The Big Story - Seekr
An in-depth look at the issues, culture and personalities shaping Canada today.
Anyone investing heavily this year??
- Thread starter rph2005
- Start date
The Big Story - Seekr
An in-depth look at the issues, culture and personalities shaping Canada today.thebigstorypodcast.ca
Me personally I don't care to speculate cause it does no good besides getting people panties in a bunch, but what I will say is 2025 will be an interesting year!!
Who on the board is jumping on the XRP hype train?
Analyst ratings (from ChatGPT)
Stock analyst ratings are recommendations given by analysts based on their assessment of a company's stock. Here’s a breakdown of common terms:
Stock analyst ratings are recommendations given by analysts based on their assessment of a company's stock. Here’s a breakdown of common terms:
- Buy: The analyst believes the stock is a good investment and will likely increase in value. It suggests buying it now because it’s undervalued or has strong future growth potential.
- Outperform (or Overweight): The analyst expects the stock to perform better than the overall market or a particular benchmark over time. The stock may not necessarily be undervalued, but its growth prospects are stronger than the market average.
- Overweight: Often used in comparison to a specific index. It means the stock has more importance in the portfolio relative to its weight in the index because it’s expected to perform better.
- Hold (or Neutral, or Equal Weight): The analyst believes the stock’s current price is fair and doesn’t expect significant movement up or down in the near future. It’s a recommendation to neither buy nor sell the stock.
- Underperform (or Underweight): The analyst expects the stock to do worse than the market or a particular index. It suggests reducing the stock's position as it may not yield as much return as other stocks.
- Sell: The analyst believes the stock’s price will decrease, so it’s a good time to sell before losing value.
You should’ve done that 12 months ago it’s too late now.
Was on it and didn't even know until yesterday. Haven't check my crypto in forever. I need it to keep going up.
Damn! The one day I don't check out anything stock related until after lunch and this happens. WTF, lol. What does that mean for foundry? Are they gonna replace him with another engineer or a finance/sales guy? I'll always remember his $AMD rearview mirror quote:
Intel CEO Gelsinger Says AMD Is "In the Rear-View Mirror" After Alder Lake
The war of words escalates.
"Alder Lake. All of a sudden...Boom! We are back in the game," exclaims the impish tech CEO. "AMD in the rearview mirror in clients [consumer market]," he adds, "and never again will they be in the windshield; we are just leading the market."
Pat Gelsinger's exit as Intel's CEO raises questions about whether the company's manufacturing roadmap is still on track, Raymond James analysts say in a research note. Gelsinger had been the driving force behind Intel's manufacturing roadmap and Foundry strategy, the analysts say. With his departure, the analysts are left wondering whether the beleaguered company will split up its Product and Foundry businesses, which they consider to possibly be the best option for Intel given the amount of potential value it would unlock. - WSJWas on it and didn't even know until yesterday. Haven't check my crypto in forever. I need it to keep going up.
Damn! The one day I don't check out anything stock related until after lunch and this happens. WTF, lol. What does that mean for foundry? Are they gonna replace him with another engineer or a finance/sales guy? I'll always remember his $AMD rearview mirror quote:
Intel CEO Gelsinger Says AMD Is "In the Rear-View Mirror" After Alder Lake
The war of words escalates.www.tomshardware.com
"Alder Lake. All of a sudden...Boom! We are back in the game," exclaims the impish tech CEO. "AMD in the rearview mirror in clients [consumer market]," he adds, "and never again will they be in the windshield; we are just leading the market."
Anyone tracking nuclear fission companies? I see Sam Altman's $OKLO has a nice couple weeks.
Oklo Inc. - Home
www.oklo.com
The CEO seems to know his stuff. He was talking like they are doing it now, but their end product has not been fleshed out yet. They have concepts and ideas.
My initial take is the public doesn't understand the maturity of this company or the end product they plan to provide. All they hear is "nuclear". The market movement seems to be based on hype and hope, not facts.
The risk is apparent on this one. I will buy into if it dips back down to 17 or so for swing trades. Not a long term hold until they provide better tangibles.
EDIT: Here is the short report on OKLO - https://www.kerrisdalecap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/OKLO-Kerrisdale.pdf
Last edited:
It went from 5.65 to 24.00 in 3 months... I'm waiting for a pullback.
I'm ready for CNBC to switch to Bluesky.
I agree.
Doubt it, I expect all these news corps to be kissing Trump's ass for the next 4 years.
A very good breakdown on intel from the 28-second mark to the one-minute mark.Was on it and didn't even know until yesterday. Haven't check my crypto in forever. I need it to keep going up.
Damn! The one day I don't check out anything stock related until after lunch and this happens. WTF, lol. What does that mean for foundry? Are they gonna replace him with another engineer or a finance/sales guy? I'll always remember his $AMD rearview mirror quote:
Intel CEO Gelsinger Says AMD Is "In the Rear-View Mirror" After Alder Lake
The war of words escalates.
