TV News: Roseanne Revival Is in the Works With the Original Cast - Update: RENEWED & CANCELLED & BACK - THE CONNERS!

dtownsfinest

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Never seen this shit. Never will.

But them some impressive numbers. I notice a lot of these networks are bringing old shows back. Prison Break, X-Files, Will and Grace...I wish they'd bring back some shit that needs to be brought back that was cancelled prematurely.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
DZjoCnTVoAAZ9v6

https://www.bgol.us/forum/threads/roseanne-barr-dressed-as-hitler-putting-jews-into-the-oven.996808/
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Roseanne’s Lecy Goranson on How She Feels About Trump and Returning to the Show for the Second Time

While all of the original cast of Roseanne is back for the blockbuster revival, only Lecy Goranson, who originated the role of Roseanne Conner’s oldest daughter, Becky, has the distinction of returning to the show for the second time. Goranson played Becky for the first five seasons of the show before leaving to attend Vassar. She was replaced by Sarah Chalke for seasons six and seven, but returned for season eight, and now, once again, for the show’s tenth season, 11 years after its first run. We got a chance to talk to Goranson minutes after she learned that the series was picked up for an 11th season, after its two-hour premiere clocked a whopping 18 million viewers.

Why RoseanneCan’t Be Reduced to a Single Episode
Congratulations on your renewal. How do you feel?I just feel so excited. You know, I was just spending a few days with my TV family doing press in New York. We love being together. What can I say? We love each other’s company and we have so much fun. This is what we were hoping for. The ratings have been such an unbelievable delight for us. But, in addition, in just a couple days, getting picked up for another season is pretty fantastic.

So are you ready to dedicate all of your life to Roseanne?
I’ve already done that. Well, I guess I had a long break there but I’m used to it. We used to do 20-plus episodes a season, so 12 is not easy, but it’s certainly not the work haul I had as a teenager.

Like you said, the ratings have been huge. What do you think has been behind the popularity of the show coming back?Well, I think people just relate to things that are authentic. I think that’s what people crave in terms of entertainment. It’s the human condition to feel lonely and confused and maybe disenfranchised, or feeling like you don’t fit in. Our show says, “Hey, we don’t fit in,” and, “We have some big problems.” It’s like catharsis almost, for people to see people who are like them.

What was it like for you the first time you came back onto the set?
It felt like going home to my parents’ house or what I used to feel like when I would step into my grandparents’ house. It was just being totally surrounded by familiarity and of course, I was on set with Michael Fishman and Sara Gilbert, my TV siblings, so there was that feeling of being kids again. Then seeing everybody, all the crew who were back and some of the writers and directors that were back. It reminded me that I had this big family.

This is the second time you’ve come back to the show. How was this time different from the last time?Well, the last time, I would say things on set were pretty tense. The climate on set these days has been so different. Everyone’s really mellowed with age in a positive way and cultivated parts of themselves that and nurtured parts of themselves. It makes it less intense in terms of the fame elements or the pressure. I feel like everyone can weather the sitcom storm more effectively now.

The first time I came back, I was hoping I would have some kind of resolve from when I left. But I guess I felt like I had already moved on from it.

What did you think was unresolved from the first time you left?It was like leaving a family, so when you think about what happens when that happens, it’s not just, “Oh, we’ll miss you. Bye.” It’s sadness, it’s loss, it’s frustration. I think rightly so, people were concerned about the show itself and missing such an integral character and energy, so it was all those things. It’s not like I felt guilty going to college. I didn’t feel I made the wrong decision, but maybe I wanted to check in with that other life and revisit it.

This time was totally different. It felt like a clean slate, even with all the familiarity. I just really felt loved and appreciated by everybody. That’s really reflective of the show. Whatever happens with the Conners, they have each other, for better or for worse.

You finally got to share a scene with Sarah Chalke, who played Becky when you were gone. What was it like acting together for the first time?It was really fun. I mean, Sarah is great. She’s a sweetheart and she has a great sense of humor. Once we were on Amy Schumer together and we went out to dinner afterwards and we talked about our experiences, and I was really curious about her experience after I left and what it was like for her. She was really honest about everything. Because of that, we already had a bond and an understanding of each other and where we were coming from.

How do you think Becky has changed over all of these years since we’ve seen her last?Well, she’s really tough. I think of her as a very strong woman and I feel like she’s gone through a lot. She’s lost her husband and, as America will see in upcoming weeks, that really took a toll on her. Part of how that has manifested is that she hasn’t really dealt with the pain of it. As a result, she’s a little bit of arrested almost to the time where Mark passed away. I really feel like that happens to people. Facing pain is a very hard thing to do. Sometimes the only way we can move forward in life is if we really face some of that sad stuff, you know?

Has that pain made her a more interesting character to play?She’s always been a really interesting character. It’s funny because part of the process is the fact that the show is on constantly every day. Sometimes I’ll be clicking through the channels and I’ll see my scrunchy and pink pants run by. Even though Becky is kind of goofy and she’s a little bit of a nerd, she’s always been complex. That’s one of the wonderful things about our show, you get to play a real person with so many different personality traits.

One of my favorite things about the new episode was seeing that the dynamic between Becky and Darlene was exactly the same as when we left them. Did you two just fall right back into that pattern?That is not only something that is fun for Sara and I, but also Michael Fishman. It’s just classic Roseanne. You’ll see in this season and I imagine in the next season too, because Sara and I really realized what a big part Becky and Darlene’s relationship really is. As adults, they need each other more as people to get through life. They really aren’t happy about that. They’re so used to being at each other’s throats and constantly bickering, then to have to come around and say, “I need you,” let alone, “I love you.”

