No I didn't, I really didn't...
What the hell? Who said the earth was falling upwards? The earth is STILL. Flat and motionless.
FLAT EARTH!!!: Yes Niggas I'm Still Here... The Re-Up... Get Yo' Popcorn...
- Thread starter 14damoney
- Start date
No I didn't, I really didn't...
What the hell? Who said the earth was falling upwards? The earth is STILL. Flat and motionless.
I didn't say the planet was being raised.....Are you high??
Then how do we get our faux gravity? What keeps us on this planet?
Here is a silhouette of the planet Venus in front of the Sun.. Now according to your numbers the sun is only 24,900 miles in diameter residing only 3000 miles away, so according to retarded logic (I love the fact that this guy has no problems responding to the name retard)what size would you estimate Venus to be based off of this picture...
More with the lying Nassa bullshit... Now here is the million dollar question, why are they going all out spending billions of dollars to try to fool the world, when all it takes is one flat earther to launch a simple weather balloon to debunk their whole shit. What is the point, other than to make you look dumb as shit???
Why are they doing this???
Why are they doing this???
Do you realize how weak the gravitation force is and how large an object has to be to create a orbit, especially on this planet with the earth gravity pulling everything down...
But I bet in your dumb brain that shit sounded smart as hell....
Trust me I know what the Aurora lights are about and how they are made, my question is according to your model of the flat earth, how are such phenomenon possible?
By the way that so called transparency Venus is due to lighting distortion called bloom, something you get when a dark object is sometimes photographed in front of a very bright object..
They've already launched rockets/weather balloons and debunked it.
google "flat earth homemade rocket"
on the why? Look up Admiral Byrd interview where he talks about there being more continents beyond Antarctica rich with more resources than the world would ever need.
Some say it's the fact that we might live in a world of infinite resources rather than a finite one which we are lead to believe.
Some say it's to hide God...you know...Satanic biblical stuff....the Bible says the Earth is Flat...and the ancient Kemet, Sumeria, Hindus...
I'm not sure about the "why". But check this out...shit is crazy if you just consider it could be true.
Please tell me your not going to Google and Youtube to answer my simple questions...
While your at it, explain to me, according to your model how is it possible for both the North pole and the South Pole to experience both 24 hour sun light and 24 hour darkness, always the opposite of the other????
While your at it, explain to me, according to your model how is it possible for both the North pole and the South Pole to experience both 24 hour sun light and 24 hour darkness, always the opposite of the other????
Sorry I am allergic to deep bullshit, cut to the chase and tell me where I can see these so called images of the earth that prove its flat...
It's also called a silhouette.
Post a photo of "bloom" in photography.
And what dark object are you referring to? Sounds like you're describing an eclipse to me...
Too tired to type but here are some good reading on the subject...
You're seeing bloom - it's an artifact caused by imperfect cameras and bright light sources. You can read more here.
Possibly ironically, the author of that article states, "Don’t put the sun in the shot," but I suppose the guys over at ULA didn't read that article.
Pipinpadiloxacopolis[S] 1 point 1 year ago*
It seems a very special kind of bloom that conserves details so well though. It seems to capture the exact edge of the sun, instead of radiating from the edges of Venus... I expect bloom to look more like this (i.e. radiating inwards from the bright bits, and fading fast with distance from the edge).
I agree that it does appear to be translucent.
Is Venus a gas planet? No. It's too heavy and we've landed on its rocky surface.
Is Venus hollow? No. Again, too heavy, and it would be ringing like a bell. Also, quite unlikely.
Are the materials Venus is made of, transparent to ultraviolet light? No. We know that none of the materials that we know Venus is made of, are transparent to UV light to the extent that the sun shines right through the planet with low-energy photons.
Could it be due to lensing of some sort, perhaps caused by Venus's dense atmosphere? Unlikely. The refractive indices of the gasses comprising the atmosphere are known and the effect is not expected to occur with the configuration found on Venus. There might be an as-yet unidentified aerosol agent present which may give the planet a pearl-like lustre, but other similar effects would also be seen if this were the case.
