I was talking to my Chinese handler, all this talk about 50% ownership or forced sale of TikTok has gotten them pissed off.
DeepSeek, new AI model from China, it's the new rival to the US AIs. It's a game changer: you can sign up today and it's open sourced! It's free.
- Thread starter World B Free
- Start date
I was talking to my Chinese handler, all this talk about 50% ownership or forced sale of TikTok has gotten them pissed off.
Berkley AI research team claims to reproduce DeepSeek core technologies for $30
An AI research team from the University of California, Berkeley, led by Ph.D. candidate Jiayi Pan, claims to have reproduced DeepSeek R1-Zero’s core technologies for just $30, showing how advanced models could be implemented affordably. According to Jiayi Pan on Nitter, their team reproduced DeepSeek R1-Zero in the Countdown game, and the small language model, with its 3 billion parameters, developed self-verification and search abilities through reinforcement learning.
DeepSeek R1's cost advantage seems real. Not looking good for OpenAI.
china spends billions hacking US, well, everything and folks gonna trust some software from them? Okay.
Nope. There are intelligent people outside of the United States, also, don't fall for the U.S. okie doke.
”competition is for losers” ! cac’s mind is still there …
cacs better realize they‘ll face competition in any given aspects of their lives ANY ! this ain’t those 1800s years !
Yup, their time is ending and they're throwing tantrums like a child in aisle nine at Walmart. & their ending is not gonna be pretty, because their arrogance is frothing into violence; that's what they do when they can't have their way: they kill and maim. I'm glad this uni-polar world is ending, because the US is a dishonest broker and criminal steward of the world.
Like I said several pages ago America will find a way to push propaganda about the other company and have a campaign trying to convince folks that they are evil and a problem for the American people.. rinse and repeat.. if America can’t literally kill their competition they will demonize them… white men don’t believe in people having options they want to monopolize everything for themselves
Yup, & Donald Trump embodies the id of White America; they deserve him. When I hear Donald whine about DEI, that's White America who is afraid of competition. Now the progressive DEI world is at America's doorstep and that multi-polar world cannot be denied: it wants what coming to it. Africa wants to control their natural resources, the Arabs are rising against Israel, and China is taking the economic lead in the world; however the United States and Europe are floundering, hoping their white skins will save them. But they don't realize that World Majority has wised-up and realizes that the future is theirs.
Shit Biden joked about in the 90’s is reality now but not the way he figured it would be
What did Biden joke about in the 90s?
This what he said then
This report came out a couple months back
I can see what you're saying now. Thanks for the posts.
Yup, the United States is a bunch of hypocrites. Nato expansion is just a code word for expanding the American Empire, that's it. What if Russia wanted a military alliance with Mexico and wanted to bring their missiles to the border of Mexico then what would the United States say, huh?
That's what's going on with the Ukraine, the US is at Russia's doorstep and Russia is telling the US to get off my doorstep and outta my dayummm yard.
I thought you knew better than this but I guess not.
china is a military dictatorship and any "smart people" there are doing what they're told. Best believe the MSS got them on lock.
china has hundreds of thousands, probably millions of people engaged in military and industrial hacking. Social media manipulation too.
Their activities are so widespread they've outsourced to India and at least 4 Afrikan countries.
Do whatever you want but don't say you haven't been warned.
Believe that propaganda, bro. Eat it up! Just remember the United States is a global empire with 800 military bases globally and they're trying to hinder the growth of BRICS and the global south in general. Google BRICS and the Uni-polar world. What the United States is really afraid of is a multi-polar world....& that's why you're not understand in the engulfing of your US propaganda, but eat it up like McDonald's: you're lovin' it!
Last edited:
Very interesting app. 
Which countries would be best to move back to in Africa?
It's a preference thing. I would check out vlogs -
of Black Americans already living there and see if the daily scenes interest you. Then a proper visit to the countries of your choice to see everything in person.
Hmmm.... some in congress are a little... shook:
www.yahoo.com
DeepSeek download to be criminalized in US, could mean 20 years in prison, $100M fine
Kaif Shaikh
Mon, February 3, 2025 at 4:49 PM EST3 min read
A newly introduced bill from Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) is drawing attention for its unprecedented severity in restricting Chinese artificial intelligence (AI), specifically targeting technologies like DeepSeek.