Since the show started, that’s probably the primary thing I’ve heard from women who come up to me — the relationship between Becky and Darlene is always, “I was Becky and my sister was Darlene,” or “I was Darlene and my sister was Becky.” I hear it all the time and I’ve been hearing it for years.

Roseanne was famous for its Halloween episodes. Are we going to get another Halloween episode?
There are some relics from Halloween past this year, but there’s not a full-throttle Halloween episode. At least from the cast’s point of view, we were wildly disappointed about that. I just don’t know if we could do two seasons without a Halloween episode — it’s not like us.

No, you absolutely cannot! There should be a law.It’s almost like why even bother without one? I don’t feel that way, it’s not that extreme. Our inside joke with the cast is that the Conners are always poor, but somehow $100,000 dropped from the sky around Halloween so they can have all their candy and their costumes. You know, their makeup artists come.

A lot has been made about the politics of the show and Roseanne being a Trump supporter, both onscreen and in real life. How do you feel about all that political attention surrounding the show?
Well, I actually wrote an article about it. Basically what I said in it is that I disagree with Roseanne’s politics in that regard. I voted for Hillary. I’m a Democrat, but I respect her as a person, and as a feminist and as an American citizen, I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I also think that just because you voted for Trump doesn’t mean you’re a bigot or a racist or someone who hates homosexuals. I don’t feel you can equate a vote to all those other things. To me, the reason some people voted for Trump is because he thought if you were wealthy, he would save you money in taxes, but if you weren’t wealthy, people thought he would get you a job. I don’t think those things have anything to do with bigotry but I feel like we live in a very knee-jerk society where it’s all about soundbites. People like to say, “Roseanne’s a Trump supporter” because they don’t want to say, “Roseanne, who voted for Trump, who disagrees with many of his policies, but agrees with the fact that the working class should have more job security” is not as fun for people.

People are angry. People are clinging to anger. There’s a rigidity on both sides and my argument is our show has always been a source of social dialogue. It’s a reflective show that makes families look and reflect on their own lives, but it’s also about talking about things. Roseanne didn’t want the show to come back to spread her own propaganda. She wanted the show to come back to create a dialogue among these two rigid sides. I know for people who hate Trump, they don’t want to think that someone who voted for him would have that intention, but that’s the truth.

And I think what’s really interesting about the show is that, like you said, it has always been provocative and political.
And she has been.

At least in the first two episodes, a lot of families are struggling with what Roseanne and Jackie are struggling with — that we have these different political ideas, but we still love each other and we’re still family. How do we get past that and how do we go forward with these differences?
Exactly. Whether you’re a liberal or you’re conservative, I just don’t understand how you feel like someone else would understand your point of view if you’re stuck in anger and you’re not open to another view. How could there be progress?

Even for me, people call me and say, “Oh, did you hear that Trump called Roseanne?” and I said, “Yeah, well people call each other.” Who knows what their conversation is? Each little thing is blown up or used towards this anger. I’m not fond of him. I’m not fond of our president. I feel like we could do a lot better. That’s my view, but does that mean I’m furious about the woman who plays my mother on a TV show? No.

This interview has been edited and condensed.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
https://www.damemagazine.com/2018/03/23/reckoning-with-roseanne-my-tv-mom/

RECKONING WITH ROSEANNE, MY TV MOM



The original “Becky” reflects on the polarizing comic and Trump voter who indelibly changed what it means to be a TV matriarch.





Alicia "Lecy" Goranson Mar 23, 2018


Thirty years ago, I was just a 12-year-old kid sitting in the kitchen of my home in Evanston, Illinois, eating take-out Chinese food with my family, when I cracked open a fortune cookie that read: “You will be graced with the presence of stardom.” Minutes later, our phone rang: I had a callback for a sitcom called Life and Stuff, which would later be known as Roseanne.

The star of the show was a comedian named Roseanne Barr—I had never heard of her before, but I figured she was going to be the kind of TV mother I was accustomed to seeing at the time, like Phylicia Rashad on The Cosby Show, or Meredith Baxter Birney on Family Ties.

But as I sat in a soundstage at the Universal Studio lot, waiting to audition, I saw Roseanne walk onto the vast, cavernous stage. She was small and round, had no make-up on her face, and was wearing sweatpants. And then came the laugh: unabashedly loud and piercing. She wasn’t anything like I’d expected.

Later that day, I learned I’d been cast in the role of her oldest daughter, the smart and rebellious Becky—and my life changed. Because right after the show premiered on October 18, 1988, the critically buzzed-about ABC sitcom became an overnight success. Roseanne’s star supernovaed.

Yet, despite the show’s popularity, America didn’t easily embrace the “Domestic Goddess,” who often appeared less jolly and more Kali (the Hindu goddess of destruction). Indeed, from the pilot episode, the media—and the world—picked up on the fact that Roseanne’s version of “mother” wasn’t like anything we’d seen before. After just one episode, the New York Times wrote: “With a malicious glint in her eyes, Ms. Barr pounces on the absurdities of a tough no-nonsense woman trying to survive in a world of lazy self-inflated men.” Thirty years later, in Trump’s America, some things haven’t changed.

Both “Roseanne” the character and Roseanne the woman were strong and idiosyncratic and not the least bit interested in explaining themselves. But today, Roseanne Barr has become a cultural talking point for another reason: Her controversial political opinions don’t quite align with the mainstream Hollywood mindset, including my own. I long for the good old days, when people would at least ask, “What is Roseanne Barr really like?” They don’t have to ask now. She’s happy to tell them.

I was in Pasadena this past January, for ABC’s Television Critics Association press event, where journalists did not shy away from asking Roseanne about her well-known support of the Cheeto-in-Chief. “Trump says a lot of crazy shit. There are a lot of things that he’s said and done that I don’t agree with,”she told Vulture, and then added, “There’s probably a lot of things Hillary Clinton has done and said that you don’t agree with.”

