Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

***BGOL Hall of Fame Voting***...[ Princess Reeshe ]..."DENIED INDUCTION !!"

Is she a 1st Ballot Hall of Famer

  • Total voters
    97
  • Poll closed .
cli-terminator

cli-terminator

Retired ManWhore
BGOL Investor
The primary flaws I see with the voting is the understanding that this is for 1st ballot HOF not overall HOF. Combine that with the fact that some of the nominees are only recognized by OGs, we have skewed voting taking place because some of the voters have no knowledge or experience with the nominees but are still allowed to vote on them resulting. Unfortunately I have no idea how to rectify that issue. Just recognizing & pointing out the inherent flaws itself.
 
4 Dimensional

4 Dimensional

Rising Star
Platinum Member
code_pirahna said:
What folks are mad at is the no vote especially when people dont know who they are voting no on. They should abstain or do some homework to make a real decision.
Click to expand...
playahaitian said:
It's working

me not liking the results is not an accurate decider

However I wondered with the troll votes is there any way to perhaps

have a "margin for error"

there are OBVIOUS bullsh*t NO votes that skew the overall numbers and percentages.
Click to expand...

If the no votes are the issue, then the only way to negate that is to not set a threshold on the "no" votes.

Keep the 80/20 system, but don't let the "no" votes determine the outcome immediately.

Run for 48 hours. If it gets to 80 "yes" votes before 20 "no" votes, then make it an automatic induction.

If "no" votes reach 20 before 80 "yes" votes, then continue to run the poll for the rest of the 48 hours and determine the induction on an 80% threshold. For example, at the end of 48 hours, there are 147 total votes, then 118 "yes" votes are needed to make induction. That can negate possible trolling on the "no" votes and Slam can keep his original 80% threshold.
 
playahaitian

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
4 Dimensional said:
If the no votes are the issue, then the only way to negate that is to not set a threshold on the "no" votes.

Keep the 80/20 system, but don't let the "no" votes determine the outcome immediately.

Run for 48 hours. If it gets to 80 "yes" votes before 20 "no" votes, then make it an automatic induction.

If "no" votes reach 20 before 80 "yes" votes, then continue to run the poll for the rest of the 48 hours and determine the induction on an 80% threshold. For example, at the end of 48 hours, there are 147 total votes, then 118 "yes" votes are needed to make induction. That can negate possible trolling on the "no" votes and Slam can keep his original 80% threshold.
Click to expand...

damn I LIKE this!!!!!!!
 
cli-terminator

cli-terminator

Retired ManWhore
BGOL Investor
4 Dimensional said:
If the no votes are the issue, then the only way to negate that is to not set a threshold on the "no" votes.

Keep the 80/20 system, but don't let the "no" votes determine the outcome immediately.

Run for 48 hours. If it gets to 80 "yes" votes before 20 "no" votes, then make it an automatic induction.

If "no" votes reach 20 before 80 "yes" votes, then continue to run the poll for the rest of the 48 hours and determine the induction on an 80% threshold. For example, at the end of 48 hours, there are 147 total votes, then 118 "yes" votes are needed to make induction. That can negate possible trolling on the "no" votes and Slam can keep his original 80% threshold.
Click to expand...
Well shit solved the flaw I pointed out a few posts earlier. That's why you're the mathematician & I'm just a BGOL porn viewer who hates Nissans :lol:
 
4 Dimensional

4 Dimensional

Rising Star
Platinum Member
cli-terminator said:
Well shit solved the flaw I pointed out a few posts earlier. That's why you're the mathematician & I'm just a BGOL porn viewer who hates Nissans :lol:
Click to expand...

:lol:

Not even going to front. I think I’m kind of impressed with myself on that one. After I read it, I was like “damn, that doesn’t sound too bad.”

My current algebra class will be doing something similar as this voting process. It’s just ratios and proportions.
 
4 Dimensional

4 Dimensional

Rising Star
Platinum Member
playahaitian said:
damn I LIKE this!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

And if “yes” votes doesn’t make it to 80 votes and “no” votes doesn’t make it to 20 at the end of 48 hours, then induction should be denied even if “yes” votes still makes the 80% threshold.

For example, out of 86 total votes, there are 69 “yes” votes. That’s technically 80%, but the “yes” votes did surpass the required minimum of 80 “yes” votes, do induction should be denied.
 
Dr. Truth

Dr. Truth

QUACK!
BGOL Investor
4 Dimensional said:
And if “yes” votes doesn’t make it to 80 votes and “no” votes doesn’t make it to 20 at the end of 48 hours, then induction should be denied even if “yes” votes still makes the 80% threshold.

For example, out of 86 total votes, there are 69 “yes” votes. That’s technically 80%, but the “yes” votes did surpass the required minimum of 80 “yes” votes, do induction should be denied.
Click to expand...
What a shitty system
 
code_pirahna

code_pirahna

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
4 Dimensional said:
If the no votes are the issue, then the only way to negate that is to not set a threshold on the "no" votes.

Keep the 80/20 system, but don't let the "no" votes determine the outcome immediately.

Run for 48 hours. If it gets to 80 "yes" votes before 20 "no" votes, then make it an automatic induction.

