82.1% she in right?
78 members voted
78 members voted
somebody keep an eye on this i gotta run out for a few hours ..
slam wants an actual 80 votes. not 80%.82.1% she in right?
78 members voted
slam wants an actual 80 votes. not 80%.
The poll needs to be set up so we can see who voting. Lurkers are having too much influence and they only need 22 assholes to co-sign.
The poll needs to be set up so we can see who voting. Lurkers are having too much influence and they only need 22 assholes to co-sign. This one gonna set off a civil war.
I asked her if I could come eat her pussy when I was in Atlanta. She thought I was joking. I was not . I’d be her designated pussy and asshole eater . She could just jerk me off we didn’t have to have intercourse . Just a nice 69 session. I miss her. She was a good friend and potential lover.
This is the twilight zone.
I understand the math, but I feel like there also needs to be a minimum turn out number
@4 Dimensional you the expert.
How is the FAIREST way to do these polls?
Like what should the MINIMUM number of participants be?
How LONG should the poll be active?
What percentage should be sufficient for entry into the Hall?
First 100 votes. 80 yes or 21 no whichever comes first.Is this out of 100 votes only?
Run the requirements by me.
Is this out of 100 votes only?
Run the requirements by me.
I don't remember her either. Based on that I would have voted no.i don’t remember her, I wasn’t gonna vote because I don’t know who or why I’m voting but once I saw the above post she gets a yes from me
The person I really feel bad for though is @Dr. Truth.
That dude poured his heart out in this thread and confessed to wanting to do all that shit only for homegirl to end up being a 2nd ballot hall of famer
First 100 votes. 80 yes or 21 no whichever comes first.
@slam is running this so he can confirm
but from WHAT I UNDERSTAND
He wants 80 votes and then the majority wins
@BigDaddyBuk is that right?
Doesn’t make sense to run it that way unless you use the same 100 people every time.
Why not run the polls for 2 to 5 days and let the majority votes be inducted? And require a minimum of 80 as the qualifier. If they dont met the minimum votes, but wins the majority after the poll closes, they shouldn’t be automatically disqualified, but reserved for later dates.
Doesn’t make sense to run it that way unless you use the same 100 people every time.
Why not run the polls for 2 to 5 days and let the majority votes be inducted? And require a minimum of 80 as the qualifier. If they dont met the minimum votes, but wins the majority after the poll closes, they shouldn’t be automatically disqualified, but reserved for later dates.
The system now seems to be working.Doesn’t make sense to run it that way unless you use the same 100 people every time.
Why not run the polls for 2 to 5 days and let the majority votes be inducted? And require a minimum of 80 as the qualifier. If they dont met the minimum votes, but wins the majority after the poll closes, they shouldn’t be automatically disqualified, but reserved for later dates.
Wait I think another issue is that the list of inductees is SO LARGE slam wanted to try to knock them out at a quicker pace
but I don;lt think 48 hours should be an issue
again I have to formally submit these requests to the sensei.
The system now seems to be working.
What folks are mad at is the no vote especially when people dont know who they are voting no on. They should abstain or do some homework to make a real decision.Do you think the system is flawed?
If it's working no need to change anything.
Do you think the system is flawed?
If it's working no need to change anything.