And there are a lot of things Roseanne has said and done that I—and others—don’t agree with, but that doesn’t mean she’s not important to me, or that the show lost its stature as a cultural benchmark. I’m grateful for both. Roseanne has always fought to represent the overlooked or forgotten working-class America with integrity. Blue-collar America is not just a fan base to her, but a cause. It’s why she created Roseanne in the first place.

But I believe the real power of Roseanne comes from its honesty, and that includes showing the flaws in all of its characters, whether that’s teenagers making bad decisions or Roseanne supporting Trump. Not everyone sees it this way. In Wonkette, Robyn Pennacchia cursed the show’s choice to depict Roseanne’s character as a Trump supporter. “This evolution makes no sense for the character. It makes sense only for propaganda. There is something sinister in taking a feminist character who stood up for working people, who not only opposed racism and homophobia but thoughtfully addressed her own biases and worked to overcome them, and who—perhaps most importantly—did not fall for bullshit, and putting her on the freaking Trump train.” In the Chicago Tribune, Tracy Swartz speculated about the origins of Landford, Illinois, the fictional town where Roseanne is set. (It has long been believed to be based on Elgin.) Swartz asserted that “Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who grew up in the Chicago area, easily defeated Trump in Elgin Township in 2016, election records show. Clinton’s maternal grandfather is from Elgin.”

I am a proud feminist, and a Chicago native, and often read articles like these with tremendous interest. Yes both Roseanne Barr and “Roseanne” voted for Trump. As we know too well, a lot of white women did. And Landford, like the Conners, are fictional, vivid and relatable. But however you may feel about Roseanne Barr voting for Trump, the character “Roseanne” is part of a separate, fictional narrative. Those who watched it when it first aired may recall how groundbreaking it was not only in its depiction of a flawed, working-class family led by a strong matriarch, but by the way it shed light on issues from gay rights to mental illness. Should that be diminished simply because its star voted for a president whose beliefs are antithetical to what she represented? Real-life Roseanne may be polarizing, but Roseanne as a TV show remains a paragon.

The fact is, the hero is not a hero at the beginning of her story. That is the purpose of her journey and narrative: Whether “Roseanne” becomes a hero by the end of season 10. And that is debatable. But maybe it is worth debating.

As much as the choice of investing one’s time, energy, and money in art and/or an artist is integral to being a conscientious individual in society, so is the right to exist with a nuanced, personal politic, and the freedom to artistically depict characters with complexity. Polarity may, arguably, work in a justice system or a democracy, but it serves neither the individual nor the art.

Roseanne lasted nine seasons (222 episodes) from 1988 to1997, and was one of the most watched shows in America for the majority of its run. There’s no disputing that success, even if it wasn’t always fun for us. Roseanne is both an auteur and a collaborator, but she is not one to acquiesce, particularly when it comes to a funny joke or the integrity of one of her working-class characters. As a teenager, watching her tirelessly assert her authority was equal parts intimidating and inspiring. I remember back then, when I wanted to complete my “grunge look” with a cute, pixie haircut and the producers said “no,” Roseanne took the liberty of grabbing a pair of scissors and chopping off the base of my pony tail in the hair-and-make-up room, right before the live-taping. As horrified as I was at the time, I understood her lesson: Sometimes it is right not to compromise.

The writers had it the worst. Every Monday, after reading a new script around the table, I recall the anticipatory “angel of silence” that fell across the room. “This isn’t funny!” Roseanne would exclaim. The writers, down but not out, would retreat back up to their room, with Roseanne in tow. Some of them would not make it to the next season. (Though some writers who were fired back then, were asked to return this season—a testament to what 20 years can do to heal old wounds).

I don’t know whether Roseanne sees herself as a feminist. But, to me, the idea of feminism is to simultaneously exist within society and be independent of it. Ultimately it assures each of us a right to our own respective voices and power. And gives each of us a platform for discourse, despite whether it makes others uncomfortable. I don’t know anybody who understands this better than she does. But when I recount to her my memories of her heroism, the many times I watched her stand up to the Hollywood Boys’ Club and stick to her guns when it came to our show’s blue-collar integrity, she recoils.

Whether we are talking about Roseanne-the-Comic or Roseanne-the-Character, both always have been consistently controversial, radical, and, for the most part, anti-establishment. When I was a teenager, strangers would often cross a crowded room and go out of their way, just to tell me how much they hated her or the show. You’ll likely recall her rendition of the “National Anthem”; I remember the aftermath, of how tight security was on our lot the weeks that followed.

Arguably, what makes Roseanne a good show—what has always made it great—is not the politics of its lead character, but the conflicts that exist within all the characters that ultimately make the Conners believable and, therefore, relatable. While Dan may defer to Roseanne, he never loses his authority. Jackie’s life may perpetually be in shambles, but she often interjects a depth and wisdom. Becky is a straight-A student who is primarily driven by rebellion. Darlene’s dry humor only masks her true vulnerability. And DJ’s innocence is humorously met with a world-weariness. However the characters might be described, one is hard-pressed to categorize them in stereotypes.

Like any great drama, Roseanne holds up a mirror to the American family. The Conners not only struggle with outside circumstances, they struggle with each other. And more than hate or criticism, I often hear from fans who say that watching Roseanne with their respective families gives them permission to address uncomfortable and painful issues with authority, sincerity, and moreover, humor. I hope, even in this chaotic and often isolating social-media climate, that our show continues to allow for cathartic discussion among its viewers.

Roseanne herself is as complex as the characters she created—both a comic and a writer, a collaborator and a tyrant, a genius and an everywoman, a mother and a grandmother, and a bright and brazen force of nature. That is what Roseanne is really like.