Could it be an artefact caused by the image capturing equipment, technique, or the processing? Most likely. It may be that some instrument does not capture a single moment, but rather records the change within a short moment, or the difference between two moments, in which case there would be superimposition of images in the record. Or, perhaps the instrument combines data from more than one source to produce its final image, which too would lead to apparent transparencies.
Not enough is known about the exact details of the equipment and processes involved in creating the imagery to exclude this as a cause, and with most other causes ruled out, it may be said with great confidence that the explanation for this phenomenon lies in the part we don't know enough about.
GG_Henry 3 points 1 year ago
It's almost certainly an artifact due to the camera or compression or transmission or upload our stream.
Pipinpadiloxacopolis[S] 2 points 1 year ago
That's a very Vulcan answer!
And I mean that in the best way. You're right, it's probably very specific to the way these particular images were created, if no-one recognises a known cause.
image: http://public.media.smithsonianmag.com/legacy_blog/20040608_Venus_Transit.jpg
[/caption] Every century or so, something truly special happens in the sky, and it happens twice: Venus passes in between the sun and earth. The transit of Venus, as it's called, comes in pairs spaced exactly 8 years apart, with each pair separated by gaps more than 100 years long. As a result, only 8 transits have occurred since the invention of the telescope. The most recent one was in 2004, and the second half of the pair is next week, during sunset on June 5th for North American observers, and during sunrise on June 6th for many in Europe and Asia. After this, the next one isn't until 2117. Why does it happen so rarely? Two events need to occur at the exact same time for us to see a transit of Venus. First, Venus needs to pass between us and the sun, so that to an observer looking down at the solar system, all three bodies would be in a straight line. This happens every 584 days, as shown in the bottom part of the diagram below. [caption id="attachment_10068" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Transits of Venus are so rare because the planet must pass between earth and the sun while lining up vertically, as well"]
image: http://public.media.smithsonianmag.com/legacy_blog/Transit_diagram_angles-300x200.png
[/caption] However, Venus also needs to line up vertically so that it appears somewhere in front of the face of the sun from our vantage point. Because Venus and the earth don't orbit the sun on the exact same plane—Venus' orbit is tipped 3.4 degrees relative to ours—most of the time it's too high or too low, as shown in the top part of the diagram. It only lines up in all 3 dimensions and traverses across the sun four times during an unusual 243 year cycle, with the transits coming in pairs separated by alternating periods of 121.5 and 105.5 years. In the United States, the transit will begin at roughly 6:04 Eastern, 5:04 Central, 4:05 Mountain, and 3:06 Pacific Time. Over the course of several hours, Venus will appear as a small dot moving slowly against backdrop of the sun. As with a solar eclipse (or anytime, really), looking directly at the sun can severely damage your retinas, so you should use a special filter or simply project the sun onto the ground or a piece of paper, by holding up a piece of cardboard with a small hole punched in it and allowing the sunlight to pass through. Historically, the transit of Venus played an important role in helping astronomers learn about the dimensions of our solar system, says Owen Gingerich, professor of astronomy and history of science at the
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "The first observed transit was in 1639, but it was in 1716 that the astronomer Edmund Halley noticed that the geometry of it could be useful in determining the distance to the sun," he says. "At the time, the relative distances between the planets was well known, but not the absolute scale of the solar system, and without the absolute scale, you couldn't know how big the sun was." When the next pair of transits came, in 1761 and 1769, the scientific world was ready. "There was an international campaign set up to make the observations, and you needed observers from as far removed places on earth as you could get," says Gingerich. Scientists were dispatched to everywhere from Newfoundland to Tahiti to gather as much data as possible, and at each location, observers attempted to measure as accurately as possible just how long it took Venus to traverse the sun. As Halley had pointed out, if one knew the exact distance between two points on earth—Newfoundland and Tahiti, for example—and also calculated the difference in how long it took Venus to traverse the sun from each of these vantage points, the principle of parallax could be used to determine the size of the sun itself, and with that our distance from it. "From each observatory, you would get a slightly different measurement for the length of Venus' path," Gingerich says. "And in fact, if you take three of the best observations from 1769 and use them in the calculations, you get a result within 1 percent of the modern value of the size of the sun." Although the transit is no longer as scientifically significant as it was in the 18th century, it will still provide valuable data for many observers. Our ongoing discoveries of planets in other solar systems, for example, depends on the intermittent dimming of distant stars as their planets pass in front of them. Calculating just how much Venus causes the sun to dim during the transit might help us more accurately understand these far-flung exoplanets. Whether you watch the transit to make complex calculations about exoplanets or just to see something unusual in the sky, we have just one recommendation: You'd better not miss it. The next few transits will be in December 2117, December 2125, June 2247 and June 2255. Your grandchildren and great-grandchildren might be watching, but you won't be around to see another one.