If "no" votes reach 20 before 80 "yes" votes, then continue to run the poll for the rest of the 48 hours and determine the induction on an 80% threshold. For example, at the end of 48 hours, there are 147 total votes, then 118 "yes" votes are needed to make induction. That can negate possible trolling on the "no" votes and Slam can keep his original 80% threshold.
Click to expand...
Good idea but I think the current system should stay for the integrity of the others who were denied.
 
BlackGoku

BlackGoku

Rising Star
Platinum Member
cli-terminator said:
The primary flaws I see with the voting is the understanding that this is for 1st ballot HOF not overall HOF. Combine that with the fact that some of the nominees are only recognized by OGs, we have skewed voting taking place because some of the voters have no knowledge or experience with the nominees but are still allowed to vote on them resulting. Unfortunately I have no idea how to rectify that issue. Just recognizing & pointing out the inherent flaws itself.
Click to expand...

I said this in another thread...are we going to get a redo because this makes no sense..like a lot of these young cats don't understand the impact these women had on the board..it's like basketball, "I don't see why Oscar Robertson is such a big deal" :hmm:
 
peterlongshort

peterlongshort

Rising Star
Platinum Member
slam said:
dam ...denied ...:fuckyousay:
Click to expand...
tenor.gif
 
playahaitian

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
slam said:
dam ...denied ...:fuckyousay:
Click to expand...

this is some ole bullsh*t sensei

I asked @4 Dimensional for help cause you working damn hard for this and I feel like just a few jerks messing it up

.
4 Dimensional said:
If the no votes are the issue, then the only way to negate that is to not set a threshold on the "no" votes.

Keep the 80/20 system, but don't let the "no" votes determine the outcome immediately.

Run for 48 hours. If it gets to 80 "yes" votes before 20 "no" votes, then make it an automatic induction.

If "no" votes reach 20 before 80 "yes" votes, then continue to run the poll for the rest of the 48 hours and determine the induction on an 80% threshold. For example, at the end of 48 hours, there are 147 total votes, then 118 "yes" votes are needed to make induction. That can negate possible trolling on the "no" votes and Slam can keep his original 80% threshold.
Click to expand...
 
playahaitian

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
code_pirahna said:
Good idea but I think the current system should stay for the integrity of the others who were denied.
Click to expand...

I disagree

if the integrity is ALREADY being questioned

why not FIX IT now?

and we can also continue on and have those denied given another shot

so its all fair.
 
playahaitian

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
code_pirahna said:
The thing is though folks have to be allowed to vote how they like though. No votes count also
Click to expand...

Of course.

But no pun intended

But its like porn i can't define it but i know it when i see it

Dudes trolling its obvious
 
Last edited:
Bullet

Bullet

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
TEN said:
What??

I give the fuck up on these bullshit ass threads, this will be the very last one you'll see me in

I hate you bgol niggas
Click to expand...
Yeah I'm done with this bullshit. Put who y'all want in this Hall of Fame. It gets the Astrick for the Corona virus hof
 
code_pirahna

code_pirahna

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
playahaitian said:
Of course.

But no pun intended

But its like porn i can't define it but i know it when i see it

Dudes trolling its obvious
Click to expand...
The trolling part is bad. I do think a lot of the no votes though is that people dont have any clue who they are voting on. In that case I wish they would abstain or atleast do enough homework to make a good decision.
 
playahaitian

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
code_pirahna said:
The trolling part is bad. I do think a lot of the no votes though is that people dont have any clue who they are voting on. In that case I wish they would abstain or atleast do enough homework to make a good decision.
Click to expand...

all I'm saying fam...

so that is why I liked @4 Dimensional system to reduce the effect of No votes.
 
papi68

papi68

Rising Star
Platinum Member
BigDaddyBuk said:
this is not an instance of an electoral college at all.

all of this is based on sports HOF induction, baseball journalists vote for baseball's HOF. a 48 person group of media members vote for the football HOF. it should be similar here.
Click to expand...
Nah, some cats are saying that some people’s votes should count more or less than others. That’s on some delegate superdelegate shit since we’re in election season.
 
BigDaddyBuk

BigDaddyBuk

still not dizzy.
Platinum Member
papi68 said:
Nah, some cats are saying that some people’s votes should count more or less than others. That’s on some delegate superdelegate shit since we’re in election season.
Click to expand...
then why did you quote me?

and you shouldnt vote at all cause youse a sour heman woman haters club type round here.
 
Mo-Better

Mo-Better

The R&B Master
OG Investor
4 Dimensional said:
:lol:

Not even going to front. I think I’m kind of impressed with myself on that one. After I read it, I was like “damn, that doesn’t sound too bad.”

My current algebra class will be doing something similar as this voting process. It’s just ratios and proportions.
Click to expand...
Yeah that Fisher-Price PC has got it going on. :rolleyes: That 80/20 is the shit. Let's see if the management is willing to adopt a slight change. :yes:

S/B less labor intensive and that's always a good thing.
 
slam

slam

aka * My Name Is Not $lam *
Super Moderator
lol...jus got around to reading all the replies ...

we are taking this way too seriously ...:lol:

2nd i`m staying with the current system yes it`s not perfect but it`s close enuff

and giving it 48 hrs is way too much time and we got way too many ho`s to get to ...

and it seems like we want to fix it to get a desired outcome cuz couple of our faves didnt get in ...lol
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top