As for the Roseanne you’re about to see, I can say this with absolute authority, it is thoughtful, well-written, extremely funny, and faithful to the story it began with: a portrait of an imperfect family as they struggle to find levity in an imperfect America.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Roseanne Revival Ratings Are Dropping; Hit New Low

Roseanne-revival-2018.jpg


The Roseanne revival’s ratings are continuously dropping and it just experienced its lowest ratings to date this week. What’s interesting – and worrying for the much-touted TV series – is that revival has lost nearly half the audience that tuned in to its record-breaking premiere episode.

Set in the fictional town of Lanford, Illinois, the original Roseanne focused upon the titular matriarch of the Conner clan as she attempted to raise three children and run a series of small businesses with her husband, Dan. The show ran for nine seasons (though many fans skip over Roseanne‘s gimmick-driven final season) and was praised for addressing social issues that no other situation comedy of the day would touch. The revival is breaking similar ground this time around, with Roseanne Conner now being a vocal Trump supporter despite heading the sort of blended household that contradicts what some would consider a typical American family should look like.

RELATED: ROSEANNE DOESN’T BELIEVE TRUMP IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIVAL RATINGS

TV By The Numbers notes that the Roseanne revival is seeing a constant viewership drop and the latest episode seems to have placed the series at rock bottom. The Roseanne premiere episode attracted 18.44 million viewers. The latest episode, which aired on May 1, only attracted 10.42 million viewers. That’s certainly higher than what cable programs typically get, but it’s not exactly glowing for a network like ABC.

While 10.42 million viewers is still a respectable number, it still represents a 21% drop in viewership over the course of one week, with the previous week’s viewership being 13.264 million viewers. This marks a shockingly steep decline even allowing for the fact that show’s ratings have been dropping since the premiere. A more worrying point is that Roseanne failed to be the highest rated show in its time slot, coming in second to the latest episode of NCIS, which also won the night with 12.35 million viewers. Roseanne barely beat out CBS drama Bull (10.37 million viewers) to be the second-highest rated television series of the evening, let alone second best in its time slot.

Roseanne-TV-show-revival-cast.jpg


Despite these plummeting ratings, it seems unlikely that ABC will reconsider their decision to renew Roseanne for a second season – a call that was forecast the Wednesday after the record-breaking first episode aired. It’s possible that the NCIS victory was a fluke, fueled by the upcoming departure of fan favorite actress Pauley Perrette. Nevertheless, this is still a worrying trend for a series that was being hyped for having attracted more viewers than the season finale of The Walking Dead only a few weeks ago. Only time will tell if things will start to look up again for the Conners, but for now, there is no joy in Lanford.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Interesting...

this is the most anti-Trump epsiode

It showed a black woman in the Army in Afghanistan, how poorly vets are treated racism how the government destroying the middle class and public assistance illegal immigrants and sh*tted on Fox News (too real applause)...

I was genuinely surprised.

they even brought back the ONLY black characters on the original show.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
CTV pulls 'Roseanne' from its television and streaming platforms
image.jpg

In this image released by ABC, Roseanne Barr, left, and John Goodman appear in a scene from the season finale of 'Roseanne,' airing Tuesday, May 22. (Adam Rose/ABC via AP)

The Canadian Press
Published Tuesday, May 29, 2018 4:55PM EDT
Last Updated Tuesday, May 29, 2018 5:13PM EDT
TORONTO - CTV says it is pulling "Roseanne" from its television and streaming platforms following a racist tweet on Tuesday by the show's star Roseanne Barr.

CTV Communications tweeted its plans less than two hours after the show's U.S. network, ABC, said it was cancelling the series.

Barr apologized for suggesting on Twitter that former White House adviser Valerie Jarrett is a product of the Muslim Brotherhood and the "Planet of the Apes."

RELATED STORIES
But the comment drew widespread condemnation from observers including consulting producer Wanda Sykes, who tweeted that she would not return to the show, and executive producer Sara Gilbert, who said the comments "are abhorrent and do not reflect the beliefs of our cast and crew."

"Roseanne" recently concluded its first-season run Tuesdays on CTV but had also been available to stream on CTV.ca and the CTV Go app.

A CTV spokesman says the episodes were being removed from those platforms, as well as the on-demand services available through the country's various cable providers.

 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Hulu Scrambles to Pull All Reruns of Roseanne After Star's Racist Tweet

Tom McKay

32 minutes ago
Filed to: HULU
2.1K
6
kzo92futbgszzgasewwt.png

Screenshot: Hulu
The torturous situation caused by TV star and far-right conspiracy theorist Roseanne Barr, whose 90s-era show Roseanne was revived for 2018 in some kind of horribly misguided effort to appeal to Donald Trump supporters, culminated in a predictable implosion this week. Barr—who has been tweeting for months about the 4chan-born Qanon theory that ludicrously alleges Democratic leadership are members of a Satanic pedophilia cartel—sent out a racist tweet smearing Barack Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, resulting in the show’s abrupt cancellation by ABC.

Now, per Entertainment Weekly, streaming giant Hulu and digital network Laff have made the same call as a number of TV networks including Paramount Network, TV Land, and CMT, pulling Roseanne from their streaming libraries. (Hulu only had streaming rights for the revival, while the other networks appear to be clearing out their entire back catalogue of Roseanne episodes.)

EW wrote:

Starting tomorrow, syndicated episodes of the recently revived sitcom — which was axed by ABC earlier today after racist tweets from star/co-creator Roseanne Barr ignited a social media firestorm — will no longer run in rotation across the channels.

Laff, a digital network that specializes in reruns of popular sitcoms, has similarly yanked old episodes of the series. “While we believe viewers have always distinguished the personal behavior of the actress Roseanne Barr from the television character Roseanne Conner, we are disgusted by Barr’s comments this week,” read Laff’s official statement. “Therefore, we are removing the original Roseanne series from the Laff schedule for the time being, effective immediately.”