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/scien...ont-of-the-sun-180947493/#YyD2C6tkbrQ0LZQE.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
You're seeing bloom - it's an artifact caused by imperfect cameras and bright light sources. You can read more here.
Possibly ironically, the author of that article states, "Don’t put the sun in the shot," but I suppose the guys over at ULA didn't read that article.
Pipinpadiloxacopolis[S] 1 point 1 year ago*
It seems a very special kind of bloom that conserves details so well though. It seems to capture the exact edge of the sun, instead of radiating from the edges of Venus... I expect bloom to look more like this (i.e. radiating inwards from the bright bits, and fading fast with distance from the edge).
I agree that it does appear to be translucent.
Is Venus a gas planet? No. It's too heavy and we've landed on its rocky surface.
Is Venus hollow? No. Again, too heavy, and it would be ringing like a bell. Also, quite unlikely.
Are the materials Venus is made of, transparent to ultraviolet light? No. We know that none of the materials that we know Venus is made of, are transparent to UV light to the extent that the sun shines right through the planet with low-energy photons.
Could it be due to lensing of some sort, perhaps caused by Venus's dense atmosphere? Unlikely. The refractive indices of the gasses comprising the atmosphere are known and the effect is not expected to occur with the configuration found on Venus. There might be an as-yet unidentified aerosol agent present which may give the planet a pearl-like lustre, but other similar effects would also be seen if this were the case.
Could it be an artefact caused by the image capturing equipment, technique, or the processing? Most likely. It may be that some instrument does not capture a single moment, but rather records the change within a short moment, or the difference between two moments, in which case there would be superimposition of images in the record. Or, perhaps the instrument combines data from more than one source to produce its final image, which too would lead to apparent transparencies.
Not enough is known about the exact details of the equipment and processes involved in creating the imagery to exclude this as a cause, and with most other causes ruled out, it may be said with great confidence that the explanation for this phenomenon lies in the part we don't know enough about.
GG_Henry 3 points 1 year ago
It's almost certainly an artifact due to the camera or compression or transmission or upload our stream.
Pipinpadiloxacopolis[S] 2 points 1 year ago
That's a very Vulcan answer!
