Buzz Aldrin Reveals Existence of Monolith on Mars Moon
- Thread starter ankhheru
- Start date
oh brother
Damn,
IF this wasn't C-SPAN, IF this wasn't Aldrin himself, I would simply have just been amused. [Skeptic]]I need to see the full program in its' entirety, to make sure it's not a mock for/from some movie or something.[/Skeptic]
Got me wanting to visit an observatory.
It would be REALLY incredible IF John Von Neumann & Arthur Clarke got it right? (see: Von Nuemann probe)
Some backstory, F.Y.I.
The 'Monolith' in Clarke's '2001 Odyssey' is an adaptation of the 'Von Nuemann probe' concept, theorized by John Von Neumann (mathemetician/physicist). Which Clarke used to engender scientific realism as a basis for the 'characters' and plots in his books (Space Odyssey series).
JG
IF this wasn't C-SPAN, IF this wasn't Aldrin himself, I would simply have just been amused. [Skeptic]]I need to see the full program in its' entirety, to make sure it's not a mock for/from some movie or something.[/Skeptic]
Got me wanting to visit an observatory.
It would be REALLY incredible IF John Von Neumann & Arthur Clarke got it right? (see: Von Nuemann probe)
Some backstory, F.Y.I.
The 'Monolith' in Clarke's '2001 Odyssey' is an adaptation of the 'Von Nuemann probe' concept, theorized by John Von Neumann (mathemetician/physicist). Which Clarke used to engender scientific realism as a basis for the 'characters' and plots in his books (Space Odyssey series).
JG
believe it or not
yeah i tried to find the full program but couldnt but cspan is selling the entire program for $29.99. personally i have believed most of what he has been saying all along about being followed and everything else. he actually fights for what he believes is true.
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/FUI36tPKDg4&hl=en&fs=1&[/FLASH]
-
I googled this topic and found an image. Enhanced pics show this actually being a PYRAMID. WOW!!!!!!!!!!!
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...l_img/7252monolith.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.r
http://images.google.com/imgres?img...l_img/7252monolith.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.r
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=7252
That should be the full thing, it's about an hour long.
assist:
i dont know if this is it or not but what ever it is it definitely looks weird. do you have any more information on this picture? it looks like a tall 3 sided object standing on end to me.
thanks, i'll give this a listen this morning.
he made this statement during the question and answer part and the interviewer just breezed right by it as if buzz had given him salutations in passing. why didnt he persue that statement further?
I have been unable to find the transcript some of you were eluding too but the story is interesting non the less.
man I don't know what to believe.
Why didn't they try to land that Mars rover closer to it so it could get better pictures???
I still laugh at this right hook Buzz gave Bart Sibrel after he asserted that Buzz Aldrin never walked on the moon
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/FUI36tPKDg4[/FLASH]
[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/FUI36tPKDg4[/FLASH]
That was awesome.
JG
That isn't Mars genius, it says in the topic title that It's a picture from Mars moon Phobos. It was taken via an orbiter.
Aldrin is well-known for his battle with ...
Apple cider?
Perhaps Mars' gravity would pull the probe too close into its atmosphere rendering the probe trapped..these probes have no real power they operate either through solars power or some gravity sling shot effect and mostly take shots in passing..Most of what NASA does is backwards or theyre just feeding lies..I have a 2oo dollar telescope and can see jupiter saturn venus and mars clearly theyre not telling us the truth man
I found what you were asking for fam, the interview in its entirety.
The interview is a little bit over an hour and I don't have a clue of where at the exact time he states the Mars Monolith but I found the interview.
http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=7252
the video you're looking for is the first video in the link
:::::edit::::
Just realized it was already posted previously. Oh well if you missed that post here it is.
Last edited:
Perhaps Mars' gravity would pull the probe too close into its atmosphere rendering the probe trapped..these probes have no real power they operate either through solars power or some gravity sling shot effect and mostly take shots in passing..Most of what NASA does is backwards or theyre just feeding lies..I have a 2oo dollar telescope and can see jupiter saturn venus and mars clearly theyre not telling us the truth man
I need to start investing into telescopes. I have always been in sheer awe of the heavens.
Relax Fam.
It's just a naturally formed monolith. It's "unusual" because we can't get right up on it to study it and can only examine from a single pic with limited lighting.
Hell, we've got "mysterious" monoliths right here that can be just as "spooky" with the right pic.
But we know what they are and how they were formed. We don't know as much about our 4.5 billion year old satellite.
Peace BGOL
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
It's just a naturally formed monolith. It's "unusual" because we can't get right up on it to study it and can only examine from a single pic with limited lighting.
Hell, we've got "mysterious" monoliths right here that can be just as "spooky" with the right pic.
But we know what they are and how they were formed. We don't know as much about our 4.5 billion year old satellite.
Peace BGOL
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
Same here since a kid I've always seen strange things in the sky, a telescope is one of the best investments you can make, I need to upgrade my telescope and get something where I can upload what I see to my computer..
Lies about what?
