Re: Albert Einstein Said Racism Is “A Disease Of White People”........... was he wron
Would you say Asians are racist towards blacks?
yeah
![]()
Would you say Asians are racist towards blacks?
yeah
![]()
So are you saying that Africans in their explorations did not classify difference in the different tribes, peoples, and environments they came across.
I find this hard to believe. How would they be able to have trade, build some sort of system of communication between each other, or just simply be civilized amongst one another?
I mean "slavery" did exist within African tribes. They had to have some sort of system in place to say who would be a slave and who would not, a system to explain or quantify difference. As I'm sure the Scandinavians did.
But again, I try not to speak on things I don't know about.
If you say that's the case I'll take your word on it.
I believe I answered your last question already.
It was done to consolidate power within them.
The system of race was done to add "reason" to their agenda.
Would you say Asians are racist towards blacks?
Noticing differences is one thing. Creating a system of classification to make another human being not human is another thing.
Race was created to make it seem that Africans were not really human.
They were more like animals.
Therefore it was ok to have them enslaved.
And if it was ok then the wealth that they generated was ok to keep.
But to keep it, a system need to be created that keeps that line of thought in place........ and that birthed racism i.e. race and white advantage being preserved throughout all elements of society, the education system, financial system, religion etc...
![]()
No.
I would say that they can be prejudice.
i.e. pre-judging black people as a group
A racist is one who maintains or benefits from racism.
Racism is a system created to extend & preserve unfair advantages gained by whites.
![]()
Kaya, back and forth global travel wasn't perfected until the concept of race was created.
For example, we have no idea what Native Americans would have done if they had perfected back and forth global travel. They very well could have created racism.
Slavery is in the bible. It wasn't created in the 1400s. Also, it's clear that ethnic cleansing was cool back then(biblical times). I know you don't believe in the bible, but many on here hold it up as truth. Black Hebrews and what not.
So if those black Hebrews that committed ethnic cleansing and genocide could travel the globe in a back and forth manner, what would have happened to people who didn't get down with their shit?
And I agree with the bolded parts.
Where we disagree, apparently, is that it can't be assumed by someone else.
That racism cannot be practiced by anyone else that is not white.
Much more, that their racism cannot enact institutional discrimination against anyone else.
I simply disagree.
I've tried to give evidence of this and was rebuffed but have no received a viable explanation why it is rebuffed other than blacks are not capable racism if racism is defined as hate towards another not like yourself based on race or ethnicity.
1) I will say personally that I believe in theory any race could take over and discriminate against other races in similar fashion to white supremacy, but it has not happened and in all honesty if it did happen it would be retribution... not a natural inclination. Why is it that races of all kinds have interacted and traded with each other with out racism until white influence?
2) Your example is infighting between ethnic groups which isn't the same as racism and the sad part is that you probably think you can interchange their meaning. Which would be equivalent to to trying to make a fight between two bull dykes about sexism.
3) Please if your aren't white. Let's give white people their credit and ride with their definition of racism. English is their language and racism is their social construct after all. I think they would be the experts that would set you straight about a ethnic group not being the same as race or if they were trying to squirm out of an argument about racism they would pull the intellectually dishonest move of trying to redefine words...![]()
And I agree with the bolded parts.
Where we disagree, apparently, is that it can't be assumed by someone else.
That racism cannot be practiced by anyone else that is not white.
Much more, that their racism cannot enact institutional discrimination against anyone else.
I simply disagree.
I've tried to give evidence of this and was rebuffed but have no received a viable explanation why it is rebuffed other than blacks are not capable racism if racism is defined as hate towards another not like yourself based on race or ethnicity.
Evidence or shut tha fuck up its that simple.Everybody is racisr. It is human nature. lol @ some of yall. Most of the people on here ar the most racist people I have ever seen.
lol I don't need evidence. Most of yall are worse than most people I know. Acting like black people cant be racist gets a lol from me. too funny.Evidence or shut tha fuck up its that simple.
1) I will say personally that I believe in theory any race could take over and discriminate against other races in similar fashion to white supremacy, but it has not happened and in all honesty if it did happen it would be retribution... not a natural inclination. Why is it that races of all kinds have interacted and traded with each other with out racism until white influence?
2) Your example is infighting between ethnic groups which isn't the same as racism and the sad part is that you probably think you can interchange their meaning. Which would be equivalent to to trying to make a fight between two bull dykes about sexism.
3) Please if your aren't white. Let's give white people their credit and ride with their definition of racism. English is their language and racism is their social construct after all. I think they would be the experts that would set you straight about a ethnic group not being the same as race or if they were trying to squirm out of an argument about racism they would pull the intellectually dishonest move of trying to redefine words...
This my last post on this, because we all know better and those that don't... aren't up to par for this anyway.
Exactly you don't have anything now roll your pasty ass tha fuck off this forum.Storm Front is that way------------------>lol I don't need evidence. Most of yall are worse than most people I know. Acting like black people cant be racist gets a lol from me. too funny.
Evidence or shut tha fuck up its that simple.
