but thats a woman on your level..thats not tiger's situation. Buk said....Correct.
If the woman is accomplished and has a career you can look at her assets too in a divorce. My ex-wife wanted half of my business, my lawyer said he wanted half of her 401k, so when we both hit 65, she'd have to pay me half of her retirement. She folded.
they dont understand the rule of assets vs liabilities.
women who come into a relationship with nothing think they are equal in skill level and experience to the dude who has cultivated a thriving business. those women will waste or devalue his assets because they have no appreciation for what it takes to get and maintain said assets. to them its free money, house, car, etc. often they feel a sense of privilege and decide they deserve it by virtue of their looks.
Tiger Woods gave $100 million dollars to a baby sitter. he chose badly.
Tiger is a BILLIONAIRE he would have given a 100m to a investment banker...he's not likely to find a woman on his level thats in the age range and looks like the kind of chicks he'd like to fuck. So the idea that he chose poorly is NQR.
This girl in the OP is AUTOMATIC TROPHY WIFE material. She already popped up on every athlete, musician, actor and tech billionaires radar. And she will very likely go from MickyD fries girl to video vixen to D-list actress to WIFE of some kind of athlete or musician..pop out 2 kids and get a multimillion dollar settlement in the divorce (cuz he fucked around on her) by 2030.
And yall will be saying that that dude gave her a 100m+ settlement because he "choose poorly..."
and the beat goes on...