In fact, Hulu seems to have jumped ahead of its own stated termination date. As of Tuesday evening, the show is listed as “Currently Unavailable”on its streaming website.

“We support ABC’s decision and are removing the show from Hulu,” a Hulu spokesperson told Hollywood Reporter. The site also noted that Amazon “still has SVOD rights to seasons one through nine of the original series.” As of Tuesday evening, both the original seasons and the revival remained available to purchase there.

According to Deadline, ABC has additionally halted its campaign to promote Roseanne for the Emmys, and all promotional materials for the show have been yanked from websites belonging to it and Disney, one of Hulu’s owners.

In retrospect, this all seemed inevitable, given Barr’s Twitter feed has been filled with all manner of vile racism and bigotry for a decade. It’s possible this singular tweet was the reason for the cancellation. But the speed by which many of those involved in the production and distribution of the highly-rated show are distancing themselves seems to suggest that ABC had realized the Barr situation was reaching a boil prior to Tuesday, though perhaps not until after they signed for another season in late March.

Entertainment and employement lawyers told Law & Crime that while Barr’s contract probably contained a “morality clause” requiring her to maintain an acceptable degree of public decorum, ABC could still be on the line to pay out talent and crew who signed on to the revival and the next season. So if TV executives miscalculated how toxic Barr was and would continue to be under the spotlight, that was a disastrous mistake—albeit one that is deserving of no sympathy whatsoever.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
‘Roseanne’ Cancellation Leaves Huge Crater in ABC’s Fall Schedule
By Daniel Holloway
@gdanielholloway


The abrupt cancellation of “Roseanne” will have a massive impact on ABC’s plans for the fall.

At its upfront presentation to advertisers two weeks ago, ABC unveiled a fall schedule that boasted “Roseanne” leading off the Tuesday-night primetime lineup. The revived multi-camera sitcom had just secured its place as the 2017-18 season’s No. 1 scripted show in Nielsen’s 18-49 demo. Heading into the upfront, ABC had positioned the show as the long-sought answer to the network’s Tuesday-night woes and the new face of its comedy brand.

On Tuesday, ABC canceled “Roseanne” just hours after star Roseanne Barr published a racist Tweet about former Obama-administration White House aide Valerie Jarrett.

Tuesdays had for years vexed ABC, with each season bringing a new strategy for reviving the network’s fortunes on the night. In 2013-14, ABC made the unorthodox move of putting freshman Marvel drama “Agents of SHIELD” on at 8 p.m., where comedies had typically dwelled. Two seasons later, another Disney-owned franchise, “The Muppets,” was given a shot at 8 p.m. Last season, “Black-ish” was relocated to 9 p.m. Tuesdays, where the network hoped it would anchor the primetime block much as “Modern Family” had for years on Wednesday nights.


None of those moves mattered, and ABC continued to flounder on Tuesdays. But “Roseanne” promised a solution. At 8 p.m., it would go head-to-head with “The Voice” on NBC and “NCIS” on CBS and provide formidable competition to both — even with a likely ratings decline in the upcoming season. The decision to schedule new single-camera comedy “The Kids Are Alright” at 8:30 p.m. was a risk, but one with potential payoff if the freshman series proved able to hold a significant chunk of the “Roseanne” audience and establish itself. “Black-ish” and “Splitting Up Together,” scheduled for 9 p.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively, had already proven themselves able schedule partners to “Roseanne.”

At 10 p.m., ABC execs had high hopes for “The Rookie,” a freshman drama starring Nathan Fillion as a middle-aged man who joins the Los Angeles Police Department. The morning of the upfront, ABC entertainment president Channing Dungey told reporters that “The Rookie” would appeal to “the broad base of viewers that we start off the night with” — a reference to the outsize ratings earned by “Roseanne,” which played particularly well in Midwestern states — and acknowledged that 10 p.m. Tuesdays “has been a challenging time period in the past.”

Without “Roseanne,” ABC’s options for saving Tuesday night are limited. The network could, conceivably, make a bold move such as tearing “Modern Family” from its longtime Wednesday perch and placing it in the Tuesday lead-off spot. But doing so would hobble the survival chances of freshman comedy “Single Parents” at 9:30 p.m. Wednesday and freshman drama “A Million Little Things” at 10 p.m. Wednesday.

Tinkering with Wednesday risks undermining a night in which ABC is fairly well positioned, at least until 10 p.m. But one possible move would be to dispatch season three of “American Housewife” to Tuesdays and rearranging the two hour comedy block there into whatever order would make the most sense (and do the least damage to “The Kids Are Alright,” for which ABC has high hopes).

That move would mean waving a white flag on Tuesdays — but present an intriguing opportunity on Wednesdays. The only new comedy other than “The Kids are Alright” to get a series order from ABC for next season is “Schooled,” a spinoff of “The Goldbergs.” “Schooled” is not yet on the schedule, but almost any “Roseanne” patch-job scenario involves it being moved to fall. Placing it at 8:30 p.m. Wednesday behind “The Goldbergs” gives the spinoff a solid shot at capturing the original’s audience. Alternatively, ABC could move “Fresh Off the Boat” or “Speechless” from the newly formed Friday comedy hour to Tuesday, then move “Schooled” into the vacant slot — or go with the unscripted standby of “Shark Tank” reruns on Friday in place of the comedy block, holding whichever comedy doesn’t move to Tuesday until midseason.

If ABC needs to ramp up additional development, it has Kenya Barris and Julie Bean’s untitled family comedy still in development. The show had been ordered to straight to series last season, but was pushed to off-cycle development in February after ABC failed to find a suitable replacement when planned star Alec Baldwin left the project.