The bill, which Hawley filed last week, intends to “prohibit United States persons from advancing artificial intelligence capabilities within the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.” Analysts say the proposed legislation, if passed, could effectively outlaw the use of DeepSeek, the emerging Chinese AI competitor, within the United States.
Key provisions and consequences for DeepSeek download
Under Hawley’s proposed law, “technology or intellectual property” developed in China would be barred from importation into the U.S. Anyone found violating these restrictions could face up to 20 years in prison, as well as substantial monetary penalties of up to $1 million for individuals and $100 million for companies. According to Harvard AI research fellow Ben Brooks, the measure stands out as “easily the most aggressive legislative action on AI” to date.
Although the bill was tabled soon after its introduction, often a signal that a proposed law is losing momentum, the fact it was proposed at all signifies a growing sense of urgency in Congress.
Lawmakers remain alarmed by the sheer speed and scale of DeepSeek’s rise, which also contributed to a $1 trillion stock market selloff last week. DeepSeek captured international attention earlier this month by matching the performance of top-tier U.S.
AI chatbots use far fewer resources. Its efficiency has fueled fears in Washington that American technology companies could be wasting billions of dollars, especially if smaller-scale alternatives prove just as capable. Lawmakers also worry that AI breakthroughs in China could accelerate military or surveillance technologies.
Hawley and some of his colleagues argue that banning AI exports or imports tied to China would protect national security as well as U.S. economic interests.
According to The Washington Post, Hawley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) criticized the slow pace of action by the Biden administration before it imposed new limits on the export of high-performance AI chips to China in 2022.
“Multiple administrations have failed — at the behest of corporate interests — to update and enforce our export controls in a timely manner,” Hawley and Warren wrote in an appeal to Congress. “We cannot let that continue.”
Impact on U.S. tech and Nvidia’s uncertain role
Nvidia, one of the world’s leading AI chipmakers, has become a focal point for this debate. Its stock plummeted in the largest one-day loss for any company in history, leaving many questioning whether the AI giant will continue supplying chips to Chinese entities.
Last Friday, Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang met with President Donald Trump. Details of the meeting are scarce, though a spokesperson told Reuters that they “discussed the importance of strengthening US technology and AI leadership.” Trump remarked, “I can’t say what’s gonna happen,” describing it as a “good meeting.”
The abrupt emergence of DeepSeek and China’s broader AI prowess has magnified concerns about national security and control over AI technologies, which have become essential over the years.
Some lawmakers argue that letting a Chinese AI tool flourish in the United States could pose the same privacy and security issues surrounding the TikTok debate. Although Congress approved a TikTok ban last year, the restriction still hangs in limbo, partly because President Trump reversed his original support and opted not to enforce it.
With new bills like Hawley’s appearing to restrict or even criminalize the importation and use of Chinese AI, the possibility of legislative overreach remains an open question. Critics argue that lawmakers are partly motivated by protecting U.S. markets from competitive threats rather than addressing national security concerns.
Nonetheless, pressure is likely to continue, given the scale of DeepSeek’s disruption and the fragile state of AI-related markets. Whether or not a formal ban on DeepSeek materializes, the bill’s introduction highlights the intensifying scrutiny on Chinese AI and could shape future technology policies within the United States.
DeepSeek download to be criminalized in US, could mean 20 years in prison, $100M fine
The future of AI is under scrutiny, with proposed laws threatening severe punishments for using Chinese AI, such as DeepSeek.
DeepSeek download to be criminalized in US, could mean 20 years in prison, $100M fine
Kaif Shaikh
Mon, February 3, 2025 at 4:49 PM EST3 min read
A newly introduced bill from Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) is drawing attention for its unprecedented severity in restricting Chinese artificial intelligence (AI), specifically targeting technologies like DeepSeek.
The bill, which Hawley filed last week, intends to “prohibit United States persons from advancing artificial intelligence capabilities within the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.” Analysts say the proposed legislation, if passed, could effectively outlaw the use of DeepSeek, the emerging Chinese AI competitor, within the United States.