These fools acting like I only limited them to 2 weeks in history.I gave them since tha beginning of recorded history until 2012 and they can't produce 1 single instance but yet they run their mouths like they are making a point.![]()
mahfuckas doin the gump on ya!!
run forrest run!!!
they just saying any ol shit, just to be sayin any ol shit..
race, ethnicity, being used interchange
they cant provide ONE example of blacks treating whites like animals based on skin color alone...
but they will run around that summabytch like its the gotdamn olympic steeple chase race!!
the mere fact that there is no such thing as white on white violence in the media in a fine example of psychological mind fuckery white racist bullshit attack on the black mind!!
Exactly you don't have anything now roll your pasty ass tha fuck off this forum.Storm Front is that way------------------>
Global travel?
Who perfected this and when?
There was no global travel so that can't be a factor.
There was only regional travel e.g. European travelled to Timbuktu, Alexandria etc. to learn.
The silk route existed to India etc...
In fact there was more travel by non-Europeans than there were travels by Europeans.
The concept of race was created in the 1600's.
If you want to point out the concept of race before 1600's please share, I always like to learn.
![]()
Read what I said. What group of people had perfected global travel before 1600?
Not one group of people. NONE(at least in the last 5,000 years of recorded history). It's easy as fuck to go one way, but who went back and forth around the globe in any consistent manner?
The group that perfected it invented racism to gain and keep power. They basically set WESTERN Europe loose on the world.
Just because he was brilliant doesn't mean he can't be wrong.
Being ahead in your field of choice doesn't make you wise on all matters.
Anyone can have the "disease" of racism.
Anyone can hate.
![]()
mahfuckas doin the gump on ya!!
run forrest run!!!
they just saying any ol shit, just to be sayin any ol shit..
race, ethnicity, being used interchange
they cant provide ONE example of blacks treating whites like animals based on skin color alone...
but they will run around that summabytch like its the gotdamn olympic steeple chase race!!
the mere fact that there is no such thing as white on white violence in the media in a fine example of psychological mind fuckery white racist bullshit attack on the black mind!!
Thoughts and actions are two different things to compare what Asians "think" to what white ppl have done to black ppl is beyond insane
lol tell em why you mad. Like I said everyone is racist. That is nothing new.
Definition of RACISM
1
: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
lol I don't need evidence. Most of yall are worse than most people I know. Acting like black people cant be racist gets a lol from me. too funny.
Which group perfect it?
You lost me with your timelines
What point in time did they perfect global travel? Was this before or after race was created?
![]()
I answered some of these in replying to Kayanation.
The rest like I said will just continue to cause us to go round and round because we disagree on a particular concept that is a strong basis for both of our arguments.
Additionally you are asking me something that requires thought and time because it is a loaded question. I suppose in the future I can make a separate thread about it and we can hash it out there.
bro you can't be sure and unaware at the same time...
'Race' only exist because the people (whites) who created race spread the idea of race to other cultures by way of colonialism . 'Race' was created to categorize people by physical features. In other words 'race' was created to separate whites from the rest of the world.
People change not the definition. How are words defined? Words has no meaning until you define it by its function or how it works. When people takes the idea of race and makes it a reality by practicing it, then constructs a system based on the practice then you have racism.
Whites created the idea of race. Whites practiced the idea of race. Whites created a system based on the practice (racism). Every non-white is the 'collateral damage' of the practice.
Blacks, Indians, Asians, Mexicans, and every other non-whites are collateral damage of the practice of racism by whites.
The 'collateral damage' is a result of racism. Any other non-white culture that carries this idea of racism can only be prejudice because racism was never meant for any other group except whites.
1) I will say personally that I believe in theory any race could take over and discriminate against other races in similar fashion to white supremacy, but it has not happened and in all honesty if it did happen it would be retribution... not a natural inclination. Why is it that races of all kinds have interacted and traded with each other with out racism until white influence?
2) Your example is infighting between ethnic groups which isn't the same as racism and the sad part is that you probably think you can interchange their meaning. Which would be equivalent to to trying to make a fight between two bull dykes about sexism.
3) Please if your aren't white. Let's give white people their credit and ride with their definition of racism. English is their language and racism is their social construct after all. I think they would be the experts that would set you straight about a ethnic group not being the same as race or if they were trying to squirm out of an argument about racism they would pull the intellectually dishonest move of trying to redefine words...
This my last post on this, because we all know better and those that don't... aren't up to par for this anyway.
It can not be practice by other non-whites because the creation of racism was also the creation of white supremacy, which implements the nature of superiority over all others.
Racism is white supremacy and white supremacy is racism.
x (the creation of racism) = y (white supremacy)
y (white supremacy) = x (racism)
There are no other solutions. Both are equal. Anything other variable (non-whites) is trivial (equal to 0).
If any other ethic group tries to implement a system of racism it will be trivial because there is no solution. They will be only a variable to the context of racism. If any other ethnic group tries to practice racism it will be trivial because racism is white supremacy and non-white supremacy does not equal racism.
You stated that the concept of race was started in the 1600s. By that time, Europeans were traveling back and forth around the globe like it wasn't shit. They used racism to justify fucking over all the native peoples they found. Racism was used from Australia to the Americas to Africa and even in Asia.
Racism was used to justify taking land and resources from people. Without global travel, Europeans just beef along ethnic and tribal lines just like everyone else in the world.