A decision on ABC’s fall schedule is not expected for at least several days.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Wow, ABC stuck to their word, it's not even on now.

http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/29/media/roseanne-reruns-pulled/index.html

It's now a lot harder to watch 'Roseanne,' if you wanted to
by Sandra Gonzalez @CNNMoneyMay 29, 2018: 7:33 PM ET




ABC cancels 'Roseanne' after star's racist Twitter rant

cancellation of her show by ABC, streaming services and networks airing existing episodes have started distancing themselves from the show.


Hulu told CNN, "We support ABC's decision and are removing the show from Hulu."

Searching for the series on the service now yields a single result, a 2016 documentary titled "Roseanne For President."

On ABC's website, where all nine episodes from Season 10 had been available for viewing, the URL that once led to the "Roseanne" landing page now redirects users to the homepage or a list of current shows.

A CMT spokesperson also confirmed that Viacom's cable networks -- Paramount Network, TV Land, and CMT -- will be pulling "Roseanne" from their respective schedules starting tomorrow.

RELATED: ABC took a big risk with 'Roseanne' reboot -- and it just backfired

Additionally, The Laff network, a comedy-focused Scripps network, has pulled reruns of the sitcom from its air.

"While we believe viewers have always distinguished the personal behavior of the actress Roseanne Barr from the television character Roseanne Conner, we are disgusted by Barr's comments this week," the network said in a statement. "Therefore, we are removing the original 'Roseanne' series from the Laff schedule for the time being, effective immediately."

Barr has not responded to news of the show's cancellation, but a few of her cast members have.

Michael Fishman, who has played D.J. Conner on the series since its start in 1988, said he's "devastated" following news.

Emma Kinney, who joined the series in the most recent season, said she supported the network's decision.

ABC canceled "Roseanne" hours after Barr's comments about Valerie Jarrett, former aid to President Obama, Chelsea Clinton and George Soros caused an outcry.

"Roseanne's Twitter statement is abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values, and we have decided to cancel her show," ABC Entertainment president Channing Dungey said in a statement.

Disney CEO Bob Iger added that "there was only one thing to do here, and that was the right thing," in a statement on Twitter.

"Roseanne" returned to TV back in March after more than ten years off the air. Season 11 had been planned to premiere in the fall.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Why ABC had to cancel Roseanne
It’s not (just) because it was the right thing to do.
By Todd VanDerWerff@tvotitodd@vox.com May 29, 2018, 4:50pm EDTSHARE

148094_0034.0.jpg
ABC
Roseannewas the No. 1 show on TV for the 2017-’18 TV season, as ABC’s various representatives never tired of reminding attendees of its recent upfront presentation to advertisers. It was a dominant cultural monolith.

And now it’s canceled — the highest-rated show everto not return for a new season when it by all rights should have. (Most high-rated shows that don’t return reach the end of long runs and choose to close up shop on their own terms, as happened with Seinfeld, Cheers, and many, many others.) Star Roseanne Barr’s blatantly racist tweet about former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett was the nail in the show’s coffin, but the star’s conspiracy-obsessed, constantly-flirting-with-overt-racism Twitter feed was always a ticking time bomb. This was always going to happen. It just wasn’t expected to happen so quickly.

ABC cancels Roseanne following “abhorrent, repugnant” comment from Roseanne Barr[/paste:font]

(A hopefully edifying sidebar: The previous bearer of the “highest-rated show to be canceled when it normally wouldn’t have been” title was CBS’s one-season sitcom Bridget Loves Bernie, which ran from 1972 to 1973, came in fifth place for that TV season, and was canceled because it depicted a Catholic woman marrying a Jewish man. Representatives of both faiths were offended by their respective representations — as well as the very idea of an interfaith marriage, which was held up as contrary to the teachings of both religions. This gives you a sense of how drastically the boundaries of the culture war have shifted in the intervening 45 years; conservative outrage led to the end of Bridget, but progressive outrage led to the end of Roseanne.)

From a moral and ethical standpoint, canceling Roseanne was the right call. But if morals and ethics were the only things at play, the show would have ended long ago — or wouldn’t have been revived in the first place. ABC had to have known that Barr’s Twitter feed would be a problem, and it’s telling how often the star has “left” Twitter (or turned her account over to her kids), only to get right back to it. Keeping Roseanne on the air meant managing Roseanne, and fans of both the original show and its revival surely knew there are few more difficult tasks in the world.



So there had to have been reasons for Roseanne’s cancellation beyond the moral and ethical ones. And believe it or not, I think you can make a really compelling business case for canceling the show as well.

Roseanne debuted huge and then promptly lost viewers
147976_3279.jpg

By the time of its finale, Roseanne had lost around half its viewership.
ABC
When Roseanne debuted in March 2018, its ratings were the TV story of the year. With 18 million viewers and a 5.1 rating among the 18- to 49-year-old viewers advertisers most care about, the show was pulling in the sorts of numbers network TV only dreamed about. Once viewers on DVR and streaming platforms were factored in, the number rose to more than 27 million viewers total. The series was quickly feted as a new gold standard for a hit sitcom, and was just as quickly renewed.

To be clear: A lot of the early ratings momentum was always going to leach away from the series, as it did with NBC’s Will & Grace and Fox’s The X-Files revivals, which both opened big and then quickly declined. The premieres of these revivals garner lots of curious viewers who want to see what an old show looks like in the 2010s but don’t particularly care to keep up week to week, or choose to watch later when they can binge the full season.

And Roseanne did see a similar downward trajectory. By the time its finale aired on May 22, it had lost almost half its live viewership (down to around 10.5 million viewers) and fully half its younger viewership (down to a 2.5 in the 18- to 49-year-old demo). And while we don’t yet have final streaming and DVR numbers for the finale, the trajectory in those numbers has followed a slightly less steep but similar decline.