Key provisions and consequences for DeepSeek download
Under Hawley’s proposed law, “technology or intellectual property” developed in China would be barred from importation into the U.S. Anyone found violating these restrictions could face up to 20 years in prison, as well as substantial monetary penalties of up to $1 million for individuals and $100 million for companies. According to Harvard AI research fellow Ben Brooks, the measure stands out as “easily the most aggressive legislative action on AI” to date.
Although the bill was tabled soon after its introduction, often a signal that a proposed law is losing momentum, the fact it was proposed at all signifies a growing sense of urgency in Congress.
Lawmakers remain alarmed by the sheer speed and scale of DeepSeek’s rise, which also contributed to a $1 trillion stock market selloff last week. DeepSeek captured international attention earlier this month by matching the performance of top-tier U.S.
AI chatbots use far fewer resources. Its efficiency has fueled fears in Washington that American technology companies could be wasting billions of dollars, especially if smaller-scale alternatives prove just as capable. Lawmakers also worry that AI breakthroughs in China could accelerate military or surveillance technologies.
Hawley and some of his colleagues argue that banning AI exports or imports tied to China would protect national security as well as U.S. economic interests.
According to The Washington Post, Hawley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) criticized the slow pace of action by the Biden administration before it imposed new limits on the export of high-performance AI chips to China in 2022.
“Multiple administrations have failed — at the behest of corporate interests — to update and enforce our export controls in a timely manner,” Hawley and Warren wrote in an appeal to Congress. “We cannot let that continue.”
Impact on U.S. tech and Nvidia’s uncertain role
Nvidia, one of the world’s leading AI chipmakers, has become a focal point for this debate. Its stock plummeted in the largest one-day loss for any company in history, leaving many questioning whether the AI giant will continue supplying chips to Chinese entities.
Last Friday, Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang met with President Donald Trump. Details of the meeting are scarce, though a spokesperson told Reuters that they “discussed the importance of strengthening US technology and AI leadership.” Trump remarked, “I can’t say what’s gonna happen,” describing it as a “good meeting.”
The abrupt emergence of DeepSeek and China’s broader AI prowess has magnified concerns about national security and control over AI technologies, which have become essential over the years.
Some lawmakers argue that letting a Chinese AI tool flourish in the United States could pose the same privacy and security issues surrounding the TikTok debate. Although Congress approved a TikTok ban last year, the restriction still hangs in limbo, partly because President Trump reversed his original support and opted not to enforce it.
With new bills like Hawley’s appearing to restrict or even criminalize the importation and use of Chinese AI, the possibility of legislative overreach remains an open question. Critics argue that lawmakers are partly motivated by protecting U.S. markets from competitive threats rather than addressing national security concerns.
Nonetheless, pressure is likely to continue, given the scale of DeepSeek’s disruption and the fragile state of AI-related markets. Whether or not a formal ban on DeepSeek materializes, the bill’s introduction highlights the intensifying scrutiny on Chinese AI and could shape future technology policies within the United States.
The United States used to herald the 'free market' and the benefits of it; now, that China and other countries are competing with the Unites States in the 'free market', now the US is embracing protectionism. That free market shit that the US espoused was bogus; they only believed in monopolies with US corporate dominance.Hmmm.... some in congress are a little... shook:
DeepSeek download to be criminalized in US, could mean 20 years in prison, $100M fine
The future of AI is under scrutiny, with proposed laws threatening severe punishments for using Chinese AI, such as DeepSeek.
DeepSeek download to be criminalized in US, could mean 20 years in prison, $100M fine
Kaif Shaikh
Mon, February 3, 2025 at 4:49 PM EST3 min read
A newly introduced bill from Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) is drawing attention for its unprecedented severity in restricting Chinese artificial intelligence (AI), specifically targeting technologies like DeepSeek.
The bill, which Hawley filed last week, intends to “prohibit United States persons from advancing artificial intelligence capabilities within the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.” Analysts say the proposed legislation, if passed, could effectively outlaw the use of DeepSeek, the emerging Chinese AI competitor, within the United States.
Key provisions and consequences for DeepSeek download
Under Hawley’s proposed law, “technology or intellectual property” developed in China would be barred from importation into the U.S. Anyone found violating these restrictions could face up to 20 years in prison, as well as substantial monetary penalties of up to $1 million for individuals and $100 million for companies. According to Harvard AI research fellow Ben Brooks, the measure stands out as “easily the most aggressive legislative action on AI” to date.
