UPDATE: Donald Trump Takes Office as the 47th US President

Supersav

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
So the example is an old white man who filed for bankruptcy 6 times and was convicted of financial crimes...and another white man born and raised in apartheid.. these are the examples who should follow...

The fucked up part is there are people on this board who agree with that...
You voted for the old white man who was best friends with a segregationist
 

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Last edited:

NightMare Paint

Not A Horse
BGOL Investor

Alright. List the names.

Edit: Nevermind. Let someone with a brain do it:

Five Charged Following Investigation into Handling of Absentee Ballots in 2023 Elections​

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE​

2/21/2025
(Rocky Hill, CT) - Chief State’s Attorney Patrick J. Griffin today announced that five people have been criminally charged in connection with the misuse of absentee ballots during the 2023 Bridgeport Democratic mayoral election cycle.
Inspectors from the Statewide Prosecution Bureau in the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney today arrested Alfredo Castillo, age 53, Wanda Geter-Pataky, age 68, Maria Pereira, age 57, and Jazmarie Melendez, age 26, all of Bridgeport, and Margaret Joyce, age, 45, of Stratford.
On September 12, 2023, the City of Bridgeport held a primary election for the Democratic Party candidate nomination for mayor. The candidates were incumbent Mayor Joseph P. Ganim, and his challenger, John Gomes. Ganim was declared the winner after the absentee ballot votes put him ahead of Gomes, who was the victor at the polls. On September 13, 2023, the Bridgeport Police Department received a complaint alleging that Geter-Pataky violated state laws regarding absentee balloting. Gomes filed a civil lawsuit in Superior Court in Bridgeport alleging absentee ballot fraud shortly thereafter resulting in a court-ordered new primary. The Bridgeport complaint was referred to the State Elections Enforcement Commission or “SEEC”. The SEEC subsequently referred the case to the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney for further investigation by the Statewide Prosecution Bureau. The SEEC referred two additional complaints for investigation alleging Pereira violated Connecticut election laws during the same primary.
Some of the facts and circumstances alleged in the arrest warrant affidavits stemming from the criminal investigation formed the basis of the civil lawsuit alleging absentee ballot fraud that resulted in a judge’s decision ordering a new Democratic mayoral primary.
“The Office of the Chief State’s Attorney takes allegations of voter fraud seriously and I commend the Statewide Prosecution Bureau’s investigative efforts that resulted in these arrests,” Chief State’s Attorney Griffin said. “To protect the integrity of our voting process in Connecticut, it is important that our elections are fair and free from fraudulent activity and criminal intent. These prosecutions hopefully send the message that deters tampering with election results in the future in Connecticut.”
All five defendants were released on promises to appear in Bridgeport Superior Court, Geographical Area No. 2, on March 6, 2025.
These charges are merely accusations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.
The investigation resulted in the following charges:
  • Castillo was charged with five counts of Misrepresenting Eligibility Requirements for Voting by Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-135(b), five counts of being Present When an Absentee Ballot Applicant Executes an Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(e) and eight counts of Possession of Ballots and Envelopes Restricted, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(d).
  • Geter-Pataky was charged with 42 counts of Possession of Ballots and Envelopes Restricted, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(d), two counts of Fraudulent Voting, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-360, 22 counts of Misrepresenting Eligibility Requirements for Voting by Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-135(b), 17 counts of being Present When an Absentee Ballot Applicant Executes an Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(e) and nine counts of Conspiracy to Commit Possession of Ballots and Envelopes Restricted, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes §§ 53a-48/9-140b(d).
  • Pereira was charged with 20 counts of Misrepresenting Eligibility Requirements for Voting by Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-135(b), four counts of being Present When an Absentee Ballot Applicant Executes an Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(e), five counts of Possession of Ballots and Envelopes Restricted, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(d), Forgery in the Second Degree, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-139 and Disorderly Conduct, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 53a-182.
  • Melendez was charged with six counts of Misrepresenting Eligibility Requirements for Voting by Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-135(b).
  • Joyce was charged with four counts of Misrepresenting Eligibility Requirements for Voting by Absentee Ballot, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-135(b), four counts of Possession of Ballots and Envelopes Restricted, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-140b(d) and Fraudulent Voting, in violation of Connecticut General Statutes § 9-360.
I know you red cuckolds aren't used to seeing accountability within your party so I hope this has been enlightening.
 
Last edited:

DC_Dude

Rising Star
BGOL Investor


McGovern: Democrats offered an amendment to protect Medicaid. Every Republican voted no.

Democrats offered an amendment to extend tax cuts for people making under $400,000 while ensuring that corporations and billionaires pay their fair share. Every Republican voted no.

Democrats offered an amendment preventing tax giveaways for people earning over $1 million a year. Every Republican voted no.

We asked them to vote against tax breaks for people earning over $100 million per year. Every Republican voted no.

We offered an amendment preventing tax cuts for people with a net worth of over, get this $1 billion. Every Republican voted no.

They betrayed their constituents. They voted to steal from the American people in order to protect tax breaks for billionaires
 

code_pirahna

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
It's killing these white folk. Sit back and watch the PAIN. Wait until the Spring hits...all hell breaking loose in the streets. They'll drag Trump and Musky out of the house by their ankles.
Bruh until white people wake up and realize that to Elon, Trump and the rest of the oligarchs they are n$$$ers too.....they will continue to lose.



White folks better listen to Mooney cause it is costing them the food out of their mouths.
 
Top