a person who WILL brazenly use the FBI and DOJ for personal reasons. You know the same shit republicans screamed illegal when they thought Obama was doing it. Trump WILL openly do it.
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY
Trump would seek to decimate what he terms the "deep state" – career federal employees he says are clandestinely pursuing their own agendas – through an executive order that would reclassify thousands of workers to enable them to be fired. That would likely be challenged in court. He has vowed to fire what he terms corrupt actors in national security positions and "root out" his political opponents.
 

Non-StopJFK2TAB

Rising Star
Platinum Member


Over the past 30 years, the American political landscape has been characterized by a growing divide between rural and urban voters, almost as if they’re on two opposing teams, according to Suzanne Mettler, the John L. Senior Professor of American Institutions in the College of Arts and Sciences (A&S).

But the divide is confined largely to white Americans, Mettler and collaborators have found in an examination of the racial and ethnic facets of the trend.

When it comes to politics, Black and Latino residents of rural America differ far less, if at all, from their urban counterparts than do non-Hispanic white residents, the researchers report. With one in four residents of rural America now identifying as nonwhite, the study’s findings raise concerns about political representation of Black and Latino Americans and highlights a need for further research on rural people of color broadly, including racially marginalized groups beyond Black and Latino people.

A Rural-Urban Political Divide Among Whom? Race, Ethnicity, and Political Behavior Across Place” published in Politics, Groups, and Identities on March 31, with a summary of the findings appearing in the United States Politics and Policy blog of the London School of Economics, June 7. Mettler is corresponding author, and co-authors are doctoral students Trevor E. Brown, Marissa Rivera and Gisela Pedroza Jauregui.

“Rural and urban Americans began moving apart politically in the late 1990s, and the division has widened and deepened since then, transforming the nation’s politics,” Mettler said. “We wanted to know whether all Americans, regardless of race and ethnicity, are swept up in this growing cleavage.”

Mettler and Brown are writing a book investigating the divide, supported by a New Frontier Grant.

“The rural-urban political divide is a major problem threatening the foundations of American democracy for everyone,” Brown said. “But the stakes seem especially high for people of color in rural areas. They tend to be ignored by our two major political parties and, as a result, lack much voice in the political process.”

From 1970 through the 1990s, there was relative balance between Democratic and Republican leanings in rural areas, the researchers said, but “since the late 1990s, rural and urban areas have increasingly become bastions of support, respectively, for Republicans and Democrats.”

During the same time period, the share of the U.S. population identifying as nonwhite increased in both urban areas and rural, so that by the 2020 census, 25% of rural residents identified as nonwhite, the study points out.

To find out whether a rural-urban divide exists among people of color, the researchers analyzed data from the Cooperative Election Studies survey, which includes a wide array of policy questions and a large sample size. Using survey respondents’ county information, they were also able to designate each as living in a “rural” or “urban” area, according to the White House Office of Management and Budget.

The study compared Black, Latino and white voters, urban and rural, between 2008 and 2020. Black support for the Democratic Party was very high – around 90% – in both rural and urban areas from 2008 to 2020, with support for Republicans consistently very low. Latino support for Democrats remained consistent nationally for this period with only a few points of variation among both rural and urban voters.

White support in urban areas was split almost 50% Democrat/50% Republican from 2008 to 2020, with a slight Republican edge.

It was only among white voters that a large and growing disparity appears between rural and urban residents, the researchers found.

Why haven’t rural Black and Latino Americans shifted to the Republican party alongside their white peers? The question needs further study, the researchers said, theorizing that varying degrees of “linked fate” – a term coined by political scientist Michael Dawson, implying the belief that one’s individual fate is tied to that of their racial or ethnic group – can help explain why Black and Latino Americans do not diverge.

Another possible explanation is a theory, proposed by political scientists Ismail K. White and Chyrl N. Laird, that Black Americans who hold more conservative views follow social pressures to continue supporting the Democratic Party.

“Untangling the mechanisms that hold the voting behavior of rural and urban Black and Latino Americans together is a crucial avenue for future research,” the researchers wrote.

Kate Blackwood is a writer for the College of Arts and Sciences.

Needs further study. This grad school losers really are milking it.
 

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY
Trump would seek to decimate what he terms the "deep state" – career federal employees he says are clandestinely pursuing their own agendas – through an executive order that would reclassify thousands of workers to enable them to be fired. That would likely be challenged in court. He has vowed to fire what he terms corrupt actors in national security positions and "root out" his political opponents.

I have a lot of friends that work for the Federal Government that are very worried about this....

Alot of BLACK JOBS will be gone....This is one of the main reasons why PG County and Charles Co has the highest percentage of wealthy blacks in the USA....
Alot of AA work for the federal gov. directly and indirectly......
 
Top