But the numbers for the first Roseanne revival season were so big that it almost didn’t matter, and it certainly didn’t hurt that one of the main audiences still watching TV live (and, thus, still watching TV commercials live) is older, whiter, and more rural than the national average — both prime Trump voters and prime Roseanne viewers. Had the series held steady at 10.5 million viewers and a 2.5, it wouldn’t have been TV’s No. 1 show, but it would have been comfortably in the top 20 — and probably in the top five once DVR and streaming viewers were factored in.

But this isn’t really how TV works anymore. The best guess for what would happen to Roseannein its second revival season is that its audience would continue to drift away, as happened with the second revival season of The X-Files, which struggled to move the needle, even though it was creatively much stronger than the first revival season.



There are so many different ways to watch — and monetize — TV now that even a Roseanne that halved its season one finale audience (going down to 5 million viewers and the low 1s in the demo) probably would have found a way to justify a spot on the lineup.

But that presumes a Roseanne that still draws healthy advertiser interest, which is to say it presumes a Roseanne whose star isn’t provoking outrage on social media every other week.

In the short term, canceling Roseanne makes very little sense. But in the long term, keeping Roseanne on the air made no sense.
148094_9898.jpg
ABC
ABC doesn’t directly own Roseanne, which means that it doesn’t control all the eventual revenues from the program from sales to streaming companies, to international broadcasters, and so on. (You can read more about how this works here.)

Instead, the show is produced by the Carsey-Werner Company (its original production studio in the show’s 1988-’97 run) and Jax Media (which also produces Broad City, among others). Even if ABC got a cut of the show’s profits (as many broadcast networks do nowadays for shows their parent companies don’t technically own), it would be a small one. That’s an acceptable trade-off when the ratings are so huge that you know you’ll be making tons of money from advertisers, but it’s not when those ad dollars aren’t assured. (Because of this ownership situation, it’s not impossible that Roseanne could be revived elsewhere, but it would require such a specific set of circumstances that it seems incredibly unlikely.)

And though Barr had tweeted outrage-provoking things in the past, they were often shrouded beneath 17 different levels of conspiracy-mongering. To really get mad, you had to know, for instance, what “QAnon” meant, and many people are just never going to have the time to disappear down that particular rabbit hole. But the Jarrett tweet was immediate, virulently racist, and hard for even Barr’s supporters to deny as racist. It caused writer Wanda Sykes to leave the show even before its cancellation, and star Sara Gilbert (also a producer on the revival) to chastise Barr on Twitter.

But leave aside the advertiser of it all and think about this: At what point do you accept that Barr is going to keep tweeting things like this, turning off a growing portion of your audience, and if that continues to happen, soon only those who are watching to hear Barr say outrageously racist things will be around? When the show goes from the much more nebulous target audience of “people interested in considering the political divide in the Trump era” to the target audience of “hardcore racists,” what’s the damage not just to the show but to your network as a whole?

Roseanne was canceled. It isn’t the only sitcom tackling politics and the working class.[/paste:font]

And then consider that ABC is the network of Black-ish and Fresh Off the Boat and Shonda Rhimes’s assorted dramas, and the only network in broadcast TV history to be headed up by a black person (in this case, Channing Dungey). At a certain point, Barr’s Twitter feed doesn’t just hurt Roseanne. It hurts all those other shows by sharing space with them, and it scares off peddlers of new shows who might not want to share a network with a series whose star seems intent on chasing away everybody who isn’t already predisposed to laugh at racist tweets.

Canceling Roseanne lost ABC a bunch of ad dollars in the short term. Nothing it airs in that time slot in the fall is going to replicate what even the declining Roseanne managed, and the network has opened itself up to attacks on the front that it doesn’t care about conservatives or Trump voters or something similar.

But in the long term, canceling Roseanne was the only decision that made sense. At a certain point, ABC would have stopped being the American Broadcasting Company and would have become the broadcast network home of Roseanne Barr’s Twitter feed. And in a future when traditional networks are less important than untarnished brand names, that was a trade-off not worth making.

https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/5/29/17406210/roseanne-canceled-abc-valerie-jarrett-roseanne-barr
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Trump doesn't talk 'Roseanne' at Nashville rally
President Donald Trump spoke for over an hour in Nashville, Tennessee, but his wide-ranging remarks notably left out one of the day's biggest news stories: Roseanne.

ABC cancelled the hit sitcom "Roseanne" Tuesday following the eponymous star Roseanne Barr's racist tweet, with the network calling her remarks "abhorrent, repugnant and inconsistent with our values."

Instead, Trump stayed mostly on message in Nashville. He talked at length about his 2016 victory and accomplishments since taking office, he praised Senate candidate Rep. Marsha Blackburn and tied her Democratic opponent to Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi, and he looked ahead to his administration's push on infrastructure.
On the flight to Tennessee, press secretary Sarah Sanders repeatedly declined to comment on the show's cancellation.


"The President spent his day focused on dealing with the things going on with North Korea, trade roll-out this morning. A lot of activity going on at the White House that the President has been focused on," she told reporters aboard Air Force One, later adding,

"Again, that's not what the President is looking at. That's not what he's spending his time on. And I think that we have a lot bigger things going on in the country right now, certainly that the President is spending his time when it comes to policy."

:rolleyes2:


Trump railed against political correctness on the campaign trail in 2016, and aides were unsure ahead of the rally whether the President would weigh in on the news.

He previously praised the comedienne's show at a March rally in Ohio.

"Look at Roseanne! I called her yesterday, look at her ratings! Look at her ratings," he said to cheers at the time.

