Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

Akademiks inappropriate with 15-year-old boy

I thought TGOL loved pedophiles.. What happened all of a sudden? It took influencers to get y'all to speak against child grooming?
Where's all the 'he lucky' and 'why he snitching dudes at?
 
Complex said:
They aren't media, they're people speaking into their cameras or phones like half the people on this planet do. Like we do on this board.

They took some sort of journalism courses? Have some sort of oath?
Click to expand...

The companies these guys work for are billion dollar media companies. They reach millions of people. They are just as powerful in influencing the public as traditional news sources. Why do you think advertisers pay so much money to be on these platforms? Because they reach and influence people to do things.

Complex said:
Not everyone with a camera or phone is media and should be considered the same.

You consider Andrew Schulz and Charlamagne to be the same as Rachel Maddow or Al Franken, just because you can listen to both on Spotify and Apple?

I have a lot more discernment than that
Click to expand...

LOl your discernment to what you consider media is irrelevant to the general public. For the general public media is all around them "social media" so while you feel you have the logical abilities to discect true news purveyors and shills. Ak has 5 million followers on Insta Rachel got 600K. SO when a guy that reaches that many people does something this abhorent there should be general public outrage just like if Rachel Madow did something abhorent on TV.

I
 
Temujin said:
The companies these guys work for are billion dollar media companies. They reach millions of people. They are just as powerful in influencing the public as traditional news sources. Why do you think advertisers pay so much money to be on these platforms? Because they reach and influence people to do things.



LOl your discernment to what you consider media is irrelevant to the general public. For the general public media is all around them "social media" so while you feel you have the logical abilities to discect true news purveyors and shills. Ak has 5 million followers on Insta Rachel got 600K. SO when a guy that reaches that many people does something this abhorent there should be general public outrage just like if Rachel Madow did something abhorent on TV.

I
Click to expand...

I see your point

but some 14 year old gamer who follows Ak shouldn't the direction of society based on how popular they are online.
 
Complex said:
Not everyone with a camera or phone is media and should be considered the same.

You consider Andrew Schulz and Charlamagne to be the same as Rachel Maddow or Al Franken, just because you can listen to both on Spotify and Apple?

I have a lot more discernment than that
Click to expand...
Bro they are media. They are getting the same money as tv networks are getting.

Ak and kai are paid by labels and companies that were paying the traditional media . It doesnt matter the quality everything u think about traditional media is what they are giving to them. This why Elliot Willson apologized to camron.

Again world have change.

They had a discussion about this on jbp podcast and ur argument was brought and u aint wrong technically but world change bro.

As seen by the link I post they are media
 
Temujin said:
The companies these guys work for are billion dollar media companies. They reach millions of people. They are just as powerful in influencing the public as traditional news sources. Why do you think advertisers pay so much money to be on these platforms? Because they reach and influence people to do things.



LOl your discernment to what you consider media is irrelevant to the general public. For the general public media is all around them "social media" so while you feel you have the logical abilities to discect true news purveyors and shills. Ak has 5 million followers on Insta Rachel got 600K. SO when a guy that reaches that many people does something this abhorent there should be general public outrage just like if Rachel Madow did something abhorent on TV.

I
Click to expand...
All im saying
 
Complex said:
I see your point

but some 14 year old gamer who follows Ak shouldn't the direction of society based on how popular they are online.
Click to expand...
Doesnt matter if that is what makes money. One example who u think is listening to this mumble rap.

Ak has made weak rappers big bag that we didnt even heard of. Bro thr game has changed. When is the last time u watched TV? But people go directly to ak daily for content.
 
keone said:
van loves his manz
Click to expand...

Oh he wanted to try to defend him deep down but he ain't that stupid.

He properly buried him but still not enough.

Like I keep saying...

Notice the energy certain people have to ACTUAL CHILD ABUSE LIVE IN THEIR FACE

As opposed to all the yelling and multiple videos over FAKE RUMORS OF ABUSE.

go back to those defending Puff even AFTER the Cassie video

These people are sh*t
 
playahaitian said:
Oh he wanted to try to defend him deep down but he ain't that stupid.

He properly buried him but still not enough.

Like I keep saying...

Notice the energy certain people have to ACTUAL CHILD ABUSE LIVE IN THEIR FACE

As opposed to all the yelling and multiple videos over FAKE RUMORS OF ABUSE.

go back to those defending Puff even AFTER the Cassie video

These people are sh*t
Click to expand...
i hear u bro
dont forget this the same guy that defended shultz smh lol
 
keone said:
i hear u bro
dont forget this the same guy that defended shultz smh lol
Click to expand...

KABOOM

remember they kept asking what to do?

I told them then...

Erase him. Make his name toxic. Make sure no one stands next him or they get it too.

But they were scared of the white boy.

I hope all this actually puts all these fools in check at least for awhile.

Cause if Schultz pops out AGAIN on a black person? Especially his boy T.rump going full nazi?

And yall still crying just ignore him?

Yeah okay.

F**k Lenard still just so yall remember
 
playahaitian said:
Oh he wanted to try to defend him deep down but he ain't that stupid.

He properly buried him but still not enough.

Like I keep saying...

Notice the energy certain people have to ACTUAL CHILD ABUSE LIVE IN THEIR FACE

As opposed to all the yelling and multiple videos over FAKE RUMORS OF ABUSE.

go back to those defending Puff even AFTER the Cassie video

These people are sh*t
Click to expand...
Van has come out said that both of them (him and Rachel) are going to be more critical of their friends moving forward. prob because of the smoke they caught for not speaking on the Fox Lawsuit (both of them are friends with Joy Taylor, I think rachel is closer than van)
 
dik cashmere said:
Mf’ers be grooming these youngins
Click to expand...

^^^^

That's what I keep telling these dudes

Nothing here new - In and out this Industry

Before we celebrate fake rumors?

We got ALL THESE UNADDRESSED OUT IN THE OPEN REAL ISSUES

this is some sad sex sh*t bring passed down from generation to generation

We gotta stop making excuses for one but excusing the other. It was wrong then and wrong now.

It's all bad.

Yeah okay we can call these new kids sensitive but we should also salute this generation ain't quietly allowing fuckery to continue.

We can't cosign pushing sex on a 14 and 15 year old.

And then expect that kid to not potentially have issues later in relationships.
 
Last edited:
BlackGoku said:
Van has come out said that both of them (him and Rachel) are going to be more critical of their friends moving forward. prob because of the smoke they caught for not speaking on the Fox Lawsuit (both of them are friends with Joy Taylor, I think rachel is closer than van)
Click to expand...
They are both full of shit. And I like Van.

But they are both extremely narrow minded when it comes to certain topics and don’t really listen to understand when someone has a difference of opinion.

And Rachel is just super lame and boring
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top