And I mean that in the best way. You're right, it's probably very specific to the way these particular images were created, if no-one recognises a known cause.image: http://public.media.smithsonianmag.com/legacy_blog/20040608_Venus_Transit.jpg
[/caption] Every century or so, something truly special happens in the sky, and it happens twice: Venus passes in between the sun and earth. The transit of Venus, as it's called, comes in pairs spaced exactly 8 years apart, with each pair separated by gaps more than 100 years long. As a result, only 8 transits have occurred since the invention of the telescope. The most recent one was in 2004, and the second half of the pair is next week, during sunset on June 5th for North American observers, and during sunrise on June 6th for many in Europe and Asia. After this, the next one isn't until 2117. Why does it happen so rarely? Two events need to occur at the exact same time for us to see a transit of Venus. First, Venus needs to pass between us and the sun, so that to an observer looking down at the solar system, all three bodies would be in a straight line. This happens every 584 days, as shown in the bottom part of the diagram below. [caption id="attachment_10068" align="alignright" width="300" caption="Transits of Venus are so rare because the planet must pass between earth and the sun while lining up vertically, as well"]image: http://public.media.smithsonianmag.com/legacy_blog/Transit_diagram_angles-300x200.png
[/caption] However, Venus also needs to line up vertically so that it appears somewhere in front of the face of the sun from our vantage point. Because Venus and the earth don't orbit the sun on the exact same plane—Venus' orbit is tipped 3.4 degrees relative to ours—most of the time it's too high or too low, as shown in the top part of the diagram. It only lines up in all 3 dimensions and traverses across the sun four times during an unusual 243 year cycle, with the transits coming in pairs separated by alternating periods of 121.5 and 105.5 years. In the United States, the transit will begin at roughly 6:04 Eastern, 5:04 Central, 4:05 Mountain, and 3:06 Pacific Time. Over the course of several hours, Venus will appear as a small dot moving slowly against backdrop of the sun. As with a solar eclipse (or anytime, really), looking directly at the sun can severely damage your retinas, so you should use a special filter or simply project the sun onto the ground or a piece of paper, by holding up a piece of cardboard with a small hole punched in it and allowing the sunlight to pass through. Historically, the transit of Venus played an important role in helping astronomers learn about the dimensions of our solar system, says Owen Gingerich, professor of astronomy and history of science at theHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "The first observed transit was in 1639, but it was in 1716 that the astronomer Edmund Halley noticed that the geometry of it could be useful in determining the distance to the sun," he says. "At the time, the relative distances between the planets was well known, but not the absolute scale of the solar system, and without the absolute scale, you couldn't know how big the sun was." When the next pair of transits came, in 1761 and 1769, the scientific world was ready. "There was an international campaign set up to make the observations, and you needed observers from as far removed places on earth as you could get," says Gingerich. Scientists were dispatched to everywhere from Newfoundland to Tahiti to gather as much data as possible, and at each location, observers attempted to measure as accurately as possible just how long it took Venus to traverse the sun. As Halley had pointed out, if one knew the exact distance between two points on earth—Newfoundland and Tahiti, for example—and also calculated the difference in how long it took Venus to traverse the sun from each of these vantage points, the principle of parallax could be used to determine the size of the sun itself, and with that our distance from it. "From each observatory, you would get a slightly different measurement for the length of Venus' path," Gingerich says. "And in fact, if you take three of the best observations from 1769 and use them in the calculations, you get a result within 1 percent of the modern value of the size of the sun." Although the transit is no longer as scientifically significant as it was in the 18th century, it will still provide valuable data for many observers. Our ongoing discoveries of planets in other solar systems, for example, depends on the intermittent dimming of distant stars as their planets pass in front of them. Calculating just how much Venus causes the sun to dim during the transit might help us more accurately understand these far-flung exoplanets. Whether you watch the transit to make complex calculations about exoplanets or just to see something unusual in the sky, we have just one recommendation: You'd better not miss it. The next few transits will be in December 2117, December 2125, June 2247 and June 2255. Your grandchildren and great-grandchildren might be watching, but you won't be around to see another one.
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/scien...ont-of-the-sun-180947493/#YyD2C6tkbrQ0LZQE.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter
Please tell me your not going to Google and Youtube to answer my simple questions...
While your at it, explain to me, according to your model how is it possible for both the North pole and the South Pole to experience both 24 hour sun light and 24 hour darkness, always the opposite of the other????
Dude, I've already explained this in this thread. (No South Pole btw) . It's due to the rotational pattern of the sun. I also already posted a video SHOWING the rotational pattern.
Here it is:
Your showing the seasons, now show me how either the north or south polls can be in pure darkness, and while your at it, again explain the Norther and Southern lights to me....
NO picture of the earth, globe or flat is possible.
Globe - because it doesn't exist and all that shit is NASA photoshopping...which they admitted....but you don't hear me though.