"I got a call from Mark Burnett, he did The Apprentice, a great guy, he said, 'Donald, I called to say hello and to tell you -- did you see Roseanne's ratings I said, Mark, how big were they, they were unbelievable!' Over 18 million people, and it was about us! They haven't figured it out, the fake news hasn't quite figured it out yet," he said.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/30/media/roseanne-barr-tweets/index.html?iid=ob_article_hotListpool

Roseanne Barr is blaming Ambien for her racist tweets and telling her fans, "I'm not a racist, just an idiot who made a bad joke."
Sanofi, the maker of Ambien, responded with a statement full of shade: "While all pharmaceutical treatments have side effects, racism is not a known side effect of any Sanofi medication."


Barr's Ambien explanation was part of an hours-long tweetstorm reacting to ABC's cancellation of her hit show "Roseanne."

She had said on Tuesday that she was leaving Twitter, but she just can't seem to log off.

She zig-zagged between apologizing for her foul Twitter behavior and retweeting memes that made her apology sound insincere. She retweeted fans who portrayed her as the victim of a liberal media double standard. All told, she posted more than 100 times.

Later in the day, President Trump joined her on Twitter. His first public reaction to the show's cancellation was a tweet criticizing Disney CEO Bob Iger.

Related: Trump breaks silence on Roseanne Barr scandal

Trump and Barr have been prominent supporters of each other. They both delight in attacking Democrats.

In this case, Barr was fired for her Tuesday tweet about former Obama aide Valerie Jarrett. But she kept it up on Wednesday, retweeting photos of Jarrett side by side with an ape.

It was Barr's earlier tweet about Jarrett that caused outrage and ultimately led to the show's cancellation. In a response to a comment about Jarrett, Barr had said: "Muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby=vj."

Barr still claims she was just joking when she compared Jarrett to "Planet of the Apes" and the Muslim Brotherhood in a tweet on Tuesday morning.

In a reply to one of her fans, she said "I honestly thought she was Jewish and Persian-ignorant of me for sure, but...i did."

She also said she had been on Ambien, a medication used to treat insomnia, at the time.

She tweeted, "guys I did something unforgiveable so do not defend me. It was 2 in the morning and I was ambien tweeting -- it was memorial day too -- i went 2 far & do not want it defended -- it was egregious Indefensible. I made a mistake I wish I hadn't but...don't defend it please."

She cited Ambien again in a later tweet, saying, "Not giving excuses for what I did(tweeted) but I've done weird stuff while on ambien -- cracked eggs on the wall at 2am etc."

Oddly, she later deleted all of her references to the medication. Nevertheless, Ambien became the #1 trending topic on Twitter on Wednesday morning, leading to Sanofi's public rebuke. Barr's explanation was deemed laughable.

"I have only taken Ambien once ... but I don't remember one of the side-effects being racism," CNN's John Berman tweeted.

Related: The inside story of how ABC fired Roseanne Barr

In one of her other deleted tweets, Barr said "I'm sorry 4 my tweet, AND I will also defend myself as well as talk to my followers. so, go away if u don't like it. I will handle my sadness the way I want to. I'm tired of being attacked & belittled more than other comedians who have said worse."

Some of her replies to fans clearly expressed how she feels. At one point she said she believes she was fired because of fears over a potential boycott of the show's advertisers. She also lashed out at co-stars Michael Fishman and Sara Gilbert.

"You throw me under the bus. nice!" she said in a tweet directed at Fishman.

Her Twitter account had a manic feel throughout the morning. Through her selection of retweets, Barr implied that she was fired over her support for President Trump. One of the posts she shared said, inexplicably, "they brought the show back so they could inevitably cancel the show when she said something they didn't like."

But then she deleted her retweet of that post.

Another retweet, still up as of 7 a.m. ET, quoted Herman Cain on Fox saying "I believe they were looking for a reason to cancel #Roseanne and here's why. Even though the show was a ratings success, forces within ABC didn't like the fact that her conservative defense of certain things was so popular."
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/roseanne-barr-attacks-cast-members-130102854.html?.tsrc=fauxdal

Hours after returning to Twitter to apologize to the “hundreds of people and wonderful writers and talented actors who lost their jobs,” Roseanne Barr changed course by slamming some of her ABC sitcom costars. The comedian responded negatively to tweets by Michael Fisher and Sara Gilbert condemning her behavior that led to the cancellation of ABC’s “Roseanne” revival. The series was pulled from ABC shortly after Barr made a racist joke referring to former Obama advisor Valerie Jarrett as a mix between the “Muslim Brotherhood” and the “Planet of the Apes.”

Fisher responded to Barr’s joke and the show’s cancellation by releasing a statement to his Twitter page in which he expressed sorrow for the many “Roseanne” workers who lost their jobs. The actor said he “condemned” Barr’s joke “vehemently,” calling it “reprehensible and intolerable.” Fisher said the joke did not reflect the inclusive views of himself or his “Roseanne” character.


“I created the platform for that inclusivity and you know it,” Barr fired back at Fishman on Twitter. “You throw me under the bus. Nice!”


Gilbert, meanwhile, issued a statement after Barr’s joke went viral. The actress and “The Talk” cohost said, “Roseanne’s recent comments about Valerie Jarrett, and so much more, are abhorrent and do not reflect the beliefs of our cast and crew or anyone associated with our show.” Gilbert then expressed disappointment in Barr’s actions. Barr responded: “Wow! Unreal.”

Barr’s comments to her costars differ from the statements she made hours earlier. Breaking her silence after the show’s cancellation, Barr apologized to the hundreds of people she put out of work due to her racist tweet. She urged her fans not to defend her and admitted she “did something unforgivable” and “made a mistake.” The comedian was feeling a bit more antagonistic hours later when responding to Fishman and Gilbert.





 
Top