Dude said why didn't the Mars Rover land closer to an object that is not located on Mars. It was a dumb question. Or Are you trying to say that they should have landed the Rover on Phobos instead of Mars?
I have a 2oo dollar telescope and can see jupiter saturn venus and mars clearly theyre not telling us the truth man
Telescopes are made for viewing very big, and very bright objects. Not small formations off the surface of planets, satellites, ect.
Hey smokedacane, How do you feel about that John Lear disclosure interview? Its from some years back where he states that earth moon isn't natural, & was towed here. Do you think anything in that disclosure was true?
Yeah I have heard it (been awhile though). Speculation pertaining to whether or not the moon is a natural satellite or was towed here billions of years ago (because some tests have determined the moon is much older than Earth) has been a hotly contested theory even before Lear brought it up. But Lear has said a bunch of off the wall shit that it is hard to take what he says into consideration sometimes.
The difference is, you're comparing apples to oranges though. A moon isn't terra formed through millions of years geo thermal and atmospheric dynamism. Not to mention the strong planetary gravitation that imparts its' on influences to that mix.
Moons are barren with little to no planet-like atmospheric conditions from which to produce 'similar' natural structures. This is why such features are 'curious'.
JG
But OUR moon has been pelted with celestial bodies, throwing dust & debris all over it for eons. THAT much we know.
Stands to reason that the billions of rocks, boulders and/or monoliths that have been flipped here and there on the surface could take the shape of a pyramid and land with the broadside down.....like what we're used to seeing here (man-made or otherwise).
I'm not saying something CAN'T be out there (solar system, galaxy, universe). I'm just saying that geological anomalies don't impress me much (See: The Face on Mars). Simple explainations likely prevail.
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
FIRE POST... And I love that BUZZ ALDRIN Straight Punch... It appeared to shut that idiot ass CAC up.
It's at about the 53:00 minute mark.The host moves on and says we will get back to that but never does.
Someone tell me what is the big deal if we finally, officially verify that there are aliens and there are other planets with life on them?
There is no big deal. If you live in a bubble and careless about the world around you.
It changes how we view the lands we fight over.Someone tell me what is the big deal if we finally, officially verify that there are aliens and there are other planets with life on them?
It changes how we view God/a God.
It changes how we view energy.
It changes how we view the galaxy/universe.
It changes how we think of our world.
It changes how we view ourselves.
Shall I go on?
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
I'm not saying something CAN'T be out there (solar system, galaxy, universe). I'm just saying that geological anomalies don't impress me much (See: The Face on Mars). Simple explainations likely prevail.
D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
I get that, and agree generally regarding the (un)impressive-ness of geological anomalies. It's however not fruitful, scientifically, to lump terrestrially distinct phenomenon together with generalities. The astrophysical events that explain the craters didn't provoke the discussion because those are understood and expected. Whereas, the feature described as the Phobos monolith cannot be accounted for with the same explanation. I don't see a pyramid (which, is a naturally occurring feature . . . under the 'right' conditions). Asteroids and comets impacting a rock like structure can produce (and often do) many shapes depending on the elemental composition, angle of impact, shearing, etc.
However, what I see is an isolated towering rectangular protrusion, that seems to be fairly well formed for an image captured at a distance. I wouldn't ascribe any technological capability to it. BUT a rule of thumb in the physical & natural sciences is nature REPEATS itself. And I see no other similar objects, hence being anomalous. I said all that to say all anomalies are not created equal . . . or are equal I should say. In which case there could be several explanations for this. Perhaps there are many more buried deeper, and THIS one is just tall enough to pierce the surface.
If the photo is genuine, I wouldn't be too quick to glossed over it, because the greater question, how or what event took place that resulted in its' existence, isn't easily explained away by the same things that produce the impact craters. That thing is bizarre.
JG
see, that's that bullshit!!!
YOU know?
Dude, why y'all have to hit y'all set up?
Dude, why do I care if you made it to the moon or not?
WHY BLACK MEN HAVE TO ALWAYS CONTEND WITH ONE ANOTHER?
I'M JUST SAYING...
Dudes want to put up MONOLITHS...Like don't nobody know who did that!!! NA' MEAN?
Cats always on that show off shit!!!!
Putting monoliths on the moon, pyramids on mars...lil show offs!!!
That's a'ight!!
Why I'm trying to get my son to PLUTO!!!
WE GONE HIT THE SET UP!!!
lol....eeeehhhhh.... much props to the black race...eh, TAQBIR...
YOU know?
Dude, why y'all have to hit y'all set up?
Dude, why do I care if you made it to the moon or not?
WHY BLACK MEN HAVE TO ALWAYS CONTEND WITH ONE ANOTHER?
I'M JUST SAYING...
Dudes want to put up MONOLITHS...Like don't nobody know who did that!!! NA' MEAN?
Cats always on that show off shit!!!!
Putting monoliths on the moon, pyramids on mars...lil show offs!!!
That's a'ight!!
Why I'm trying to get my son to PLUTO!!!
WE GONE HIT THE SET UP!!!
lol....eeeehhhhh.... much props to the black race...eh, TAQBIR...