"Alder Lake. All of a sudden...Boom! We are back in the game," exclaims the impish tech CEO. "AMD in the rearview mirror in clients [consumer market]," he adds, "and never again will they be in the windshield; we are just leading the market."
Good interview. Agree on Google too.
Delaware judge reaffirms ruling that Tesla must revoke Elon Musk’s multibillion-dollar pay package
By —
Randall Chase, Associated Press
DOVER, Del. (AP) — A Delaware judge has reaffirmed her ruling that Tesla must revoke Elon Musk’s multibillion-dollar pay package
Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick on Monday denied a request by attorneys for Musk and Tesla’s corporate directors to vacate her ruling earlier this year requiring the company to rescind the unprecedented pay package.
McCormick also rejected an equally unprecedented and massive fee request by plaintiff attorneys, who argued that they were entitled to legal fees in the form of Tesla stock valued at more than $5 billion. The judge said the attorneys were entitled to a fee award of $345 million.
The rulings came in a lawsuit filed by a Tesla stockholder who challenged Musk’s 2018 compensation package.
McCormick concluded in January that Musk engineered the landmark pay package in sham negotiations with directors who were not independent. The compensation package initially carried a potential maximum value of about $56 billion, but that sum has fluctuated over the years based on Tesla’s stock price.
Following the court ruling, Tesla shareholders met in June and ratified Musk’s 2018 pay package for a second time, again by an overwhelming margin.
Defense attorneys then argued that the second vote makes clear that Tesla shareholders, with full knowledge of the flaws in the 2018 process that McCormick pointed out, were adamant that Musk is entitled to the pay package. They asked the judge to vacate her order directing Tesla to rescind the pay package.
McCormick, who seemed skeptical of the defense arguments during an August hearing, said in Monday’s ruling that those arguments were fatally flawed.
“The large and talented group of defense firms got creative with the ratification argument, but their unprecedented theories go against multiple strains of settled law,” McCormick wrote in a 103-page opinion.
The judge noted, among other things, that a stockholder vote standing alone cannot ratify a conflicted-controller transaction.
“Even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here due to multiple, material misstatements in the proxy statement,” she added.
Meanwhile, McCormick found that the $5.6 billion fee request by the shareholder’s attorneys, which at one time approached $7 billion based on Tesla’s trading price, went too far.
“In a case about excessive compensation, that was a bold ask,” McCormick wrote.
Attorneys for the Tesla shareholder argue that their work resulted in the “massive” benefit of returning shares to Tesla that otherwise would have gone to Musk and diluted the stock held by other Tesla investors. They value that benefit at $51.4 billion, using the difference between the stock price at the time of McCormick’s January ruling and the strike price of some 304 million stock options granted to Musk.
While finding that the methodology used to calculate the fee request was sound, the judge noted that the Delaware’s Supreme Court has noted that fee award guidelines “must yield to the greater policy concern of preventing windfalls to counsel.”
“The fee award here must yield in this way, because $5.6 billion is a windfall no matter the methodology used to justify it,” McCormick wrote. A fee award of $345 million, she said, was “an appropriate sum to reward a total victory.”
The fee award amounts to almost exactly half the current record $688 million in legal fees awarded in 2008 in litigation stemming from the collapse of Enron.
Delaware judge reaffirms ruling that Tesla must revoke Elon Musk's multibillion-dollar pay package
The judge on Monday also rejected an equally unprecedented and massive fee request by plaintiff attorneys.
www.pbs.org
@HellBoy @DC_Dude
This was a quote from the Wall Street Journal article that I was reading.
“This is a thorough smackdown of Musk’s ratification theory,” said Brian Quinn, a law professor at Boston College, of the judge’s latest opinion. If the court had recognized the second shareholder vote, it would create a “get out of jail free” for any CEO seeking to overturn a judge’s opinion, he said.
“The court wasn’t having any of it,” Quinn added.
Last edited:
Solid interview. Love Google
The video is three months old, and she purchased it when it was priced at six dollars. However, the price has since increased significantly, reaching nearly twenty-five dollars. Time in the market beats timing the market.
I would love for us to set up a Discord or Telegram group for the BGOL members or any like-minded people. I have the two apps on my phone, but I don’t really use them that much and therefore not really familiar with how to properly set up a channel.
@DC_Dude @HellBoy @Aww Skeet Skeet! @Madrox
@DC_Dude @HellBoy @Aww Skeet Skeet! @Madrox
I posted it for the data points mentioned. I dont advocate for Cathy Woods, I low key hate her.
I think it was suggested in the past. A discord group would be helpful for real time market action alerts. Im not sure how many of us are online like that all day. I day trade, so Im around every morning until noon.
Yeah good idea.
Dude is boring and never says anything substantial. He is being used by algos to manipulate the stocks.
He has to be that way. The SEC is just waiting for an excuse...