I find it hilarious that that this is an actual issue.So here's the hairy pussy argument from both sides. that I've gathered from forums across the internet.
For:
It's a sign of womanhood.
Against:
It's not hygenic
For:
It looks sexier
Against:
You can't actually see her pussy
For:
It adds a nice touch to nude pics
Against:
It doesn't translate well to modern HD pics.
For:
It does translate well, because many modern pornstars perform with hairy pubes.
Against:
Many retro women had lines of hair up to their navals and substantial hair in their asses
For:
Loving pubic hair doesn't mean being totally against all shaving.
I find it hilarious that that this is an actual issue.
I find it hilarious that that this is an actual issue.
Point takenIf you grew up and they had it then it’s not an issue. If you didn’t grow up and they had it, then generally it’s and issue.
Or some just don’t like it in general. Similar to female armpit hair. If you grew up in Europe or wherever they do that at then it’s normal. If you grew up in America where it’s usually shaved, then you’re grossed out by it.![]()
Point taken
I just find it weird that people go into threads and/or look at pictures of what offends them and will get into multi-page arguments about why their preference is right.
Personally I always hated hairy legs on women. However, if I come across a pic or thread with said women in question, I back out and find something more visually appealing to me.