Flat - Man can't fly high enough to see the complete earth.
If you study the video you will see that the rotation isn't stationary, it moves, closer to the center and then closer to the outer edge. Because of this movement and the finite reach of the sun's light, it illustrates how the center (North Pole) and outer edge (South Pole) can have periods of 24-hour darkness and sunlight.
Why not? With all the smart flat earth scientiest in the world, surely one of them is smart enough to shine a cheap laser from here to Africa proving the earth is flat, or surely one of them is smart enough to release a drone, balloon or fly an air plane over the Antarctic revealing how it is circling the planet...
All these smart guys you listen to and yet all they have is talk and no evidence or real test to prove the earth is flat? Shit at this point show me a Photoshop version of the flat earth, this way you can prove how easily fake earth pics are to make...
And that explains the seasons, but there is noting there that can account for 24 hours of darkness at the polls..
No matter what I am able to draw a direct line from the sun to the polls no matter where it is positioned..
I'm waiting for a non-photoshopped picture of this oblate spheroid they say it exists. You STILL haven't addressed those NASA earth "photos" I posted.
Believe what you want dude. I'm going with flat. And now that I KNOW it's flat, it becomes more and more obvious everyday. Every time I see sun rays I just chuckle to myself. When I look at the moon, I now understand why the shit looks so weird. How can a sphere be completely illuminated by a hard light coming from one direction?? The globe model, when you really think about it, makes no logical sense.
So I'm going with Flat. Believe what you want dude. It ain't the end of the world, just the edge.
Until next time, Peace out!
So in your retarded brain, how do they pull this off in real time by using special effects? And why are they doing all of this just to make you look stupid?? Whats the point???
You have to go 70 miles to get a one degree curve in the earth, so 4 miles is barely anything... If they wanted to prove shit they would shine a laser make it 3 thousand miles or so, prove it is flat debunking the 30 degree it should be for that distance..
But they don't do this, do they....
While your at it try explaining this (hmmm seems like your not explaining anything, and when you do, it gets immediately debunked) You see where I am going with this???
Now if the sun floats above the flat earth how is it possible for a drone to film the sun below it, and how is double sun sets possible with your flat earth model you just posted?
Now if the sun floats above the flat earth how is it possible for a drone to film the sun below it, and how is double sun sets possible with your flat earth model you just posted?
It's very possible. As a matter of fact, it actually supports the Flat Earth model, which I've explained already.
The higher you go, the further the horizon extends. It's as simple as that.
You're thinking about "below" the horizon when in reality it's beyond the horizon.
THIS shuts down your WHOLE double sunset argument.
EDIT: This is the one best, most logical explanations of why the earth is flat. I really don't have too much else to say after this video.
This dude broke the shit down so well I could slap him.
He even pointed out something that I had previously halfway misunderstood about lens distortion and the sun, which I was still right about, the sun does get smaller as it gets further away but it also doesn't vanish into a tiny dot because at a certain point it will still dip below the vanishing point of the horizon.
Anyway. It's FLAT.
EDIT: This is the one best, most logical explanations of why the earth is flat. I really don't have too much else to say after this video.
This dude broke the shit down so well I could slap him.
He even pointed out something that I had previously halfway misunderstood about lens distortion and the sun, which I was still right about, the sun does get smaller as it gets further away but it also doesn't vanish into a tiny dot because at a certain point it will still dip below the vanishing point of the horizon.
Anyway. It's FLAT.
Last edited:
One internet bill away
This nigga says the sun is a few thousand miles away but we can't fly up far enough to take a picture of his flat earth. Max Dawg's Honda got like 400,000 miles on it.
Nigga says a million pictures from a hundred agencies are ALL fake but doesn't have a single pic, not even a piece of one to support his flat earth.
We are witnessing something truly amazing here people.
Nigga says a million pictures from a hundred agencies are ALL fake but doesn't have a single pic, not even a piece of one to support his flat earth.
We are witnessing something truly amazing here people.