Although the bill was tabled soon after its introduction, often a signal that a proposed law is losing momentum, the fact it was proposed at all signifies a growing sense of urgency in Congress.
Lawmakers remain alarmed by the sheer speed and scale of DeepSeek’s rise, which also contributed to a $1 trillion stock market selloff last week. DeepSeek captured international attention earlier this month by matching the performance of top-tier U.S.
AI chatbots use far fewer resources. Its efficiency has fueled fears in Washington that American technology companies could be wasting billions of dollars, especially if smaller-scale alternatives prove just as capable. Lawmakers also worry that AI breakthroughs in China could accelerate military or surveillance technologies.
Hawley and some of his colleagues argue that banning AI exports or imports tied to China would protect national security as well as U.S. economic interests.
According to The Washington Post, Hawley and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) criticized the slow pace of action by the Biden administration before it imposed new limits on the export of high-performance AI chips to China in 2022.
“Multiple administrations have failed — at the behest of corporate interests — to update and enforce our export controls in a timely manner,” Hawley and Warren wrote in an appeal to Congress. “We cannot let that continue.”
Impact on U.S. tech and Nvidia’s uncertain role
Nvidia, one of the world’s leading AI chipmakers, has become a focal point for this debate. Its stock plummeted in the largest one-day loss for any company in history, leaving many questioning whether the AI giant will continue supplying chips to Chinese entities.
Last Friday, Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang met with President Donald Trump. Details of the meeting are scarce, though a spokesperson told Reuters that they “discussed the importance of strengthening US technology and AI leadership.” Trump remarked, “I can’t say what’s gonna happen,” describing it as a “good meeting.”
The abrupt emergence of DeepSeek and China’s broader AI prowess has magnified concerns about national security and control over AI technologies, which have become essential over the years.
Some lawmakers argue that letting a Chinese AI tool flourish in the United States could pose the same privacy and security issues surrounding the TikTok debate. Although Congress approved a TikTok ban last year, the restriction still hangs in limbo, partly because President Trump reversed his original support and opted not to enforce it.
With new bills like Hawley’s appearing to restrict or even criminalize the importation and use of Chinese AI, the possibility of legislative overreach remains an open question. Critics argue that lawmakers are partly motivated by protecting U.S. markets from competitive threats rather than addressing national security concerns.
Nonetheless, pressure is likely to continue, given the scale of DeepSeek’s disruption and the fragile state of AI-related markets. Whether or not a formal ban on DeepSeek materializes, the bill’s introduction highlights the intensifying scrutiny on Chinese AI and could shape future technology policies within the United States.
I asked chatgpt about taxable gamble winning, it returned $600, refined the question and it returned $3k. I tried deepseek for comparison and returned $5k with seem right to me. Went back to chatgpt to dispute the answer and this is what I got:
"You're correct that there are certain situations where $5,000 is the threshold for income tax withholding on gambling winnings.
If you fucking knew that, why the $600 answer in the first place?
"You're correct that there are certain situations where $5,000 is the threshold for income tax withholding on gambling winnings.
Explanation:
For gambling winnings from sweepstakes, wagering pools, poker tournaments, or lotteries, income tax withholding is required when:- Winnings exceed $5,000 and
- The winnings are at least 300 times the amount of the wager.
Final Answer:
The threshold for gambling winnings subject to tax withholding is $5,000, when the conditions are met, especially with larger winnings like in poker tournaments."If you fucking knew that, why the $600 answer in the first place?
One thing I "like" about trump is, he exposed this country for what it is - a SHAM!
I tried it. Not impressed. Who says otherwise?
Deep seek is a cheap knock of Chat GPT. Unlike ChatGPT if you ask Deep Seek what happened in 1989 at Tiananmen Square, you get a true answer.
Not really it's not a cheap knock-off of ChapGPT, ChapGPT was just a bloated over-priced Behemoth of a project. Also, ask ChapGPT about Israel and it's colonial racist project, & they barely have anything useful to say. There are always some inbreed biases.
New York state bans DeepSeek from government devices
DeepSeek’s AI app shot to No. 1 in the Apple App Store in January, pushing ChatGPT down to second place.